Dr. Fauci’s Lieutenant on the Hot Seat
In a moment of rare bipartisan denunciation, Democrat Representative Kweisi Mfume (D-MD) confronted Dr. David Morens, longtime advisor to Dr. Fauci: “Sir, I think you’re going to be haunted by your testimony today.”
Dr. Morens, a senior scientific advisor at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been embroiled in controversy following revelations of his attempts to seemingly conceal embarrassing information about his personal friend and NIH grant recipient, Dr. Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance. Morens’s attempts to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests laid bare yesterday in front of the Select Committee on COVID-19 were eye-opening and disturbing.
Dr. Morens frequently used his personal email to conduct official business, explicitly to avoid FOIA scrutiny. He emailed a colleague in May 2020: “So you and Peter and others should be able to email me on gmail only.”
In other uncovered correspondence, Dr. Morens openly discussed methods to delete federal records to prevent their release under FOIA: “I learned from our FOIA lady here how to make emails disappear after I am FOIAed, but before the search starts, so I think we are all safe. Plus I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to Gmail.”
In one particularly shocking email, Dr. Morens asked Dr. Peter Daszak for monetary reimbursement – specifically a “kickback” – for his assistance in editing EcoHealth Alliance’s grant compliance efforts. Although this allegation has yet to be confirmed, the email reads: “…do I get a kickback???? Too much fooking money!”
Under testimony, Dr. Morens claimed that this was simply “black humor” and “joking” with his friend Peter Daszak – who is now under disbarment from NIH grants following serious mismanagement of grants to his company EcoHealth Alliance.
In addition to Dr. Morens’s FOIA endrun revelations, the emails also contained unprofessional and misogynistic comments. He seemingly disparaged CDC Director Rochelle Walensky attributing her appointment to her sex: “Well, she does wear a skirt…”
Representative Mary Miller-Meeks (R-IO) confronted Dr. Morens on these issues: “You’re trusted with one of the highest positions in government to combat public health crises. And instead of doing your job, you’re too busy worried about avoiding FOIAs and challenging someone’s position because they happen to wear a skirt.”
Morens apologised but seemed to downplay the significance of his comments: “…it was the same snarky, joking stuff”. But Rep. Miller-Meeks was having none of it. She interrupted: “That’s not a snarky joke. That is an underlying behaviour that indicates how you approach women and how you think of women, and it’s disgusting.”
At the heart of the matter is what Dr. Morens was doing to hide information to protect Peter Daszak and even Dr. Fauci from embarrassing revelations of their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In emails, Morens discussed back-channeling information to Dr. Fauci to avoid FOIA requests: “I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him…” Confronted by these emails, Morens dismissed them: “There are some elements of this that I don’t think are being understood.”
Additional emails further reveal Fauci’s involvement in offline communications, potentially undermining U.S. Government operations by assisting Dr. Morens’s efforts to share internal NIH information with Dr. Peter Daszak.
For instance, Dr. Morens shared confidential information marked (For Official Use Only) with Daszak: “Please feel free to share any docs that I’ve sent to you, with Tony. Hopefully, you can do that in a way that avoids FOIA, and if not possible, just show him stuff on screen share on Zoom.”
Dr. Morens and Dr. Fauci have collaborated and co-authored numerous papers and articles over the years but Morens seemed to downplay his relationship with Dr. Fauci: “I never gone out with him to have a beer.”
Representative Michael Cloud (R-TX) read the email regarding the “FOIA lady” instructing him on how to avoid the information requests. Morens objected: “She gave me [no info] about avoiding FOIA.” Cloud pushed back: “So you were lying then but you’re telling us the truth now?” Morens dug deeper: “I was making a joke with Peter, I said something like ‘I have a way to make it go away’ but that was just a euphemism.”
These past few weeks have been busy for the Select Committee of COVID-19, headed by Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R_OH). They have long requested the disbarment of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak from the NIH, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has initiated formal proceedings. The May 15th, 2024 memorandum from HHS underscores the severity of EcoHealth’s compliance failures, emphasising the need for exacting oversight in public health research.
As background to all of this, the ideological framework that Fauci and Morens have consistently promoted over two decades of co-authorship gives some colour commentary on where the stringent pandemic policies originated. Their collaboration began with largely technical papers on infectious diseases, yet over time, their recommendations expanded significantly in ambition.
Their earliest publications together (which started in 2004) seemed to show cautious optimism for tackling infectious diseases without breaching individual rights or governance norms. By 2007, their tone had noticeably shifted. In an article on the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, they warned against complacency and hinted at the necessity for heightened vigilance.
In their 2012 work, ‘The Perpetual Challenge of Infectious Diseases’, they moved even further, declaring eradication – rather than just mitigation – as the new goal, emphasising a radical new approach to managing infectious diseases.
Their evolution was cemented in a 2016 article on the Zika Virus. In it, they posited that human behaviours and modern societal structures were significant contributors to the emergence of diseases.
…in our human-dominated world, urban crowding, constant international travel and other human behaviours combined with human-caused microperturbations in ecologic balance can cause innumerable slumbering infectious agents to emerge unexpectedly. In response, we clearly need to up our game…
The implications of crowds spreading sickness are not new, but the corollary here is that human actions need strict regulation to prevent future outbreaks, a policy evolution that would have significant impacts just four years down the line.
The culmination of these ideas appeared starkly in their widely-cited 2020 Cell Magazine article in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, Fauci and Morens argued for transformative changes in human behaviour and infrastructure to live “in greater harmony with nature”. They contended that human behaviours fundamentally disrupt the “human-microbial status quo”, leading to disease outbreaks.
This article was a watershed, revealing their vision of a restructured society to prevent pandemics – an ideological stance that has drawn criticism for its potentially authoritarian overtones.
Fauci and Morens’s advocacy for “rebuilding the infrastructures of human existence” was more than a scientific proposal; it was a call for a societal overhaul.
They seem to pine for yesteryear without all the hustling and bustling: “Since we cannot return to ancient times, can we at least use lessons from those times to bend modernity in a safer direction?”
Nothing epitomises the U.S. Government’s response to the pandemic like the loaded phrase: “bend modernity in a safer direction”.
Now, with Dr. Morens’s skirting FOIA requests and promoting ways to “[make] it all go away” – the hubris is laid bare for all to see.
The deceitful actions of Drs. Morens, Daszak and Fauci, their evasion of FOIAs and their backroom dealings have severely undermined public trust. As these revelations come to light, it is crucial for us to demand greater transparency and integrity from our public health officials. Only then can we restore faith in our health institutions and ensure they truly serve the public good.
Justin Hart is an executive consultant with over 25 years experience creating data-driven solutions for Fortune 500 companies and Presidential campaigns alike. Mr. Hart is the Chief Data Analyst and founder of RationalGround.com which helps companies, public policy officials and even parents gauge the impact of COVID-19 across the United States. This article was first published by the Brownstone Institute.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This reminds me of the Climategate emails. Are they still around somewhere on the internet, in a searchable database?
All just an unfortunate cockup – anyone who thinks that “Covid” was largely a conspiracy or series of related conspiracies is clearly a nut job who gives a bad name to sensible sceptics.
It has seemed to me for a good while that one or more bodies in the US had a much bigger hand in the “reaction” to “Covid” than they are letting on
I’ve met this sort of “cock-up” a couple of times in the past, once personally involved, once as a by-stander, though not on this scale. In both cases the damage done to the members of the public was not the original mistake, partly excusable, but the attempts (initially successful) made by the miscreants to cover up the original mistake by diverting attention, appealing to “experts”, ascribing it to an earlier regime, waiting for the actors to die, or simply “losing” the documentation and emails. It’s very familiar territory, but it takes a long time for the truth to come out.
Indeed
Whatever one believes about how it started, one surely can’t believe that there has not been a huge conspiracy to cover up things people would rather remain unknown to the wider public
What they were discussing in 2012 sounds much like the Rockefeller Lockstep document around 2010 I recall.
“in greater harmony with nature”……Very similar to the, now demolished. Georgia Guide Stones.
Nah, you are all confused Ron. Rockefeller Lockstop 2010 was just fiction. The fact that much that was in it is now playing out is Pure coincidence.
“it is crucial for us to demand greater transparency and integrity from our public health officials. Only then can we restore faith in our health institutions and ensure they truly serve the public good.”
Certainly for people posting here that boat sailed three years ago. Trust in health institutions and indeed institutions linked to the state even remotely has gone for good.
Indeed it seems implausible that this kind of thing was a one off anomaly and not habitual behaviour. This time they got drunk on their own success and pushed it too far and slowly but surely are getting caught out. I don’t believe there will be a proper reckoning in our lifetimes but I think many know that something is not quite right.
“Restore faith in our health institutions……”
Dream on Sunshine: there is now a sizeable minority, in all the Covid lockdown terrorised nations, who will never trust them again, let alone Big Pharma.
Next week Fauci will be in the hot seat.
hopefully he will be provided with a lie detector and won’t be allowed to say ‘I do not recall’..
Regardless of what he says, he will climb back into his chauffeur driven tax payer funded limo, to return to one of his Pharma funded homes, with the tax payer funded security detail. Nothing will change for him, he is part of the protected and untouchable Governing class.
What is the point of these inquiries? This one has exposed the absolute corruption of Fauci and co, who through their own hubris and deceit created the 3 years of horror of the plandemic and which has resulted in deaths, injuries, and continuing impacts upon the lives of millions, they ruined an economy and trust, and yet? what will happen to these individuals as a result of this exposure? So a Government contract has been taken away from one of them, he still made millions, whilst ruining millions of people, Fauci still has a tax payer funded chauffeur, security and a lifestyle the envy of ordinary Americans who fund it. The only solution and the Just solution, is for these men and women to be prosecuted as the criminals they are, and to have them subjected to the highest penalty. They caused terrible things to happen, if trust in institutions is to be returned then people must see that such frankly wicked behaviour is severely punished, such that it is a deterrant to others in future. Otherwise all these meetings are doing is demonstrating that those in the public and health sector can literally get away with murder.