News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DickieA
DickieA
2 years ago

Half of Tory councillors think Sunak’s Government is ‘too Left-wing’

This really shocks me as it suggests that the other half of Tory councillors are happy with Sunak’s socialist government. I hadn’t realised how deep the rot is.

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  DickieA

Exactly. A quarter of supposed Tory councillors think the far-left government aren’t left enough, and half think that it’s bang on. That’s three quarters of supposed Tory councillors that are actually not Conservatives at all, but socialists/communists in disguise (perfectly explaining everything we’re experiencing at a local level). ~75% of supposed Tory councillors are actually far-left – that’s the real stat to be shouting about.

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I’d love to know the logic of the downvoters. If you downvote please have the courage to explain why. “I don’t like you” isn’t a reason and shows you’ve had too much warm milk and rusk for one day.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

47% of Tory Councillors believe the Government is too Left-wing, compared to 24% who say it is too Right-wing

This is nothing personal, Free Lemming:

Leaving aside your eccentric definitions of “socialists/communists” and “far-left”, can you explain how mathematically you arrived at your twice-stated stat that “75% of supposed Tory councillors are actually far-left” and “three quarters of supposed Tory councillors that are actually not Conservatives at all”?

Where do you get the figure of 75% from?

Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  DickieA

And the word ‘Tory’ is irish for thief!

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Free Speech Under Threat Across Britain – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, including your local Reform Party candidate, your local vicar, media and friends online.

03a-Free-Speech-Under-Threat-Across-Britain-MONOCHROME-copy
Jon Garvey
2 years ago

Hostage taking is illegal, but nobody ever seems to suggest a strategic value in Hamas’s doing it and persisting in it.

Arguably, it could have been to prevent Israel retaliating for October 7, but Israel did retaliate anyway, and the intensity of the response is easily explicable in terms of the desire to get hostages back. What nation would not do the same? Having hostages is not preventing any harm to the Palestinian people whatsoever.

So keeping the hostages appears to be a way of guaranteeing maximum war will continue, whereas releasing them would test the left’s assumption that Israel doesn’t care about the hostages (or even engineered/faked the massacre) and make good propaganda if Israel did not reciprocate..

The only other explanation I can think of is that the genocidal antisemitic ideology of Hamas makes causing grief and harm to Jews more important than strategy, or the lives of Palestinians.

CGW
CGW
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

I suggest the reason for Hamas taking hostages was to force the Israeli government to discuss with them the appalling conditions the Palestinians are forced to accept as their daily life: for example, imprisonment in the Gaza Strip with 24h surveillance, overlooked by remote-controlled machine-guns stationed on watch towers, having to apply for permission (possibly/probably declined) to go outside, access to only limited food and medications, indiscriminate arrest or even killing, and so on. I do not believe Hamas was on a suicide mission or that they expected the excessive reaction of the IDF blasting away at anyone in sight, including their own people.

Under normal circumstances, any country would negotiate with people taking hostages, primarily to protect the lives of the hostages. But the Israelis have their Hannibal directive and their 2,000lb bombs, and seem only intent on causing maximal death and destruction.

Free Lemming
2 years ago

On Sky News, David Lammy tries to explain to Trevor Phillips why there should be one rule for the Prime Minister and another for Angela Rayner.”

We all know that these commies understand equality in the Orwellian form of some animals are more equal than others. Their main concern here will be having accusations of sexism thrown at them – that’s the top trump of victim cards. These morons are simply getting all their victim cults in a row.

Are these communists even further left than the far-left morons we currently have in government? Let’s hope so, only then can we have any chance of the rest of the not far-left population waking up. For it to get any better, it’s got to get a whole lot worse first.

Dinger64
2 years ago

“Why the death of North Sea oil is a disaster for Britain”

Never, Well blow me down!

Lucky enough to be above millions of tons of gas oil and coal and we choose not to use it, neah, we choose to import it from around the globe to keep a silly little idealistic Swedish schoolgirl happy!

Dinger64
2 years ago

“Academic who claims trans womens’ milk is as good as breast milk has taxpayer funding”

He should be blindfolded, led out to a wall and shot!

EppingBlogger
2 years ago

Why is it suggested that the Labour Party should carry out investigations into apparent, alleged breaches of the tax laws by one of its leading spokes persons? That is surely the role opf HMRC, when they can be bothered to turn up for work.

You may be sure that any similar allegation against Farage or Tice would be dealt with expeditiously and adverse leaks would continue until, miraculously, the day after the next GE the case ould be closed with no crime found.

Brett_McS
2 years ago

Maureen Lipman claims protests against Israel ‘close to fascism’

The Fascists protected Jews against their Nazi allies.