News Round-Up
- “Reform U.K. commits to excess deaths and vaccine harms inquiry” – Reform U.K. Leader Richard Tice has committed his party to a public inquiry into excess deaths and Covid vaccine harms, saying the jabs could be responsible for thousands more fatalities than expected, the Telegraph reports.
- “How the doctor behind ITV’s new Covid drama is a Tory-hating activist” – The new ITV drama Breathtaking is based on a book by doctor – and vocal Left-wing activist – Rachel Clarke, a 52-year-old palliative care specialist with plenty of practice as an anti-Tory mouthpiece, according to the Mail‘s Andrew Pierce.
- “Council staff join ‘working from the beach’ culture of logging in from exotic locations worldwide” – A freedom of information request to local authorities has revealed employees have successfully applied to work from as far away as Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica and the U.S., according to the Telegraph.
- “Lee Anderson suspended after ‘Islamophobic, racist’ about Sadiq Khan” – Lee Anderson has been suspended by the Conservative party after he refused to apologise for ‘Islamophobic, racist’ comments about London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the Mail reports.
- “Farage woos Anderson after Tory suspended over Khan comments” – Lee Anderson has been offered a place in the Reform party by Nigel Farage after he was stripped of the Conservative whip after claiming that “Islamists” have “got control” of Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, the Telegraph reports.
- “Starmer has brought shame upon Labour” – Keir Starmer put maintaining the facade of unity within his party ahead of the principle that Parliament cannot be seen to be intimidated, says the Telegraph in a leading article.
- “The cowardice of our elites is emboldening Islamism” – Lindsay Hoyle’s capitulation to extremists marked a dark day for British democracy, says Tom Slater in Spiked.
- “Bodyguards for MPs as extremism threat rises” – Private security is being deployed to protect MPs amid warnings that the Israel-Hamas conflict is a “generational radicalising moment”, the Telegraph reveals.
- “Three female MPs given taxpayer-funded bodyguards over safety fears” – Three female politicians have been given taxpayer-funded bodyguards and cars amid growing concerns about MPs’ safety, the Times reports.
- “Met cuts ties with adviser who previously praised Hamas founder” – A prominent mosque chairman who previously praised the founder of Hamas has been removed as an adviser to the Metropolitan Police, the Telegraph reports.
- “Ministry of Justice hosted speaker who said ‘Jews need to get in the queue behind Muslims’” – The Ministry of Justice hosted a speaker who previously said that “Jews need to get in the queue behind Muslims”, in response to concerns about antisemitism, the Telegraph reports.
- “This nihilistic new era of protest is a danger to British democracy” – The idea that people can demonstrate outside MPs’ homes is so outrageous that it shouldn’t even be up for debate, says Janet Daley in the Telegraph.
- “No action against judge who dealt leniently with paraglider protestors” – Senior MPs have criticised prosecutors for dropping an investigation into judge Tan Ikram who dealt leniently with three women protesters exposed for sporting ‘Hamas paragliders’ pictures on their jackets, reports the Mail.
- “Pro-Palestine protesters shut down Tower Bridge” – Activists waving Palestinian flags and carrying a banner that read ‘Save Gaza, Ceasefire Now’ shut down London’s Tower Bridge, says the Mail.
- “France expels ‘radical’ Tunisian imam Mahjoub Mahjoubi over flag comments” – Immigration reforms have made it easier for the French Government to forcibly remove foreign residents, according to the BBC.
- “The shamelessness of Hope not Hate” – Hope Not Hate has shown no interest in speaking out against antisemitism yet thinks that investigating Paul Marshall’s tweets is a worthy use of its time, says Laurie Wastell in the Spectator.
- “Shoppers face £1bn ‘toaster tax’ under plans for new set of Net Zero rules” – The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has unveiled plans to require larger shops to ‘take back’ used electrical items such as toasters for recycling, even if the items were bought elsewhere, the Telegraph reports.
- “BBC should be proud to be progressive, Director General told staff” – The BBC’s Director General Tim Davie told staff the corporation should be proud to be progressive, the Telegraph reveals.
- “The ‘greedy good’ are destroying Britain’s economy” – Liz Truss is right: wokeonomics is destroying the West, says the Telegraph‘s Matthew Lynn.
- “Church of England yet to set up £100m slavery reparations fund after a year” – The Church of England is yet to set up a promised £100 million slavery reparations fund a year after announcing it was “time to take action to address our shameful past”, the Telegraph reports.
- “Church of England set for ‘urgent’ review into asylum seeker policy” – The Church of England is reviewing its policies towards asylum seekers as a “matter of urgency” after it was accused of presiding over a “conveyor belt” of fake conversions, the Telegraph reports.
- “Germany: Interior Minister Looks to Ban Private Gatherings of ‘Right-Wing Extremists’” – Nancy Faeser’s Government colleagues say her plans are more dangerous to the constitutional order than the “Right-wing extremists” she claims to be fighting, according to the European Conservative.
- “Supreme Court set for arguments in most consequential internet free speech case yet” – The Washington Examiner reports that the Supreme Court will hear arguments over the extent of states’ power to hold social media platforms liable for political censorship.
- “Letting women join front-line Army fighting units a ‘failed exercise in political correctness’” – The decision to allow women to join front-line Army fighting units has been described as a “failed exercise in political correctness” after Government figures revealed that only 10 female recruits started infantry and Royal Armoured Corps basic training last year, the Telegraph reports.
- “Trump imitates Biden navigating his way off a stage. Just an absolute masterpiece in comedic entertainment” – Watch Trump mock his political opponent at a rally in South Carolina.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/24/new-nihilistic-era-of-protest-danger-to-british-democracy/
Correction –
The idea that MP’s can – and have – dictated that people must stay in their homes is outrageous and should never have been up for debate.
Jabbed Without Consent Elderly Man Dies – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online.
A straightforward case of murder.
Bodyguards for MPs as extremism threat rises
You let these guys in……
And you now want to be protected from them……
And you want us to pay……..
Words fail……….
And they leave us to our own devices to try to stay safe.
Sorry. Just posted something very similar.
Saturday Morning A329 & A322 Downshire Way Bracknell
I admire your energy. How much response do you get from passing traffic?
Letting women join front-line Army fighting units a ‘failed exercise in political correctness
Allowing women to join the infantry is as silly as allowing women to participate in men’s Olympic events.
The emblem of the infantry is the bayonet.
Britain would not enter women into men’s Olympic events because they would have no chance, as the whole ‘trans’ nonsense regarding men entering various women’s sporting events has clearly demonstrated.
Why, in the event of us being attacked, would we then think it a good idea to have women to defend us and fight against male attackers with bayonets in order to defend this country?
Stark raving mad………
All the metrics are there in every Olympic event to demonstrate just how mind numbingly dumb this idea is…….
Oh! Our politicians are so dim that they cannot read, are completely innumerate……
Brilliant! Who voted for them? Oh, hang on………..
Excellent point. Women in the front-line actually endanger all their colleagues, because men are programmed to protect women and children at the cost of their own lives. Hence a woman will stand outside a burning house from which she quickly escaped, leaving her children behind, screaming for a man to go in and save her children. Men do respond courageously to this, and often lose their lives in doing so.
Instead of being able to rely on their fellow men to fight alongside them in battle, the men have to worry about protecting the females, who do not have the same physical strength and natural “warrior” abilities to hold up their end.
Remember the report of an Australian Special Forces man on patrol in the Outback, who was forced to carry his female colleague’s entire kit as well as his own, because she didn’t have the strength to do it herself. She went on ahead with the rest, relying on him as the tallest, strongest man in the group to carry her load, while he slowly fell behind in the searing heat, and collapsed beneath a scraggly bush to recover.
“Parliament cannot be seen to be intimidated”
Because it’s normally not so public.
MP’s have been voicing concerns over their security on and off for some time. Don’t single out the extremists, everyone is to be seen as a threat. That’s why we’re all treated like the enemy.
I’m starting to believe that islamists don’t give a toss about our laws and constitution!
They seem to have their own law, intimidation imposed by the threat of violence, and maybe, actual violence, time will tell!
and mps are allowing it to work
Shameful
“I’m starting to believe that islamists don’t give a toss about our laws and constitution!”
Blimey Dings, what took you so long?
I know, I try to give the benefit of the doubt, diplomacy and all that but they are really getting my hackles up just lately! Shouting and demanding in the streets!
And the fake police ‘force’ and mps do fat frogs ass about any of it!
It’s just a convenient, exceptionally timely excuse to get what some MP’s clearly want. Aside from the damage so far, what’s in the policy pipeline that could be unpopular? Any serious extremist isn’t going to be disuaded by any measures put in place.
Asking for protection out of fear of the British electorate doesn’t quite have the same impact.
However, attacking an MP shows no understanding of how that benefits no-one except the very people who seek to justify further controls.
Why?
“Bodyguards for MPs as extremism threat rises”
So mps finally admit police protection is not good enough!
Tax payers money to protect them from the problems they caused?
Damn them all to hell!
I’m wondering how many people here would agree with this, and are you seeing the same changes whether you’re a rural dweller or a townie? Certainly I can see the stark contrast in quality of living between the Netherlands and the North of England when I visit. Even just sitting on the train you can see how shabby and neglected everything looks, with many old buildings obviously derelict for years and just left to fall to bits. Historical architecture, rather than being respected and lovingly maintained has just become an ugly eyesore and a blot on an otherwise beautiful landscape; ”Filthy streets lined with charity shops, pound shops, and vaping shops. Rubbish strewn across the walkways. Half-built or half-collapsed buildings covered in scaffolding. Fast-food joints on every corner, their logos printed on the litter that blows down the road. Very few English folk around, though a few of them lie homeless on the pavement. Many languages yelled aggressively from hidden allies. A vision of a third-world town. Raise your eyes a little above the shop fronts, however, and you will see glorious Restorationist Romanesque, sumptuous Regency facades, and medievalist romanticism expressed in high Victorian gothic. This is the town of… Read more »
“The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has unveiled plans to require larger shops to ‘take back’ used electrical items such as toasters for recycling, even if the items were bought elsewhere, the Telegraph reports”
There is no need for this. At my local council run “recycling centre” (aka rubbish disposal) the all male staff there are focussed mainly on getting hold of any non ferrous metal and electrical items. They even follow people up the steps to the metal recycling bin to check if there is copper, aluminium or small appliances to be taken.
There enthusiasm for this part of the work suggests there is a financial incentive.
We used to have once a month recycling skips in our town but now we have to drive 6 miles with a pre-booked appointment to dispose of rubbish the bin men don’t take. Sadly but naturally, we have more being dumped on verges, in fields and in the forest.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/three-female-mps-get-taxpayer-funded-bodyguards-over-safety-fears-llqhgz7zk
Which proves MP’s have failed in their job. Their responsibility is to keep the people of this country safe. Now we are expected to fund bodyguards so that they can carry on doing exactly what got us in to this mess. They have clearly defined their failings and should resign.
Whoops, got that wrong.
They CGTF
W.r.t. excess deaths, it should be known by now that they haven’t been so bad, according to the ONS, with them changing the mathematical model so that the expected ones have gone up, such that the excess is lower.
“Church of England yet to set up £100m slavery reparations fund after a year”
I don’t suppose they asked their congregations for their opinion about this, since the congregations’ donations, and British Taxpayers, will be funding these scandalous “reparations” while church buildings are desperately in need of money for repairs.