News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/12/30/michael-gove-told-scrap-funding-inter-faith-network/

Our so-called government has no business whatsoever in handing over taxpayers money to fake, tax-dodging charities.

Taxes are raised to benefit society as a whole. Personally I object to ALL payments to charities by government. If a charidee cannot raise funds legitimately on merit then it deserves to die.

Always remember…donations to charidees are simply secondary taxation for the gullible.

EppingBlogger
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Charitable status should be allowed only for organisations that do something useful. Lobbying, “research” and political campaigns should not be charities.

only incidental research and policy work directly in support of their main function should be permitted.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12881399/Councils-hiking-car-parking-prices-54-year-Hertfordshire-New-Forest-Southampton-seeing-sharpest-increases-does-area-fare.html

As WEF instructions go this must be the most blatant – how to kill high streets and town centres in one easy go. Bloody hell some town centres are half dead already. Increasing parking charges should effectively kill off most High Streets and the markets and businesses therein.

Agenda 2030 going to plan.

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

As far as I can see most town centres are in their death throes. And, I agree, by design. The places that are thriving are the retail parks on the edges of towns that are just full of big chains. Control the flow of traffic, control the flow of money, control the destruction of independent business. Keep reducing the fail-safes until the only ones that exist are the ones you control. Then…. bang.

NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

The big chains are in trouble too in Town Centres. Councils seem to see parking charges as both revenue maker and Earth Saver. I know people see Agenda 2030 in this, but its more to do with stupidity of following yet another ill-thought out ‘plan to save the world’, imo. Lose the vibrant city centre, lose jobs, lose business rates, more benefits, more social issues, more decay, all the time people are shopping online where small businesses thrive if they have their internet game sorted out. Big High Street is dead with or without A2030.

Free Lemming
2 years ago

Happy New Year to everyone. No caveats.

NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

.And to you FL, and all commentators on DS.

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Covid Jab Alarming Rise In Illness 

latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online. 

12a-Covid-Jab-Alarming-Rise-In-Illness-MONOCHROME-copy
NeilParkin
2 years ago

South Park was right once again

Ah.! The contradictory nature of woke strikes again. Toxic masculinity makes men compete physically > Women should never be subjected to male violence. Solution: Put them together in a boxing ring. I marvel at their ability to tie their logic and themselves in knots.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

When it comes to a sport such as boxing that’s divided into weight categories do biological men have much of an advantage over women? Obviously people will recoil at the idea of men hitting women, but if a woman is able to fight back fairly against a similar sized man, the woman has trained to gain the same muscle mass as the man and chooses to enter the fight maybe boxing, and other martial arts, are one of the few sports where women can compete fairly against biological men who have reduced their testosterone levels. If I’m wrong and people can link to studies showing that biological men will always have an advantage over similar sized women fair enough I’ll admit I’m wrong. However I think that most of the studies into male advantage in sport have compared ‘average’ men with ‘average’ women and obviously find that biological men who have gone through puberty as males have a natural advantage due to their larger average size. Obviously this means that in most sports that aren’t divided into weight categories it’s unfair for biological men to compete against women but having weight categories might largely create an almost level playing field.… Read more »

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

It’s an interesting concept if we’re directly comparing weight for weight. IMHO the structural and metabolic differences that occur during puberty will still give trans women-who-were-men an advantage but as you say, difficult to find direct data which doesn’t compare averages; early days, perhaps. This general article highlights a few of the more salient points (heart size/lung capacity differential, metabolic oxygen uptake, body shape, slow/fast twitch muscle fibre differences, peak power per Kg bodyweight, etc):

https://www.shapefit.com/exercise/men-vs-women-exercising.html

The Spina article referenced in the above (endurance VO2 max increases through different sex based mechanisms):

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8226490/

As with other sports, we’ll probably have to wait until a sufficient number of XX women boxers have suffered serious injury for the differences to be accepted….

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

I boxed on and off for over 30 years and had many competitive fights in that time, and I can say without doubt that it wouldn’t be a fair fight. I don’t need to see a study. I hung up my gloves a few years ago but females had been a common sight in the gym many years before that; pound for pound, men hit harder and quicker. I would also say they generally recover from taking a good shot better. It’s not exactly surprising given the natural biological differences between the sexes.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

I don’t know why you’ve attracted so many downvotes. It’s not an unreasonable question. I think the simple answer is that strength is not distributed in the same way between the sexes – men have stronger upper bodies which are important in combat sports. I think they will also most likely have more fast twitch muscles and better ability to utilise oxygen.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
2 years ago

Thanks for this, it’s a shame so many people automatically downvoted my comment without trying to provide any evidence that I may be wrong. Men may generally have stronger upper bodies but this may be something women can equalise with proper training. Oxygen utilisation might not be an issue in martial arts when rounds only last 3 minutes whereas it would be in events such as distance running or cycling where athletes keep going for much longer periods of time without breaks.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

Indeed a shame. I don’t think “proper training” would make a difference. Women are worse at pretty much every sport pound for pound, at the elite level, compared to elite men. A well trained fit woman could probably beat a lot of men in a boxing match, but that’s not really what we are talking about here. Oxygen utilisation is also about your anaerobic threshold which relates to short burst activity. Women are I believe almost as good as men at ultramarathons. People’s athletic ability like most abilities will probably form a bell curve, and the elite are outliers – but the female bell curve will be slightly to the left of the male one, just like the different bell curves in sprinting of people of west African origin vs everyone else, or people of east African origin in distance running. As someone else points out, logically the “open” category would be males plus trannies, not females plus trannies. The trannies, assuming they are mediocre, would not qualify for elite level competition with males – they would be competing in a category appropriate to their level. In non-contact sports, women could enter men’s events but they would simply almost never… Read more »

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
2 years ago

I agree with athletic ability being a bell curve, and the general female curve being to the left of males, but a lot of this is down to men on average being larger than women. When comparing men and women of equal weights is the female bell curve to the left of the male curve? I’m thinking of Laura Hubbard the bloke who represented New Zealand in female weightlifting at the Tokyo Olympics and finished well outside the medal positions. Obviously one example doesn’t prove a point but he didn’t have any massive advantage as a biological male.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

You only need to look at weightlifting world records which are by the weight of the competitor. List of world records in Olympic weightlifting – Wikipedia I picked a couple at random and in both cases the male record is way higher than the female one. I don’t have time to check but I imagine there will be hundreds of men who can lift more than the best female – maybe thousands. Of course a given woman could outlift a given man but at the elite level they would not get the qualifying score to be able to compete. Dividing people into categories that are not simply the level of performance by sex, age and weight is an attempt to level the playing field so that more people in each category can compete for medals/records. You may view this as somewhat arbitrary, but it’s what has evolved and it seems to suit people – both at the professional and amateur level. There’s also a safety aspect for combat/contact sports. Removing those categories would screw the whole thing up royally. Having men and women compete against one another would destroy female elite sport – they would not get on TV, not… Read more »

NickR
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Essentially, the women’s category becomes the ‘open’ category. Surely, if you’re going to offer an ‘open’ category it should be the men’s.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago

Nicola Sturgeon is still an MSP. That’s not a downfall but a reduction in pay, responsibility and media attention but retaining the opportunity to influence.

Alongside that, she gets to monetise her previous dictatorial role with a book deal.

When does Alex Salmond’s “reckoning” start?

WyrdWoman
2 years ago

Woke corporatism has started to implode” 

Dream on. They’ll just find other, more sinister, ways to push/nudge/indoctrinate the same DEI/ESG/2030/globalist/useless eater tropes.

A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

They can let woke themes on gender, sexuality and race go back and forth like tennis ball watching as long as they can hold the line at energy, money and identity control.

NeilofWatford
2 years ago

A very happy new year to all my fellow blogees on DS.
May your posts prosper.

Dinger64
2 years ago

“Britain is no longer safe – and few police chiefs care”

It’s called ‘ to hell in a handcart ‘ welcome to 21st century Britain!

Dinger64
2 years ago

More shyte, different year😁 let’s make it a green one🤯
The very best to all of you!

Dinger64
2 years ago

“Woke crime guidelines and questioning branded ‘ludicrous’”

Rape victim: “I’m a man”
Rapist: “I’m a woman”

Dinger64
2 years ago

https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2023/12/31/lithium-ion-battery-fire-in-hold-of-cargo-ship-near-dutch-harbor-extinguished/

Are you sure?

“After lithium-ion batteries burned in a large cargo ship’s hold for a number of days, the U.S. Coast Guard said late Saturday that the fire was out and directed the ship to anchor near Dutch Harbor.”

“Near”Dutch Harbor? If your so confident it’s out, why not bring it in to the dock?
More liar liar pants on fire (no pun intended)
to protect your little green precious toy battery🔋agenda!

Freddy Boy
2 years ago

Best Wishes for 2024 fellow Sceptics ,(until the WHO treaty gets waved through 🤯) “May your Gods go with you” 🥰

Dinger64
2 years ago

“NEW: USA Boxing will now allow biological males to compete with females starting in 2024 under their new “Transgender policy”

In a sport where the ultimate win is to stop your apponent’s brain from working (knockout)!
So, Mike Tyson calls himself a woman and kills his female apponent! How many women will die before they realise this wasn’t such a good idea?

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago

I’m surprised John Pilger’s death was not included.

A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

I’m not surprised but it’s a big loss.