News Round-Up
- “Forget the election – Rishi Sunak’s allies wonder if he’ll get that far” – Senior figures around the Prime Minister think he’ll face a confidence vote if the Tories are thrashed at the local elections in May, which they will be. After that, all bets are off, says the Times.
- “U.K. military ‘couldn’t fight Russia for longer than two months’” – Failure to secure more funding for the Armed Forces puts Britain at a major disadvantage, warns the Deputy Chief of Defence Staff in the Telegraph.
- “There’s nothing conservative about the Tories’ free childcare rollout” – From April, parents of two-year-olds will get 15 hours of free childcare. In September, this will be extended to infants of nine months or more. Why, exactly, is this a Conservative policy? asks Fraser Nelson in the Spectator.
- “Tory MPs plan for migrant crime league tables” – A ranking system that shows the percentage of crimes committed by different ethnic groups would allow the Home Office to tighten restrictions on certain countries, according to a group of Conservative MPs, as reported in the Telegraph.
- “Illegal immigrants still come in their thousands. This will be the end of Rishi Sunak” – Ross Clark in the Telegraph is disillusioned by the gap between the Government’s rhetoric on illegal immigration and its actions.
- “Boost for Rwanda plan as ECHR makes it harder to block deportations” – A rule change embraced by the European Court of Human Rights allows injunctions against deportations of illegal migrants only where they face an “imminent risk of irreparable harm”, reports the Telegraph.
- “Justin Welby says he will not block Rwanda Bill” – In a surprising move, the Archbishop of Canterbury accepts that “open borders” are not the answer and promises not to block the Rwanda Bill, says the Telegraph.
- “Let’s kick ‘racial justice’ out of the Church of England” – The Venerable Dr. Miranda Threlfall-Holmes, archdeacon of Liverpool, should read the Bible rather than attend racial justice conferences, says Gareth Roberts in the Spectator.
- “Church tribunal clears clergyman who called trans archdeacon ‘a bloke’” – Brett Murphy described Rachel Mann, a biological male who identifies as a woman who’s an archdeacon in the Church of England, a ‘bloke’ and a ‘fella’, but a CofE review ruled the words were “not in themselves offensive”, according to the Times.
- “Civil servant sued over gender critical beliefs has case dropped” – Elspeth Duemmer-Wrigley, who works alongside Defra, was due to appear at an Employment Tribunal this week accused of harassment for comments including “only women menstruate”. But her colleague has dropped the complaint, reports the Times.
- “If the West abandons Israel, we all lose” – The UN ceasefire vote confirms that our rulers are retreating in the war to defend democracy, argues Mick Hume in Spiked.
- “Westminster council scrambles to celebrate Easter after only putting up Ramadan display” – Labour-run Westminster Council rushes to put up Christian decorations after Tory councillor Paul Swaddle pointed out that so far the Council has just honoured Ramadan, says the Telegraph.
- “BBC ‘abandons Christianity’ after dropping traditional Easter service broadcast” – Corporation criticised as celebratory mass from King’s College, Cambridge is no longer being broadcast on the BBC, reports the Telegraph.
- “Why you’re more at risk of cancer than 25 years ago – here’s what to do about it” – Cases of cancer in the U.K. have jumped by about 50% over the past 25 years due to an ongoing rise in risk factors, says the Telegraph.
- “Why are more young people getting cancer?” – Experts say the increase in diagnoses could be down to a rise in obesity, alcohol and smoking, as well as changes in diet and the microbiome, reports the Times. Nothing to do with mRNA vaccines, then?
- “Ultimate guide to going private for cancer treatment amid NHS waits” – Chaotic scenes facing the thousands of cancer patients receiving NHS care every day are comparable to ‘Heathrow on a Bank Holiday’ according to a respected oncologist. Is going private the solution? asks the Mail.
- “Follow the vast sums of money” – Public health is a racket, says Christopher Snowdon on Substack.
- “RKI protocols reveal pandemic managers providing ‘fictitiously accurate’ R-values and overstating Covid risk on the explicit directions of their political overseers in the Health Ministry” – Eugyppius on the latest revelations in Germany about the manipulation of public health authorities by the federal government.
- “Covid and the politics of panic” – Good leading article in the Spectator criticising the panic that informed the pandemic response four years ago.
- “Andrew Bridgen must pay Matt Hancock legal fees of £40,000 in libel claim” – The independent MP cases a costs bill of £40,000, not including his own costs, in his libel case against the former Health Secretary, repots the Guardian.
- “Dems, media push new study linking climate change to inflation, but economists aren’t buying It” – The Earth’s average temperature does not affect the amount of currency in circulation, says Nick Pope in Whats Up With That.
- “New York first U.S. city to introduce congestion charge” – Manhattan motorists will pay a $15 toll from June despite a fierce backlash and string of lawsuits designed to stifle the plan, reports the Telegraph.
- “In the new world of EVs and AI, renewable green energy means more gas or coal capacity, not less” – The development of EVs and AI requires a huge amount of electricity, points out the Telegraph.
- “Germany’s Alfred Wegener Institute shows January Arctic sea ice now 20 years stable!” – Winter sea ice in Arctic stable over past 20 years hasn’t disappeared; on the contrary, it’s become more plentiful, according to Whats Up With That.
- “Some classics are slapped with warnings to appease modern readers” – Over recent years, many classic tales and childhood favourites have been given trigger warnings, says the Mail, including Harry Potter, The Adventures of Alice in Wonderland and more.
- “Barristers should be allowed to join the Garrick” – the Bar Council is hinting it will forbid any member of the Bar from being a member of the Garrick. That’s a monstrous intrusion into individual liberty, argues Andrew Tettenborn in the Spectator.
- “Police Scotland could reveal complaints over ‘hate incidents” to employers” – Scottish police officers could disclose ‘non-crime hate incidents’ recorded against people’s names in enhanced criminal record checks, according to the Scottish Sun.
- “Bullying, cowardice, and careerism behind BBC disinformation on gender” – Current and former BBC journalists have condemned the media giant for embracing trans rights dogma, says Michael Shellenberger on his Public Substack.
- “Sir Jeffrey Donaldson latest: DUP leader quits after being charged with historical sex offences” – The leader of the DUP has resigned after he’s charged over historic allegations of rape, reports the Telegraph.
- “Iranian journalist stabbed multiple times outside London home” – A U.K.-based Iranian journalist who’s critical of the current regime is in a stable condition after being attacked by two people outside his house in London, according to the Telegraph.
- “Easter egg hunt in Wrexham cemetery pulled after backlash” – Friends of Wrexham Cemetery, who organised the Easter egg hunt, say their aim was to get young people “interested in local genealogy”, reports the BBC. But the event has been cancelled after a backlash from locals whose relatives are buried in the cemetery.
- “Copying the mistakes of Greece” – Labour’s tax raid on private schools was tried by Syriza in Greece and proved to be a disaster that was quickly abandoned, says Mr. Chips on Substack.
- “The UAE bid for the Spectator is over” – In the Spectator, Fraser Nelson celebrates the Government’s amendment to the Digital Markets Bill which will make it impossible for foreign states to own even 0.1% of British newspapers or magazines.
- “This is magnificent to watch” – Watch this clip of the President of Guyana putting a BBC journalist in his place when he tries to lecture him about the risks of climate change.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Are we being gaslit over the cause of the Princess of Wales’s cancer?
Commenting on this article has been closed
Any idea why?
Not really.
My only thought was that it was by request of the author.
Actually further to me getting very annoyed and disappointed in equal measure, last night a rumour I heard on Twitter suddenly came back to mind. It wasn’t an accredited source and I have no idea if this is true. However someone from the US did say the UK press are currently subject to a Super Injunction. Were that the case the Daily Sceptic would then be in something of a legal bind and would be wholly unable to defend themselves or their actions publicly. They would also want to err on the side of ensuring nothing that will bring a big lawsuit down on them is said. So now I’m thinking maybe, so long as this is a one off, we should cut them some slack if just on this basis. If this is the case, which again I have no idea, then I would want to apologise to them for some of the comments I made. Clearly it would not be their fault, and indeed the whole situation would then serve as a good example of why that law is extremely bad, unfair, anti-democratic and potentially very damaging to parties like The Daily Sceptic.
Possibly but then you’d think the article itself would have been withdrawn. I’ll not be bothering to make any further BTL comments on any subject other than this one, unless there’s some kind of explanation. “Comments from this subscriber are now closed”.
What does ‘gaslit’ mean?
Gaslighting is the process, whether intentional or not, of constantly drip-feeding false information to another person with the effect of causing them to doubt their own perception of the world about them. If done intentionally in order to cause an opponent to doubt their [correct] perception it is akin to “nudging” or simply “lying” in order to deceive the opponent into pursuing a particular sequence of decisions beneficial to the gaslighter but detrimental to the target. If done unintentionally it likely to be part of the behaviour pattern of somebody with a personality disorder, especially Borderline Personality Disorder, in which the other person in the relationship tends to lose contact with reality and can develop strange behaviour in order, initially, to maintain the relationship until something snaps. It then becomes difficult to attribute “intent”. The last time this discussion came up regarding royalty was with comments on Princess Diana’s behaviour.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/gaslighting
Gaslight is also a wonderful film.
It is indeed the film from whence the term arises.
Gaslighting crops up frequently. I met it, almost literally, around 2004 at university when we all being told “look, the Earth’s temperature is going up at an unprecedented rate”. All I saw a random bouncing of a graph, dodgy downward “adjustments” of historical temperatures, curve-fitting with a ridiculously large number of Von Neumann’s Elephant parameters and zealous evangelical meetings of the coming Thermogeddon where dissenters were ejected. The same process is alive and kicking in UK schools to this day, by including “Climate Change” (i.e. Global Warming rebranded) in many different subjects. Some say that Lockdown propaganda had a similar same element, but I wouldn’t call it gaslighting because, rather than being drip-fed falsehoods over twenty years, we were bullied or deceived into submission over twenty days. That said, the occasional medical person I come into contact with still talk as though Covid 19 was an existential threat and that masks and vaccines are safe and effective: the drip-feeding continues. An important element for the success of gaslighting is that the target should have strong emotional motivation to keep the relationship working, be it within a family or between a loyal citizen and the state. Another film is Girl, Interrupted… Read more »
Who is this weird person who has downvoted our two innocuous remarks about an old film? Bonkers.
It’s a brilliant film despite its age. Can’t see why a down tick is required.
Maybe they’re not a Bergman fan. Or perhaps they’re holding the phone upside down?
Thanks very much.
I’m not clear why the shorter and more readily comprehensible ‘misleading’, ‘misled’ is not used?
Is ‘gaslighting’, ‘gaslit’ some kind of ‘journalese’ thing, maybe?
I’m no expert but I think it’s a specific kind of misleading intended to undermine the target’s belief in their own sanity. If you read the synopsis of the film mentioned below it might give a better picture.
Perhaps “We’ve always been at war with Eastasia” is also an example.
Thanks. That makes the word specific and useful but, surely, also means that, more often than not, its use would be hyperbole, ‘hype’ (not uncommon in ‘journalese’!)
Yes, that’s how I understand it too. Also, making the target so confused that they just give up and go with the flow.
aka Bamboozle.
If someone is bamboozled – someone has been doing the bamboozling.
That’s correct. Her husband caused the gas lighting to flicker and then told her she was imagining it. He also removed items from her purse and then replaced them after she’d failed to find them.
👍
Excellent description 👍🤩
In a nutshell: denying your personal take on reality.
Many thanks.
A perfect summary Aethelred.
Cheers, HP!
I received a response from Toby explaining why the comments were closed/deleted.
I’ll let him tell everyone.
I would appreciate if you can point out to me where his explanation is, if he has made one on DS ….cheers. ———I am not going to rush to judgement on this issue till I see an explanation, which since we pay money to post comments I think we deserve that.
Ditto on all counts.
Ditto here too.
Well said, V!
I asked him on email, he responded there.
Can you give us a clue?
Thanks M A k.
Looking forward to the explanation.
If indeed comments were taken down at the behest of the author, perhaps a better way to do this would have a proper explanation from the DS rather than leave us all wondering about being censored. One of the best comments, and one of the first taken down, I saw was from Hester and there was absolutely nothing contentious or judgemental in it. Since the article still stands, I doubt there was anything about the actual article that worried the DS from a legal POV. It must have been the type of commentary. As if the world wasn’t dystopian enough, the DS enact a type of censorship worthy of that description.
Covid Jab Cancer Link – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, including your local Reform Party candidate, your local vicar, media and friends online.
U.K. military ‘couldn’t fight Russia for longer than two months We know what we have to do. The USSR invaded Hungary and Poland in 1956, Czechoslovakia in 1967. Consequently, in 1972, the British Army comprised 180,000 men, with an Army Corps (1(Br.)Corps) of four small divisions, later concentrated into three stronger divisions, forward located in West Germany. That formed part of a credible NATO conventional deterrent in Western Europe……and it worked……so that is, quite simply, what we have to do again. For Pete’s sake, that Army Corps was only circa 55,000 men. And for those who say that warfare has moved on, I say: ‘Yes it has, but Putin’s invasion of Ukraine demonstrates, quite clearly, the old maxim that still ‘quantity has a quality all of its own’. What to do? The political will is simply not there for a new British Army on the Danube. The last time Britain could put one (weak) armoured division in the field was 1990. For perspective, Edward III’s army at Crecy was, in numbers, the size of a strong armoured division. That is where thirty years of economic mismanagement has landed us. A radical reorganisation is required. The United States Marine Corps, an… Read more »
Canada tried that 50y ago. It sapped morale. Accountants don’t get that.
I know. I served with them. They all wore the same uniform. That was a good example of how not to do it and precisely not my proposal.
Retention of service uniforms, cap badges at Regimental/Ship/Squadron level, with more delegated powers, very much is what I am proposing.
The USMC has been demonstrating how it can be done, retaining esprit, considerable elan, since 1775.
And, as I point out, they are equivalent in size to our entire armed forces and have their own dedicated procurement system.
Are you really suggesting that the USMC, excellent though they are, can do things that are beyond the wit of our armed forces?
Hopefully not.
It is worrying that our armed forces are in such a weakened and defunded state. Our navy an embarrassment, our airforce denied ‘white’ pilots, our army god knows where and woke infesting it all from the top down. The idea of a deterrent to an imagined Russian invasion is beyond a joke. All that I can determine about what is going on is that we are being prepared for a war that none of us – including Russia – want.
How about cutting all benefits for people out of work and making the resources available to the armed forces?
Then if anyone is out of a job, they can join up.
I know a lot of people actually benefitted from National Service or say they did. They learned about personal responsibility, got fit and could pursue different activities of interest. At the moment, we have to do something about our young people because they are being ignored. Living on benefits just saps any strength and sense of purpose and meaning.
National service, using serving military as trainers, takes them away from their core function so, in my view, is not a good idea.
However there is no reason why any government of the day could not employ retired service personnel, many of them erstwhile brilliant trainers, to provide a youth training program as required.
I agree that the citizens of Russia, for the most part, do not wish for war. Nevertheless, they are at war.
The problem that Britain has is that it is very much not being prepared for a war that has already started.
“Crime league Tables for migrants” ? So that we can apparently restrict people coming from certain countries. ————Is this a joke? There is no way this will ever happen because human rights would scream blue murder. Remember when Trump tried to say they could not come from dangerous countries and the race bleaters said it was an anti muslim decision. ——–Look, we need to just accept the politicians have f…ed us over and the country is not a nation anymore. It is just a region.
Good Morning fellow sufferers, My spirits soared when News broke that Andrew Bridgen could pursue the Worm that is Hand cock in court for his outrageous tweet MH made against him , then later I was left reeling in disbelief as The Guardian informed us that AB has to pay Wancocks 40k Court Costs but the case can still proceed , HOW did this happen ??
Here’s Bridgen’s crowdfunder to pay for Wancock’s hate speech:
https://democracythree.org/en-gb/en-gb/the_day_democracy_died_andrew_bridgen
Thanks 👍
Forgive me if I am wrong but surely a court case has to proceed first to determine who wins it? Is this from an earlier case, perhaps?
It’s confusing , 40k & the case hasn’t been heard yet 😳😳
If it was sourced from the Graun/Indy is it the full truth?
“Tory MPs plan for migrant crime league tables”
Well done to Robert Jenrick for this excellent proposal, and to the few MPs brave enough to support him.
“U.K. military ‘couldn’t fight Russia for longer than two months’
Absolutely right he is to point this out.
May I also point out the real danger of importing Taliban double agents who pretended to “help” the UK Armed Forces in Afghanistan, now claiming to be “in danger from the Taliban” so they can continue their double agent work, reporting back to the Taliban? If they were in any real “danger” from the Taliban, the Taliban would have sorted them long ago.
St Athan: ‘Brave’ Afghans who helped UK are to be housed on Welsh military camp | UK News | Sky News
Remember what the Bible says: Never let the enemy into the camp.”
“This is magnificent to watch”— It really is!!!
Can anyone help me to unsubscribe from my recurring £5 payment?
I have emailed Daily Sceptic and no response.
Thank you
It’s not straightforward because usually you can go into your account and do it but you have to go into your donor account – you access that by going to one of the thank you emails and clicking on the LOGIN TO DONOR ACCOUNT tab – once through to that account, it is hopefully easy enough to do. Sorry to see you go.