News Round-Up

https://twitter.com/Michael_Wgd/status/1725585879928906020?s=20

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A Y M
2 years ago

Seeing that there is a HUGE lack of skepticism on the “Daily Skeptic” now that the zionists seem to have mind controlled this site, it may be worth noting that most, if not all that we were told about October 7th, you know, Israel’s 9/11, was a lie.

40 beheaded babies, nope, charred babies, nope, gang rated women, pregnant women etc…ALL LIES.

The skeptics among us may have thought “hang on a second.” This site has lost credibility.

https://youtu.be/d0gECjlpXF8?si=K7dGvik9nGF0vAs-

Id love to hear the resident partisans tell us how this is just antisemitism….

stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I’ve always considered myself to be generally pro-Israel. For two simple reasons. 1. They’re more “like me” than their Arab neighbours, so I can relate better to them. 2. I was brought up on holocaust stories and so sympathy has sort of been inevitable. That said, I’m beginning to find the whole Israel drama a bit tiresome. The deliberate fuzziness between Israel and juddhaism and the constant sef victimisation.is beginning to feel like a form of collective narcissism. They’re a tiny proportion of the world population constantly demanding attention. To be clear, no matter how much anti-Jewish, anti-Israel sentiment they think there is in the world, you are better received around the world as an Israeli and/or a Jewish person than as a Palestinian. In fact, if you’re a Palaestinian, the chances are you can’t go anywhere and the moment you try to cross a border you’ll be interrogated. However bad you think your life is as a jew or an Israeli, it’s definitely a lot worse as a Palestinian. And if you are a non-Israeli jew, nobody knows and probably nobody cares you are Jewish and anyone who does will only do so if you draw attention to the… Read more »

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Follow the money.

Anti Israel sentiment is venal; paid for.

‘In 2020, the State Department estimated that Iran gave Hezbollah $700 million a year. In the past, Tehran had historically given $100 million annually to Palestinian groups, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.’

The Wilson Centre

‘Iran has spent the past 44 years using the Palestinian cause to advance its own interests and enhance its standing with Arabs ‘

FT

‘Al Quds quoted anonymous Palestinian sources March 4 as saying that Iran had re-established its financial support for Hamas. Tehran would provide $15 million annually to the movement in principle, an amount that would likely double in the coming period, according to the paper.’

‘The Hamas official refused to give a precise figure of the funds Hamas receives from Iran annually, stressing that Iran has been and remains the most prominent supporter of Hamas, both in terms of money and weapons.’

‘The US envoy to the Middle East peace process, Jason Greenblatt, tweeted 04 Feb. 2018, that Iran is giving $100 million a year to Hamas to buy weapons and build tunnels to attack Israel.’

Al Monitor 08 March 2019

stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

If I follow the money, the bigger pile of money leads ro powerful pro Israel lobby groups in Washington and billions in weaponry going to Israel. My guess is that what Iran spends on Palestine is a pittance in comparison.

But the money has little to do with my point

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Correct – this much:

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2023-10-10/how-much-aid-does-the-u-s-give-to-israel

In 2021, U.S. obligations to Israel amounted to $3.31 billion, a figure that saw Israel returning to the top spot among aid recipients that year. But in 2022, the U.S. committed $12 billion to Ukraine in its defense against Russia’s invasion, far exceeding Israel’s $3.18 billion that year. …

Almost all U.S. aid to Israel recently has been military aid rather than economic aid, in the form of Foreign Military Financing grants – U.S. grants and loans to Israel for acquiring U.S. military equipment and services. Israel is typically allowed first access in the region to U.S. defense technology to stay ahead of neighboring militaries, a concept summarized as a “qualitative military edge” by the Congressional Research Service in a report on foreign aid to the country. …

The CRS estimates that U.S. military aid reflects 16% of Israel’s total defense budget. The non-partisan data center, USAFacts, points out those totals don’t include funds for Israel’s missile defense systems, which to date have amounted to about $10 billion more in U.S. contributions, according to the CRS report.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Whataboutery…..

Anti jewish sentiment is venal; paid for.

That many other political lobbies are paid for is both blindingly obvious and beside the point.

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

I would venture to say that the money for both sides in this comes from the same source. Israel/Palestine is the weeping sore that refuses to heal and never can. No amount of attacks from either side will ever stem the pus. Plus, it is no one’s interests – well, the shysters who

JayBee
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

For me, there are two stories here. The first starts with Balfour, the Holocaust etc. and Israel’s foundation and ends with Sharon’s deliberately provocative visit to the temple mount in 2000. During that time, Israel had a point, was mainly the victim (though mainly of the Germans and Brits and later of the Americans, who all just made the Arabs pay for their sins) and the Arabs ignored reality/strengths of cause and of the allies and always played their poor hand terribly. But then, both sides came to their senses in 1993 and until that visit in 2000 (ignoring continued West Bank settlements&quarrels, ignorance of UN res. reg. Golan, WB&co etc.). With that deliberately the peace process sabotaging visit by Sharon and with Netanjahu’s subsequent deliberate sabotages of it and of any two state soution, Israel (and Israelis who elected them) has become the main current villain of that story now. The reflexive, excessive efforts to smear any criticism of it and them in that regard as anti-Semitism (while giving a fig about real anti-Semitism in the form of global conspiracy ringleadership stories etc. see Caitlin Johnstone yesterday) by Jews and most of the Western elites has only put me,… Read more »

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

For balance, youtube clip is by Chris Hedges:

‘Hedges began hosting the television show On Contact for the Russian-government owned network RT (Russia Today) America in June 2016. Hedges……was approached to make a show by RT America president Mikhail “Misha” Solodovnikov’

‘In June 2014, Christopher Ketcham published an article on The New Republic website accusing Hedges of plagiarism in several Truthdig columns, a 2010 Harper’s Magazine article, and in his 2002 book, War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning. The Truthdig posts were updated to give attribution to their author (though Ketcham critiqued some corrections as too little or too late)……

Hedges has described himself as a socialist and anarchist.

Hedges is married to the Canadian actress, writer, and vegan activist Eunice Wong.’

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Wow. Straight into ad hominem attacks rather than questioning the veracity or otherwise of the report itself (which, incidentally, I’ve seen corroborated and confirmed on numerous other sites). Way to go.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

You don’t like balance, context?

Hardly ad hominem to point out that Hedges is a plagiarising socialist anarchist Russia Today journalist vegan loon since he has admitted all those things himself, presumably believing that they do him credit……..

Well done for not giving any actual corroboration links……telling.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.’

Not particularly reassuring…..

And then haaretz (The problem with Haaretz is that it tends to be heavily one-sided. Asaf Ronel, world news editor in 2017, declared that he is an anti-Zionist.)  references Mondoweiss

In 2015, David Bernstein, writing for The Washington Post, called the website a “hate site”, and listed quotes from Weiss that he said were anti-Semitic.’

No wonder you delayed the corroboration links.

That’s why I try and give some balancing views.

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-forces-shot-their-own-civilians-kibbutz-survivor-says/38861

Israeli Efrat Fenigson spoke out about the situation very early on and on multiple platforms – this is the Darkhorse podcast. While not questioning the makeup of those killed, questioning the overall situation naturally leads to scepticism over numbers (1400 victims stuck for a long while, recently and quietly reduced to 1200 with higher numbers of military/police victims, for example).

https://rumble.com/v3p80xd-israel-did-not-respond-to-the-attack-for-many-hours.-how-is-this-possible-e.html

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

Electronic intafada as a source?

The clue’s in the name……..

NickR
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

You don’t have to believe that everything the Israelis have done over the past 80 odd years has been good to believe that the Hamas/Palestinian pogrom was evil.
As was always said of the Palestinian leadership, they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. The result is both the impoverishment & displacement of their people.
The hostages are real. The massacre was real. The Palestinians have vowed to do it again & again. How can the Israelis not react? And a half hearted reaction is no reaction.
Hamas suffers from Munchausen by proxy on a national scale. They’ve provoked a crisis, which leads to the continued immiseration of their people.
Since April in Sudan about 50,000 civilians, all Muslims, have been killed by other Muslims. 6m have been displaced. 4m people have abandoned Khartoum alone. Does your heart bleed for them too?

Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I would say there’s a huge amount of scepticism below the line, possibly fueled by the DS policy of not showing any scepticism above the line. Some of what I’ve read I find disturbing. To be clear, I have not taken a side in this conflict – something I’ve maintained from very early on. I believe choosing one over the other can only mean that you’ve chosen which propaganda to believe. Blind faith seems to be the main evidence for ‘truth’. Your claims are very controversial, and I’ve seen them posted before, does the video you link to provide indisputable evidence of these claims? Evidence that holds up to the highest scrutiny? I very much doubt it. And what happens when you get your wish – a wish that so many, suddenly BBC/Guardian loving, ‘sceptics’ on here support, of an anti-Semitic state having recognised sovereignty? Israel holds a key strategic position for the West, sitting as an island amongst Arab land that practices a lot of radical Islam. Do you support the expansion of radical Islam and are happy to see that expansion on the street you live in? Like I’ve said before, this conflict goes way beyond the simple… Read more »

Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I keep asking for proof! In a world full of camera’s and recording equipment why o why is there no evidence? I don’t trust either side as far as I could throw them, until I see evidence, not propaganda!

Shimpling Chadacre
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I don’t trust either side as far as I could throw them

Indeed. I remain misanthropically even-handed about the whole Israel/Hamas affair: I hope both sides lose and everyone dies.

A Y M
2 years ago

While I don’t share the sentiment, the possibility of mass carnage, even more than we are seeing, is non-zero.

Shimpling Chadacre
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I used to own a T-shirt, bought from an army surplus store (do they still exist?), which bore the Marines/Green Berets motto:

“Kill ’em all, let God sort ’em out.”

Apparently it dates back to the crusades and paraphrases the Papal Legate’s response to Simon de Montfort’s question about how to identify heretics claiming to be Catholic.

It appealed to my pitch-black sense of humour, which I try but mostly fail to communicate in the written form.

Dinger64
2 years ago

Your a tonic👍

JeremyP99
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Next you’ll be peddling the blood libel…

Shimpling Chadacre
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

You may only be sceptical about approved subjects on the DS, and I wouldn’t expect anything else in the current social/political/legal climate in the UK.

You need balls of steel, financial independence – and probably the protection of a First Amendment – to allow such a wide range of views (in the article subject matter and comments) as The Unz Review, for example.

I won’t be renewing my subscription, but I wish Toby and everyone involved in the site the best of luck with all their future endeavours.

A Y M
2 years ago

Ill be sorry to see another real skeptic leave.

DickieA
DickieA
2 years ago

In the Daily Mail article about Transexual, Steph Richards’s (71) appointment – it fails to mention the value of “Steph’s” house – which just goes to show how far standards have slipped at The Mail.

However, the article states: “On Endometriosis South Coast’s website, the charity added endometriosis in the ‘gender non-conforming population is a highly stigmatised and scary area of diagnosis and treatment’. It claimed that ‘focussing research and treatment plans on gendered constructs is not progressing either research or treatment’. ”

Endometriosis is the condition where cells similar to the ones in the lining of the womb (uterus) are found elsewhere in the body. I struggle to understand “woke-speak” – but is the charity saying that focussing research on women is delaying progress in finding treatments to the problem? If that is the case, are they seriously suggesting that transexuals have wombs? Am I missing something here – or has the world gone mad?

watso
watso
2 years ago

…some sceptical comments to the sceptical article regarding Chris Morrison’s story re BMGF funding of Guardian/BBC Media Action

https://mfinmoderation.wordpress.com/2023/11/17/surely-scepticism-should-apply-to-all-sources/#comment-121012

Monro
2 years ago

‘From the river to the sea, time to ditch the bbc!’

For balance:

‘Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) also have form with their own rockets backfiring and killing civilians in Gaza. During this current war, 450 missiles have been misfired into Gaza by militants fighting for both groups. Not only does this add to the civilian death toll but also gives Hamas a PR opportunity to blame Israel, as they did when PIJ fired a rocket into the carpark of a Gazan hospital on October 18.’ 

‘Just now, hamas snipers have reportedly killed dozens of children and women on the streets, targeting those attempting to travel from north to south Gaza and those displaying white flags as a sign of peace. Similar acts have previously been attributed to Palestinian and hezbollah terrorists in Syria. They do not want civilians to leave; they want to use them as human shields.’

How hamas use their own civilians as human shields, Karen Harradine TCW

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Subsidised Wind Solar Wreak Economic Havoc

latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online. 

08a-Subsidised-Wind-Solar-Wreak-Economic-Havoc-MONOCHROME-copy
soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

Michael Matheson MSP racked up an £11k bill for data access on his Scottish Government iPad while on a family holiday in Morocco. £7k of that was in just one day. He first tried to pass it off as a necessary expense because the device was only used for government work before then agreeing to personally pay the bill as he changed his story and said his children had used the device to watch football.

Michael Matheson says sons used iPad data to watch football

So, he clearly kept the government device highly secure.

Aunty Beeb has helpfully followed up with a guide entitled:

Data roaming charges: How to keep costs down when travelling abroad” on how to avoid similar embarrassment. It includes such obscure but helpful tips as:

Check your plan before you go

Get a temporary Sim or Esim

Use WiFi

Limit your time online

Stop non-essential usage

Switch off roaming

All of which could be summarised as “Don’t be a numpty” and “Aren’t those Moroccans bastards for charging Brits so much for Internet access”…

…oh yes, and “No Sh*t Sherlock”.

The one thing they forgot to mention was “Don’t watch too much p0rn”.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
2 years ago

Surely Scepticism Should Apply To All Sources?

On the 16th November The Daily Sceptic published an article by Chris Morrison with the headline:

Billionaire Funds the Guardian to Tune of $116 Per Reader of Print Edition

I want to use this as an example of how DS sceptics are selective about where they apply their scepticism (most of the points I am making here I already made in comments about the article but few people read all the comments)..

As, similarly, few people would have read my comments, posted late in response to Chris Morrison’s article, with a further delay while ‘awaiting approval’ (which seems to happen when a post contains a lot of links) – here are my two posts again:

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
2 years ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

This used to be the Guardian:

2002:

The drug pushers

US pharmaceutical firms are increasingly plying doctors with expensive gifts in the hope that they will prescribe their drugs. It couldn’t happen here, could it?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/apr/11/nhsfinance.lifeandhealth

2003:

Revealed: how drug firms ‘hoodwink’ medical journals

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/dec/07/health.businessofresearch

2004:

The drugs industry and its watchdog: a relationship too close for comfort?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/oct/04/health.businessofresearch1

2006:

Drug companies use unscrupulous and unethical marketing tactics not only to influence doctors to prescribe their products but also subtly to persuade consumers that they need them, a report claims today.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2006/jun/26/health.medicineandhealth1

2007:
Drug firms try to bribe doctors with cars
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/oct/31/international.mainsection1

2009:
Pfizer drug breach ends in biggest US crime fine
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/sep/02/pfizer-drugs-us-criminal-fine

2011:

How drug companies’ PR tactics skew the presentation of medical research

Elliot Ross reveals the secret ‘army of hidden scribes’ paid by the drug companies to influence doctors”

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/may/20/drug-companies-ghost-writing-journalism

2012:
GlaxoSmithKline fined $3bn after bribing doctors to increase drugs sales
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
2 years ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

This is what The Guardian became:
2020:
Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine has 95% efficacy and is safe
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/18/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-95-effective-and-safe-further-tests-show

2021:
“Are Covid-19 vaccines safe?
Yes.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/18/covid-vaccine-side-effects-pfizer-moderna-johnson-is-it-safe

2021:
Pfizer finds Covid vaccine safe and effective for children 12 to 15
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/31/pfizer-covid-biontech-vaccine-safe-effective-children

2021:
Undermining the AstraZeneca jab is a dangerous act of political folly
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/03/undermining-the-astrazeneca-jab-is-a-dangerous-act-of-political-folly

2021:
Don’t fear the AstraZeneca jab, the risks are minimal
https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2021/mar/21/do-not-fear-the-astrazeneca-covid-jab-the-risks-are-minimal

2022:
Anti-vaxxers should face penalties for their selfish choices
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/anti-vaxxers-should-face-penalties-for-their-selfish-choices

2022:

From medical advances to expanding equity and access, the Guardian US’s solution-driven healthcare coverage puts people first, making our platform the perfect match for Pfizer’s messaging. At the same time, our audience is uniquely tuned-in to healthcare topics: some 74% of Guardian readers are very interested in learning about the behind-the-scenes evolution of treatments, research and innovations.

https://advertising.theguardian.com/us/labs/projects/elevate-pfizers-scientific-innovation-via-powerful-video-storytelling

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

No need for the re-posts.

As I responded at the time – If Billy is chucking money at the Groan it doesn’t matter what purported reason he attaches to the “donations.” The bottom line is that Billy is guaranteeing favourable press by virtue of the amounts involved.

It is that simple.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

Global warming might not happen quite as fast as we thought – here’s why” – Plants will absorb more carbon dioxide than predicted, meaning models could be overestimating the speed which the planet will heat up, writes Sarah Knapton in the Telegraph.

Whaat? The models might be wrong?

It’s a story about yet another model which tries to explain why so many of the other models are proving to be so wrong.

A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Yes And it still buys the notion that x CO2 is a causative factor in global temperature.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

It’s also a story showing that Sarah Knapton is still on board with the global boiling crap. Carbon dioxide has F. all to do with heating the planet. And if the planet is warming up it is simply the result of climate change which goes with living on planet earth.

Knapton still schilling.

Mogwai
2 years ago

More on the further Islamification of Europe and what will it be like for the future generation to live here? Will we end up living in ”two-state” countries in years to come? I think all of these ‘strikes’ by school kids gives us an indication and does not bode well at all; ”In this essay I shall concentrate on Germany. If we have learned anything from history, it is that German problems don’t stay in Germany but seem to emanate to the wider world. And so, I ask a lot of questions as food for thought. -Can you imagine what would happen if Germany’s Muslim population grew, through demographics and immigration to amount to about 15% of the population up from its present 6%? -Can you imagine what would happen if Islamists undertook a major campaign to have Sharia Law and Islamist culture against Christians, Jews, women, LGBTQ, and children, be part of a separatist movement for a two state solution within present-day Germany? -Can you imagine if Iran (with its terrorist proxies) and other terror-sponsoring and Muslim Brotherhood groups backed this movement by undertaking serious terrorism including chemical weapons and missile attacks aimed at German civilians? -Can you then… Read more »

Mogwai
2 years ago

An Arab’s perspective on Jews and Israel; ”Many many years ago, I learned Hebrew out of curiosity and in a bid to penetrate into a world that I once thought was evil and conspiring against the Arabs and Muslims. Once in, I was surprised how wrong I was, how wrong almost every Arab and Muslim around me was. Israel was not on a mission to kill us all, was not conspiring against us. Israel wanted to live, and let live. In the Middle East, it’s we, the Arabs, who never seem to let live, even if that means that we die. The world does not feel Israeli pain. It only sees and hears Palestinian pain. The world likes to take the side of the underdog, even when the underdog is guilty. Of course, they don’t see it that way. One billion Muslims have a much louder voice than 16 million Jews, making it harder to hear the truth, easier to tell lies. So the world blames Israel, even when Palestinians started the carnage like Hamas did on 10/7. Many Jews died to earn that Israeli sovereignty, and they continue to die for it—even now. Hamas’s 10/7 massacre threatened Israel’s existence,… Read more »

WyrdWoman
2 years ago

Bad tempered, rather shouty interview on MSNBC of all places, with Medhi Hassan and Mark Regev, Senior Advisor to Bibi. Rather revealing, nonetheless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HD-yRuTasHU

WyrdWoman
2 years ago

Propaganda side of the war doesn’t seem to be going as well as Jonathan Greenblatt would like. The ole’ left/right divisions deliberately fomented over the last few years just ain’t working like they used to….

https://twitter.com/snarwani/status/1725138601996853424

WyrdWoman
2 years ago

The 10K statement from HM govt on withdrawal of UK from the WHO petition. If you haven’t signed it already, would urge you to do so, so that a debate can be had in the House. They clearly haven’t read the small print on the IHRs… https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/648609 The UK Government will not end our WHO membership. We are committed to working with the WHO to tackle the world’s health issues. We do not and will never cede sovereign powers through our partnership. … The best way to protect the UK from the next pandemic is by ensuring all Member States can contain and respond to disease outbreaks through compliance with International Health Regulations (IHR). Therefore, the Government is supporting the processes of negotiating an Accord on pandemic preparedness and response, and agreeing targeted amendments of the IHR as a means of strengthening preparedness for and in response to future health emergencies. … Throughout both negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments to the IHR or sign up to an Accord that would cede sovereignty to the WHO in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health,… Read more »

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

That statement is of course subject to future amendments. 😀😀😀

WyrdWoman
2 years ago

Landmark study finds sudden cardiac deaths in sport fell over time” 

From the study itself:

Methods: This study included National Collegiate Athletic Association athlete deaths during a 20-year time frame (July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2022). Athlete deaths were identified through 4 separate independent databases and search strategies (National Collegiate Athletic Association resolutions list, Parent Heart Watch database and media reports, National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research database, and insurance claims). Autopsy reports and medical history were reviewed by an expert panel to adjudicate causes of SCD. [my emphasis]

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065908

Call me whacky, but didn’t TPTB prevent most if not all autopsies during the plandemic and after jab rollout? If that’s the case, how can this study be representative?

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

Call me whacky, but didn’t TPTB prevent most if not all autopsies during the plandemic and after jab rollout”

Yes. I lost a friend who died less than 24 hours after being boosted – massive heart attack. No autopsy. According to the coroner the jab and the subsequent heart attack were just an “unfortunate” coincidence.

Yeah right.

Dinger64
2 years ago

‘Labour still has an antisemitism problem!’

Never! Well blow me down!

Dinger64
2 years ago

Just reading through all the headlines above

The world has gone fu£king mad!

Alan M
Alan M
2 years ago

Listening to the Woman’s Hour interview with Emma Barnett (Kudos to her by the way), Steph Richards was not “bullied”, she was just asked a few hard questions to which Emma responded with very valid counter arguments. Ms (sic) Richards is obviously not used to being forced to argue the position rather than being given a sycophantic free ride.

Roy Everett
2 years ago

Apostrophes are a fiendish European printers’ invention from a few centuries ago. They sneaked into English but never fully integrated with it. Some colleges’ names pre-date apostrophes. I hoped Brexit would get rid of them.

ekathulium
ekathulium
2 years ago

GB News is going the way of AUF1 in Germany.
The Germans have gone full STASI and just banned the station, à la RT.
Like our government did over the COVID jabs, GB News won´t be directly banned: it´ll just be starved by excommunication.

JohnK
2 years ago
Reply to  ekathulium

They seem to be following the tactics of the main stream, with selective paywall for certain publications on their website to raise revenue. Of course, we can only comment here if we donate cash as well.

Cameron
Cameron
2 years ago

I found Ben Pile’s paper measured and non sensational in its reporting (whilst not agreeing with him on every point). It brought to the surface issues and info not readily available and focused on the very pertinent point of ‘influence’. Undue (and covert) influence is particularly relevant in the range of climate policies. (The paper also made clear the period over which the BMGF donations are made).

On the matter of the Guardian, I suspect there is much more to be told of the circumstances which result in the majority of news items returned by Google searches being from the Guardian