News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Free Speech Media’s Dark Future – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, your new MP, your local vicar, online media and friends online.  

Start a local campaign. We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

01a-Free-Speech-Medias-Dark-Future-MONOCHROME-copy
JeremyP99
1 year ago

Jon Snow has clearly not been to Glastonbury…

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

Talking of Jon Snow, I was at Chatsworth for a “country fair” this weekend and I can safely say I have never seen so many white people all in one place before.

Monro
1 year ago

Master stroke or folly? Ukraine could pay high price for its Kursk incursion

‘Data currently available—such as the discovery of underground bunkers—is only the beginning of uncovering a larger truth. Over time, more information will be made public, and people will become aware of it.

“I think that people from Ivano-Frankivsk and Ternopil, in particular, may still find wells in the forests whose depths cannot be determined. These are former facilities of the Soviet Union. Currently, we have a situation where entire complexes of this nature exist in the Belgorod, Kursk, Voronezh, and Bryansk regions. It is clear that the situation will continue to develop, and the whining of the Moscow Fuhrer, along with his evasion of key problems by discussing economic and budgetary issues, is evidence that he has been personally affected, as has the entire system, which once claimed to be the ‘second army of the world,’

Roman Bezsmertnyi 

Master stroke or folly?

This is the Daily Sceptic, where you decide things for yourself.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

In 1917 the German parliament had agreed that Imperial Germany should take part in peace talks arranged by the American president that were to be carried out on the basis that no side had won. Then, after some unexpected successes on the battlefield, the Germans pulled out of these negotiations. That might have been thought of as a masterstroke in Germany at the time. But a year later it would be revealed to be absolute folly. Defeat in war always corrupts. The sort of authoritarian rule that developed in Germany in the 1930s was a result of the characteristics both of German society and the nature of that defeat. The ‘incursion’ at Kursk only serves to underline what Putin has been telling the Russians for years. Namely, that Ukraine is a potential danger to Russia, especially when associated with NATO. It also demonstrates the hollowness of claims of UK politicians about the capabilities of the Russian ‘war machine’. And what are the Russian losses compared to those they were prepared to endure in the Second World War? Why are the British print media so fascinated by the minutiae of this war? As far as most of the British public are… Read more »

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

About 30 million of Brits participate in a representative democracy.

Their representatives, aided by some extremely able and well informed Generals and Academics, are now only too well aware of Putin’s ambitions for a new European super state of 250 million souls.

Obtained by power politics backed by military conquest, those ambitions are not seen to be in the best interests of the British people. Finland, Sweden, the Baltic States, Moldova and Poland at least are of like mind, France, Italy, Romania, Bulgaria as well.

So, at least in this, Westminster and Whitehall may very well demonstrably have the best interests of the British people in mind.

Many on here do not agree with that but they represent a tiny minority and are consistently incapable of producing anything in the way of authoritative sources to support their point of view.

That point of view, superficial but mercifully brief comments already on here a case in point, can therefore be dismissed.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Well you quote many sources, though I have no idea if they are “authoritative”. It seems to me that a lot of it is just speculation about future intentions and events. The rich west led by the US has been intervening since WW2 all over the place. To say that results have been mixed seems generous to me.

Monro
1 year ago

Quoting direct from verified Kremlin documents regarding Russia’s future intentions, ‘primary sources’, is as authoritative as it gets. Quotes from Putin’s, Lukashenko’s own speeches are equally illuminating and authoritative.

I am not in favour of overseas interventions unless Britain has signed up to some kind of agreement or treaty commitment.

That is very much the case with regard to Ukraine.

And we have failed to live up to the security assurances that we gave to that country.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Quoting direct from verified Kremlin documents regarding Russia’s future intentions, ‘primary sources’, is as authoritative as it gets. Quotes from Putin’s, Lukashenko’s own speeches are equally illuminating and authoritative.”

Not really. All for public consumption. Politicians say all sorts of things.

“I am not in favour of overseas interventions unless Britain has signed up to some kind of agreement or treaty commitment.”

Well, I would say I am not in favour of overseas interventions unless there is a compelling national interest AND we’re comfortable we’re not going to do more harm than good and that the billions spent will give a return on investment.

Monro
1 year ago

This is a representative democracy.

Your government, representing you, made a decision in 1994 to give Ukraine security assurances regarding its territorial integrity in return for the surrender of its nuclear warheads.

It should be abundantly clear, now that Ukraine has just launched its first ballistic missile, that your government did the right thing.

That government has subsequently reneged on those security assurances. Nevertheless they believe it is in Britain’s best interests to support Ukraine in order to prevent Putin setting up, by force, a new European super state.

Putin’s intentions are documented, verified primary sources from the Kremlin.

By all means disagree, but, without any substantive documentary support for your position, opinion, it can be dismissed out of hand.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Representative democracy doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything the government does

Assurances should be reneged upon if they are not in our interests

What Russia might do in the future is uncertain, except to Almighty God

Monro
1 year ago

Of course you do not have to agree but if you adopt a position unsupported by any credible evidence, subject matter experts, then your position cannot be taken seriously, should be dismissed.

Assurances reneged upon out of weakness destroy deterrence as Russia has amply demonstrated by its second invasion of Ukraine.

Not only do we know exactly what Russia will do in the future but we know why they will do it, if we allow them to, because they keep telling us. Documents are not leaked from the Kremlin by accident.

Russia wishes to create a Russian Union Super State because the Russian domestic birth rate has dropped dramatically (and large numbers of educated Russians have emigrated).

Sound familiar? It should do because that is exactly the same motivation shamefully displayed by our own government in ‘permitting’ so much inward migration.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

What politicians say they are going to do and what they end up doing are two different things. That’s why we have clandestine intelligence gathering, to find out stuff that they DON’T want you to hear or know.

Your position can be dismissed out of hand because it’s based on speculation about the future.

Monro
1 year ago

My position is based on verified primary source material.

Yours is not.

That is why 80% of the British public take my position and not yours.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

80% of the British public think there was a “covid pandemic” based on “verified primary source material”.

There cannot be any “verified primary source material” that predicts the future with much accuracy, especially if that material was meant for public consumption.

Monro
1 year ago

80% of Britain does not give a flying fig for primary source evidence. They have elected representatives to do that for them. They were badly let down regarding SARS CoV 2.

Those representatives have, however, done their homework regarding Putin’s second invasion of Ukraine, correctly identifying it as a threat to Britain’s national security. Pity they didn’t do that after Putin’s first invasion as many of us pointed out at the time.

Setting out a plan of action is not ‘predicting the future’. It is a statement of intent regarding future actions.

It only becomes the future if nothing prevents it from happening.

At the moment, something is stopping Putin’s plan from happening. That something is the Ukrainian Armed Forces supported by various western government’s including that of Britain.

I have evidenced Putin’s strategic plan and its motivation.

You were wrong in 2014 and you are wrong now simply because you are uninformed, have not done the research.

No reason why you should, except that your position, unevidenced as it is, can, consequently, be dismissed as unworthy of serious attention.

Have a good day.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

“They were badly let down regarding SARS CoV 2”. A good reason to be sceptical about our “elected representatives” and “experts” when they decide that wars are necessary – given we have such a great track record in that department.

Our plan of action is based in part on what we think Putin might do in future, but don’t pretend you know what he will do.

I had no opinion on the matter back in 2014, but having witnessed the biggest scam in history (“covid”) and seeing the other two biggest scams in history unfold (“net zero” and the deliberate replacement of White Europeans in their own countries) I no longer trust the government and their “experts”.

Monro
1 year ago

No plan ever survives first contact with the enemy but, for that to be the case, there has to be an enemy. In this case Putin has an enemy thanks to the support, from this country and others, given to Ukraine. Had there not been, as in 2014, Putin’s plan would have succeeded. I am not pretending that I know what he will do. But I do know his intentions, which I have evidenced. I have quoted from his strategic plan as he himself and his staff have set it out. Had those of us who shouted about the need for an enhanced conventional deterrent in Europe in 2014 been listened to, pound to a pinch of salt, Putin’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, as set out in his strategic plan, would not have taken place. I do not want Putin to subsume Ukraine, Moldova into his Union State by force. I do not want Putin to surround and dominate the Baltic States. I do not want that because it means that this country will once more be at war in Europe. You certainly should have had an opinion in 2014, given the inhuman treatment once again meted out to the… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Ah, I see your measure of a good post is length. There are many articles on the power of brevity in writing, A search on the topic might help make your posts readable.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

In a spirit of helpfulness:

‘If you use few words but convey little information, you have not been concise.’

https://worktalk.medium.com/emotionally-intelligent-people-know-the-difference-between-brief-and-concise-28215c348ea9

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Roman Bezsmertnyi – failed Ukrainian presidential candidate and sacked from his official position by his boss Z in 2019 over a failed attempt at a Donbas settlement.

Insurrectionist
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

This is the Daily Sceptic, where you have to navigate Monros delusion never ending rhetoric..

Mogwai
1 year ago

Germany again. I think the existence of this ‘Handbook’ to instruct migrants on how to avoid deportation provides irrefutable proof of just how treacherous the German government and the EU are. This is absolutely crazy. Germany *really* don’t want to be rid of all those migrant dangerous criminals who are a threat to the good citizens of the country, do they? Do other countries have one, I wonder? ”An investigation by the German outlet Apollo News revealed the existence of an online platform funded by the German government and the European Union, one of the aims of which is to provide practical and legal advice to migrants so that they can oppose their possible deportation, in the name of a “right to remain for all” on German soil. The site, called Handbook Germany, takes the form of an information site aimed at immigrants arriving on German soil, with an apparently harmless programme: ‘orientieren—informieren—austauschen’ (find your way around, get informed, exchange information). But on closer inspection, the site turns out to be a weapon in the service of a militant and openly declared political programme: “against deportations and for the right to freedom of movement for all.” The Apollo News investigation shows that the site provides a whole range… Read more »

Freddy Boy
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

So a child could be done away with to let a family stay in Germany 🇩🇪, how inclusive !!

JeremyP99
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

What IS clear is that Germany is incapable of learning from its past. If you want to follow the decline and fall of Germany, I highly recommend Eugyppius Substack – written in perfect English – on this very matter. He’s very funny as well, despite these dark times

https://www.eugyppius.com/

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Does the U.S. need to ‘queer’ its nuclear arsenal?” – A newly hired expert in the Biden administration wants to bring wokeness to the field of nuclear weapons, says Rosie Norman in Spiked.

I’m sure that Russia and China look forward to the discussions about painting their ICMBs pink.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

There was a Cold War era cartoon, possibly by Gary Larson or else in that style, that depicted US and Soviet generals as flashers wearing long trench coats exposing their nuclear missiles to each other.

Now in the New Age of Transgendia we are to come from missiles as ‘heteronormative’ phallic symbols – the point made, in effect, by the US’s new diversity expert – to missiles as rainbow-striped bearers of inclusion. How can a rainbow-striped missile be aimed at gays in Minsk or San Francisco?

JeremyP99
1 year ago

This has been known for years. Long before Cult Transgender took over the show. Parental support or therapy was used, and many would just pass through this, and man would accept they were gay. It worked, and was what the children needed. Now medics experiment on them, way under the age of consent. We hanged people after the war for this. We should hang them again.

Mrs Bunty
1 year ago

Has the world today changed, or are people today just the boiled frogs?

Had a break from the constant doom and gloom but came across this article from 2013. Could have been written yesterday, covering gender nonsense, offence taking, police idiocy (including insulting a dog) and the pre-cursor to ‘Covid’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/allison-pearson/9806112/Why-taking-offence-is-Britains-new-national-sport.html

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Mrs Bunty

“Covid” opened my eyes much wider to what was already there, which has been slowly building for decades. It was not some unusual aberration, just an extreme manifestation of an existing collection of malaises.

JohnK
1 year ago

I’ve ordered a copy of “Fighting Goliath” via A; should arrive on Tuesday, apparently, so we’ll see.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago