“It’s Shameful that so Many British Jews Were too Intimidated to Come to London”
Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson was in London yesterday and wrote about what happened in Parliament Square and other parts of the capital as Armistice Day was marked and protesters marched and clashed.
I was standing with the British Friends of Israel at the foot of the statue of Winston Churchill (If only the great man were here in the flesh and not cast in bronze to show the present Government what leadership looks like!). Lots of Telegraph readers had travelled from far and wide to join us. “It takes a lot to get Brits out of their armchairs,” said James, a gentle giant from Thaxted in Essex, “We are a nation of armchair critics, aren’t we? But if this doesn’t get you to stand up for your country then nothing will. Enough is enough.”
I lost count of how many times I heard that phrase. Events at the Cenotaph were blighted by football hooligans and ‘far-Right yobs’. There was disorder, and some men who looked as if they weren’t entirely there to hum along to Edward Elgar. But that was hardly the whole story.
Things were worse down at Embankment where Tommy Robinson, leader of the English Defence League, had summoned his followers to “protect” the war memorial and “honour” the fallen.
But where we were in Parliament Square, and till well past noon, it was respectful, peaceful and good-humoured, with no pro-Palestinian protesters to spoil the two minutes’ silence as we had feared.
“Do you think you’re far-Right yobs?” I asked a group of elegant and venerable ladies.
“Oh, no, we’re from Kensington mainly,” came the startled reply.
From Kensington, from Yorkshire, from Dorset, from Kent, from Stratford, from Hertfordshire, from Reading, from Belfast, from Swansea; the silent majority of decent people, who agree with Suella Braverman, showed up, perhaps because they intuited that a mob who were chanting genocidal slogans, driving away poppy sellers from their annual perches, posed an existential threat to their country.
How shameful it was, too, that so many British Jews were too intimidated to venture into the heart of their own capital city. Gary Mond, chairman of the National Jewish Assembly, did come along and movingly, and quite instinctively, the rest of us closed ranks as if to protect him.
As we stood there, people expressed dismay that Sir Mark Rowley, Metropolitan Police Commissioner, had failed to ban the fifth pro-Palestine march through London since the heinous Hamas massacre of Israelis on October 7th. And this latest one on a most solemn, sacred day in the national calendar; almost calculated to give offence.
“It’s incredibly disrespectful to Britain,” said a veteran of Asian background who had been coming to the Cenotaph on this same date for 25 years. “This is a Christian country. When my grandfather came to the U.K., he fitted in, he didn’t start laying down the law about what he wanted. This is a good country, show some gratitude”.
The Home Secretary may have a point when she says the Metropolitan Police have favourites. Peter, a sweet, deeply courteous man who had been helping me hold up the British Friends of Israel banner, popped over to invite a couple of coppers to pose for a picture with our group. They declined.
“They did it for the Black Lives Matter lot, they took the knee to them, didn’t they? We’re not woke enough, Allison,” Peter laughed, bitterly.
And why were so few police officers wearing poppies? It did not go unnoticed. “You’ll wear your Pride patches and badges, won’t you?” jeered Jayne at some passing coppers. Jayne complained how hard it had been to get across town, passing stall after stall selling Palestinian flags.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This is ridiculous. Why on earth shouldn’t people, rightly or wrongly, peacefully demonstrate calling for a ceasefire on armistice day? One of the things our military fought and died for was the right to peaceful protest.
The most basic ‘risk assessment’ would indicate that such a march as took place would be provocative, and so it proved…..
A very bad idea……but perfectly legal…..
Actually it appears to have gone off very peacefully. The police estimated 300,000 protestors and say there were just 126 arrests the vast majority of which were counter protestors. They certainly didn’t bother Alison Pearson. For some reason the right wing main stream media (remember that scepticism about MSM?) is determined to present protests against the violence in Gaza as pro-terrorist/anti-semitic/anti-British. None of this follows. I am sure there were all sorts of people on that march, including some pro terrorist, anti-semite, anti British people. but it’s stated objective is simply to call for a ceasefire.
I am not at all sure what the Israeli government should be doing, a ceasefire may the wrong response, but I can quite understand many people being deeply upset at the level of violence in Gaza. It is a compassionate and laudable response.
Marchers calling for a ceasefire (which only works for hamas) are effectively supporting hamas; not a good look. A ceasefire in all but name was in place until 07 October when hamas unleashed medieval barbarity.
Marching on Armistice Day was designed to provoke a response, which it did, so requiring many more Police and a great deal more taxpayers money spent; also not a good look, particularly at the moment.
The smattering of ‘socialist worker’ placards indicates a political agenda. That political agenda has deeply unattractive paymasters; a backward and barbaric look.
In 2020, the State Department estimated that Iran gave Hezbollah $700 million a year. In the past, Tehran has historically given $100 million annually to Palestinian groups, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
‘Compassionate and laudable’ would not be the first words that come to mind for many……
As the next article on here clearly shows:
‘Hamas-style headbands were also worn by some protesters.
Many demonstrators chanted “From the river to the sea”. The controversial phrase has been used by Palestinian nationalists and terror groups to assert territorial claims of an independent Palestinian state.
In one particularly disturbing clip, male demonstrators were seen shouting “Khayber Khayber ya yaud jadish al Mohammed sauf yaud” through a megaphone. The antisemitic chant, which references a seventh-century battle in which Jewish people were massacred by a Muslim army, translates as: “Khaybar Khaybar, O Jews, Muhammad’s army will return.” …
Oh were they Ian? Were you there? Where you bx. So Pearson turns up and miraculously hears that phrase? Give it a rest. As for River to the Sea – it is EXACTLY as it says – Palestinians will be free – from occupation. It does NOT call for an end to the State of Israel, only the occupying elements of it. They are referred to as the Occupied Territories for a reason.
I would hope a ceasefire would work primarily for the people of Gaza. It will inevitably (cynically) be taken advantage of by Hamas but I am sure the Israelis will not be sitting on their hands; they do surround the place you realise.
If hamas are preventing people leaving areas occupied by hamas forces, a ceasefire will most certainly not work for the people of Gaza.
‘The leader of Palestinian Islamist group Hamas said on Saturday Palestinians will not leave Gaza or the West Bank to migrate to Egypt, after calls from the Israeli army for more than a million of the enclave’s residents to leave their homes and head south.
“Our decision is to remain in our land,” Ismail Haniyeh added in a televised speech, while addressing Egypt in that part of his address.’
There already was a ceasefire in place in all but name before 07 October.
You know less about Gaza than you did about the Russia-Ukraine conflict – and it was already a low bar. Hamas tunnels go as deep at 80M. They have their own hospitals. The Gazan’s don’t want to leave Gaza (even if they Egyptians allowed it), they don’t want their land stolen – AGAIN. The fact that IDF have already raised an Israeli flag in Gaza makes their intentions clear.
So good you back the genocide Ian – no surprises there. Of course a ceasefire doesn’t ‘only work for Hamas’ – do you have ANY original ideas of your own. Hamas is underground – way way below – you think their tunnels don’t extend into Egypt?
There are two sides in this conflict and worldwide. Those who care for humanity and those who don’t. As for provocative – the ceasefire in Gaza marches have been going on for weeks – so not set up to coincide with Remembrance Sunday as they were on a Saturday, 1.45 hours after the 11am silence and miles away. Get a grip Sayanim.
The provocation was from those fanning the flames of Division – as Will Jones is doing.
Your failure to understand the situation coupled with a glaring lack of intelligence is a blight on the DS community.
Well at least I present arguments as opposed to insults. Many in the DS community have confirmed that they value an alternative view point. I take it you would prefer only to hear from like-minded people?
I think it’s blinkered views like the one you have just stated, Huxley, that are the real problem here. People on both sides of this war are dying because others like yourself insist on a fight to mutual destruction.
A peaceful protest with some protesters chanting for the genocide of the Jews.
You sure it was peaceful? After all, words are now acts of violence I am told, and regardless, calling for the death of others, well if that’s peaceful then God help us.
“Some” doesn’t make the whole protest invalid. Most people just want the war to end and a start to talking. This will require acceptance from both sides that each party has to share the blame.
Yet these people remain too stupid and uninformed to understand that there is NO desire for peace from the Hamas side only the eradication of the jews from river to sea.
But also including some Jews – as I said with 300,000 people you are bound to get a every opinion under the sun – judge it on what happened overall – a vast crow marched peacefully and then went home.
Or not really
‘“We are aware of Jewish families being targeted on their way out of synagogue and have received multiple reports of police having to escort congregants away in groups for their own safety.”
They added: “The placards today bore slogans and imagery that would not have looked out of place in Nazi Germany.’
‘Hamas-style headbands were also worn by some protesters.
Many demonstrators chanted “From the river to the sea”. The controversial phrase has been used by Palestinian nationalists and terror groups to assert territorial claims of an independent Palestinian state.
In one particularly disturbing clip, male demonstrators were seen shouting “Khayber Khayber ya yaud jadish al Mohammed sauf yaud” through a megaphone. The antisemitic chant, which references a seventh-century battle in which Jewish people were massacred by a Muslim army, translates as: “Khaybar Khaybar, O Jews, Muhammad’s army will return.” …
Ìt just so happens I have both the Observer and the Sunday Telegraph in front of me. You can hardly believe they are reporting the same event. However, only actual numbers to emerge are the police reports of 300,000 protesters and 126 arrests. All the rest is anecdotes.
No doubt people on both sides behaved badly but you can’t tell how big a problem that was without knowing how widespread it was.
One thing I am sure we can agree on, any problems for UK residents, Jewish, or otherwise, are nothing compared to the suffering of the Israeli and Palestinian people.
One thing that all should agree on is that those of the Jewish faith (or any other religion) should not ever feel intimidated in this country.
Agreed. But do you agree that is a minor problem compared to the suffering in Israel and Gaza?
It is certainly not a minor problem, has existed in this country (regarding all religions) back into the mists of time, heavens knows how many deaths as a consequence over the centuries.
Any kind of equivalence is, I’m afraid, completely beyond me.
Put it this way. As far as I know not a single person,Jewish or otherwise, in this country has died or even lost their home as a consequence of the protests. Over 6000 Palestinians and over a 1000 Israelis including many children have died as a consequence of Oct 7th. God knows how many have lost their home. We should stop being so focussed on our petty political quarrels, appreciate our good fortune, and sympathise with those with real problems.
We can certainly appreciate our good fortune and our duty to ensure citizens of all faiths are safe and secure within our borders; the first duty of government.
Events in Israel, Gaza, are another matter entirely.
Can we influence them, have any real, practical impact? In my view, no.
These demonstrations are largely funded from overseas, attended by charlatans, poseurs, useful idiots. They signify nothing, but have a side effect of local intimidation; fascist.
It’s a conundrum for sure. A protest calling for a ceasefire that has large elements calling for Jihad. It’s a schizophrenic situation and if you’re ‘for peace’ does that mean you’re ‘against Israel’? I would say that most people involved just want the bloodbath to be stopped – all it requires is a phone call from Biden or his handlers. This, to me, is designed to create anger and rage and to divide people and lead to civil unrest in those countries with large muslim populations. Then martial law can be declared and who knows what else they can then introduce on the back of that. Dangerous times ahead.
I tried making a similar point a few times in earlier posts and the idea wasn’t well received.
It made me realise that there are very few people who actually believe in free speech. For most people it seems that free speech reaches a limit as soon as something is said that they find really objectionable. They want it for themselves, for the things they believe in earnestly but not those that others who have distasteful ideas they believe just as earnestly.
So on many occasions I’ve seen comments on here along the lines of pitchforks, stringing up people, hangings etc for those who, for example, were pushing these terrible covid jabs for children, lockdowns, masks etc. A sentiment I found it quite easy to share.
And yet, any vague calls for retribution from a pro-Arab that thinks Israel is going to far, well, that’s beyond the pale.
In short, I agree with you. Anyone should be allowed to protest, especially if its peacefully, in a public space any time any place, Anything less and we invite tyranny.
You’re absolutely right, MTF. The perversity of warmongers claiming that armistice day shouldn’t be a valid day for asking for peace is nauseating.
Hamas attacked the bee’s nest and they have been severely punished. Now, however, the genocide that Israel is inflicting on the children of Palestine has to stop. Anyone who is incapable of seeing that has no humanity.
A march on Armistice Day is provocative. The taxpayer has to foot the bill for the thousands of Police required. Of course that is not popular.
Iran funds many of the palestinian groups represented on the march.
Hamas is using the hostages to apply leverage for a ceasefire; not many think that represents much in the way of humanity.
A ceasefire in all but name existed until 07 October.
A further ceasefire will simply allow hamas to reorganise and re-arm; not going to happen. That is the reality. Neither Israel or hamas can afford humanity now, though Israel tries to encourage movement away from the fighting; hamas does the opposite….
The next article on DS shows just how provocative some of the pro palestinian marchers were…..
‘Hamas-style headbands were also worn by some protesters.
Many demonstrators chanted “From the river to the sea”. The controversial phrase has been used by Palestinian nationalists and terror groups to assert territorial claims of an independent Palestinian state.
In one particularly disturbing clip, male demonstrators were seen shouting “Khayber Khayber ya yaud jadish al Mohammed sauf yaud” through a megaphone.
The antisemitic chant, which references a seventh-century battle in which Jewish people were massacred by a Muslim army, translates as: “Khaybar Khaybar, O Jews, Muhammad’s army will return.” …
Hmmm……..
I have not adopted a position on the conflagration in Palestine / Israel other than to state, more than once, that I want the killing to stop. As you would know if you have followed my posts.
The Police did a great job, as we knew they would.
A big thank you to the Metropolitan Police. Very well done.
Hope they took the knee first. And wore their rainbow ribbons.
Yobs, chavs and trouble-makers, not to mention a blatant demonstration of terrorist support and disrespect for anyone who does not share the same mindset. People really want to stand alongside this lot then complain when they’re tarred with the same brush? Look at these lunatics in Pret a Manger. What sane person who values a free and democratic society goes on like this? I too would be bloody fearful leaving the house if I were Jewish;
”The Islamic takeover of London is going well…
Muslims wearing their Palestinian war scarves (keffiyeh) stormed a Pret a Manger restaurant in London. The jihadis threatened customers to leave immediately.
Since the beginning of 2023, the Muslim group Friends of Al-Aqsa, a pro-Hamas organization in the UK, has been campaigning to force the chain restaurant to cancel its plans to open dozens of stores in Israel.
The future of the United Kingdom is Islamic, where Muslims will dictate every aspect of British people’s daily lives, including where they can dine, what they can say, what they can eat, whom they worship, the clothing they can wear, etc.”
https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1723603172885963200
You have one bad case of Islamophobia.
Only a total idiot would deign to use such a nonsense slur. Well done on ticking that box.👍🤡
Nope. Islam is colonising the West. You need to get out more,
Absolutely. Unless there is a severe kickback we are done for.
I stand with Mogs.
Cheers, hux.😊 It’s not just the invasion of invalid nonces we are threatened with, but seemingly we’ve been infiltrated with many terrorist sympathisers/antisemites, who are probably tea towel-wearing f*ckwits in their spare time too.😆
‘The List’ of humourless freaktard keyboard warriors that I shall be blanking in future grows ever longer…life’s too short to engage with toxic CUNxtTuesdays.😇
Peeps don’t like my opinion? Here’s a radical idea; either deal with it or STFU. Simples.💁♀️
A very reasonable and considered response.😀😀
😆 Well I’m glad you get me when thousands don’t!😉
Here is something that may get some people’s backs up.
The moment to you ascribe an “identity” to yourself, you are by definition causing division. You are in essence saying, this is something that I am that others are not. And if you go around making a big deal about this special characteristic of yours, what message are you sending?
Personally I don’t care how people chose to define themselves, nor do I care whether they manifest it. And the reason I can prove I don’t care is because I don’t ascribe any identity to myself. I am me. The things I believe in or care about are ideas I hold, but they don’t in any way represent an identity. I don’t like any labels being ascribed to me be it religious, political or ideological of any kind. I don’t know exactly why, probably because I don’t particularly want to set myself apart from others.
Those who feel the need to be part of a group or a tribe and insist in making it a fundamental part of themselves need to understand that in doing so they are setting themselves apart from others in a way that is divisive.
Agree, Stewart. I’m me as well (almost said ‘too’!!). I don’t bracket myself with anything in particular apart from my stand on not complying with unjust and inhuman laws and rules that are to the detriment of human beings and their freedoms to live as they choose. As long as no one’s harming others, that’s OK. NB: ‘offence is not harm’!
I am English first, British second.
I am also white and working class and I have NEVER apologised for any of it.
Good for you, HP. I’m English with a hint of Scottish, a dash of Irish, (sound like a whisky!) and a small helping of Welsh. There’s also some other stuff in there too. Essentially though I am English.
Blimey Aethelred our genetic history is very similar. Scottish on my father’s side and Irish on my Mum’s – going back a few generations that is. Very much Lancashire Catholics.
So we are. We’re all a bit of a hotchpotch in this land…Irish/English on dad’s side and Scottish/English on mum’s but protestants.
I agree. 20 years ago I thought the world was growing up and moving away from identifying by nation, race, political party, sexual preference etc. Sadly I was completely wrong and identify politics dominates the world.
I would have said the same 20 years ago. Nowdays, I think rather differently of that. You’ll end up being labelled as belonging to some essentially homogenously envisionend group, anyway. I’m German regardless if I want that or not. Hence, I can as well embrace it as positive part of what I am and accept that there are some things I have in common with other Germans non-Germans don’t because it is actually this way, if I’m honest with myself which I strive to be.
That’s absolutely fine.
But defining yourself, or having others do it for you, by definition creates division. Us and them.
It’s how it is.
I don’t have a problem with people who want to define themselves and create groups as long as they leave me be. But plenty of others don’t. And let’s face it, when people create groups, it’s not for no purpose. It’s usually to push something.or get some outcome for themselves and not others.
It didn’t stop Tommy Robinson, who is funded by the IDF and Zionists, to turn up with his football hooligan goons to create mayhem with over one hundred of them arrested.
Meanwhile 300,000+ concerned citizens marched peacefully to show they are opposed to the bombing of women and children.
As far as I’m concerned people can protest what they like, but I can assure you the motivation isn’t revulsion at the death of children.
Around 2 million children under 5 die each year, most of which stems from extreme poverty. I don’t recall seeing too many marches about that recently.
What I see is political conflict between two camps. One which has been brainwashed into thinking Israel is evil and one which has been brainwashed into thinking Israel is good and/or muslims are prone to being radical and dangerous.
You can try to “assure” me as much as you like but you are still misguided.
European Jews with no ancestry to Palestine are an occupying force who have been using violence against the indigenous Palestinians for 75+ years.
One isn’t “brainwashed” seeing what has been happening in front of you with your own eyes.
Israelis use barbaric methods to ethnically cleanse the area.
Of course the local population are going to resist.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Israeli violence fostered more militancy.
Netanyahu is at fault for the rise of Hamas. He told his Likud Party’s Knesset members in March 2019,
“anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy- to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.”
The resistance has stopped using slings and are now using everything at their disposal to stop the Israeli violence.

The killing of women and children started on 07 October when hamas brutally broke a ceasefire that had existed in all but name. Any new ceasefire only works for hamas who are attempting to leverage a ceasefire through the hostages that they hold; barbaric; they have no interest in peace.
The next article on DS clearly shows that not all pro palestinian marchers were peaceful….and many will have been funded, one way or another, by iran.
‘Hamas-style headbands were also worn by some protesters.
Many demonstrators chanted “From the river to the sea”. The controversial phrase has been used by Palestinian nationalists and terror groups to assert territorial claims of an independent Palestinian state.
In one particularly disturbing clip, male demonstrators were seen shouting “Khayber Khayber ya yaud jadish al Mohammed sauf yaud” through a megaphone.
The antisemitic chant, which references a seventh-century battle in which Jewish people were massacred by a Muslim army, translates as: “Khaybar Khaybar, O Jews, Muhammad’s army will return.” …
Israel has been killing Palestinian women and children for decades.

The Netanyahu government has never been interested in a ceasefire.
Yes, taking hostages is barbaric. Desperate times calls for desperate measures.
Hamas are using hostages to barter for the thousands of Palestinians jailed by Israel.
A very, very small percentage of the peaceful protestors used inflammatory language. I doubt if any were “funded by Iran”.
The second largest Jewish population outside Israel is in Iran who live there peacefully.
Oh dear!
‘Alireza Nader, an Iran scholar based in Washington, DC, told Iran International, “The remaining few members of the Jewish community in Iran live in constant fear. Any sort of public pronouncement or guidance from their leadership should be seen in light of the community’s extreme vulnerability.” Nader has written about the persecution of Iranian Jews.
Beni Sabti, an expert on Iran from the Israeli National Security and Strategy Institute, who first located the Telegram post, told Iran International that the Jewish leadership is “worried that Jews can be in trouble if they stay in the streets” and urged them “to rapidly go from the synagogues to their houses.”
Sabti is a Tehran-born Jew who speaks fluent Persian and has extensively documented the Iranian regime’s repression of the country’s tiny Jewish population, which is estimated to number 9,000 members.’
Iran International 091123
Condoning the seizing of hostages by hamas 07 Oct. puts you beyond the pale.
Oh dear.
“Iran’s Jewish community is the largest in the Mideast outside Israel – and feels safe and respected”.https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/world/inside-iran/2018/08/29/iran-jewish-population-islamic-state/886790002/
I stated “taking hostages is barbaric”.
Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
You, and the rest of the Zionist fan boys should try to find unbiased reporting from Palestine and stop believing everything the Zionist main stream media tell you.
It is called The Daily Sceptic and the pro-Zionist articles have been very disappointing.
Your reference is from 2018. Mine is from 2023. You are badly out of date.
Spare us the silly little schoolyard infantilisms. They show you up for what you undoubtedly are. In saying ‘Desperate times call for desperate measures’ you are quite clearly condoning hamas hostage taking, however barbaric it may be. If you cannot understand that, then English cannot be your first language.
These ‘pro-palestinian’ demonstrations are largely funded from overseas through conduits for Iranian money, attended by charlatans, poseurs and useful idiots.
Consequently they signify nothing, but have the side effect of local intimidation; fascist.
You are a fascist; completely beyond the pale.
Laughable.
Monro is an anagram of moron and you live up to your name well.
I supply a link to a respected media outlet, you don’t.
I will say it once again so you can get it through your thick head
“taking hostages is barbaric”.
Yes, I support the Palestinian fight for survival and I support their attacks against the IDF (short of taking hostages).
I am a libertarian old socialist who believes in the plight of the oppressed.
You have aligned yourself with people like Tommy Robinson and the far right in supporting the brutal occupying forces of Israel who have very little, if any, ancestry to Palestine.
It is the Zionist far right Israelis who are acting like fascists and the “morons” who support them.
Thank you, but further clarification was otiose.
Out of your own mouth, you have already shown yourself up as the socialist fascist that you undoubtedly are.
‘Believes in the plight of the oppressed’ Meaningless tripe. Perhaps it transliterates differently into your first language?
Well said. Perhaps GlassHalfFull and everyone else who keeps going on about Israel being a violent oppressor state or stealing other people’s land should say what they want to see in the region.
Ethnic cleansing of anyone with Jewish heritage?
Hamas given free reign to carry out whatever barbaric acts they want?
A democratic liberal society that respects the rights of women, LGB people, people of different faiths that want to live in peace with them (unlike pretty much every other country in the Middle East) have the right to exist defend itself?
It certainly seems like they don’t support the third option.
Are you sure your little graphic shouldn’t say
Source: Hamas Ministry of Propaganda
Having said that there’s very little difference between the UN and a mouthpiece for Hamas
On the Gaza conflict issue, the DS has descended to promoting fake binaries.
Below the line, the majority of sceptics rejects fake binaries and stands with all civilians, of all creeds, with humanity, with peace, with armistice.
I contend that a majority of sceptics would echo this veteran’s pro-peace sentiment –
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1723339412648415724
We ought to stop subscribing to the fake binaries of the Powers-That-Be (aka EPS, as in Evil Psychopathic Scum).
Let us operate and articulate with nuance. Let us reject all fake binaries.
Dear Jayne, you have our sympathy. Speaking of genocidal chants –
https://t.me/robinmg/31766
Unlike all these Jews who were present and very loud in the pro-peace demonstration:
https://t.me/robinmg/31788
https://t.me/robinmg/31792
https://t.me/robinmg/31798
Actually the majority of reasonable intelligent people reject fake binaries.
Now, that’s almost prizeless: British friends of Israel showing solidarity with Britain’s embattled jews on armistice day who — prefer to stay at home instead. You are being taken for a ride by the inventors of Keep on boosting! covaxxing cycles. That was an initiative of the government of Israel which was – at that time – justified with Nobody conducted clinical trials of this but we are just going to do it anyway to see what happens! That’s by definition a medical experiment conducted on millions of people under duress.
Why are they always described as “British Jews” rather than “Jewish Britons”?
Were British Jews really “too intimidated to venture into the heart of their own capital city” yesterday?
I suggest an alternative explanation. Saturday morning is the Jewish Sabbath, and travel involves acts classified as work.
A lot of people of Jewish heritage in the UK are fairly secular. It’s probably only a minority of more orthodox Jews that would choose not to travel on their Sabbath.
3 or 4 articles about the plight of Jews in London. And not 1 about the plight of Palestinians in Gaza. I’m reconsidering my subscription.
It is shameful that some Jewish people were too terrified to go out – but whose fault is that? telegraph tools like Pearson & Oakenshott who fan the flames of division. There were many Jewish people on the march and plenty of Jewish organisations. If you don’t believe in free speech then move to China. Free Speech Union – right, as long as it’s what you want to hear.