News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Dictators Indoctrinate Children – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, your new MP, your local vicar, online media and friends online.  

Start a local campaign. We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

01b-Dictators-Indoctrinate-Children-MONOCHROME-copy
Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

Yes, and just have a look at this latest appalling news of Communist and Third World ethnic teachers and officials targeting white children in schools: Racism in schools surges with SIXTY children as young as age four sent home every day (msn.com) “In total, 11,619 [white] children were suspended for racist behaviour in 2023 –” “Dr Shabna Begum, who heads up Racism Think-Tank the Runnymede Trust, said: “The fact that children and young people are picking up and articulating racism in schools feels entirely predictable in this current climate.” “Begum”? Any relation to Bangladeshi Terrorist Shamima Begum? A Muslim Bangladeshi woman put in charge of ridiculously-named Runnymede Trust, where the Magna Carta was written and signed by White People, who are the Indigenous Peoples of the British Isles? “Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union, added: ‘These figures should be a wake-up call. We have had years now of divisive, hateful language and negative, racist stereotypes from some politicians and in sections of the media.'” Then we have Ethnic African Kebede, who scorned his own Ethnic African women to have a child with a white woman, sticking his oar in. The we have Ethnic African Dr. Patrick Roach… Read more »

NeilParkin
1 year ago

NHS trust’s new diversity role branded as ‘insult to taxpayers’

How much more diverse does the NHS have to be..?

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

How blind can you be? Not only does the NHS discriminate against treating dogs and cats, but the number of them in medical roles can be counted on one hand.

NeilParkin
1 year ago

One-word Ofsted school ratings scrapped

If I may be so bold, ‘requires improvement’ is two words. Notice the letters, then the space, then more letters. Two words…

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

No,no! you misunderstand. They’re banning the one word ratings. That means all schools will now be rated ‘Requires Improvement’. They can’t tolerate ‘Good’ or ‘Outstanding’ schools and they don’t understand the meaning of the word ‘Inadequate’.

JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

On the beeb propaganda channel, they emphasised that the previous rating led to the suicide of a former head teacher, and said that this was a reason for the change being made.

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

As in every bureaucracy, the problem is centralising standards, which always leads to corruption. A school is now excellent if it persuades small children to undergo surgery behind their parents’ back, to believe cultic prophecies about the climate, and if it cultivates exam results rather than education.

Before OFSTED some schools were bad. Now they all are, on pain of shame and sanctions.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

I don’t think you are suggesting this but does the Beeb really suggest that it was the one word nature of the assessment which led to this suicide?

As I understand it from now on Ofsted are going to use similar words to describe each of a number of features of a school. So Discipline: Requires Improvement; Core skills: Requires Improvement; Truancy: Requires Improvement. See, so much better.

NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

I recall the case.Very sad.I also recall being told that to be happy and content in work, you need to be in the top 25% of performers,at that level. And that people in the bottom half are never going to be achievers in the role. They will therefore always be under stress, because they can never improve enough to avoid it. If people are struggling at a level, then they should be encouraged to drop back one or two levels until the work is well within their capabilities.

There are far too many people chasing ever loftier careers who are just not up to it. The saddest part is you only really find out when they have gone beyond their competence, and the Peter Principle bites them in the bum. Then they wont give up the big salary and the car to achieve contentment.

Steve-Devon
1 year ago

Worcester EV Charging Point Survey

Geoff Buys Cars has a rant about the Worcester EV charging point survey;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgi_tfa9QE

As with many others; Geoff is now clear that the move to EV’s is not about getting us all out of petrol/diesel (ICE) cars and into EVs, it is about getting us out of cars full stop.
He muses on the comparison between the totally free market driven world of ICE cars to the State intervention, State subsidised world of EVs.

He also notes the introduction by TPTB in Worcester of the term ‘ruralism’? go figure!
He also notes that one of the facebook replies to this survey that discussed the role of China in the production of EVs and renewable technology seems to have been removed.

For a fist full of roubles

What I find really offensive is one-letter rating for children’s exams. My sugestion is for a three level classification = absolutely spiffing, not quite so absolutely spiffing and far right candidate.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

👍 😀 😀 😀

RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago

That’s the funniest thing I’ve watched since the Starmer Downfall parody 🙂

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

Re The Critic article, note this:

”For many of the intervening years, only Britain and Denmark met this ambitious target; a fact that bought DfiD a huge amount of influence and credibility within the global humanitarian establishment; not only among their counterparts in peer countries, but also with the multilateral institutions and mega-NGOs that dominate the sector.”

It seems to me the UK gained no benefits whatsoever. Likely it was the contacts list of the civil servants that gained.

The author calls for a change to legislation so our money goes to poorer places. It should not need legal enforcement just good management.

One change that a conservative government would introduce, if we had one, would be to fund only those social and economic structures that are preconditions for economic development. These are private property rights, legally enforceable contracts snd open markets. Come to think of it they could spend money here to reinstitute such things.