African Wildcats Roamed Inside the Arctic Circle Just 9,000 Years Ago at Temperatures That Were 5°C Warmer Than Today

Astonishing finds by a group of Scandinavian scientists have placed a number of animal species living north of the Arctic Circle 9,000 years ago including African wildcats, dogs and frogs. The area in northern Norway is much further north than where these wild animals would survive today and indicates, yet again, that temperatures in what is known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum (HTM) were much warmer than today. And of course it makes a nonsense of climate alarmists’ claims that current temperatures are higher than periods going back thousands if not millions of years.

The scientists analysed the DNA bone fragments found in the sealed high-latitude Storsteinhola cave system. The DNA record stretches over a substantial period of climate warming, at a time when carbon dioxide levels were at dangerously low levels of around 260 parts per million, from around 13,000 to 5,000 years ago. Other scientists have also found proxy evidence that suggests temperatures may have risen around 5°C during this period to levels much higher than today. The science blog No Tricks Zone recently noted scientific findings that suggested the early Holocene was so warm that 10,000 years ago, boreal forests expanded northwards to Arctic regions in places that are today too cold to support anything but tundra.

The Scandinavian scientists identified species with expanded northern ranges “far outside their current geographic distribution”. The identification of African wildcats is said to be ”remarkable” and the researchers go out of their way to dismiss an explanation based on human presence. The sites show no evidence of human activity, and the introduction of domestic cats into Fennoscandia is said to date to the Late Roman Iron Age. The finding of wildcat remains is said to be the “highest latitude location for this species ever”.

No Tricks Zone has also commented on the findings of this paper, noting that wildcat species became extinct in northern Europe after the HTM ended, and “snow cover increased above the wildcat threshold of 20cm over a 100-day period”. Dogs (wolves), ducks, geese, prairie chickens, gulls, brown bear and several species of frogs also found the Arctic climate in northern Norway warm enough to reside there during the period. Amberjacks (Seriola) – a fish species only found in temperate to tropical Pacific and Atlantic waters (Gulf of Mexico, Brazil) today – also lived north of the Arctic circle during the early Holocene, notes the blog.

Findings such as this no longer have a place in mainstream media, since they detract from the political fearmongering driving Net Zero. As regular readers know, the Daily Sceptic often points out that the tragedy of politicised ‘settled’ science is that diverse opinions and large areas of inquiry and knowledge are out-of-bounds in both political and media discourse. But climate has always been driven by natural cyclical variation, whether it be long-term orbital changes, or any number of short-term movements. All of this must be put to one side these days to promote the idea that most if not all changes in the weather and climate are caused by humans burning hydrocarbons. Every bad weather event is cue for hysterical warnings of climate Armageddon. Whenever the Arctic or Antarctic sea grows, or coral accumulates in record amounts on the Great Barrier Reef, the scare is quietly dropped, until a propitious, if natural, melt or bleach takes place. Then the whole racket roars back into action again.

The Arctic sea ice has always waxed and waned, whether it be the massive lifting of the ice sheets in the early Holocene, or the more modest cyclical rises and falls seen today. There is always a risk of attracting an allegation of ‘cherry-picking’ from a silly Reuters ‘fact check’, but we can report on the current pattern. The latest April sea ice figures from the U.S.-based National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) show that the current cyclical rise continues. The sea ice extent in April was only the 16th lowest extent recorded since modern satellite records began in 1979. In fact, the month had the highest sea ice extent for the month in 12 years.

The significant April recovery, replicated in the annual record, can be clearly seen with a large upturn since 2020. But on a moving average of four years, the recovery dates back at least 10 years. The year 1979 started the modern record and was a high point for Arctic sea ice extent, with much lower levels recorded back to the 1950s and beyond. The NSIDC continues to draw a linear line downwards from this point, a ‘cherry pick’ that seems to escape all known mainstream fact checkers

Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, another wall of silence greets the news of the current Antarctic sea ice extent. The latest figures, not to be broadcast out loud, show that in April, the month of most rapid growth, the sea ice grew significantly above the average rate between 1981-2010.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
varmint
1 year ago

If this study had been done any time prior to 2009 then the Climategate emails would have revealed the global warming establishment at the CRU in East Anglia and their friends across the Atlantic seeking ways to discredit and silence the authors of the study. They would have threatened editors of journals who dared to publish it. They would have been emailing each other not to communicate or reveal any data that might even remotely confirm some of its findings, and the authors of the study would have been name called as “deniers” ——–This is how the climate change “scientists” funded by government conduct their business. They do what Mann did with his Hockey Stick Graph and refuse to provide data, methodology or computer code so others can check the work. This is what has become of science when government agenda’s like Sustainable Development and Net Zero are at stake. The gatekeepers of climate and temperature data keep from the public the true state of the climate for political purposes.

Steve-Devon
1 year ago

Net-Zero – A Dangerous Cult I looked up some references as to what constitutes a cult, this one give 10 characteristics of a cult; https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-cult-5078234 It seems to me that the net-zero enthusiasts are well and truly into the dangerous cult scenario. Just as with the Emperor’s new clothes fairy tale, once you have been following an extreme idea it is very hard to admit you got it wrong, the more so when your cult belief is tied up with money and power. The net-zero cult also seems to tie into the propensity that many people have to believe that we are all sinners and must repent, we must be guilty of something, we must suffer and make sacrifices. What will it take to end this Net-Zero cult, much as facts, as per this article are useful, they alone will not do it. I think that as the immiseration of the hoi-polloi that is so much a part of Net-Zero starts to kick in, it will cause many people to question the agenda. Time for us all to pick up on the old Louis Armstrong song and just accept it’s all OK. I see trees of green Red roses too… Read more »

varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

The DS is not read widely enough for its articles by the likes of Chris Morrison to change the minds of the general public. This would only have a chance of happening if the climate change narrative was questioned and investigated thoroughly and with no bias on mainstream news where I understand that 70% of people get their news from BBC. But ofcourse BBC are simply climate change activists who question or investigate nothing, and the public have a tendency to want to be part of the herd. They are reluctant to question things that they have come to think of as established facts. They think it is all about science and since scientists know more than them they don’t want to make a fool of themselves. I know this from having seen the reaction from friends and family when the issue of climate comes up. Propaganda is a very powerful tool. It puts an idea in people’s head that is very difficult to shift. Even when you present them with facts they will stare at you like you are from Mars.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  varmint

I continue to believe that sites like this has some ‘up stream’ impact. That is, some journalists at papers like the Telegraph might read it, and it might then have an impact on the types of articles that appear on their websites.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

I am not sure the DT is reliable. If it and the Speccie were all we had to rely on we would be doomed.

I trust the DS servers are located and managed and IP is owned outside the UK otherwise it may all be deleted on orders from a future energy minister.

varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

“some impact” YES. ——–But ask all of your friends and family if they have even heard of the Dail Sceptic, and you will lucky to get a score of 2%

10navigator
10navigator
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Years ago Steve, I too checked the definition of a ‘cult’. I found the 17 (as I recall) characteristics of a cult described Islam to a tee.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago

So now we have to worry about wildcats too?!

Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

Keep your chickens locked up.

Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
1 year ago

The warmists will argue that the HTM saw gradual warming over thousands of years which allowed time for fauna and flora to adapt whereas the current rate of change is much faster.

varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

Except 1 C since 1860 is not very fast, and temperature has changed many times over such periods. It is not at all unprecedented. But another crucial thing to remember is that half of that warming occurred before humans were emitting much in the way of CO2 as industrialisation was limited to only a couple of countries. It was only after world war two that humans could have caused some warming with our emissions in the period economists call the Post war Economic Boom, where goods like washing machines, fridges, cars etc etc started to be manufactured for global markets and people in their millions started to drive vehicles and fly in aeroplanes. So the true temperature rise that can be attributed to human activity is only 0.5C since 1860. And that assumes that natural variability played no part.

RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

Thousands of years is far to little time for large/ complex animals and plants with correspondingly long generational cycles to adapt, ie, incrementally mutate into different species, to anything. The Bronze Age was thousands of years ago. But the people living then, or, for that matter, a few hundredthousands of years earlier, belonged to the same species as we do.

7941MHKB
7941MHKB
1 year ago
Reply to  RW

But, but, Justin Lowrat was pitying the cruel fate of poor little barnacles lurking under rocks in the Menai straights, just a week ago.

Poor little blighters subjected to a one degree rise in sea temperature (he claimed), in only 70 years!

Imagine their distress! They can’t move!

So, instead of sending your money to provide new donkeys to cruel and abusive donkey drivers in some North African or Middle Eastern shithole, send the money to me! I’ll organise a team of the donkey driver’s chums to fan the Welsh barnacles! Simple!

7941MHKB
7941MHKB
1 year ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

Actually, no-one can honestly claim to know what the climatic “rate of change” was, more than a few hundred years ago.

The various “proxy” studies typically have resolutions ranging from decades to centuries.

Compare and contrast with MET / BBC / HMG “record” temperature, boasted to be accurate to tenths of a degree C., and lasting a minute. (Class 4 observation – accurate to +/- 2 degrees – at Coningsby whilst three Tornado jets were circulating immediately adjacent.)

I suppose if your career is lying for the Uniparty’s gormless, venal and malicious politicians and their Billionaire funders, no lie is too ridiculous.

Ron Smith
Ron Smith
1 year ago

Ben Leo talking with JSO….”Why don’t you protest in China”….I concentrate on here in UK, you can feel free to go, Ben says I don’t need to protest there because I’m not a deranged climate activist LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2lUBVMQJqo

Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
1 year ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

JSO don’t need to “disrupt” in China because they already have communism there.

Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
1 year ago

Keep going Chris. Time you appeared up against the deranged Jim Dale.