News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Stop Net Zero Industrial Wipeout – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online. 

05a-Stop-Net-Zero-Industrial-Wipeout-MONOCHROME-copy
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Saturday Morning Windsor Rd & Winkfield Road Ascot 

Message to politicians: nothing in this world is worth your soul.

101
Monro
2 years ago

A fascist, totalitarian future awaits us

We’re living in it……….

‘Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal will of man as a historic entity. It is opposed to classical liberalism………..Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts……..’

Mussolini 1932

Mussolini’s Italy: By 1939, Fascist Italy attained the highest rate of state ownership of an economy in the world other than the Soviet Union….

Blair’s Britain: in 2010, the public sector employed about 6.1 million workers, or 21% of all UK workers

May, Bunter, Sunak’s Britain: There were an estimated 5.90 million employees in the public sector in September 2023, which is 35,000 (0.6%) more than in June 2023 and 135,000 (2.3%) more than in September 2022.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

US Federal govt under Biden has managed a similar increase (increase is all accounted for by non-white people): Biden succeeding, by Steve Sailer – The Unz Review

Monro
2 years ago

Boots orders support staff back into office five days a week from September

The retail chain’s boss has declared the office a “much more fun and inspiring place” with everyone in attendance.

Errrr……compare and contrast ‘orders support staff back’ with ‘fun and inspiring’…..

Maybe ‘fun and inspiring’ doesn’t really help with appalling, ruinously expensive, commutes to work in dreadful open plan offices to participate in meetings about meetings, with a snatched spam sandwich eaten at the desk for lunch……..

If the workplace really was ‘fun and inspiring’, treating employees as adults, an enlightened approach concentrating on performance rather than clock watching, instead of ego preening David Brent managers filling every hour of the day with pointless meetings that never finish early because that would open the window to having to do some real work, then maybe ‘orders support staff back’ might not be necessary?

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

I think all their chuck-out operators are working from home too.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Indeed. Another significant bonus for me is that I get to keep my job, as I would surely have been fired by now if I had been forced to listen to the utter bollocks my mainly covidian, often woke metro “liberal” champagne socialist colleagues spout. The Brexit referendum and the first Trump election were bad enough, but since “covid” during which I was compared to Hitler, called a “conspiracy theorist” and during which my colleagues were quite happy for me and my family to be locked up to “save granny”, I have very little respect for most of them and I imagine the feeling is mutual.

Our office is open, really nice office, brand new, staff can work as many or as few days as they like there. It’s so “fun and inspiring” that many never go in and most of those that do don’t go in every day. Office attendance is at maybe 10% of pre “covid” levels. Money saved with a smaller office goes into the pockets of the staff who are all shareholders (one benefit of having a champagne socialist founder, to be fair).

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

Money saved with a smaller office goes into the pockets of the staff who are all shareholders (one benefit of having a champagne socialist founder, to be fair).

Is making sure your employees have ‘skin in the game’ a socialist idea? My last company did it too and I don’t think the board were fired with Socialist zeal.

I acknowledge the ‘champagne’ qualifier.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Is making sure your employees have ‘skin in the game’ a socialist idea?”

Not exclusively, that’s true. It has worked well for us.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

It has worked well for us.

Likewise…

Well, former ‘us’. I’m retired but still catch myself referring to ‘us’ many years later. In my experience many colleagues were very keen to drive productivity up and waste down.

Happy days (mostly). ‘Fun and inspiring’? Not the way I’d have described it though we were not averse to a party or two.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I guess the reference to socialism was to the founder’s ostensible motivation, though for a “socialist” he made plenty of money (though honest work) and made sure that personally and for the firm we never paid more tax than was legally necessary.

The office was sometimes fun and inspiring, but I still enjoy my work from home – just not the social side. Don’t miss the travel though.

DS99
2 years ago

Surely it’s a vicious cycle though, staff don’t go in so staff don’t go in. I know several young people in their first jobs who work from home and it’s a lonely kind of life bearing no resemblance to the sociable places I worked in as a youngster in the 1980’s.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  DS99

I think there are enough people going in now in our firm that it’s no longer a barrier, though initially I think you are right it was a bit chicken and egg. Some of our youngsters go in, others choose not to. I think they should go in more but I’m not their dad. For some it has been an opportunity to live somewhere further away from London, saving tons of money. Anywhere nice commutable to London is hugely more expensive than other parts of the country.

DS99
2 years ago

I get that London is expensive and by all accounts finding any rented accommodation a bit of a nightmare. I can see that in that situation, it could be the only way of retaining staff (allowing them to work from home). I’m just a big believer in the embodied “in the room” connections between staff. In many offices, people asking to work from home must surely impact their customer services?

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  DS99

There are certainly downsides from both a social and professional standpoint, but there are upsides too. On balance we have been more productive. Most of our customer contact is remote anyway. You need to manage people properly by looking at what they produce and not mere presence at a desk, and it helps that most of our staff are intrinsically motivated people who don’t need much managing. Those are the kind of people we try to employ.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  DS99

I think it’s horses for courses.

‘We’ (I’m doing it again) had remote working nailed quite a lot earlier than many other companies. Our more senior staff were consultants and would spend most of their time at the client’s offices anywhere in the world with only occasional visits to their own. The back-office support and admin would be in the office and might need to arrange or change support at short notice. We also had a lot of recent graduate analysts who were less suited to working under remote supervision.

Customer services, marketing, finance, HR were all office based. A lot of ‘sales’ work was repeat or follow-on work brought in by successful consultants.

EppingBlogger
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

No mention of being contracted and paid to be there. No mention of the humungous amounts of tax payers money they get to provide prescription medicines on time? It’s all about the life pleasures of the staff?

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Yes, it should be all about employee welfare as opposed to employer welfare…..because the one leads to the other:

‘Highly engaged teams are 21% more profitable for the company.

The top 20% of the most engaged teams showed a 59% reduction in (staff) turnover and a 41% reduction in the amount of absenteeism.

American companies lose up to $550 billion per year because of disengaged employees.

61% of employees feel burnt out and experience symptoms of depression, anger, anxiety, aches, fatigue, and other physical and mental health issues.’

Forbes

Dinger64
2 years ago

“British Museum could send tribal artefacts back to Jamaica”

Looking at the picture in the Telegraph they can bloody well have them back! Grief,ugly or what!

EppingBlogger
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

How long before they are on the black market?

Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

About 2 and a half minutes, and then the prime minister can have that new ev he always wanted!

Stuart
2 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Black market…how dare you!!

Dinger64
2 years ago

“The Church of England is replacing its Christian nature in a fit of woke frenzy”

Then F the church of England, It’s done!