News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Net Zero Kills Freedom Brings Poverty – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, including your local Reform Party candidate, your local vicar, media and friends online.

07b-Net-Zero-Kills-Freedom-Brings-Poverty-MONOCHROME-copy
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Wednesday Morning Eversley Road & Langley Common Road Arborfield, Wokingham

Saturday 20th April 7pm
Freedom Drinks
Belgian Arms
Holyport St
(off A330 Ascot Rd) Holyport
Maidenhead SL6 2JR

201
Steve-Devon
2 years ago

Gloomy Commentaries on Ukraine We seem to be seeing some gloomy commentaries appearing regarding the situation in Ukraine. https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/america%E2%80%99s-stark-choice-ukraine-and-cost-letting-russia-win https://www.politico.eu/article/why-ukraine-losing-russia-war/ Both of these articles are, I guess, to some extent aimed at the current USA debate on aid to Ukraine. Given all the other current demands for bombs, bullets and missiles around the world, is it possible to supply Ukraine with the weapons needed in time to make any difference? The Institute for War article presents 2 options and boldly states there is no third option. They seem to rule out any possibility of discussions, negotiations and a settlement. I know some on here think I am naive for still thinking that a settlement is possible but I do. Can we trust Putin, no of course not but there again can we trust anyone? The question is can we construct a settlement with terms and conditions that will operate to hold that deal? I think it is possible. Putin has worked hard to balance his Ukraine war efforts with maintaining some semblance of normal domestic life in Russia, if he had any doubts before? he now knows for real how hard it is to pull of this balancing act and… Read more »

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Of course Putin would settle for a deal…….today…….and then, tomorrow…..deja vu (2014) all over again (2022)………. He had a deal in 2014…..he chose war again in 2022…..and the peace ship sailed…… This is why: ‘…..the Presidential Directorate for Cross-Border Cooperation, a subdivision of Putin’s Presidential Administration…….was established five years ago. The rather innocuously named directorate’s actual task is to exert control over neighboring countries that Russia sees as in its sphere of influence: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova.’ ‘While the 9th Directorate of the FSB’s Fifth Service Department for Operational Information prepared for the occupation of Ukraine from July 2021, the 11th Unit of the Department for Operational Information, responsible for Moldova, was assessing plans for the next round of operations under the direction of Major General Dmitry Milyutin. In November 2020, the FSB’s strategic objective in Moldova was to bring about ‘The full restoration of the strategic partnership between Moldova and the Russian Federation’. FSB Outline of Operational Aims and Means, 21 November 2021. We cannot see this matter clearly from the safety of a country thousands of miles away protected by a nuclear deterrent (nuclear disarmament anyone?……tumbleweed). So we must take our lead from those with borders with… Read more »

Steve-Devon
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

And so what in your view should happen now? Or more to the point, what is it now possible to do?

Is it actually possible to supply Ukraine with the armaments they would need in the time scale they would need them, in order to hold or even take back territory?

Or do you think NATO should go into Ukraine and take direct action?

OK for sure Russia and Putin may have all sorts of weird and preposterous ambitions, don’t we all? but as another person once said ”you can’t always get what you want”. The trick would be to settle with Russia in a way that puts all these ancient aspirations well back on the back burner. Russia owes it current stronger than expected position to alliances with other states. A peace deal that sticks may need to include some involvement with these other countries with whom Russia is in alliance and who may well want to see the end of war in Europe.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

The U.S. will supply Ukraine. The war will go on.

NATO will not go anywhere near it…this is, effectively, a soviet civil war.

Russia, ‘The Russian Federation’, ‘The Union State’ seeks to become the USSR all over again; a world superpower.

All its ‘alliances’ are expedient measures towards that end.

Any ‘end of war in Europe’ will be an expedient measure towards that end.

We know what to do. We have done it before: 1945-1990 (‘The Long Peace’)

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

OK Give us a clue. What will the US supply Ukraine with and who will Ukraine get to use it?
I am also puzzled by your use of “soviet” which relates to local governing councils elected by the workers.

Monro
2 years ago

Be careful, buddy:

‘Russian blogger Anastasia Ivleyeva, has been charged with discrediting Russia’s armed forces and will face a hearing on April 25 at Moscow’s Tver district court.’

$20 billion Replenishment of the U.S. military with weapons and equipment provided to Ukraine from Defense Department inventory.

$14 billion For Ukraine to purchase weapons and equipment from U.S. firms.

$15 billion U.S. support including military training, intelligence sharing, increased presence in Eastern Europe, and other activities.

$8 billion Direct budget support for Ukraine.

$3.2 billion $1.6 billion for economic development, $1.6 billion to bolster air and maritime defences in and around Ukraine

‘Soviet: The people and especially the leaders of the USSR’

Cambridge Dictionary

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Do bear in mind that The Institute for War, the organisation behind the Understanding War website is identified as vehemently hawkish and anti-Russian, funded by elements of the MIC such as Raytheon, General Dynamics, etc. This is a fair assessment of the site from 2022, and it is no surprise to see Victoria ‘f*ck the EU’ Nuland’s name mentioned: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/06/12/a-case-study-in-american-propaganda/ It opens with this joke: A Russian is on an airliner heading to the US, and the American in the seat next to him asks, “So what brings you to the US?” The Russian replies, “I’m studying the American approach to propaganda.” The American says, “What propaganda?” The Russian says, “That’s what I mean.” … So are you ready for my big reveals about glaring bias in ISW analysis? There aren’t any! That’s part of my point: The bias imparted by ISW is subtle. Its incremental effects are barely perceptible, but they add up over time. And what they add up to, basically, is The War According to Our Side. Little shadings here and there create more or less the picture of the war that the Ukrainian government is trying to present. (I think it has become considerably more overt… Read more »

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

Here’s an example of ISW biased reporting. Pay no attention:

‘The US House of Representatives filed a supplemental appropriations bill on April 17 that would provide roughly $60 billion of assistance to Ukraine, and will reportedly vote on the measure on April 20. The supplemental appropriations bill largely resembles a previous supplemental bill passed by the US Senate and would offer Ukraine $48.3 billion in security assistance: $23.2 billion for replenishing weapons and equipment from the US Department of Defense (DoD) inventory; $13.8 billion for the purchase of weapons and munitions for Ukraine from US manufacturers; and $11.3 billion for continued US support to Ukraine through ongoing US military operations in the region. The overwhelming majority of the proposed assistance for Ukraine, if passed, would go to American companies and US and allied militaries.’

Mogwai
2 years ago

WTF is this?? 😮 We need an actual source and I didn’t listen to the Andrew Bridgen interview, so does anyone else know if this is true?

”Andrew reveals his worst fears that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair is set to replace Klaus Schwab as the high priest of the #WEF. Blair has lusted after such a role in world governance for decades, now is his chance.”

https://twitter.com/HerdImmunity12/status/1780658703739261318

Just Stop it Now
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Nooo………!!

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Bliar! Oh, FFS!

Mogwai
2 years ago

Anyone in Liverpool? You’ve now got a Muslim mayor. Expect Khant-style changes coming your way. The thing that’s missing though, that I’d be really interested in knowing, is the ‘why?’

https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1780498283913158896

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Bloody traitor.

Free Lemming
2 years ago

“Young men are being left behind in the battle of the sexes” – Improving the lot of women was not intended to be at the expense of men, says Helena Morrissey in the Telegraph.

Well, Helena, let’s say I have two vintage cars, and one appears to have a little more rust than the other. I then decide to concentrate 100% of my time on improving that car whilst watching the other car fall into a state of disrepair. Now, if I don’t just watch the other car deteriorate, but, in fact, take a lump hammer to that car, then I absolutely intend my attention to be at the expense of the other car. Perhaps, some years later, I’ll then reflect on the possibility that what I did was an act of incredible self-harm and try to banish the memory of myself with lump hammer in hand.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
2 years ago

My idea for defeating Russia is to allow free emigration from their to here for anybody with an IQ above 120, plus the hot blondes. Give it a couple of years and the whole place will cease functioning.

I only say this half in jest.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Jon Mors

Then you nothing about the disdain with which the average Russian regards the woke West.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
2 years ago

That’s not doing much to dissuade me from my plan. Worst case scenario – nobody comes. Best case scenario – some hot blondes and based high IQ chavs turn up.

Heretic
Heretic
2 years ago

Move to repeal Scotland’s new hate crime laws fails after Holyrood debate

Of course it failed, because the Pakistani Muslim leaders of two of the main political parties colluded to force their MSPs to vote against it. This is how the Globalists are handing the British Isles to the Caliphate, and this is what is wrong with the whole party system.

Scottish National Party with Pakistani Muslim leader: 63 MSPs
Scottish Labour Party with Pakistani Muslim leader: 22 MSPs

Scottish Conservative Party with Indigenous Scottish leader: 31 MSPs

The Pakistani Muslims now have a massive majority of 85 MSPs, who will outvote the other parties every time. Their aim is to establish a Caliphate North of the Border, and the Indigenous Scots can’t do anything about it.

brightlightsweetown
brightlightsweetown
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

You forgot the Greens who as part of the Bute House Agreement totally support any bill they and/or the SNP magically produce from thin air, as it was agreed that Green MSPs would be rewarded with Ministerial positions. Totally corrupt and inept way to govern our wee country, I really despair.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago

Interesting comments on the unlawful eviction of Armenian Christians in Jerusalem led by the Israeli police.

https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252?in=10:30:28

Conservative Edward Leigh asking for the “good friends of Israel” to call-out the “violent activities of the settler movement”. “will the Church of England stand-up for Christians in the old city?”.

Andrew Selous: “it would be an absolute tragedy if there were not to be Christians left in the Holy Land”