Senior BBC Employee Called Jewish People “Nazis” and White People a “Barbaric Bloodthirsty Rapacious Murderous Genocidal Thieving Parasitical Deviant Breed”
A senior BBC employee branded Jewish people “Nazis” and white people “parasites” in a string of social media posts. The Telegraph has more.
The BBC has been informed of statements made online by Dawn Queva, who is a scheduling coordinator at BBC Three, according to her online profile.
Posts made on her Facebook page include calling Jewish people “Nazi apartheid parasites” that funded a “holohoax”.
Her posts repeatedly attack white people, calling them a “virus” and “mutant invader species”.
Ms. Queva, whose location is listed as London on her Linkedin profile, also brands the U.K. “bigoted” and “genocidal” and claims white Europeans are “melanin-recessive parasites”.
The posts come after Tim Davie, the BBC Director General, held a “listening” session for staff concerns following the breakout of the Israel-Hamas conflict, which has led some Jewish employees to file official complaints about antisemitism.
Ms. Queva’s posts were made under the name of Dawn Las Quevas-Allen on Facebook, but it has the same profile picture as her regular profile, and trade magazine Deadline reports that her identity has been confirmed.
She previously worked with Disney and UKTV, according to her Linkedin profile.
Some of the posts state that white people have disturbed the natural order of the planet and are a “barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving parasitical deviant breed”.
What a delightful person. No wonder she’s getting on well at the BBC. She seems to have a good grasp of DEI ideology.

Fortunately for her, it’s not possible to be racist against white people. In fact, it’s racist to suggest that racism against whites is a problem. So one imagines she’ll be fine.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Queva has continued defiantly posting today, writing “Come at me by all means, my shoulders are broad” as she continued to publish a string of messages attacking Jewish and white people, the Mail reports. No public response yet from the BBC, though a spokesman said the corporation has “well-established and robust processes” to deal with antisemitism. “We do not tolerate anti-Semitism, Islamophobia or any form of abuse and we take any such allegations seriously and take appropriate disciplinary action wherever necessary,” he added.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If you can be anything be kind! 🙏🙏
That can’t be racist, because the judge said racism can’t be defined. I expect the remark was taken out of context…
😀😀😀
Here’s your ticket Ms Queva.
Where am I going?
Gaza. One way.
But……but…
I must object to this! This would be a most cruel and unusual punishment for the people in Gaza!
😀😀😀
Yep. Or Nigeria. I’m pretty confident Boko Haram would welcome her with open arms, and she need never endure the sight of another Jewish or white person for the rest of her shortened life.
Well by the power of Free Speech, I’m just going to say it; She’s a black racist!!!!😡
Oooh the dark clouds are forming, and was that a clap of thunder?🤔 I’m so in for it now.😆 Right, well…it was nice knowing you…🙃
Yep, she’s a Black Racist no question. This also means she qualifies as an oxygen thief.
Can’t be, they don’t exist.
OK, Mogwai, I agree. Unfortunately the law says that none of us can be racist, because the term racist cannot be defined, and is not defined in law. Therefore every case which ever made a claim of any kind of racism is instantly stuck down. Every payment made because of allegedly claimed racism in employment, must be returned immediately. As it is now impossible to be racist in any way, we should all make every remark we ever wanted to, and of course any such remark cannot be censored in any way, because it is automatically meaningless. You see where this gets us? Into complete nonsense, good plan! Lawrence Fox has done all of us a huge favour, free speech is now more free than ever!
Not a direct flight – stopover in Yemen
Oh, most definitely. 😀
Perhaps a quiet sacking and a one way ticket to any country that will have her is in order. Clearly she must be very unhappy here in this country full of us ‘melanin-recessive parasites.’ I would point her towards one of the definitions of parasite and suggest she starts becoming more self-conscious:
Parasite: An organism that lives and feeds on or in an organism of a different species and causes harm to its host.
Not white people then, we are exactly the same specis as herself. Ignorant fool as well then, perhaps she means worms?
An important wee dump:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/farmers-must-resist/
1,000 people attended a meeting organised by British farmers at Welshpool last night. Let’s hope they can mobilise. Our futures depend on their success.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-climate-scaremongers-bbc-and-the-great-hurricane-hype/
Paul Homewood at TCW taking apart the hurricane myths.
A parasite is an animal which makes a living from other animals to whose well-being its existence is usually detrimental. Like, say, an exclusively melanated gendersomething paid via the BBC license fee.
“barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving parasitical deviant”.
That would look great on a T Shirt
I could wear that while my ‘Far right and proud’ shirt is in the wash…
😀😀😀
I kind of fancy a t-shirt emblazoned thus:
Farther right than far right.
She says her back is broad enough …..
In connection to Palestine she is right.
The problem is that let’s say she gets the sack because of this, many (not here but normies) might think “problem solved”. But the issue is that IMO the state has no business running, owning or funding a news and entertainment media empire, and IMO no business regulating content either. The BBC is institutionally leftist, but even if it weren’t, it has no place in a sensible state.
I will second that tof.
I was thinking of trying for a job at the BBC as I’m a big believer in DEI. Equity means that I should be paid the same as Gary Lineker.
What a nice genderperson. /major sarc. Must try and invite her over for dinner one day to discuss her views with my fellow barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving deviant melanin-deficient parasitical chums, ask her why she forgot to include ‘far right’, ‘transphobic’, ‘TERF’ and references to ‘white privilege’ and ‘slave reparations’ in her description.
Another good question would be: Assuming all of this is true, how come she made a career in the media here instead of us flaying her alive in order to eat her after raping her a bit for good measure?
That’s if you make it through the first course without one of your fellow barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving deviant melanin-deficient parasitical chums murdering the others in a bloodthirsty attack, taking all their wallets and purses and then nicking all the silverware and the dinner plates…bloody barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving deviant melanin-deficient parasitical barstewards! You gotta be careful in this country…
I would rather let her go 12 rounds with Mike Tyson
Of course the BBC doesn’t “tolerate” anti-semitism!
They strain every sinew to promote it!
Defund the BBC NOW!
I don’t think that it is a particularly intelligent journalistic technique to point out some extremist who opposes you as if to say ‘look see what they’re like!’. Strikes me as rather shoddy. Whatever your position you can always find some popinjay to make you look good but good taste should prevent you from doing so
These posts seem to be made in a personal capacity, not as a BBC employee, and therefore should not be used against her in relation to her job, whether they are racist or anti-Semitic or whatever. An employer should not have a right to control an employee’s expression of opinion in their private (meaning non-work) life. The BBC should not be involved in a response to these posts. In fact the BBC should be irrelevant.
…’hmm. I see.
If this apology of a planetary organism was employed anywhere else …. game over.
Next career move….??
Poor woman,she looks so young, with such a long life ahead of her, with all that hate and sadness in her life. Somebody tell her that life is going to get a whole lot worse when the dollar fails or they introduce CBDC’s , whichever comes first😂😂👍
The BBC “we do not tolerate anti-Semitism, Islamophobia or any form of abuse”…… except if its against white people, particularly white working class men. They’re fair game.
Presumably it’s the “barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving parasitical deviant breed” that are paying her wages.
She is unaware of the involvement of her ancestors in this activity…… not believable.
I have sympathy for her. To wake up every morning, look in the mirror and exclaim ” Oh sh*t I’m black”. Life’s a b*tch then you die.
If a white person made such ferocious statements regarding race their feet would not touch the ground as an army of plod would be battering their door down at 6 am to drag them off to the DEI gulag.
I imagine the MET Plod knealers will be hot footing it to meet with her …… ?
Where is Marianna Spring when you need her?…
She doesn’t sound like a nice person.
But I am slightly conflicted here.
Free speech and all that.
Do current laws not deal with racism already? In that case should she be prosecuted?
The law has just decided that racism is undefined, therefore cannot be an excuse for meaningless prosecutions for “nothing”. Lawrence Fox has just lost a deformation case where he was called racist, because there is no definition in law! Racism is now as meaningless as the word “****”, used in any context.
Personally I agree the BBC did right to sack her but her personal bizarre opinions are unrelated to her job. So shouldn’t the FSU be supporting her?