News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Thursday Morning Grove End & A30 London Rd, Bagshot 

Stop Starmer’s War on Farmers … and Cars



601
pjar
1 year ago

Jesus… Americans are mad enough to elect her as president, aren’t they? Jesus…

NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  pjar

Yes, I believe they are. Imagine being so frightened of Trump that you vote yourself to hell as the preferred alternative.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  pjar

86% of those who voted in the last U.K. general election supported woke socialist parties

stewart
1 year ago

Yup, we are completely surrounded.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Whut? No. Surely. I mean, if you read their manifestos… Ah.

🙂

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

The Tory manifesto would have been better than the others at hiding their woke socialist beliefs, but they had been in government for 14 years and I looked at what they actually did, not what they said.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

They could promise anything. They knew they would lose and never need to keep their promises.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

They talked a good fight on immigration for years and did very little.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

Stopping immigration is not part of the globalist agenda in any way.

paul6316
paul6316
1 year ago
Reply to  pjar

We’re not mad enough to believe that it matters for whom we vote. Bibi wants Trump, so Trump it’ll be.

NeilParkin
1 year ago

The obese are crippling the NHS. It’s time to make them pay

OMG, another sanctimonious, self righteous, know it all, pontificating about things of which they have no knowledge. What is it that makes them think that banning things is the solution to everything. Cream horns indeed…

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

It’s part of the same collectivism that brought as covid fascism.

pjar
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Although… I don’t entirely disagree with this stance, I do wonder where those who promote it might eventually stop? There isn’t much that we do which affects our health, that we don’t do ‘voluntarily’… presumably, the limit would be the point at which it affected them?

JohnK
1 year ago

“Labour membership sinks… under Starmer” story in the T: Until 2020, I used to be a member, and dropped out on account of their attitude to the panic. In effect, there was no real opposition. I wonder if other parties have the same problem, particularly the Tories? Of course, if that was the underlying cause of the balance sheet looking a bit unhealthy, they will never admit it openly.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

The “panic” was induced by governments, the media and various supranational organisations, all in cahoots of various kinds.

Free Lemming
1 year ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13768989/child-rapist-spared-jail-prison-overcrowding.html

No room for child rapists, but room for anyone ‘far-right’ who shouts at a dog. Anyone that still believes we live in a democracy whose problems can be fixed with elections, polite protest or signing petitions, needs to be locked up… unfortunately all the dissidents have filled all the cells.

Mrs Bunty
1 year ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/what-to-read/book-banning-intolerant-society/ Now I’m not for banning books nor a prude but sexualising young children, of any stripe, is not ok. He witters on about banning Ulysses and Lady Chatterley’s Lover, years ago without acknowledging the banning of books of the LGB alphabet were found to be: “Books about LGBTQ+ topics or gender theory received the most challenges, often because the complainant perceived them as “advocating child harming procedures” … ”Of the 16 books removed from public libraries, eight were due to complaints regarding racist or divisive” language, three for “inappropriate” sexual or violent content, three for concerns about potentially damaging health advice and two for outdated information.” https://freespeechunion.org/the-books-banned-from-libraries-after-one-complaint/ He continues: “It’s telling that one of the few authors who refused to defend Lady Chatterley during the 1960 trial at the Old Bailey was Enid Blyton, an author whose work now often looks mean-spirited and bigoted.” and are now among those being altered now by ’sensitive readers’, which doesn’t seem to bother the writer as he doesn’t object to that. I love books, I love and treasure the written word so instead of banning, how about the old ‘top shelf’ of certain books, let parents or older children decide if they… Read more »

Free Lemming
1 year ago
Reply to  Mrs Bunty

A society that functions normally is built on a common set of moral values which implicitly polices deviant or improper behaviour. Laws may be written down, but they are merely a reflection of cultural beliefs, so the words have little meaning other than to underline what is expected of an individual living within that society. In that society a book sexualising children would never get written, let alone published for mass consumption. When a societies common set of morals become fractured, laws may be easily subverted as powerful players (e.g. the state or judiciary) can choose a different interpretation of the words of law. Citizens within the broken society are free to express deviant thoughts with little to no consequence. Banning books to fix societal ills is as clear a sign as is possible that the common moral compass of a society has collapsed. But no amount of banning, no amount of legal words, will fix the problem. This is what happens when a common moral rulebook that people have followed for millennia (the Bible) gets mocked and ridiculed, and is gleefully binned with the full force of the state behind the demise. Whether or not you believe in God… Read more »

Mrs Bunty
1 year ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I agree with much of your comment. Whilst not a believer I do feel the values of the Bible tremendously important to any functioning society and am sad at its demise in today’s culture. Do we have (or have ever had) a common set of values though? Yes we have a facade of common values but those values have been successfully openly traduced nowadays by all and sundry. The media, the politicians, the judiciary and most egregiously by the church. There have always been what was classed as ‘smutty’ books, it is the publication for mass consumption that is now the problem and the fact that anything goes on the internet. All I personally can do is try to instil moral behaviour in my immediate family and hope that continues down the line as a safeguard against the bombardment of what I personally believe is abhorrent.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Mrs Bunty

This is a tricky one for me.

As a libertarian jihadist, my instinct is that nothing should be banned – adults can choose, and adults should be supervising their kids choices. In practice, it gets awkward if you want to let your kids loose in the local library or bookshop and not micro manage what they are reading. It also gets awkward with books in schools – you should be free to choose a school that aligns with your values, but you may not find one and again you can’t micro manage what your kids are doing in school.

As Free Lemming points out below, without shared values it breaks down and laws that take the place of shared values get abused by those with power.

That said, your kids will come across all sorts of ideas you find repellent, and you just have to deal with it somehow.

Dinger64
1 year ago

“Jermaine Jenas maintains there are ‘two sides to every story”

Funny that, it’s word for word what big ears said!

Dinger64
1 year ago

“Farrow & Ball told to make names like ‘Dead Salmon’ ‘vegan-friendly’”

“Last white rhino grey”
“Belly up whale blue”
“Polar bear inwards pink”
“Ak47 tusk ivory”
“Gutted cheater yellow”
“Vampire bat blood red”
“Clubbed seal pup puce”
“Lustrous rotting carcass Black”

Can you suggest any?

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

😀 😀 😀

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Dinger64

Take a look at the paints offered by wargaming suppliers. Citadel has for example Dreadful Visage, Bad Moon Yellow, Gutrippa Flesh and Garaghaks Sewer.
There would be an outcry amaongst wargamers if there was any suggestion of wokery entering their hobby.

Dinger64
1 year ago

Jeremy Clarkson’s new pub forces council to cut speed limit” – Jeremy Clarkson’s new pub is set to be so popular that the council is cutting speed limits and exploring other traffic-calming measures”

At any cost, in order to stop it from being successful….Perish the thought!

Dinger64
1 year ago

“Rep. Waltz suggests Crooks didn’t act alone in assassination attempt”

So there were how many shooters on that roof?
How many does it take to pull a trigger?
Hairy balz is a tw@¥!

MichaelM
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Not sure what you are saying here, Dinger. Of course Crooks wasn’t a lone gunman acting alone, any more than Lee Harvey Oswald was 62 years ago.

paul6316
paul6316
1 year ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Why?

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/22/lib-dems-are-a-national-embarrassment/

Our politicians are a disgrace but the Lib Dims take the Next Tuesday biscuit.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/scientists-silencing-science-the

BS.

The C1984 was re-branded ‘flu and nothing more. The lab-leak nonsense was gaslighting intended to bolster the story. Its about time this crap bit the dust.

If anything undermines $cience and public health it is garbage such as this.

Dr Mike Yeadon called this out long ago.

MichaelM
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Agreed HP, but what do you make of Mike Yeadon’s latest comments on Ivermectin?

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  MichaelM

To be honest Michael I am very confused with Mike Yeadon’s comments re Ivermectin. All the reporting I have seen has concluded that Ivermectin is extremely safe and very effective. There is little, if anything that Mike Yeadon has got wrong since the shit show started so I find myself on the fence re his position on Ivermectin. Wait and see I think.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

Taxman pockets record £3 billion from NHS backlog

Surely taxpayers cannot be taxed twice for the same thing???

Taxed for the NHS even if they don’t use it, and then taxed again for private healthcare???