Lockdowns Behind Exodus From Africa Driving Mass Immigration, Survey Shows

John Simpson is the BBC’s World Affairs Editor. If ever a self-made man revered his maker, it’s John Simpson.

He’s finally got himself a viral post. 2.4 million people viewed his post disparaging the events earlier this week in Dublin. But, true to form it wasn’t the distressing scene of children being stabbed but the reaction of the local riff-raff that got his goat.

You might think Simpson, being the BBC’s World Affairs Editor, would be pretty well clued up on what drives emigration from Africa. Is it war and global warming or something altogether more mundane?

Migrating from Africa or anywhere else is an expensive business. Generally, it’s not the poor that emigrate but the middle and professional classes. For every migrant crossing the channel in a small boat, 40 other migrants arrive by plane.

A fascinating study of the hopes, dreams and concerns of young Africans has been produced by the Ichikowitz Family Foundation, a market research company based in South Africa. Its African Youth Survey 2022 provides one of the few comprehensive analyses of the key drivers of African migration. The study involved 4,500 face to face interviews with 18-24 years olds across 15 African countries.

The study found that 69% of young Africans wanted to migrate within the next five years with most wanting the move to be permanent. Since 2020 there has been an 11 percentage point drop in ‘Afro-optimism’, which the authors identify as one of the key drivers in the wish to emigrate.

The study identifies the main reasons for them wishing to emigrate as:

  • Economic reasons 44%
  • Education opportunities 41%
  • Want to experience something new and different 25%
  • Corruption in my country 18%
  • Political reasons 12%
  • Security reasons 9%
  • Reuniting with family members living abroad 9%
  • Lack of personal freedoms in my country 9%
  • Religious reasons 7%

It may come as a surprise to John Simpson but neither climate change nor war got a look in (though “security reasons” might include conflict fears). Neither did discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The latest data on this I could find related to a U.K. Government study that showed 6% of asylum claims were based on discrimination in the claimants home country.

A further finding of the African Youth Survey was that young Africans see the consequence of infectious diseases being the biggest change in the last five years that has affected both their personal circumstances and that of their nation. Indeed, such was the severity of this, that what in 2019 had been quite an optimistic outlook had reversed and was now far more pessimistic.

The study found that the decline in Afro-optimism can likely be attributed to the global Covid response. Nearly half (45%) of African youth say that deaths from infectious diseases such as COVID-19, Ebola, tuberculosis, malaria and HIV/AIDS is the event that has had the largest impact on the continent in the past five years, an increase of 19% since the 2020 African Youth Survey. The researchers comment that this deterioration is likely caused by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The question is, where did the youth of Africa get the idea that Covid posed a threat to them? The data show that deaths from Covid in Africa, cumulatively since 2020 at 181 per million were 15 times lower than the rate of 2,799 per million across Europe.

Figure 1

This miniscule death rate came about despite the vaccination rate across Africa being about one third of the rate in Europe.

However, we only have to look at where these young Africans get their news to begin to understand why they were misled into believing that they faced an existential threat from Covid. Apparently, 69% of them believe that the BBC is a very, or somewhat trustworthy source of information. We’re back with John Simpson and his ilk and misleading information.

Figure 2

Exactly who benefits from migration is hard to determine. Some economists argue that we need more migrants and that they drive up GDP, though the recent sluggish growth during years of record migration make that hard to credit. Whether there are any winners is debatable. However, there’s definitely a loser, and that’s the country from which they migrate.

Covid in Africa was effectively a confected panic, confected by the BBC and other international broadcasters and by global institutions such as the WHO. It looks very much like it has led directly to yet another unforeseen consequence, that of the young, middle-class, well educated, motivated Africans wishing to leave their home countries in ever greater numbers.

John Simpson does a huge disservice to Africa by portraying it as a continent of war and apocalyptic climate change. I’d encourage you to read the study for yourselves; the views of the young people don’t reflect Simpson’s characterisation at all. Rather they come across as entrepreneurial with so much get up and go that increasingly they’ve got up and gone.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jeepybee
2 years ago

You’d think that in the age of readily available data and hard facts, people wouldn’t be blaming “global warming” for immigrants “fleeing” other countries.

I’m genuinely interested to know what they think “global warming” is doing to Sub Sahara Africa? Do they think it’s causing the sea to chase people into the hills or is the sun suddenly setting fire to houses?

Even a layman’s cursory glance at data would prove their fears to be absolutely ridiculous.

As always, what a bunch of clowns (and other words starting with C).

A. Contrarian
2 years ago
Reply to  jeepybee

Doesn’t Simpson know you’re not supposed to call it global warming any more?

FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  jeepybee

The Sahara is greening – surely for some idiot dolt like Simpson that is good news?

And who the hell flees a 1.5C or less increase in temps?

And what about the many places which are colder than 100 years ago – do they also drive the peasants into a migratory revolt?

BBC is utter horse shit.

Corky Ringspot
2 years ago
Reply to  jeepybee

Words beginning with C? Yes they really are a bunch of crazies, aren’t they! Crazy, clueless chumps – I know what you mean!

wokeman
wokeman
2 years ago

John Simpson another pompous orifice, I find it remarkable anyone has ever paid good money for his terrible books. It’s fairly remarkable how stupid these ppl are, he’s another clown who’s more interested in propping up the narrative (climate change) than the facts (we live in an ice age). I suppose being a regime lackey pays well.

FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Indeed a paid clown, paid actor to spew the lies and propaganda. -2 C this am where I am. Simptard will tell me this is the hottest Dec 1 evah…..

A. Contrarian
2 years ago

I can’t believe they’re coming here (or anywhere else in the world) to avoid Covid. If they are watching the BBC or similar then surely they know that Covid was a worldwide phenomenon and in fact, according to the majority of news sources the UK was highly negligent, locked down too late, allowed everyone to die for the sake of the economy etc etc.

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  A. Contrarian

They are coming here because the EU and it’s pathetic progressive one world governments opened the front door and shouted “In you come”.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
2 years ago

They aren’t fleeing war or “global warming”; they are seeking to leverage off the human capital that exists in Western countries. Unfortunately, this is a downwards spiral, as it is the more ambitious and able who choose to immigrate, making the places they have left the worse for it, further increasing the pressure to migrate. The demand for migration will only cease once here is as bad as there, and we have achieved an awful equilibrium.

Connor McGregor for European dictator for life!

Free Lemming
2 years ago

I never understood The Great Replacement theory until recently. And now it makes perfect sense. Lower birth rates in first world countries, but sustain population numbers. Depopulation without economic harm. And dilute identity as part of the package, making control of the masses easier. No idea why it’s taken me so long to understand something so blindingly obvious.

Ron Smith
Ron Smith
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Because it is conflated with cheap labour, and obsession with GDP, but who’s GDP does this benefit, not the working class! But that theory is plausible when you consider people in high places has advocated for this including some late EU bureaucrat.

psychedelia smith
2 years ago

How to kickstart a global dictatorship:

  1. Fear monger, groom and lockdown an entire global society over a largely mild lab manipulated coronavirus.
  2. Force economies to crash.
  3. Take in all immigrants from those counties.
  4. Oh no! We’ve lost control of how many people there are in this country and some of them are dangerous!
  5. Don’t panic, Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Mark Carney to the rescue with their digital ID, digital health pass, digital currency and social credits system.
Mogwai
2 years ago

Don’t forget, you’ve got 17,000+ ‘asylum seekers’ running around in the UK and the Home Office can’t locate them. So that’s reassuring;

”More than 17,000 asylum seekers whose claims have been withdrawn are missing across the UK, the Home Office has admitted.
The revelation came as MPs discussed Rishi Sunak’s target to eliminate the asylum backlog by the end of the year.

Thousands of applications were discontinued by the Home Office after claimants failed to respond.
“I don’t think we know where all these people are,” a senior official told the home affairs select committee.”

https://www.gbnews.com/news/migrant-crisis-asylum-skeekers-missing-home-office-latest

FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

17000?

I am betting 170.000 with their villages, families, many wives all queued up for entry.

RW
RW
2 years ago

The motives behind this are pretty transparent: Immigration into most parts of Europe from Africa happens mostly by abuse of asylum and refugee status. Hence, referring to people seeking a better fortune in more developed countries as climate refugees is supposed to legitimize, if not legalize, them coming here despite laws to the contrary.

varmint
2 years ago

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. —What evidence does Simpson have that people are fleeing “climate”? ——-Since there is no increase in the frequency or intensity of any type of weather event, I suggest he has NONE. ——This is the Liberal Progressives mentality that invents it’s own world view and then calls us all “deniers” when we challenge it

lhfry
lhfry
2 years ago

Why isn’t this migration colonization and settlement? The listed reasons differ hardly at all from those who fled the old world for the new.