Just as Corporations are Waking Up to the Chaos of EDI, Labour is Poised to Make it Worse Than You Can Imagine
Just as the corporate world is finally waking up to the catastrophic damage EDI has caused over the last four years, Labour is about to make it worse than you can possibly imagine.
In an earlier article I examined how corporate and public sector ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) commitments have forced EDI (Equality, Diversity and Inclusion) down the supply chain onto hapless small to medium-sized businesses through procurement policies which demand suppliers implement it.
In this article I want to explore where we go from here in light of a Labour Manifesto which, should the party win power, has serious implications for employers and especially smaller businesses by making the imposition of EDI through the supply chain a statutory requirement. What are the implications and how are British employers, especially the smaller ones, who employ 62% of all workers, going to fare?
The EDI Debate
It may come as a surprise to many readers that since the publication of the Cass Report earlier this year there has been a robust and open debate on LinkedIn between senior executives about how EDI has backfired, producing the opposite results to those intended. Many are now having second thoughts and the corporate world is some steps ahead of the Labour Party in understanding how damaging this has been to our economy. The much touted McKinsey report on the positives of DEI (American EDI) has been roundly debunked as hokum yet is still quoted by Anneliese Dodds, Labour’s Chair. As I discussed previously, much of this has been down to the implementation of EDI rife with Critical Race Theory, lifted from American sources and sold by chancers into U.K. businesses, desperate to virtue-signal post George Floyd.
The conclusion many are coming to is that ‘good EDI’ is extremely difficult to deliver and has to be handled extremely sensitively, being specifically written for the nuances of the target market. How much of this is a result of the more responsible EDI providers waking up to the fact that their days might be numbered and frantically re-packaging, and how much is the industry recognising it has made a catastrophic error is currently unclear. Can we expect it to dawn on employers that they have no business ‘re-educating’ their employees whatsoever and that EDI training is a gross overreach and interference in their lives? We can certainly hope so.
Who exactly thought it would be a good idea to imply that your employees and colleagues are all incorrigible bigots, racists, homophobes and transphobes who require ‘re-education’? Because, even if ‘good EDI’ doesn’t do that, the reality is that an awful lot of it does and as a result the entire concept of EDI training is irredeemably flawed. The concepts behind EDI have no business being trained as facts in the real world and should only exist in theoretical debate in the academy. It is naive of HR Professionals to think that ‘good EDI’, involving nuanced discussions with employees, wouldn’t simply degenerate into any other corporate training format, complete with zero tolerance enforcement.
Employers who have spent tens of millions on employee engagement now face a reality that out of the 65% of British workers who have been trained in EDI in their most recent or last jobs, a whopping 31% say they left a previous employer because they objected to the EDI policies and training at that employer. That rises to 43% for black employees, 46% for Asian and 46% for LGBT.
So to my colleagues who are desperately trying to shore up EDI as a valid and positive contribution to the workplace, I say: sorry folks – the boat has sailed, the grift is over. EDI is a failure, should never have been implemented and has caused catastrophic damage to our economy. It is time to dismantle it and repair the damage and make a commitment to our employees and colleagues that we will never, ever seek to force politics or ideologies on them again.
Only, that won’t happen. As I write we are facing a Labour landslide on July 4th. Labour’s Manifesto and it’s New Deal for Workers have some serious consequences for businesses and employers and especially for smaller businesses. You won’t be surprised to read that Labour puts EDI front and centre, promising to make it a statutory requirement for procurement to demand suppliers of all sizes can demonstrate that they have trained their staff in EDI and have ‘robust’ EDI policies in the workplace. Now, you can argue that this has pretty much become universal over the last 10 years under the Conservative Government, but there is a problem. Just as companies were on the cusp of waking up to the extent of the damage and huge costs, the sackings of resistant employees, the devastating impact on productivity, just on the cusp of winding this back in the corporate world, with the knock-on effect through the supply chain, along comes Labour to enforce it through law.
Last month Sir Keir Starmer claimed that his Government would “tread lightly on people’s lives”. If this is what he means by that then God help us all.
How to protect your business
It appears very likely at this point that Labour will win a big majority which will allow it to implement its manifesto and New Deal for Workers in full. Even more disconcerting is the form that EDI will take under Labour. Despite promising to implement the Cass Report findings, Starmer’s manifesto appears to promise gender self-ID through the back door and, worryingly, a ban on ‘conversion therapy’ which will essentially reverse the findings of the Cass Report. So what will be the implications for the hundreds of thousands of gender critical women, many of whom have been unlawfully fired over the last few years in an emerging national scandal? Furthermore there are promises to further legislate against racism, Islamophobia and LGBT outside the Equality Act 2010, which was meant to be the final say on discrimination in the U.K. This will result in the divisive and controversial move of ‘intersectional’ victimhood groups becoming elevated for special protection under law.
Add to this the plans for the extension of worker’s rights from two years to day one of employment and you have the cocktail for the weaponisation of new employment and equality laws against employers. The new legions of disgruntled workers will be able to call on help from their union because, as a sop to the unions, Labour plans to force employers to promote union membership and to allow ‘shop stewards’ access to workers who are not union members themselves in the workplace. There are no details as to whether small businesses will be exempt but given that the unions have been desperate to get into SMEs (employers under 250 workers) which employ some 62% of British workers, I suspect that this will include at least some of those employers.
Just how the hell is an employer meant to manage this? Small businesses don’t have HR departments. How is an SME meant to stand up to a union? How is an SME meant to deploy EDI training, forced on it by law, without destroying workplace and colleague relations that have taken decades to form?
I suspect the Free Speech Union will be very busy over the next five years. My colleagues and I founded the Fair Job Initiative to give SMEs support and guidance over how to protect their businesses from activism and politics. We’re now rapidly forming strategies to cope with the plethora of laws Labour wants to impose – watch this space. In the meantime, we have recently introduced monthly subscriptions to allow the very smallest of employers to affordably join the initiative. Only by uniting can we have a voice, while existing organisations meant to stand up for small businesses are as captured as any other of our institutions.
Batten down the hatches, it is going to get a lot worse before it gets any better.
C.J. Strachan is the pseudonym of a concerned Scot who worked for 30 years as a Human Resources executive in some of the U.K.’s leading organisations. Subscribe to his Substack. He is a founder of Fair Job, an accreditation and support service for small businesses to help them navigate the minefields of EDI and HR.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Vomit inducing crap imposed on us by university educated social engineering twerps.
Succinct.
I believe them to be much more focussed socialist re-engineers than you suppose.
“Focussed” on what? ———-Serving the globalist Sustainable Development Agenda is all, to get a little gold star on their lapels from the UN/WEF. They are certainly not “focussed” on serving the British people.
Yep… that about sums it up!
#YuriWasRight
That was a profoundly depressing read. Has to be said though. I feel physically ill when I think about this landslide victory that they are likely to achieve. Hoping for some wild card event to somehow steer things away from this. If I was ever invited to some some mandatory course on unconscious racism or some such crap I would refuse to attend and I’d make it clear that I was offended by the invitation. You should never lower yourself to that regardless of the consequences. The hit to your self-respect would have much more dire consequences than the hit to your pocket.
I am sure many of us would take that view but we have to recognise the bjob depends on adherence to the rules and they like nothing better than firing a non-compliant employee. It warns the others and gets rid of a potential point of resistance.
It wouldn’t be easy to give up your job but the times we are living in now require of us something beyond pragmatism. The vaccine is a good example. Lets say you took the shot because you have a family and a mortgage and can’t afford to risk it. Maybe you carried on in your job and did well. But given what has come out lately, even in the mainstream in regard to toxicity, disability, excess death etc – would you still consider that you made the right decision even if your health seems perfectly intact at the moment. Or if you took a child along so that they weren’t ostracized in school. Perhaps we are moving into a time when integrity will of necessity become currency because the evil that is collapsing is based upon its opposite.
Cheer up!
Look, the positive about this is that ALL this nonsense will be in the public eye once Labout take over. Do you think the likes of JK Rowling will roll over? This Labour government may.oearn, as did the SNP, that you can only implement laws that people agree to he governed by. Now Keir Starmer backed that dreadful Scottish Hate Crime Act and it backfired on the SNP bigtime…it’s on the books but effectively unenforceable. All over Europe we’ve seen the authoritarian governments of rhe left over reach with laws that have brought down their governments..look even if he does win a huge majority.. that means nothing in 2024.. this isn’t 1994.. look what happened to Boris’s 80 seats.. these days even a huge majority can collapse and Labour’s biggest weakness is not only are they.as divided as the Tories, they are also complacent about how angry people are about the assault on their culture… Labour scoff at the ‘culture war’…
Ironically, had Sunak fought his campaign on it he would probably be doing a lot better.
It is a mistake to suppose that the Labour party has overlooked or failed to understand the damage caused by EDI.
The truth is they want to re-educate the public and what better than to force businesses to do it for them. They have already largely converted the public sectior to their woke, leftist ways so if they can force the private sector to do it they will have their fully retrained voters to ensure perpetual socialist nirvana.
Ideology beats Reality, for Ideologs, anyway.
And the Left are Ideologs.
“In this article I want to explore where we go from here in light of a Labour Manifesto which, should the party win power, has serious implications for employers and especially smaller businesses by making the imposition of EDI through the supply chain a statutory requirement. ”
Anyone know what specifically in the manifesto mentions this?
It’s in the bit about procurement reforms. At the moment some public sector pprocurement policies require suppliers to demonstrate that they both have an EDI policy and train their staff. Labour wants to reform procurement law to make this statutory. This is important because once it is in law it will be very difficult to wind it back. There were far more details about this on the Labour website Policy section before it was all deleted last Thursday. We analyzed these policies last week here https://youtu.be/7rOAKvYvX4M?si=mC-TCeSg2O_BJ7xY There’s also a bit about their Union plans which Im.thinking about doing an article on at the end of the week..reading between the lines there is currently a battle between Starmer and the Unions. The now deleted policies had a lot of detail around how the Unions would have access into.smaller businesses and also make it a statutory requirement for businesses to encourage workers to join Unions. There was no mention of exempting small businesses from this which is unusual, because usually there is. Which begs the question: will small businesses be exempt or will hairdressers and pubs be facing off against Shop Stewards? Certainly we know that the Unions have been keen to… Read more »
Thanks. The Union bit could cause a lot of problems, but where I work what really bothers me is the procurement part. We treat our staff pretty well I like to think, so I don’t have major concerns in that area, but we are a smallish supplier to very large clients who will bludgeon us into submission if their compliance departments decide that’s what is needed – and we don’t really have any defence against that. I’m sure lots of my colleagues will be voting Labour, so I will be reminding them of that when they moan about us getting mithered with EDI crap.
We are building out EDI policies and training which will make suppliers compliant without wrecking their employee relations and business.
EDI is abhorrent but we are stuck with it for the foreseeable so it’s important to make sure it doesn’t damage.
The biggest challenge for us at the moment is educating smaller businesses on the danger and consequences of implementation ‘any old EDI’ … most of the avaliable EDI is appalling and WILL cause irreparable damage to relations and productivity.
We are also building out a database of EDI trainers who we would recommend in these circumstances.
[General rule… if they have blue hair don’t book them]
Thanks; as and when this happens I will bear it in mind. If it’s limited to writing some policies nobody looks at, or showing that our existing policies demonstrate our commitment to “equality” then it’s probably not too bad – just a waste of time. Getting external people is much more risky. We are far from inclusive – we only employ clever, hard-working people.
“I’m sure lots of my colleagues will be voting Labour, so I will be reminding them of that when they moan about us getting mithered with EDI crap.”
This♤♤♤
Please do!!
I wouldn’t worry that any of this will come to pass because the spirit of the time is very much in the opposite direction. You can witness that all over Europe, the disinvestment from the ‘green agenda’, the sense that when people feel that it is a matter of survival things like this go out of the window. Certain things that we take for granted like being able to buy the food we need – this isn’t vouchsafed at all especially not in this country. Just look at crop yields. Root vegetables have collapsed because of the extreme wetness in recent months. Whoever takes charge next month won’t be there for long. I am not even sure that a functioning state will be able to continue given the toxic forces that bind it to a toxic destiny. For eighty years it has all been a spectator sport to us, impossible that anything could hit us from overseas given the patronage of the Yanks. It is very difficult to tell someone that this is no longer the case.
I suspect that of Labour win in July there eill be no honeymoon. It will be straight in at the deep end and none of the issues they’ve promised to solve are straightforward.
As for the activists they’ve rooted in the Civil Service and courts, well, experience from the USA and elsewhere suggests that Starmer may have exactly the same problems managing these wreckers as the Tories have. I suspect he will have a tiger by the tail as these aren’t ‘new labour’ activists, they are hard left and they already see Starmer as a traitor.
Latest Poll 18 Jun – People Polling
Reform in 2nd place only 11 points behind Labour
Lab 35%
Reform 24%
The essence of British genius is the fine old art of taking the piss. I think in times of crisis this spirit will exert itself like it is now. That is essentially what is happening everywhere. You can call it the lifting of the veil or the long overdue mockery of the illegitimate. Our leaders are being exposed as the most venal and shallow characters that can be imagined, because of course it requires a personality like that to go along with this. It suggests the end of their reign either way. Establish yourself as the piss-taking capital of the world and you won’t go far wrong.
It’s the invisible chains that they have put on you in the last few decades. People are much more guarded now. Find the invisibile chains, shake them off and then talk from the full depth of your being.
I just sent this article to a family member who is planning to vote Labour but hates EDI. He’s come back and told me he’s checked the Labour manifesto and can’t find reference to EDI anywhere. I’ve had a look and can’t either. I’m sure it’s there somewhere. Anyone got any clues as to where it’s mentioned so I can point him to it?
It’s in their Public sector Procurement policy.
They mention they will make procurement more ‘inclusive’. They deleted all the details from their website the day they published the manifest – those details specifically discuss making workplace EDI statutory.
Ref 1: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tanya-de-grunwald-9717b815_dei-hr-activity-7210973092465049602-toiC?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
But we examined those policies in detail BEFORE Labour deleted them – this is the detail behind their Manifest and how it will impact the workplace
https://youtu.be/7rOAKvYvX4M
I’ve just reached retirement age but I’m continuing to work at a small, privately-owned business based in “the sticks.” The owner is the least PC person I’ve ever come across. I’ll be amazed if they roll out this kind of training since, for a start, she’d have to sack herself. But if they do, that’ll be the day I quit. I work because I want to …. I can give it up, walk away and never look back.
And that’s exactly what I’ll do.
Have we reached the moment when those that don’t belong to any obvious victim group hold up their arms and declare f*** it I admit it I’m a whatever phobic?. Now what happens, the “phobics” don’t know what it is that makes them a phobic and, apart from losing their job,carry on as normal.
White male ,middle class,heterosexual, possibly Christian members of society are the only group who can be discriminated against but isn’t that in itself discrimination?
People – it is VERY important that you do not allow this to be implemented on you in the workplace- unite, speak with your colleagues and resist –
The 1917 Russian Revolution was carried out by a very small number of radical Bolsheviks and hundreds of thousands of ‘Useful Idiot’ liberals who thought they were doing the right thing… within 20 years all those Useful Idiots were either dead or in a Gulag.
It doesn’t take many radicals to destroy a nation, it takes people saying nothing.