News Round-Up
- “What does Reform need to overtake the Tories? Less than 340,000 voters” – Nigel Farage’s party may only have five MPs to its name but, for them, this is only the beginning, says the Telegraph.
- “What did the Tories do with power?” – Fourteen years of Tory-led Government is over, and for many on the Right there is a sense of frustration that time in power has been squandered, says John Oxley in the Spectator.
- “Labour’s Potemkin landslide” – Something pretty big is missing from Labour’s historic landslide: the voters, says Fraser Nelson in the Spectator. Starmer won 63% of the seats on just 33.8% of the votes, with a vote total half a million lower than Corbyn in 2019.
- “Final triumph of the New Establishment: Now with a Leftie lawyer in Downing Street, they’ve seized the last piece of the jigsaw” – Andrew Neil in the Mail sees the return of Labour to Government as the sealing of a long march of Leftism.
- “We deserve this result – we had 14 years in office and did not deliver” – “Complacent Tory MPs must see the only way to persuade the public is with trust, hope and credibility,” writes Suella Braverman in the Telegraph.
- “I voted Reform because I want my country back” – Charlie Bentely-Astor in the Telegraph explains why as a young woman she backed the start-up party.
- “Class war is back – but this time the revolt against elites is from the Right” – The public has had enough of oligarchic power, says Janet Daley. “This is what is behind electoral protest in France, the United States and Britain.”
- “Reform to set up branches nationwide” – Reform will set up branches around the country to build on election success, Richard Tice has said, according to the Telegraph.
- “Defeated Tory quits party saying it has ‘no chance of ever being electable again’” – Former “Brexit Spartan” Tory MP Marcus Fysh, who lost his seat at the General Election, has quit the party, saying it has “no chance of ever being electable again”, reports the Telegraph.
- “Don’t be misled, Britain did not flock to Labour” – Sir Keir may have won the election, but he was scarcely more successful than Jeremy Corbyn in 2019, says Sir John Curtice in the Telegraph.
- “Miracle survivor: how freak circumstances conspired to save ‘doomed’ Iain Duncan Smith” – The former Tory party leader was given just a 1% chance of winning by the exit poll – but the poll had failed to take into account that the Labour vote was split by its deselected candidate, says the Telegraph.
- “How do you solve a problem like Farage? Without a solution, Tories are fated to opposition” – If the Right is split, it will keep losing, but the parties are only divided by personalities, not policies, says Daniel Hannan.
- “The Tories must strike a deal with Farage” – The Conservative party is now the political equivalent of Monty Python’s Norwegian Blue parrot, writes Dan Hodges in the Mail. “There is no unification of the Right without Farage.”
- “Panicking Tories say Nigel Farage must be ‘invited to join’ party” – The Mail looks at the lively discussions going on among the Tories about the future as they lick their wounds.
- “Control Britain’s borders to counter Reform, warns Blair” – Starmer must learn from Italy and France and control Britain’s borders to see off the threat of Reform U.K., Sir Tony Blair has said, reports the Telegraph.
- “The really interesting 2024 election numbers” – Alex Kriel crunches the election results.
- “Labour Government working with Germany on moving closer to EU, says Berlin” – The Government is working with Germany to see how Britain “can move closer to the EU”, Berlin’s Foreign Ministry said, the Telegraph reports.
- “Labour only made one promise: here’s why it could be dead on arrival” – The Telegraph looks at the new Prime Minister’s promise of 1.5 million new homes and the Nimbyism that could sink it.
- “Keir Starmer: The World’s Most Typical Pol” – In Compact, James A. Smith says you won’t find a more stereotypical politician that Britain’s new PM.
- “The Net Zero-obsessed millionaire scientist, a bullied Byker Grove actress, the pro-Palestine human rights lawyer and the cobbler who employs ex-offenders who is now Prison’s Minister: Meet Keir’s Cabinet as new Prime Minister gets to work on first day” – The Mail looks at whom Starmer has appointed to run his Government, including “Net Zero-obsessed millionaire scientist” Sir Patrick Vallance of Covid infamy.
- “Ed Miliband will be a liability as Energy Secretary” – Ed Miliband as Energy Secretary raises a clear source of trouble, says Ross Clark in the Spectator: Labour’s hugely ambitious plan to decarbonise the national grid by 2030.
- “The climate scaremongers: How the Met Office fiddles the temperature figures” – in TCW, Paul Homewood looks at some of the Met Office’s hopelessly corrupted weather stations in the U.K. where solar farms and airports artificially inflate readings.
- “Europe’s Green Energy Plans Stall as Leading Companies Reduce Expansion Plans” – Green energy is in turmoil as projects are postponed and scaled back across Europe, says Pierre Gosselin in WUWT.
- “Joe Biden: Only ‘Lord Almighty’ can tell me to stand down, says President” – Doesn’t sound like Biden is in any mood to heed the calls from his erstwhile backers to stand aside as he makes an appeal to heaven, reports the Telegraph.
- “A Parkinson’s disease specialist has visited the White House residence medical clinic at least nine times since July 2023” – Alex Berenson reports on suggestive revelations from the White House visitor logs.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
After watching the first episode of Douglas Is Cancelled about a week ago I posted this: Has anyone watched Douglas Is Cancelled on ITV? It’s described by Metro as “ITV’s new ‘woke’ series” and the writer has written fairly recent episodes of Dr Who, so I didn’t have high hopes for it. But I watched the first episode last night and I thought it was very good, well-written and very funny at times including some sharp satirical points about woke culture, especially the indoctrinated daughter who doesn’t want her father to be cancelled, who doesn’t “want to have to cancel” her father. I don’t know who the complainers are, and I don’t know if it will turn out to be woke or anti-woke or neither, but so far, very good. I have now watched all four episodes and I enjoyed it very much, it’s very cleverly written and well acted. Hugh Bonneville plays the title character quite similarly to his character in W1A, though more serious but very funny at times. I’ve read good reviews of it in the Guardian, and the Observer, and bad reviews in the Independent and Metro. While looking for reviews online, I found this… Read more »
Douglas Is Cancelled seems to have annoyed the people it was satirising, including this “socially progressive, forward-thinking member of Gen Z” writing in the Metro:
https://metro.co.uk/2024/07/04/this-hit-tv-show-insult-gen-z-viewers-like-21155033/
At first I thought the article was itself meant to be satirical, but no, she means it, while nobody in the comments section agrees with her.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/06/problem-farage-without-a-solution-tories-fated-opposition/
He’s on the money is Danny.
A complete failure to understand.
The intelligent part of the electorate know it’s all a sham. The Tory Party is in its death throes. It was ordered to be so by the Davos Deviants – controlled demolition. The demolition of Britain in other words.
I am sure Farage knows what’s really going on but of course he cannot reveal what many on here know because to do so would land him with the nut job conspiracy label.
Frankly, Daniel Hannan is a liability.
“Frankly, Daniel Hannan is a liability.”
Farage is a “problem” for the Tories – but the Tories are a problem for this country. Why anybody wants them to survive is beyond me.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13604625/ANDREW-NEIL-triumph-New-Establishment-Leftie-lawyer-Downing-Street-seized-piece-jigsaw.html
Andrew Neil pushed for mandated “vaccines.” I CGAF for his opinions.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13607137/DAN-HODGES-Tories-strike-deal-Farage-speaks-voters-neglected-long.html
Dear Mr Farage,
Tell them all to Foxtrot Oscar.
Regards,
hux.
I’m sure he will. Reform don’t need any Tory left-overs. There may be one or two exceptions but the vast majority are tarnished by being in the Westminster bubble, washed-up and fit for nothing. We need a movement of people who have real life experience and the passion to restore our democracy.
Thanks rachel.👍
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/06/control-britains-borders-to-counter-reform-warns-blair/
What’s this Next Tuesday up to now?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/06/labour-promises-planning-system/
A good friend of mine works in the building industry, the best case scenario is 250,000 new homes pa. We simply do not have the skilled manpower to produce more.
All our kids were told to go to university and do degrees media/LGBTQ studies.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/americans-war-us-government/5861774
Posted late last night. Civil war in the USA?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-peace-andrew-carnegie-temple-peace/5861713
Also posted last night – who runs the world?
Clue – not Tory.not Liebour, not
Lib Dim.
Global Research published or republished seven authors attributed by Facebook to be false online personas created by The Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, popularly known as the GRU. Sophie Mangal, Anna Jaunger, Milko Pejovic, Adomas Abromaitis, Mariam al-Hijab, Said al-Khalaki and Mehmet Ersoy were identified by Facebook as false online personas created by the GRU, as noted in Potemkin Pages & Personas: Assessing GRU Online Operations, 2014-2019 by Renee DiResta and Shelby Grossman, published by the Stanford Internet Observatory in November 2019. Altogether, these seven GRU personas are responsible for 108 articles that appear on Global Research’s website. Please stop posting this nonsense. It is turning this site into a freak show full of nutters and will kill the site eventually. Global Research is a dotty home-grown Canadian website that has become deeply enmeshed in Russia’s broader disinformation and propaganda ecosystem. Its large roster of fringe authors and conspiracy theorists serves as a talent pool for the Russian and Chinese websites with which Global Research has partnered since the early 2010s. It is run by Michel Chossudovsky. He posts stuff like: ‘In the US, the technology is being perfected under the… Read more »
Ninety percent of what you push on here is propoganda relating to the illegal US war against Russia.
If anybody is distressing this site it is you.
Don’t read my posts.
The long-winded drivel you clutter DS with on a daily basis is utterly tiresome so I don’t read it. That is an achievement because I probably read 90% of all the posts on DS. Unlike you I am keen to read other people’s views and opinions.
Trot off and make a nuisance of yourself somewhere else
Amen
Thank you 👍
I don’t read your posts.
No-one sane does.
80% of this country (using the 80/20 rule, that’s pretty much everyone sentient) takes the view that I do regarding Putin and his barbaric war crimes.
https://ctgroup.com/insights/
That’s about fifty six million people.
You are entitled to your view, but it seems to tens of millions to be an eccentric and unpleasant one.
Enough of the dotty stuff from Canada’s nuttiest professor…..
The numbers do not support your assertions and neither does your logic. If you do not read my posts how can you be so risibly critical?
I hardly feel it is helpful to condemn the few – your conclusion – people who do read my posts as being ‘not sane.’
It is not like me to use the ad hominem tack but being blunt you are a boring, one song windbag and I have no time for your propoganda.
Oh come on Monro, you can do better than “6 million Sun readers can’t be wrong”. 80% of this country or more supported Covid idiocy, and 80% of those who voted, supported parties who believe in Nut Zero (oops, so did you…). It’s hardly a measure of anything. I don’t personally think you should “trot off” even though I disagree with your views on Ukraine, but your 80/20 argument is not one of your better ones.
‘We don’t have any kings in America’
but
‘Only the Lord Almighty can tell me to stand down’
Doesn’t that sound a bit like Charles I?
Or is Biden talking about Mrs Biden?
Power is a powerful drug. Once you get the taste, you aren’t going to give it up easily…
Keep Online Privacy and Anonymity – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, your new MP, your local vicar, online media and friends online. We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.
“Ed Miliband will be a liability as Energy Secretary”
I was surprised that net-zero was not more of an election issue, it certainly was for me and greatly influenced how I voted. This article quite rightly points out the impossibility of Labour’s plans to decarbonise the grid. However, I reckon that before all that kicks in to cause problems the new Labour Govs plans for cars and transport will start to bite and cause anguish amongst the general public. Stellantis (Vauxhall) are already taking about how the UKs zero emissions mandate could well see them closing their UK plants and leaving the UK. When net-zero and zero emissions mandates start to see car and van plants closing and the decline of the UK motor industry, people may at last see where this net-zero stuff is going…………….Immiseration, poverty and decline. Have we got to wait until the problems start to arise before the mass of people wake up to the effect net-zero is going to have on their lives?
In short, probably yes. It seems to me that most people believe everything they have been told about ‘man made global warming’, and the bits that are never mentioned they fill in for themselves. A case in point is the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Proponents of net zero never seem to mention this, and, indeed, a lot of them don’t actually know what it is.
I think, as you say, it will take something big (like prolonged power cuts, or a further massive rise in the cost of fuels) before people start getting really angry.
I bet the Met office are desperate for a bit of hot weather, all this cold gloom isn’t doing the narrative any good!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/06/patrick-vallance-starmer-science-minister-covid-conflict/
A genuinely horrific appointment that worries me more than any other.
Agree. As far as I can tell he ranks alongside Fauci as one of the most sinister characters in the pharma-vaccine industrial complex.
Don’t forget Farrar.
I completely agree. A man responsible for thousands of deaths these last four years is being given immense responsibility once again. I doubt the appointment was Kneel’s more likely his Davos Deviant handlers, or Bliar. Same thing really.
Starmer’s first Cabinet ‘the most diverse on record for education background’ says PA media
Erm… did Sir Keir just say that people with comprehensive educations didn’t have the easiest of starts in life?
Also, what’s so diverse about the cabinet’s education background if 92% of them went to comprehensive schools – like the majority of those who went through secondary education since 1965?
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/starmer-first-cabinet-most-diverse-115738900.html
Liebour speak for ” uneducated thickos” who now nominally have responsibility for running down the sixth largest economy in the world. A job I believe they are eminently qualified for.
“Labour only made one promise: here’s why it could be dead on arrival”
1.5 million new houses!
Is Starmer and his bunch going to roll their sleeves up and start building? Because after 40 years in the building trade I know for a fact not a single building company has ever built houses at a loss and survived!
So, how are these houses going to get built? tax payer billions..again?
House building costs are rising all the time due to the rise in materials and the ever lengthing list of gov mandates like heatpumps and ev charges to name but two.
Insulation cost have gone through the roof(no pun intended) and yet, the gov imposes certain high levels of it for every new house and that is being increased regularly.
Good luck finding companies that can build houses on the wafer thinest of margins and still make a viable profit.
Of course, Stamer’s an account not a builder!
Time to recreate the prefab for the 21st century, although the problem of mass manufacture is still there. Perhaps they could be built in China and shipped over? This is said in jest, but absolutely nothing would surprise me these days.
Well, shipping from China does assist with greenhouse gas target reductions. 😀😀😀
A good friend of mine runs his own building construction company. He was at a conference recently and all the big companies were present. When these aspirational figures were trotted out the audience erupted with laughter. There simply aren’t enough brickies to build even 250k before even considering the ancillary trades.
Spot on, quality builders of all trades are hard to come by, however, cheap poorly trained foreign workers are easy to find, God help the quality of the housing stock over the coming decades!
“Only ‘Lord Almighty’ can tell me to stand down, says Biden”
Need i say more?
The only way of making a dementia patient do as their told will be a flying tackle, manicles and a straight jacket!
As far as I can see the main reason there is no all out attempt to oust Biden is Kamala Harris. From a legal and financial point of view, as I understand it, if Biden stepped down she could step in, take over and use all Biden’s election money, all within the rules. To have someone else come in and take over from Biden would need some jigging of the system.
A bullet?
🤣🤣 fired by his own side no doubt!
Most definitely but blamed on Trump and the Republicans.
Quite a few articles here and there about the the proportion of votes and the electoral outcome, along the lines of some kind of modification of the structure & method of counting. There are already some applications of some kind of proportional representation in this nation, e.g. in London, and elsewhere. Indeed, in a couple of years time Wales is moving to a version of the d’Hondt method.
It appears that the existing mechanics vary a bit, with a hybrid mixture of d’Hondt and something else – like single transferable, or first past the post for certain jobs. I wonder if they will ever try to adopt something along those lines for the Westminster HoC? No doubt there will be no shortage of arguments about the merits of one system versus another, at least by those who’ve got time for it over the next few years.
There needs to be a lengthy dep public debate about this otherwise two things will happen: First, and for as long as they can maintain it, the old parties and their MSM mates will deny there is an issue. Second, if they feel they cannot resist the pressure, they will come up with a d’Hondt or Clegg style system which is about the least democratic there is.
Only an additional member system by whatever name can give the following advantages:
1 individual non-party and small parties can still get elected. Still tough but possible
2 there would continue to be an individual MP for each constituency to who m the electorate could look for representation
3 it limits the ability of the party leader to decide who gets elected. This could be further limited if individual constituencies or constituency asociations were to put up their own list of potential additional members. Additional members could be barred from being such a second time at least in the same area
Under this system it would be possible to have only limited additional numbers of MPs.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/07/06/control-britains-borders-to-counter-reform-warns-blair/
Nothing but gaslighting from the arch Next Tuesday Bliar.