News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
EppingBlogger
1 year ago

“Postal voting has proved to be wide open to fraud, says Philip Johnston in the Telegraph.”: Then he asks a very odd question “Why, then, does Labour now want to introduce votes for 16-year-olds?”

We all know why political parties want to corrupt the voting and electioral system; it is to ensure they get elected using fraud, tax payers’ monety and anything else that does not involve them responding to the public’;s demands.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

“In the Spectator, Louise Perry writes about the gradual re-emergence of eugenics, although only for the super-rich who want to have designer babies.”

Is nikt free (encouraged) abortion for the masses a form of eugenics?

pjar
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

No, not unless it is done with the intention to ‘improve’ the genetic make up of the species… though I’d accept ‘Birth control for the foolish or unwary*’, perhaps?

* yes, I know there are myriad reasons for pregnancies being aborted, but I’d posit the majority of them will be to rectify ‘mistakes’.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  pjar

If people cannot regulate pfregnancies they are very incompetent. Perhaps some will justify euthenasia on the basis of rectifying “mistakes”, albeit a lot later.

My point was that if the elites do not practive abortions at the same degree or rate as the little people we will have achieved a euthenasia policy. Any such poolicy or practice wheich is not uniform across society is that.

NickR
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

There’s an excellent debate on Spectator TV between Mary’s Wakefield, Harrington & Louise Perry, concerning this issue. One observation that amused me was that, when the contraceptive pill was introduced it was expected that it would allow the poor to stop having unwanted kids and the richer to have wanted kids. In the event, the opposite has occurred.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  NickR

That doesn’t sound right to me. I suspect both the richer (more middle class) and the poorer are having fewer unwanted kids, but the richer are more effective users of birth control.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Maybe not in the UK but in the US that was certainly the case, as Louise Perry sets out in her article. A large proportion of aborted babies are black babies. This may not (anymore) be because they are black, but because blacks are overrepresented in the underclass.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

Excuse me foir making three early postings. “Tom Tugendhat, the security minister, is expected to run for the Conservative leadership if a contest is triggered next month by election defeat, The Telegraph understands. Mr Tugendhat, a former soldier seen as being on the moderate wing of the party, won more votes than expected when he sought the leadership in the summer of 2022.” Moderate? I think globalist wet would be nearer the mark. As all sorts of people put their names in the frame, or it is done for them by friendly journos, we will see Tories with a long reputation for Remain and social liberalism, economic incoherence and general non-conservative views and bbvoting history start to claim theyt were Thatcherite all along, emnbrace Brexit as it is (incomplete) and represent the centre of the Tory Party. The centre of the Tory party is left of most Labour governments we have ever had and it will move further left after the GER for two reasons: 1 few non-wets will retain their seats – the candidate lists of the past 20 years have ensured that 2 that is what the Tories always do – move left and seek support from their… Read more »

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

Starmer: Working people don’t have savings

Whagt an incfredible statewment. Aside from personal fiunancial buffers whiuch poeople build as soon as they can, most people have saviungs in the form of pension rights. In the private sector that means personal pensions which appear highly at risk from Labour.

OIf course, the public sector, including MPs, do not have to worry because the rest of us have to provide inflation protected high pensions.

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Tuesday morning Henley Rd & Caversham Park Rd  
Caversham  
Reading

101
Mogwai
1 year ago

Watch the 3min video of Starmer and Khant in this article. It’s nauseating. And what’s going on with Khant’s hair? I think you need a miracle to occur in the UK elections to avoid what’s headed down the line. Blasphemy laws in the UK, FFS. No civilized Western nation has blasphemy laws, for crying out loud; ”Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer said that if elected, his government would take a hardline approach in policing “Islamophobia” as he looks to sure up Muslim support before the July 4th general election in Britain. The government needs to take a “zero tolerance” approach to supposed anti-Islam statements not only made in real life but online as well, Sir Keir Starmer said in a video with London Mayor Sadiq Khan marking the of the Muslim holiday Eid al-Fitr. The comments from Starmer, who is widely predicted to become Britain’s next prime minister in a little over two weeks time, suggest that his potential government would look to build upon his party’s history of undermining free speech in the UK. For example, under former Prime Minister Tony Blair — whom Starmer appears to be modelling his persona and policies after — the Labour government… Read more »

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Starmer is no more modelling himself on Blair than the monkey models itself on the organ grinder.

Monro
1 year ago

Nigel Farage insists Kyiv will have to seek a peace deal with Russia What’s really going on. ‘Russia can keep this war going for ever.’ That assumes Putin can mobilise; conscription. Can he? That is also what both China and the U.S. would like Russia to do. That is their ‘Russia’ strategy. Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. Ukraine clearly would not wish for this state of affairs ‘At some point there have to be face-to-face talks……I’m not suggesting that it’ll happen quickly, but at some point that’s what we’d like to see.’ As a statement of the blindingly obvious…….. Ukraine has already committed to presenting a peace plan at the next peace summit. Putin has realised it is time to move towards a peace agreement, but isn’t yet ready to admit that this must be done not on his terms.  Ukraine is not ready for a peace agreement because there’s no trust. Ukraine is bothered by the lack of guarantees. No one can give a clear answer to the question of what to do so that Putin won’t attack again in three years. Also, after 2014, no one in Ukraine wants to go down in… Read more »

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

We also now have an interesting insight into the likely position of the U.S. Government: ‘When the USSR collapsed and Russia was at its most vulnerable, the allegedly nazified NATO (Russia’s claim) did not march its armies into Moscow, dismantle Russian’s nuclear deterrence, seize Russian natural resources, and enslave its population. Japan did not exploit Russia’s unprecedented weakness to retake the Kurile Islands. Finland did not reabsorb Karelia, nor Germany East Prussia/Kaliningrad. Instead, Russia was welcomed into the G-7 and the WTO and its business and government leaders regularly feted at Davos. Western investment and commerce blossomed, and Russia was generally accepted as a more or less normal country. This continued even after Vladimir Putin’s rise to power and his steady reimposition of autocratic rule, murder of political opponents at home and abroad, poisoning of Ukrainian Presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko in 2004, invasion of Georgia in 2008, and military occupation of Ukraine’s Crimea and Donbas in 2014. Each of these transgressions was met with new “resets” from the US and its allies eager to avoid any serious confrontation. In short, appeasement. NATO did, over fierce Russian objections, broaden its membership after the fall of the USSR to include former Warsaw… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Or alternatively the other G7 members, in particularly USA, saw Russia becoming and increasing economic power, a threat to dollar hegemony, and tried to engineer the destruction of Russia through draining its economic power.
The reverse has occurred, and the West is becoming increasinly shrill and bellicose in response.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

The parties are becoming closer togather as Russia erodes Ukraine’s borders and manpower.
Effective negotiaion requires a degree of reality on both sides, or in this case on all sides as Ukraine utterly reliant on Western sponsors for what little it actually has left.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

So what happens next? You’re looking at it…….. Media portal BanjaLuka.net published an interview with Zvinchuk on June 18. Kremlin linked Rybar Telegram channel, Mihail Zvinchuk gave an unusually frank and critical view of the Russian military when asked to discuss the current state of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Zvinchuk stated that the war has not proceeded as the Russian military had planned, in part, because of Russia’s poor planning. Zvinchuk also claimed that Russian forces have learned to fight at the platoon, company, and battalion levels but still lack the capability to fight at any higher echelons. Zvinchuk noted that Russian forces have “learned” to seize the battlefield initiative but have only done so in select unspecified locations and that Russian forces are only able to make slow tactical gains. Zvinchuk claimed that if Russia could seize the strategic initiative that Russian forces would seize “a city per week, not a house or village per week.” Zvinchuk also assessed that Russia does not have enough materiel to take the strategic initiative but acknowledged that Russia is attempting to accelerate its defence industrial base (DIB) output. Zvinchuk acknowledged that international sanctions against Russia have hindered Russia’s ability to maintain its technological capabilities,… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

You had better answer yourself, but you should remind yourself that Russia’s stated aim is secure borders and removal of Ukraine as a military threat, especially the Banderite component.
It has never stated any territorial ambitions other than those necessary to achieve the above aims, for example, a buffer zone reflecting the range of Ukraine’s missiles..
The frequency of Ukraine’s pathetic pleas for more weapons and the third or is it fourth round of conscription added added to Syrsky’s comments about depletion of reserves seems to indicate that Russian aims are well on their way.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Amusingly, a North Korean official kicked out Russian ministers who entered the meeting room before Kim Jong Un.

Foreign Minister Lavrov, Defense Minister Belousov, Health Minister Murashko, Roscosmos head Borisov, First Deputy Prime Minister Manturov and Deputy Prime Minister Savelyev were expelled from the hall.

‘Go out into the hall.

-Why did we come here? You should have warned me right away…

Our leader will come in first.’

Imperial delusions…….

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago
Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

Thanks for that link— I would have missed it otherwise.

Dinger64
1 year ago

“John Caudwell says “he is impressed by Starmer”

Wha? In that case he’d be impressed by an empty baked bean can!

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

The “right” amount of concern about racism” Noah Carl writes:

Properly defined, of course, racism is wrong. And nobody’s suggesting we should ignore the phenomenon. But what’s the “right” amount of concern about racism?”

I don’t agree with any of this. Who decided that racism is wrong, and shouldn’t be ignored, and everyone should be concerned about it?

All humans prefer to live and work with people of their own ethnic group, because they feel most comfortable around them, sharing their common ancestry and heritage. And they all tend to think their own ethnic group is superior to others, and to look down upon other ethnic groups as inferior. This is perfectly normal, natural, and universal across all lifeforms on the planet.

The answer to Noah Carl’s question, “What’s the right amount of concern about racism?”
is…
“None.”

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

I think it really depends on how you define racism, and what the results are in terms of how a country treats its citizens. The whole debate has become impossible. I agree with most of what you say, though I am not sure about thinking other groups are inferior – I’m sure some do, but by no means all – but the end result of things going more smoothly when you’re mainly surrounded by people with shared ethnicity and culture is the same.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Delhi heat sends power demand soaring to record high says the BBC

Well the per capita consumption of energy in India has certainly increased in recent years:

comment image

But is it the heat in Delhi or other cities that’s driven up energy demand? No, it’s modernisation. The same thing which is slowly improving the lives of more people in India and elsewhere in the developing world:

comment image

It’s just as well they can continue to generate more and more electricity from coal and oil without climate alarmists trying to blockade their roads and other infrastructure or destroy their cultural art works – otherwise people might die, like they used to:

comment image