News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

Anti-snooping laws planned for Sunak’s Britcoin after major backlash” – Britons who use digital pounds issued by the Bank of England will have their privacy “guaranteed” under new laws designed to allay snooping fears, reports the Telegraph.

Oh thank goodness for that! That will save us when they next change the law about what we’re allowed to do.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I haven’t read the article but would they really drop the caveat allowing police access to data when there is a suspicion of illegal activity?

Privacy isn’t guaranteed at the moment. Banks can block payments until they are told what it is for.

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Email from our MP
  
Thank you for your email about the draft WHO Treaty. I made clear in my speech and interventions in the debate that the UK must not give any powers away to make our own health decisions. The Minister did confirm the government will not agree text which would allow the WHO to impose a state of pandemic emergency on us against our will, and implied he did not intend to give away the power to make decisions on how to respond to a pandemic. They need to stick with receiving WHO advice leaving us free whether to accept it or not. 
 
Yours sincerely
  
The Rt Hon Sir John Redwood MP, D.Phil, FCSI
Member of Parliament for Wokingham

GroundhogDayAgain
2 years ago

He was quite eloquent. Mr Bridgen pulled a blinder as well.

JeremyP99
2 years ago

Chope in his bumbling way, and Danny Kruger. Thank God there are still some MPs of integrity

JayBee
2 years ago

England’s Kubicki.
Still, encouraging if true.
A big IF though.

EppingBlogger
2 years ago

It was Conservative MPs and leaders who repeatedly told us there was no question of loss of sovereignty when joining the EEC. They told us the flowery language about ever closer union was just the way of those continentals and the clever chaps at the FCO would ensure it developed as we wanted.

Well that was either a total failure of policy or a lie.

What confidence can we have over the WHO treaty.

I see no reason at all for binding treaties on these or many other matters. Good faith cooperation might benefit from a non-expoansionist and non-politically motivated central registrar but nothing more.

We voted for freedom in 2016 but the Tories have failed to deliver.

Free Lemming
2 years ago

I believe the devil’s in the detail…

“…will not agree text which would allow the WHO to impose a state of pandemic emergency on us against our will

“…and implied he did not intend to give away…”

“They need to stick with…”

Worded in such a manner that it’s meaningless.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

against our will“

Who’s will?

A department, a minister, the civil service, the will of a corrupt Parliament or the will of the people?

Ah, I see.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It’s whoever’s will is strongest. At the moment we’re mainly outsourcing that to the government and that’s part of the problem.

MichaelM
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

That’s exactly right. The Social Contract has been broken – we can no longer assume (if we ever could) that Government or Parliament or MPs are acting in good faith in order to improve our lives – which is their job. I am not sure when this happened, but it only really became clear to me over the last 3 years or so.

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Well, quite. There’s also the all-important distinction between being forced to comply and feeling obliged to comply. “against our will” only covers complying because of a forced commitment. It’s deliberately ambiguous.

Monro
2 years ago

‘Biden Administration officials from the U.S. State Department (State), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) all agree that the World Health Organization is in urgent need of reform.

Dr. Atul Gawande, Assistant Administrator for Global Health at USAID, recognized the failures of the WHO during the COVID-19 pandemic 

Dr. Atul Gawande explained the importance of protecting American sovereignty when Member States meet to discuss WHO reforms:

We want respect for our sovereignty, and so we also limit how much WHO can control or demand things of us. And that is one of the challenges here, that we are protective of our own sovereignty and therefore do not want to have those tools challenged or potentially challenge us or other Member States…’

14 Dec. 2023, U.S. Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic hearing:

“Reforming the WHO: Ensuring Global Health Security and Accountability” 

It would be great to hear something similarly clear from our own government.

Steve-Devon
2 years ago

The boiler tax exposes the truth about heat pumps
This article includes a comment to the effect that; few would disagree that we need to reduce carbon emissions. Is that statement correct? It seems to me that it is this sort of blind acceptance of the ‘stop carbon’ narrative that gives the green light for the immiseration of society in the name of net-zero.

This article seems to be on firmer ground when it observes that people will cling on to old boilers and old cars as long as possible, certainly long enough to cause problems for the economy and for the manufacturers of boilers and cars. Already the the car market in the USA seems to be in a right old pickle with dealers stacked out with EVs they cannot sell whilst people cling on to the old petrol/diesel vehicles. The new trendy car driver is in an old car, here is a video of Geoff Buys Cars in his ULEZ beating 1969 Renault 10;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTeTys4MwOg&t=442s

Stuart
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

More CO2 for a greener world…

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Stuart

Exactly.

Of all the utter rubbish spouted about climate the suggestion that a trace gas, necessary for all life on earth, is killing the planet has to be the biggest con and joke ever pulled on humanity.

And it doesn’t take any degree of scientific knowledge to reach that conclusion.

0.04 %! Get a bloody grip.

MichaelM
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

While I agree with you that human-produced CO2 is not an issue for the climate, I am not sure I buy the line that “0.04% is a really small number, therefore…” – how much cyanide in a glass of beer would be enough to have an adverse effect on someone’s health?

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Sorry but this line of reasoning is completely disingenuous, Michael, and is one that the climate alarmists fall back on when faced with such a miniscule figure. Cyanide is a lethal poison; CO2 is not. It’s an essential gas for life. There have been much higher concentrations of CO2 throughout history and yet life flourished.

MichaelM
2 years ago

Aethelred – you have missed my point. I agree that CO2 is an essential gas for life and that CO2 has been much higher in the past – these are persuasive arguments. But saying that a gas can have no impact on something purely because it is a very small proportion of something else (the atmosphere) is not in itself persuasive. I don’t hear William Happer or Richard Lindzen, for example, dismissing the greenhouse effect simply on the basis that CO2 is only a very small proportion of the atmosphere.

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Point taken, Michael. However, HP didn’t exactly say what you inferred. He said ‘…the suggestion that a trace gas, necessary for all life on earth, is killing the planet has to be the biggest con and joke ever...’. Never did he say that it can’t have any impact because it is such a small amount. I also don’t dispute that it doesn’t have any impact but whatever impact that it is, in my view, virtually negligible at those concentrations.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

Thanks Aethelred as you have saved me the trouble of providing such a response 👍

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

The Scottish government consultation to replace boilers and a choice of heating with centralised pollution under the guise of “clean heating”. All-electric systems lend to centralised control also just like smart meters.

https://consult.gov.scot/energy-and-climate-change-directorate/proposals-for-a-heat-in-buildings-bill/

The Scottish government takes climate change through human activity as gospel, does not know what a woman is and thinks the cost of living crisis is due to the cost of fossil fuels (no mention of money printing). Worth providing feedback if only to highlight flaws in their thinking which questions their capacity to make such regulations.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

…”polluting heating systems,” seems to be a very popular phrase in this “consultation” but we’ve already made our decision, document. Presumably that means gas boilers.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Gas, oil, biomass, anything where you could have a fuel reserve on-site. What they prefer are systems that just happen to offer the potential of real-time centralised control.

As part of this, they want to have a regulation that heat networks are used where available.

The heat, they suggest, could be from a data centre. A quick look seemed to show that some proposed data centre sites are those of former power stations. Demolish power station, build power hungry data centre.

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Subsidised Wind Solar Wreak Economic Havoc – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online. 

08a-Subsidised-Wind-Solar-Wreak-Economic-Havoc-MONOCHROME-copy
soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner initiates civil penalty proceedings against X” – Just days after the EU initiated formal legal proceedings against social media company X, Australia has followed suit, writes Rebekah Barnett on Substack.

Go for it Mr Musk. Withdraw access to X for accounts registered in or accessed from Oz. Start with government accounts.

JeremyP99
2 years ago
  • ““Scotland pioneers the 84.5% tax rate” – In the Spectator, Ross Clark draws parallels between Scotland’s new tax rates on high earners and the tax policies of Jim Callaghan’s Labour Government in the 1970s.”

Unexpected bonus of this was the Stones fleeing to the South of France and in scenes of utter debauchery concocting one of the finest albums of rock ‘n roll of all time – Exile On Main Street.

Not to mention The Beatles “Taxman”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMdcE8jdz70

JeremyP99
2 years ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

How fucking good was pop music back in the day?

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/12/21/the-boiler-tax-exposes-the-truth-about-heat-pumps/

Here we go, an article about the absurdity of this campaign against boilers until we reach this:

Few disagree that we need to reduce carbon emissions. Finding more environmentally friendly ways of heating our homes is crucial to achieving it, given that domestic boilers account for an estimated 13pc of the UK’s overall carbon footprint.”boilers account for an estimated 13pc of the UK’s overall carbon footprint.”

Bizarre.

Is Matthew Lynn incapable of doing some research?

Reduce carbon emissions…boilers account for an estimated 13pc of the UK’s overall carbon footprint.”

So f#ckin what? Co2 has sod all to do with a natural and ever changing climate.

Garbage so-called journalism.