Breathtakingly Awful: The ITV Drama Department Outdoes the BBC with New NHS-Worshipping, Pro-Lockdown, Anti-Tory Propaganda Series

A major benefit of having low expectations is that one is rarely disappointed. Hence when the Daily Sceptic asked me to review Breathtaking on ITV I was initially pleasantly surprised.

As an example of the medical dramatisation genre, Breathtaking is well crafted; as one might expect when the writing team includes the former doctor Jed Mercurio, probably familiar to readers as the producer of Line of Duty. To doctors of my generation, Mercurio will be remembered for Cardiac Arrest, the brutally accurate portrayal of working life on the wards in the mid 1990s featuring smoking hot Helen Baxendale as the ruthlessly effective junior physician Dr. Claire Maitland.

Sadly, Breathtaking lacks such an alluring female lead. Nevertheless, the acting is high quality, plausibly depicting how hospital staff interact with each other and their patients, even down to the totally clueless junior doctor.

The first episode also succeeds to large degree in portraying the uncertainty of early March 2020 about the nature of the Covid virus. Hindsight can distort memory. At the time it was not clear that for the vast majority of the population, COVID-19 would prove to be little worse than a bad outbreak of seasonal influenza. There was genuine and well-founded anxiety within the medical community that we were facing a very serious public health emergency, and it was rapidly obvious to front line clinicians that preparations for such an eventuality were non-existent. Insofar as it is possible to convey a sense of unease and impending catastrophe, the first episode does a reasonably good job.

Unfortunately, that’s about it for the positives. Breathtaking soon reveals itself as a thinly disguised political polemic, featuring the customary tropes of our sacralised NHS. In the opening scene, the selflessly heroic Dr. Abby Froggatt finds her facemask doesn’t pass the test designed to prove exclusion of aerosolised particles. From this observation, she deduces that PPE is only for men. From there, the writers indulge themselves with the full smorgasbord of sanctimonious virtue signalling victimhood. In the middle of the second episode, an overly emotional middle grade doctor accuses the hospital director of being unconcerned with the plight of frontline clinical staff. In a particularly confrontational moment, he utters the memorable line: “Do you know who’s dying down there? It’s certainly not the white people up here.” From that low point, I’m afraid the series continues rapidly downhill.

That really sums up Breathtaking. It’s a slickly produced piece of propaganda, pushing a retrospective defence of the lockdown protagonists and their attendant ideological baggage. Again, this is hardly surprising when the writing team includes former journalist and palliative care physician Rachel Clarke. Readers will recall Dr. Clarke’s vigorous pro-lockdown activism during the Covid period. The series illustrates many of the reasons why such catastrophically bad decisions were made. When emotion and fear take precedence over reason and logic, big mistakes follow, particularly when hysteria is amplified by the mainstream media.

I could spend considerable time detailing the dramatic devices juxtaposing heroic clinical staff with incompetent evil conservative politicians – to be frank, just listing the recognisable stereotypes would take several hundred words. There’s no point reciting this litany because readers of the Daily Sceptic can easily figure it out for themselves. As episodes roll by, the script ramps up the intensity of the narrative arc, spraying blame for Covid deaths on politicians, administrators and online disinformation with an increasingly crude editorial line that abandons any attempt at concealing pro-lockdown bias. My only surprise is that the phrase ‘like a war zone’ didn’t crop up until the end of episode three.

The timing is slightly curious, dovetailing as it does with the ongoing Covid enquiry and an impending election. A cynic might suspect ITV executives were trying to convince the public that the Government erred in not locking down sooner and harder. Perish the thought…

Breathtaking is a formulaic, predictable and ultimately tedious piece of low-grade 21st century TV. I have little doubt it will attract excellent viewing figures. When a programme is so blatantly manipulative, it ceases to be entertainment and becomes mildly irritating. I rarely watch television. Breathtaking has reminded me why.

The author, the Daily Sceptic’s in-house doctor, is a former NHS consultant.

Stop Press: The Mail reports that in tonight’s episode a doctor declares that the country should have been quicker and harsher on the second lockdown in autumn 2020. Dr. Abbey Henderson, played by Downton Abbey‘s Joanne Froggatt, declares on a radio phone-in: “I believe there have been deaths from Covid in care homes, in hospitals, in the back of ambulances, that resulted from locking down too late and incompletely.”

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

55 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

“There was genuine and well-founded anxiety”

There was well-funded anxiety 

wokeman
wokeman
2 years ago

I congratulate the writer of this piece on a brilliantly funny review that had me really chortling. Sounds like a truly dreadful program, one wonders at the sludge inside the brains of ppl who watch this drivel.

Marque1
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

And the people who write it.

modularist
2 years ago

I don’t watch TV. This reminds me why.

Douglas Brodie
Douglas Brodie
2 years ago

The “catastrophically bad decisions” were deliberate. Covid was a globally-coordinated “plandemic”. For explanation of the how and why, search for

Joel Smalley substack, Reiner Fuellmich’s Grand Jury Court of Public Opinion

transmissionofflame
2 years ago

“There was genuine and well-founded anxiety within the medical community that we were facing a very serious public health emergency”

Question for the In-house doctor. What steps did the “medical community” take to find out for themselves the truth of what they were being told? How is it possible that a significant minority of experts in the field correctly identified that there was no emergency?

D J
D J
2 years ago

Personally I re-read my Immunology textbooks, did an online course in ICU nursing and volunteered to wipe bums in ICU so that trained staff could do what was needed.2 months later after many emails and vast bureaucracy I was told I wasn’t needed.
That tipped me over the edge to real fury,which had been building as I watched the madness unfold.
I tried to carry on face to face work as I felt it was my duty.
When vaccines came in I refused the mRNA ones and finally refused a booster resulting in a threat of unemployment only rescinded two weeks before it was due to happen.
Early on I’d expected a big ‘I told you so!’ from me to those who had kowtowed,but soon realised that they simply wanted to forget.
So many real sceptical heroes out there have been a great support.
The pieces still need to be picked up and the right lessons learned,or re-learned as was done with Asian flu and Hong Kong flu.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  D J

Interesting; thanks. Did you ever think there was a “very serious public health emergency”? At what point did you stop believing that, and why?

Peter W
Peter W
2 years ago

Slightly sceptical for 10 days (it’s my default setting), then when I had gleaned a bit more information I was totally sceptical. Unfortunately those around me were lapping it up and bashing their pans.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

I’m still a bit baffled that so many people embraced it so enthusiastically. I kept thinking that such a huge upheaval that was interfering with people’s lives and livelihoods would have made people want to find good news, but no-one seemed to look for it. Once I had read about the Diamond Princess I thought “ah, that’s OK then, this isn’t the huge threat it has been painted as”.

Peter W
Peter W
2 years ago

People are trained to believe whatever the “authorities” say and many loved being paid to stay at home. Not so good for those not getting handouts such as self employed.
Basically they are lazy and lack a sceptical streak.
Yes, Diamond Princess was clincher for me. They should have censored that!

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

It didn’t float my boat but I can just about accept the first 2-3 weeks being paid to do nothing, and the sun was shining. After that, what kind of life is it? Weirdos.

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

When my wife’s retired doctor sent this letter to the Telegraph…

IMG_0838
Jon Mors
Jon Mors
2 years ago

At the time it was not clear that for the vast majority of the population, COVID-19 would prove to be little worse than a bad outbreak of seasonal influenza. I would say that this is only partly true. End March 2020 the Lancet published this: The fatality rate for children 0-9 is 0.0026% , so 2.6 in 100,000 The fatality rate for children 10-19 is 0.015% so 1.5 in 10,000 The fatality rate for adults 40-49 is 0.71 so 7 in 1000 The fatality rate for adults 80+ is 23.3% so 23 in 100 So what I would say is that this is probably ‘worse than bad flu’ for the average person, it is nevertheless not highly alarming (whilst acknowledging that if you work in a hospital you’d be concerned about an influx of the elderly). Same article had this line A unique situation has arisen for quite an accurate estimate of the CFR of COVID-19. Among individuals onboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship, data on the denominator are fairly robust. The outbreak of COVID-19 led passengers to be quarantined between Jan 20, and Feb 29, 2020. This scenario provided a population living in a defined territory without most other… Read more »

alfarom
alfarom
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

And regarding the fatality figures. They can’t be trusted. Plenty of people included who may have had a very dodgy test in the previous 28 days and then died of something or else. Or were near death and then put down as covid deaths.

JohnK
2 years ago
Reply to  alfarom

And in lots of places the protocol for issuing death certificates has been relaxed a bit. The late Harold Shipman would have loved it.

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

No, they were relaxed A LOT!

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

I suggest if we had always had Covid and Flu was the new virus then we would have had Flu lockdowns. My old dad used to say “When in doubt do nothing”. ——-Governments can never seem to “do nothing” and often they act for reasons other than that claimed. It is often the “Never let a good crisis go to waste” tactics.

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

Where I work it was apparent this virus was already here and going through the staff in February 2020. A number had come back from skiing in Italy and were off with bad sniffles and I had a bit of a cough. When the lockdown was declared I was instructed to work from home but after for 2 weeks it was realised various activities couldn’t happen. Myself and a couple of other colleagues were then instructed to be in and we had letters to be given to the police if stopped. We were then in every day. Early on I was told I could not sit where I was because I was 4 cm under the 2m distance for ‘social distancing’, which is an oxymoron, but I continued sitting there. To my company’s credit they did not mandate any of the ‘vaccines’ but strongly advised. I know no one that has died from Covid. I know several people that have died from cancer.

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

My cousin died from Covid: male, late ’50s, overweight, vegetarian, professional photographer who spent a lot of time in his dark room so almost certainly Vit D deficient.

I know 8 people who have died from strokes and cancer post jab …. and many more who have had heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, neurological problems, liver problems, debilitating anxiety and unidentified “I just don’t feel well …. all the time.”

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

The wife of a friend died and Covid was the reason given. Oh, by the way, she was also undergoing treatment for leukemia

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

One of the ‘nudges’ (thanks Cameron) was the assertion that the ‘vaccines’ were the only way we could get off the naughty step (which turned out to not be true). The WHO even changed the definition of immunity. See below.

who
Shirespeed
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

The WHO also changed the definition of pandemic and vaccine to suit the agenda.

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  Shirespeed

Wonder why the ‘down tick’ to your fact

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  Shirespeed

It was changed from “deaths” to “cases” so PCR tests were used to tell perfectly healthy people that they were poorly, hence the doom counters in the corner of your TV screen when watching the ‘news’

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

It WAS clear because 5 days before the first lockdown, the Government downgraded Covid to a Low Consequence Infectious Disease ….. because they had data which demonstrated it had low mortality rates.

I reckon* it would have taken the Public Health Blob, Civil Service and Ministers a month to get through the processes to downgrade it, including preparing the Comms and getting it all signed off. (* Retired CS).

alfarom
alfarom
2 years ago

The Daily Mail was trying to give it its usual positive spin but it is good to see that the majority of posters aren’t having it. If you’ve lost the Mail you’ve lost the middle ground. Why do they keep supporting this evil?

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  alfarom

Offen on Mailonline comments are not accepted. You don’t really get the true overall opinion of readers as comments are removed or don’t even appear in the first place.

alfarom
alfarom
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

I know, that’s why it’s so surprising there are so many of these types of posts

Shirespeed
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

On the contrary. With certain articles the Daily Mail doesn’t allow comments for a reason. This is because they already know what form the vast majority of comments would take.

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Shirespeed

Yes they will no doubt have their reasons. But this gives a false picture of the extent of feeling on issues. Here at the DS we do not have that problem. The most rabid Progressive and phony planet saver gets to have their say, along with Trump supporting anti lockdown people who know there isn’t any kind of climate crisis.

varmint
2 years ago

I know it is impossible to pass comment on trash if you never watch trash. But just like Bridgerton I probably don’t need to see it to realise it’s trash propaganda qualities.

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

But, people will watch and because there are actors acting in an over dramatic way, caricaturing medical professionals, they will consider this to be all true and real. It is as if dramatizing and caricaturing can represent objective truth and the more acting the more true the story.

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

My wife was a Sister and she tells me that Doctors etc NEVER have their stethoscope around their neck. This is all fiction. ——I am ok with fiction though, but I am not ok when the fiction tries to indoctrinate regarding the 5 main political agenda’s of Equality Diversity Race Gender and Climate. ———You can spot these programs from 40 paces

ELH
ELH
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

Have you read Miri AF’s latest? All about actors: (35) Miri’s Massive Missives | Miri AF | Substack

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  ELH

I will – thanks

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

I have and she hits all the nails on the head.

DS99
2 years ago

When I read this https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-jabbing-actor-does-my-bum-look-big-in-this-covid-drama/ I thought it was a made up programme. It’s worth a read just for the phrase “my bottom is an important feature of episode three as I lay life saving arrows on the floor of the reception area”.

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  DS99

Wonder if it featured in any of the many puerile tik tok videos…

zebedee
zebedee
2 years ago

Disinformation? Presumably not claimed to be spread by the medics themselves.

Logic puzzle – when were they lying? Masks only work in hospitals. Masks work on mannequins. Masks mandated no matter what they are made of.

Maths puzzle – it’s growing exponentially? At what time does it exceed population size? What law of Maths is being broken here?

If you want something truthful to watch then how about a game of cards?

Peter W
Peter W
2 years ago
Reply to  zebedee

Addendum: masks don’t work in hospitable either.

sskinner
2 years ago

“…facemask doesn’t pass the test designed to prove exclusion of aerosolised particles.”
Right from the start a lot of emphasis was given to the virus being transmitted via droplets as if this was the only mechanism and ignoring the fact the Wuhan Flu was a respiratory infection. Humans breathe air and not water. In this ITV drama there is a scene in an ambulance where the crew say they couldn’t do CPR because they didn’t have PPE “it’s droplet generated”. This is blatant propaganda.
I visited Southampton General Hospital yesterday and they mandate face masks – the ones that surgeons wear. I have attached a picture of the wrapper for a pack of face masks. Notice highlighted parts 1, 2 and 3.

Face-Mask-with-highlights
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

Wrong photo. The third highlight is the last assertion, bottom right. In addition while we were threatened with causing manslaughter if we didn’t wear a mask there was zero instructions of what to do with a worn mask. There were zero bio-hazard containers and all the bin men and the like would have been exposed to all this ‘contaminated’ bio hazard – or not, as was the case.

James.M
James.M
2 years ago

I watched two minutes of it tonight. There is only one word that sums it up – dire.

Shirespeed
2 years ago

“and it was rapidly obvious to front line clinicians that preparations for such an eventuality were non-existent”
Really? I thought there was a pandemic preparedness plan, which although it contained some sensible advice, stopped well short of the pointless theft of human rights and civil liberties, was rapidly discarded in favour of the lockdown drivel peddled by Ferguson, and cheered on by the likes of Rachel Clarke and her ilk.

Myra
2 years ago

I am afraid I cannot watch this.
To have a program supporting lockdowns, ignoring the harms of lockdowns and the sanctification of medical personnel who did not allow people to visit their relatives in hospital is wrong.
And I have an issue with this continued assertion that we did not know what we were dealing with early 2020. We knew enough. Average age of death, Diamond Princess data, the fact that lockdowns were too harmful to contemplate.
Common Sense went out of the window and emotion and fear were the order of the day

marebobowl
marebobowl
2 years ago

I don’t usually take medical advice from a TV drama, nor a Downton abbey actor. The best anyone can do is turn your tv off. It serves no purpose.

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

The only thing I watch on ITV (catch up) is The Chase.

So I’ll be giving this a miss, along with everything else they churn out.

Peter W
Peter W
2 years ago

I don’t watch much TV either but the missus sprung this awful programme on me!
I agree with all the sentiments of the article and comments. We have episode 3 to “look forward to”. Aaaarrgghhh!
I try to see it as a drama about a small group of panicked medics floundering around in the dark. The only thing I do agree with is the dreadful lack of PPE – although we know masks were making no difference and a bin liner even less!

T. Prince
2 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

Peter, as a member of one of the ‘blue light’ services I sat on the Local and Regional Resilience Forums (Civil Contingencies Act) established to plan for major risks affecting the UK. The National Flu Plan sat at the top of risk register for many years and, although this was mysteriously ditched when the ‘pandemic’ hit, one of the issues that had to be covered was the provision of PPE. I was surprised and concerned then that provision of PPE was a major problem, someone responsible for procurement with the NHS had obviously failed in their duties….

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
2 years ago

If this blatant tunnel-vision propaganda discredits the authenticity of ITV’s recent portrayal of the Post Office scandal then that really will be a tragedy.

Peter W
Peter W
2 years ago

Remember, though, that they whitewashed out Andrew Bridgen so not sure about authenticity.

A. Contrarian
2 years ago

American medical dramas are just as bad although with less anti-govt propaganda on the whole; had to stop watching Gray’s Anatomy because of the ridiculously OTT hero-doctor-poses and dramatic music in the first Covid episode, another drama we are also watching has been much better apart from killing off the Asian father of one of the lead characters who of course died because he wasn’t given the same treatment as a white person would have been given, and another black member of staff was also seriously ill because of, er, racism towards black people even though the staff all love her. They didn’t string it out too much but still now a series or two later they take any chance to shoehorn it in (“He’s just like those people who didn’t believe covid existed, even as they were dying from it” etc etc).

adamcollyer
adamcollyer
2 years ago

“There was genuine and well-founded anxiety within the medical community that we were facing a very serious public health emergency… a sense of unease and impending catastrophe”

Poppycock. It was completely clear from the start if you guys had bothered to look at the evidence, that it was no worse than a bad flu.

Sadly you were too busy getting your hysteria from the TV and newspapers.

JohnnyDollar
JohnnyDollar
2 years ago

I saw 2 minutes of this garbage in a hotel room & it was disgusting.