News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
1 year ago

For the benefit of everyone and specifically those asking yesterday, above the “you are logged in as” legend immediately above the comments there is a subscribe option to get email notifications when comments are added, and also when you reply next to the reply input box there is a notify icon which used to send you an email when someone replied to that comment- until it seemed to stop working.

I find it useful- it allows a dialogue without having to recheck pages you’ve already read – and dialogue is what this site is about, for me.

Marcus Aurelius knew

Thanks, tof, I never noticed this functionality! Wanted it for ages for all the reasons you give. Will see if it works for me.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago

Does it work for you?

Marcus Aurelius knew

Nope. No emails.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago

Thanks – I will chase Will. The comments section on this site is pretty moribund, present company excepted. We get more comments in a day on the little subreddit that formed when the current at the time set of BTL commenters fled from the “toxic swamp” back in the day. I think this feature might help to keep it alive.

GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago

Good to know, thanks ToF. I’ve been using this site since they upgraded it and never noticed this.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/integrate-but-dont-assimilate-how-muslims-follow-orders/

This is the real problem. The solution, until we have these ingratiates under control is to ban islam. So probably forever otherwise it will be sectarian mayhem.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Cracking article, hux. Nails it 100%. As we know, it’s all about the conquering. It’s in their DNA. Why else would they be making such efforts to bring into a once free and democratic, predominantly Christian society a repressive, archaic, patriarchal culture and set of values that hasn’t changed ( albeit now with fire arms and explosives ) in 1400 years? They’d leave that sh*t back in the Muslim lands, if they were truly to embrace the freedoms that a Western society provides, would they not? Nobody’s asking them to start celebrating Christmas but their ultimate objective is to form an Islamic State and live under Sharia and if you don’t like it you can live in complete subjugation as a dhimmi. This is why I keep referring to the so-called ‘moderates’ and where does their loyalty lie. The protests commencing the Oct 7th attack in Israel provides a decent insight. Six months on and I’ve given up looking for a banner that calls for the freeing of the hostages or ”Free Palestine from Hamas”, because they obviously don’t exist. We know what these people are about, they’ve made no secret of their attitude towards Israel or the West. Six+… Read more »

DHJ
DHJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

“It’s in their DNA.”

Except for those apostates-turned-social-media-influencers that provide a supposedly authoritative source of quotes and critiques of Islam?

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Terrific Mogs 👍

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/macrons-headlong-plunge-into-mayhem/

According to this account by Richard Ings at TCW France is now in the pre civil war phase.

What’s your view MAk?

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Covid Jab Link To Heart Deaths – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, including your local Reform Party candidate, your local vicar, online media and friends online.

We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

9b-Covid-Jab-Link-To-Heart-Deaths-MONOCHROME-copy
Mogwai
1 year ago

Can’t disagree with Stan Robinson here; ”Mad As A Nation. Great Britain is changing beyond recognition. The country that once stood as a beacon of stability, cultural heritage, and cohesive identity is now being torn apart by unchecked immigration and the relentless march of multiculturalism. It is time we faced this harsh reality with the seriousness it demands. Student visas have become an unchecked gateway, allowing thousands to enter the country under the guise of education, only to overstay their welcome and contribute to the burgeoning pressures on our public services. It is not xenophobic to suggest that we severely restrict these visas; it is a matter of national interest. Our universities, once the pride of the nation, now too often serve as mere stepping stones for those with no intention of returning home. The issue of illegal immigration is even more pressing. Our borders, once robust, have become permeable, allowing a steady influx of individuals who flout our laws and exploit our welfare system. The sentimentality that has paralysed our response to this crisis must be set aside. Deporting those who have entered illegally is not only a legal necessity but a moral imperative. It sends a clear message… Read more »

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

He’s right but I have never needed convincing.

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Monday Morning Maidenhead Road, Forest Road Three Legged Cross, Warfield, Bracknell

401
Mogwai
1 year ago

Did we really need further confirmation of just how disgusting, corrupt and terrorist-sympathizing the UN is? Not really, but here’s more evidence anyway;

https://x.com/JakeWSimons/status/1792580527481819318

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

10 reasons why this evil, mass-murdering PoS was referred to as ‘The Butcher of Tehran’. But this is what the UN approve of, seemingly. Sick, twisted Mother Hubbards. What next? A minutes silence on the anniversary of Hitler’s death?

https://www.businesstoday.in/visualstories/news/a-mass-murderer-10-reasons-why-iranian-president-ebrahim-raisi-is-called-the-butcher-of-tehran-137202-20-05-2024

DHJ
DHJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

It’s the UN Security Council and they will be following protocol. To not do so, particularly now, may have diplomatic consequences.

However, the permanent members of the Council have quite a combined history of violence so maybe they’re paying honour to the passing of a kindred spirit.

Monro
1 year ago

King Charles in crosshairs as African leaders fight hunting ban

Yet another example of how hopelessly muddled, dim, the social media classes are.

Incapable of reading or writing anything longer than two sentences, their superficial, facile, view of the world cannot comprehend the notion of rural villages populated by subsistence farmers for whom a giant betusked elephant is not a jolly pink jumbo with fairy wings. That thought, any thinking at all really, simply causes their tiny little heads, pea brains to explode.

The only people who can protect threatened wildlife are those who live alongside them; and they will only protect those creatures if they themselves are permitted to protect themselves from the worst excesses of local over-populations of certain species.

That means trophy hunting. If we want to help developing nations, particularly those that have helped us in the recent past, then we must listen to them.

If the Commonwealth has a role, that surely is it.

Monro
1 year ago

A chilling cover-up’ – nine key findings from the infected blood inquiry Ministers’ refusal to own up to failings “served to compound people’s suffering” Victims’ suffering was compounded by the lack of a meaningful apology, and a cover-up culture in the NHS and the government. Ministers “cruelly” repeated the line from Margaret Thatcher in 1989 that “they had received the best treatment available” and therefore compensation was not required. Langstaff criticised the government response as characterised by “a lack of transparency and candour” and “groupthink” among civil servants and ministers over decades. This was “damaging to the public interest”.  He also warned of the “slow and protracted nature” of government decision-making.  The report confirms there was a government cover-up of the scandal, not in the sense of an orchestrated conspiracy, but rather “to save face and to save expense”. This included the “deliberate destruction of documents of relevance”. There was a “defensive closing of ranks” within the NHS.  A COVER UP CULTURE IN THE NHS; GROUPTHINK AMONG CIVIL SERVANTS AND MINISTERS OVER DECADES. The culture within the ranks of senior administrators within the NHS and Whitehall is now, by any measure, a national disgrace: Socialist Fascism, about which many of… Read more »

DHJ
DHJ
1 year ago

This might have been mentioned already but Zelensky’s term expired yesterday. He’s reverted to pretending to be a President.

https://inews.co.uk/news/world/zelensky-crisis-term-ends-public-trust-3065148

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  DHJ

And they call the recently re-elected Putin a dictator!

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  DHJ

Of course, Kremlin propagandists will do their best to amplify questions about Zelensky’s legitimacy. The narrative is an obvious one: Russian President Vladimir Putin was elected for a fifth term in Russia’s March presidential vote, while Zelensky canceled Ukraine’s elections. The fact that Russian elections are a sham is a minor detail in such narratives.’

Carnegie Endowment 03 Apr 2024

Ruslan Stefanchuk, the current Ukrainian parliamentary speaker, has already publicly confirmed, under Article 108 of the Ukrainian Constitution, that Zelensky will be acting president until elections take place.

According to a February poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 69 percent of Ukrainians want Zelensky to continue as president until martial law is lifted.

DHJ
DHJ
1 year ago

“Either you believe in freedom of speech for views you dislike, or you don’t believe in freedom of speech.”

https://staging.dailysceptic.org/2024/03/29/are-we-being-gaslit-over-the-cause-of-the-princess-of-waless-cancer

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  DHJ

Relentless public harassment of someone else’s daughter, wife or mother about her private medical details is not “Freedom of Speech”, you blithering idiot!

It is Relentless Harassment, with no other object than to satisfy your own Ghoulish Curiosity.

Now, aren’t you grateful to The Daily Sceptic for not publishing details of YOUR OWN PRIVATE MEDICAL PROBLEMS?

“But, but, but… Why can’t we all discuss YOUR own medical problems?” we all whine pathetically…”You must be gaslighting us to refuse! We’re all going to lie down on the floor, kicking and screaming, and then hold our breath till we turn blue, unless you let us discuss your own private medical details. And then we’ll keep harping on about it for years afterward, like a gang of obsessive stalkers.”

Isn’t it “our right”, as you repeatedly insist it is your “right” to poke your grotesquely swollen, bulbous, bloodshot olfactory appendage into someone else’s private medical details?

You’re like some querulous old nag, and a stultifying bore to boot, stalking The Princess of Wales.

Give it a rest, will you?

DHJ
DHJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

The article in question speculating on her medical problems is still available on this free speech promoting website. I’m not sure I commented on it as I was travelling that day but I did read some of the initial comments which did not seem to match your description.

My only concern is the censorship of the entire comments section. The fact the article is about a Windsor is of no interest to me but for all I know, might have been of significance to whoever decided to remove the comments.

A previous criticism I raised when my own comments on an unrelated article were removed was resolved and the comments re-instated.

People kept harping on about infected blood for decades, COVID vaccines have now racked-up a few years of “kicking and screaming”. If there had been less censorship and more transparency, how different things might have been.

stewart
1 year ago

Well done JRM for calling for a US style first amendment in the UK. I couldn’t agree more.

(As long as it’s properly worded and not twisted around like every other law in this country to keep power firmly in the hands of established power and bureaucrats.)

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

I think the below neatly sums up the direction of travel. They invited comments on the proposals which I responded to. Every single proposed right is littered with caveats making them utterly worthless. US First Amendment in full: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Proposed UK Bill of Rights (introduced in 2022, currently dormant) Article 10 Freedom of expression 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises. 2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder… Read more »

transmissionofflame
1 year ago

Regarding the barrister wig business from a few days ago, RW posted an anecdote about someone from school with frizzy hair, presumably not a person of African origin, who ended up with an “Afro” hairstyle if he didn’t cut it. It occurred to me at the time that RW’s great friends the Americans have an answer for this – it’s called “Disparate Impact”: Disparate impact – Wikipedia You don’t have to prove deliberate discrimination, just that whatever rules you have are disparately impacting whatever group(s) you are trying to favour.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

Who runs Iran now? What happens when a president dies in office
Presidents don’t run Iran. “The Supreme Leader” does.

“As of 2024, then-President Raisi and The Supreme Leader Khamenei’s son Mojtaba had been considered frontrunners for the position.” So was it Mojtaba who eliminated his only rival?

They got rid of the Shah, their hereditary monarchy, and are installing a hereditary monarchy of their own. A “dynasty”, just like the monstrous Kim family in North Korea.

The West must strike now, and collapse the Iranian regime
No, The West must take care of its own people.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

The West must strike now, and collapse the Iranian regime” – The Iranian people long for freedom and democracy. We should take this opportunity to liberate them, write Mark Wallace and Kasra Aarabi in the Telegraph.”

Kasra Aarabi is an analyst with…

THE TONY BLAIR INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL CHANGE.

So yes, we should all leap into war, because Tony Blair says so. Again. Really.