Heil Homo Hitler! This Pride Month, Why Are Some Historical Figures Being Falsely ‘Outed’ as Gay But Not Others?
As annual Enforced Gay-Worship Month finally comes to an end this June 30th (only to begin again anew at precisely 12.01am on July 1st), it seems the campaign to “set the historical record queer” (rather than straight) continues apace with it. It is easy indeed to find fawning lists these days acclaiming all the top historical figures as being gay, lesbian or bisexual.
Here’s one from leading gay outlet Pink News, joyously outing the likes of Leonardo da Vinci and Julius Caesar for being bent as a boomerang. Disturbingly, this very same lavender list also praises Florence ‘The Lady With the Lube’ Nightingale for supposedly engaging in outrageous lesbian acts with her own aunt. And this is not to mention Malcolm X (now Malcolm LGBTQ) and Louisa May Alcott, who was famously into Little Wxmen. In light of Ridley Scott’s new biopic of Napoleon, out last year, Pink News even dubiously acclaimed Old Boney as being bisexual: “Not tonight, Josephine – I fancy a go on Joseph this week.”
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Funny. On a serious note, however, Pride is nothing to do with pride, and everything to do with the narcissistic need to have others agree and to dance to the tune that improves your life regardless of the cost to others. Narcissism is easily hidden if it has a group identity.
Pride is a Sin. Queerity and Trans fascism are mental illnesses. If you want to know your gender have a look down whilst showering.
Indeed – and it’s as simple as that!
Trans, with the exception of a miniscule number of people, are suffering from a mental illness; that much I agree with. Being gay now, I believe, is way more complicated. We have to acknowledge the propaganda that young people have been force-fed. For many their entire lives has been one of being told that being gay is as natural as being normal, not only normal actually, but somehow better. And they’ve been indoctrinated into this belief whilst their young minds are not fully formed and easily manipulated. Personally, I feel incredibly sorry for these people who will find it hard to turn around and will always lead only half a life. It’s not those people that I hate, it’s the people that have destroyed those lives, and, unfortunately, a subset of those people have narcissistic traits and propagate the societal illness.
With all this historical gayness, it makes you wonder how the human race ever came to be? What’s so f-ing great about being gay? Grow up ffs!
The homosexual lobby always tries to claim that “good” historical figures were gay – but ignores any men with shall we say less than admirable records.
Their claim for William the Conqueror as gay, however, is I believe based on a misunderstanding. When he gave the order to invade England in 1066 he told his generals “To the water! It is the hour!”. But of course being Norman he said in in French: “A l’eau! C’est l’heure”.
(I’ll get my coat…)
I can see what you did there!
Hello Sailor 🙂
The world is going insane, just before it’s downfall.
“The Reluctant Heterosexual Who Never Carried A Pencil”
Great title for book/film/stage play.
I think June is Gay Self-parody Month – the Pinkeratti on parade.
LGBT_XYZ are all forms of Autisum … prob caused by the MAD child vaccination scheme
Gay men are probably on average more extroverted, autists not so much
I’m not sure how you could assume that “gay men are probably on average more extroverted” as you’re more likely to see and notice extroverted gay men and not see or notice introverted gay men so much.
Yes I suppose that could be true, though extroversion seems to be a well
documented trait of at least one section of the “gay community”
That doesn’t matter to these clowns. I suspect the general argument runs roughly like this: This guy is not like me. I’m certainly not gay. Hence, he must certainly be gay! I’ve almost heard that verbatim from a ‘sweet girl’ (*kotz*) who had convinced herself that me usually preferring to remain alone ‘must’ mean that (or someone told her, possibly as cherchez la femme measure).
When the APA voted to de-classify homosexuality as a mental disorder, it did so by a slim majority of 3:2. The 40% who wanted to retain the disorder definition were worried about how a same-sex proclivity could continue in the gene pool. Why wouldn’t it be naturally selected out, given that same-sex unions cannot reproduce? Does anyone know how that question got answered?
The obvious answer is that it isn’t in the gene pool. Sexual habits are just that: habits. The classic Greeks knew that, cf Anabasis. As did the Romans, see the historical smear about Caesar being “a woman to men and a man to women”.
Those habits were forced by the culture at the time, forced structures if you like. Alfred Kinsey studied sexuality in the 50s and came up with the sliding scale on sexuality. Some of his studies were controversial like looking into the prepubescent orgasm, timing it etc. Some people have spoken out how they were ‘tested’ by Kinsey as children.
The Death’s Head isn’t really a Nazi symbol at all. It’s a symbol of a traditional Prussian cavalary regiment (Totenkopfhusaren, Death’s head hussars).
[German heir apparent at the time of the first world-war.]
Maybe important addition: Death’s head is a mistranslation. The German Totenkopf means head of a skeleton, ie, skull.
“Adolf Hitler. Why does no-one amongst the queer crowd ever try to out him as being one of their own”
There are WW1 stories about him and also his time after the Great War when he was living on the streets. How much merit they have I don’t know. Ernst Rohm head of the SA was a good friend of Hitler and a known homosexual, the butch type and probably a pederast who would’ve been at home in the Hitler Youth movements that they promoted with the Greek ethos and we all know about that.
Once Rohm got too much of a threat, that was all the excuse Hitler needed, but as he was a good friend, he gave him the option of killing himself by his own hand.
“By that logic, Hitler must also have secretly been a Jewish gypsy”
Well he did order a graveyard where he grew up to be a site of target practice, at least that is what I read ages ago. A perfect way to cover up some family ties?
As well as being Green. See the book, How Green Were the Nazis, by Bruggermeier, Coic and others. Or at least Greenish.
A bit odd that neither S.D. Tucker, nor any commenters, mention the extraordinary novel by Jonathan Littell, “The Kindly Ones”.(originally “Les Bienveillantes”, winner of the 2006 Prix Goncourt.) Anthony Beevor describes it as “A great work of literary fiction, to which readers willturn for decades to come.”
Well worth reading, if requiring a strong stomach, it concerns mainly the WWII life of an (homosexual and incestuous) SS Intelligence Officer.
No doubt Tucker is well aware of the book but considered it doesn’t fit well with his sarcastic and comic message here.
His (Tucker’s) most recent book “Hitler’s and Stalin’s Misuse of Science” is also well worth reading, but I should point out that maybe half the book concerns more recent and probably more egregious misuse of Science!