Scientists Tried to Reinfect People With Covid – and Failed

Scientists tried to reinfect people with Covid but found it impossible, even when they ramped up the dose 10,000-fold, according to the latest results from the Covid challenge trials. Nature has the details.

When Paul Zimmer-Harwood volunteered to be intentionally infected with SARS-CoV-2, he wasn’t sure what to expect. He was ready for a repeat of his first brush with COVID-19, through a naturally acquired infection that gave him influenza-like symptoms. But he hoped his immunity would help him feel well enough to use the indoor bicycle trainer that he had brought into quarantine.

It turned out that Zimmer-Harwood, a PhD student at University of Oxford, UK, had nothing to worry about. Neither he nor any of the 35 other people who participated in the ‘challenge’ trial actually got COVID-19.

The study’s results, published on May 1st in Lancet Microbe, raise questions about the usefulness of COVID-19 challenge trials for testing vaccines, drugs and other therapeutics. “If you can’t get people infected, then you can’t test those things,” says Tom Peacock, a virologist at Imperial College London. Viral strains used in challenge trials take many months to produce, making it impossible to match emerging circulating variants that can overcome high levels of existing immunity in populations.

Researchers use challenge trials to understand infections and quickly test vaccines and therapies. In March 2021, after months of ethical debate, UK researchers launched the world’s first COVID-19 challenge trial. The study identified a minuscule dose of the SARS-CoV-2 strain that circulated in the early days of the pandemic that could infect about half of the participants, who had not previously been infected with the virus (at that time, vaccines weren’t yet widely available). [Read the Daily Sceptic write-up of the study here.]

In parallel, a team led by Helen McShane, an infectious-disease researcher at Oxford, launched a second SARS-CoV-2 challenge study in people — including Zimmer-Harwood — who had recovered from naturally caught SARS-CoV-2 infections, caused by a range of variants. The trial later enrolled participants who had also been vaccinated.

The first participants got the same tiny dose of the ‘ancestral’ SARS-CoV-2 strain as did those in the first trial. When nobody developed a sustained infection, the researchers increased the dose by more and more in subsequent groups of participants, until they reached a level 10,000 times the initial dose. A few volunteers developed short-lived infections, but these quickly vanished.

Worth reading in full.

Despite this immunity to the old strains, nearly 40% of the participants reported an Omicron infection after being released from quarantine by December 2022 (and one even reported getting it twice).

The upshot? Natural immunity is extremely robust – even more robust than has previously been suggested – but new variants can appear that evade it with relative ease. We’d kind of figured that out, but it’s good to have it experimentally confirmed.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
1 year ago

Just like the Spanish Flu experiments over 100 years ago.
Just like the UK Common Cold Unit’s experiments, curtailed after zero success.- in curing a cold.
The human being has a pretty good immune system, as evidenced by the fact that we’re still here, despite the interventions of Bigpharma.

Traditonal vaccines are bad enough –

http://vaccinepapers.org/

But mRNA gene tec “vaccines” are far worse.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Take an aspirin. It helps clear up a cold in seven days. Untreated it could take all week.

bertieboy
bertieboy
1 year ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Thanks for another interesting link. In the Hope-Simpson studies on Influenza it appears that one of the things that raised questions for the researchers was the apparent low secondary attack rate of the virus. Reminded me of the Diamond Princess cruise ship (2020) where the same thing was observed.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
1 year ago
Reply to  bertieboy

Yes indeed, and that floating petri dish aka the Diamond Princess yielded vitally inportant information as to the case fatality rate, infection rate, secondary attack rate etc of the emergant “Novel New and Deadly” virus.
But proper knowledgeable experts were ignored when from studying the data they stated that the CFR was just similar to a bad Flu.
Can’t think why they were ignored….

“The Transmission Riddle” is excellent, by Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghen from their TRUST THE EVIDENCE substack.

One thing’s for sure, Germ Theory needs some serious modification.

bertieboy
bertieboy
1 year ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

👍👍

Maisysgreat
Maisysgreat
1 year ago
Reply to  bertieboy

Mentioning the first outbreak on the cruise ship reminded me that the latest 5G network had been installed there for the first time on such a ship, I understand. Can anyone give me information concerning this please?

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Note that the article in Nature concludes that scientists will have to try harder to find a reliable way of infecting volunteers in challenge studies in order to research treatments and vaccines. They stop short of the obvious conclusion that there’s no need to research treatments and vaccines – natural immunity has it covered.

Whomakesthisstuffup
Whomakesthisstuffup
1 year ago

In other news, it has been observed that bears sh*t in the woods

Epi
Epi
1 year ago

And Queen Victoria’s dead.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
1 year ago

Each pathogen or malaise belongs to a moment it can never be recreated. They do not understand the nature of this evil, even those who were instrumental in propagating it. It is way beyond any tools that we have to be able to offer a subtle description of it. Nonentheless the hubris persists in the idea that reality is reducible to number and temporality. The last couple of years have started to shatter this with human beings discovering much greater subtlety of mind and even the allowance that there might be spirit. A decree issued in the 9th century at the council of Constaninople where they said that there is God and soul and that spirit belongs soully to the clergy. Out time represents a rediscovery of the realm of the spirit. There is nothing without it hence the fact that we have been lame for so long.

Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
1 year ago

Of course natural immunity is robust. One of the many things that they lied about.

steveandrews
steveandrews
1 year ago

Our understanding of the transmission of respiratory viruses is woefully inadequate. An analogous study was performed in 1918-19 during the flu pandemic: quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/idx/f/flu/3750flu.0016.573/1/–experiments-upon-volunteers-to-determine-the-cause-and-mode?rgn=subject;view=image;q1=virology
Please see my Substack page if you are interested in exploring this further; Stephen938