Covid Vaccine to be Sold on High Street for First Time to Anyone Over 12 Years Old

COVID-19 jabs will be sold on the high street for £99 from next week, as Boots becomes the first major pharmacy to launch a private vaccination service. The Times has more.

The single-dose Pfizer vaccine will be offered at 50 stores from April 1st to anyone aged 12 or over, at a cost of £98.95.

It is the first time a COVID-19 vaccine has been available outside the NHS since the mass vaccination programme was launched in December 2020 at the height of the pandemic.

Since then, eligibility has been strictly determined by scientific advisers — with NHS booster vaccines restricted to those at high risk, including over-65s or patients with weakened immune systems due to conditions such as cancer.

Boots will offer the private vaccine to those aged 12 and over who do not meet the NHS criteria for a free booster. This means healthy adults will be able to get a COVID-19 vaccine for the first time since the official NHS programme ended in 2021. Although healthier young adults are extremely unlikely to develop severe COVID-19, the vaccine can protect them from uncomfortable symptoms such as coughs and a sore throat.

A Boots spokesman told the Times: “We are launching a private COVID-19 vaccination service for people who are not eligible for an NHS vaccination but still want the option to protect themselves from the virus. Our private service builds on our existing delivery of COVID-19 vaccinations for the NHS and we are pleased we can now offer COVID-19 vaccinations both on behalf of the NHS and privately, as we have done with flu vaccinations for many years.”

Worth reading in full.

Credit to the Times for mentioning that healthier young adults are “extremely unlikely” to develop severe Covid – but no credit for failing to mention the reams of data now available on serious side-effects, including in younger people.

It looks like children over 12 can get the vaccine without their parents’ consent – at least, I can see no sign on the the booking website of a note stating parental consent is required.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
2 years ago

They will be flogging Arsenic next!

zebedee
zebedee
2 years ago

I wonder what the legal liability of Boots will be and whether they can get any court to enforce a waiver.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  zebedee

Snap. Great minds and all that.

Tintin
Tintin
2 years ago
Reply to  zebedee

Clever. Lawyers will have a field day! You’d think that with all the vaccine damages claims going on, and more reports come out condemning the vaccine, that these chancers would hesitate?

For a fist full of roubles

I would be interested to know what the law is regarding the liability of Boots for any subsequent vaccine damage.
There was a clear deal between the government and the manufacturers but Boots will have a separate commercial contract and commercial contract negotiators are a lot better than government ones.

JohnK
2 years ago

As it’s a subsidiary of Walgreen Boots Alliance, it begs the question of who’s behind it? Are they doing the same thing elsewhere in the world?

Solentviews
Solentviews
2 years ago

“Calling all turkeys, calling all turkeys. Christmas is coming soon we need some volunteers. It won’t even cost you much….”.

I almost admire the chutzpah of these companies pushing this still.

Paramaniac
2 years ago

Uptake has plummeted.
No one will be buying Thalidomide 2.0 and certainly not for £99.
The more interesting angle is why they are changing the excess deaths statistics now?
The reason, I believe, is the Government understands that as vaccine uptake has plummeted, the excess death graph will start to show excess deaths plummeting as well.
They also understand that, if that happens, there will be a distinct start point on the excess deaths graph (around jan 2021) and a distinct end point (start of 2024).
Were they to allow that to occur it would be CONCLUSIVE proof that it was the vaccines that have caused the excess deaths.
The only way out for them is to muddy the end point by fiddling the statistics at the ONS and The Office for Health Improvements and Disparities.
Which is exactly what they are doing and why they are doing it right NOW.

Screenshot-2024-03-26-at-17.32.00
James Leary #KBF
2 years ago
Reply to  Paramaniac

Or ….. they’ve already bought & paid for so many doses that they’ll try anything to make the catastrophic loss look a bit better?

T. Prince
2 years ago

Don’t forget that there will be those non-critical thinkers who will say “ If Boots are selling them they must be safe”

disgruntled246
disgruntled246
2 years ago

For the love of God, do people need protecting from minor symptoms like coughs and colds now? I’m not sure the risk:benefit ratio is good with this one.

10navigator
10navigator
2 years ago

I’d pay 99 quid NOT to have the barst!

Mogwai
2 years ago

OMfreakingG! You seriously would have to be a special kind of stupid. Absolutely insane.
Meanwhile, who do you think would make a great celeb advert for this Boots Death Jab campaign? I suggest Arnold ‘screw your freedoms’ Schwarzenegger. After all, Karma visited him and now he’s got a pacemaker, but I’m sure it would have been a LOT worse had he not been multi-stabbed. You too could be like Arnie, stupid people, and get yourselves terminated;

”Schwarzenegger revealed on Monday that he has had three open heart surgeries in recent times and he now requires a pacemaker to keep his damaged heart beating.
During the latest episode of his podcast, Arnold’s Pump Club, the Terminator star admitted, “Last Monday, I had surgery to become a little bit more of a machine: I got a pacemaker.”
Despite the serious health issues that would have killed anyone who could not afford the kind of medical care reserved for Hollywood A-listers, Schwarzenegger assured everyone, “I’m doing great!” In that case, we would hate to see what not doing great looks like.”

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/arnold-schwarzenegger-who-called-the-unvaxxed-schmucks-has-pacemaker-installed-after-3-open-heart-surgeries/

Ron Smith
Ron Smith
2 years ago

Mark Steyn….”In the UK, I’m not reassured by the state censor Ofcom’s all-in protection of the Narrative. One reason why we get so much inane Harry’n’Meghan trivia is because, in a tightly controlled media, it’s easier for a fainthearted press to pass Palace gossip off as “news”. Now we have a genuine Royal angle on an actual news story: Will the press pursue it”.

Tylney
Tylney
2 years ago

Right, it’s time to call it a day – this madness has got to stop NOW. These genetic medicinal products are not, and never were, vaccines. Dangerously misapplied emergency regulations were hastily invoked in a hideously unethical attempt – sadly, successful – to persuade the majority of scientifically illiterate politicians worldwide to agree to their short-term use during the supposedly highly lethal global pandemic . These products were ‘licenced’ solely for temporary emergency use, and that emergency – if it ever existed – has now expired. Presumably, therefore, so too have their licences. So, on what legal basis will these products be ‘offered’ to the public? Given the overwhelming evidence that they don’t actually prevent infection – the fundamental criterion on which real vaccine licences are issued by our oh-so-reliable MHRA – what are the implications for selling these so-called ‘vaccines’ to the public by describing them to the lay public as such? This is not a trivial issue. Some years ago at a large public meeting in Manchester I raised the question of the legitimacy of the persistent claims by many dental professionals, and certain academics, that fluoridated toothpastes prevent tooth decay. I reminded the pro-fluoridation lobbyists that all… Read more »

sskinner
2 years ago

“Covid Vaccine to be Sold on High Street for First Time to Anyone Over 12 Years Old”

Why?

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

Because someone believes there’s a market for this despite the NHS doesn’t offer it anymore.

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

I can believe that but you and I know there is zero medical or biological reason for this. It wasn’t long ago that MRSA, or antibiotic resistant infections, were catching all the headlines. As we all know the reason for the antibiotic resistant bacteria was because of the over use of antibiotics. In other words the dishing out of antibiotics without mature medical thinking for any infection even at the request of a patient.

“Medical Science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left.”
Aldous Huxley

Less government
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

Greed.

RW
RW
2 years ago

There is no such thing as severe COVID-19. Sars-CoV2 is a respiratory virus (mostly) and viral pneumonia is always a possible complication for such an infection and can – in rare cases – be deadly, mostly for people who are already at death’s door.

GroundhogDayAgain
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

As I understand it, many of the early coof deaths were iatrogenic (caused by the treatment protocols). Most of other coof infections were nosocomial (caught in hospital), and of those the majority of deaths were those people almost at death’s door.

Not to mention the nationwide binge in PCR testing coupled with the loose temporal association of “death within test + 28days”

Lies, damn lies, and government statistics.

RW
RW
2 years ago

The important point here is that severe COVID-19 is a fancy name for severe pneumonia which is rare complication of pneumonia which is a rare complication of any respiratory infection. COVID doesn’t differ from the common cold or from influenza in this respect.

sskinner
2 years ago

The single-dose Pfizer vaccine will be offered at 50 stores from April 1st?
Anyway, if anyone takes a vaccine/’vaccine’ in April it will appear that these medical contrivances will have worked because all Coronavirus and Influenza type infections disappear going into summer – every year. See the graphic below created by Hope Simpson. The only issue will be any medical complications caused by the ‘medicines’ which could then create a sense that there is infection still around.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia8D7Gnq0TE
A Brief 2-minute look at Viral Seasonal Dynamics – Very Interesting!

The role of season in the epidemiology of influenza
BY R. E. HOPE-SIMPSON
https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2134066&blobtype=pdf

Hope-Simpson
transmissionofflame
2 years ago

Do we know how much the taxpayer paid for the “vaccines” so far? I think there must have been at least 100 million doses, possibly more. If we paid £100 a pop, that’s 10 billion quid. I guess we got a volume discount.

Tintin
Tintin
2 years ago

Billy and the German Pharma company must have paid someone a lot of $$$ to promote this. And Lady H can’t even bring herself to questioning the ‘science’ behind the vaccine, in a futile exercise that costs us millions. Are we so naive? Are we being sold to WEF?

Tintin
Tintin
2 years ago

Is there a huge surplus of stock Billy wants to offload? Surely they have passed their sell-by date? People must resist and rebel. Boycott Boots. Boycott this new control measure.

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago
Reply to  Tintin

Boycott was always the control measure.

Money talks.

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

“Boots will offer the private vaccine to those aged 12 and over who do not meet the NHS criteria for a free booster.”

THE NHS HAD CRITERIA? HAHAHAHA!

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

Stabbed
And
Robbed

In one handy package!

TheGreenAcres
2 years ago

the vaccine can protect them from uncomfortable symptoms such as coughs and a sore throat.

I’ve not seen any evidence for this statement, or have I missed something?

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Most people I know claim to have been given what they called “covid vaccines” – most of them multiple times – and I think all of these people also claim to have had “covid” – whatever that is – multiple times as confirmed by sticking some Chinese piece of crap up your nose. As far as the unvaxxed people in my life, it’s hard to say as none of us has ever tested, but we’re all still alive!

A. Contrarian
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Certainly I know lots of jabbed people who caught it and had ample coughs and sore throats. Maybe they could claim they weren’t boosted recently enough, I don’t know. And of course it would be impossible to prove how many jabbed people didn’t catch it but would have if they weren’t fully jabbed etc, beyond the initial rather rushed trial data of course.

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

That’s from the trials which were actually made: Less people who were – statistically – never at risk because of COVID developed a mild illness after vaccination. One has to see the positive side of things: Dying of myocarditis is bad enough and it’s really better not also having a sore throat.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

Hat tip Lickyalips at tcw. Billionaire Bill Gates has revealed that global governments have agreed to make digital IDs mandatory for anyone who wishes to access basic services and participate in society. In recent years, Gates and his globalist allies at the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) have been developing a digital ID system that will be rolled out in all countries around the world. The system is being developed to include support for bank accounts and digital cash integration along with vaccine passports. Gates has previously declared that the plan involved ensuring that every single human being on the planet can prove their identity with a global digital ID. On November 8th 2023, a virtual launch event took place for what was termed the “50-in-5” agenda. The United Nations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and partners of the Rockefeller Foundation are launching a campaign to accelerate digital ID, digital payments, and data-sharing rollouts in 50 countries under the umbrella of digital public infrastructure (DPI) by 2028. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has announced plans to roll out “digital IDs” worldwide by the year 2030, and they will be mandatory for people who wish… Read more »

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Don’t forget Sunak’s father in law owns Infosys, one of the largest digital ID companies in the world. Be very afraid….

RosJones
RosJones
2 years ago

Very depressing. I wrote briefly about this in HART last month here https://hartuk.substack.com/p/the-spring-booster-programme-now
Boots et al need to look at their business model if they really think causing injury to healthy people for whom the NHS has quietly dropped these ‘Unsafe & Ineffective’ jabs, will go down well.

James Leary #KBF
2 years ago

Are you sure they don’t mean “ paying £99”? It’s not enough by a factor of several noughts.

T. Prince
2 years ago

Calling all ‘down tickers’ on this thread. Anything useful to say? Thought not, grow up.

ellie-em
2 years ago

Hang on – is this slurry-in-a-syringe still under EUA emergency use authorisation? Surely they can’t be put on a shopping list to buy, especially and worryingly, by a 12 years old child?

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-11-april-2022/freedom-of-information-request-on-the-authorisation-of-emergency-use-medicines-foi-22602

Myra
2 years ago

I will be interested how they will deal with the ‘informed consent’ bit….

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

I presume Boots will be liable for prosecution if someone dies or is injured by this dangerous product.

Still, I suppose it’s a cheaper way of committing suicide than a trip to Dignitas.

Less government
2 years ago

The worst thing you could possibly spend a hundred quid on.
Shame on you Boots. You are complicit in the biggest medical crime of the century and failing to provide informed consent.

Less government
2 years ago

Boycott Boots!

beaniebean
beaniebean
2 years ago

A fool and his money are soon parted!