Dr. Ahmad Malik Suspended Without Pay for Warning of Vaccine Side-Effects
Dr. Ahmad Malik has been suspended without pay for speaking up about Covid vaccine harms and challenging the U.K. Government’s narrative on the ‘safe and effective’ experimental jabs.
Over the last several years, Dr. Malik, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon in London, has posted online messages and videos highlighting research into the side-effects and efficacy of the Covid vaccines. Considering that well-founded concerns about harms and lack of benefit were being ignored or covered up, he called for a suspension of the vaccines to ensure a thorough investigation.
This led to complaints and he was suspended by his hospital and referred to the General Medical Council (GMC).
The result, says Dr. Malik, in that he has lost most of his income, his reputation is being dragged through the mud and his professional practice is being harmed for as long as the suspension continues.
Dr. Malik is now taking legal action against his employer and he needs your help. Fundamentally at stake are patient safety and freedom of speech, he says, as when doctors are not free to give their professional medical opinion without threat of repercussions, patient safety is impossible.
You can find out more and donate to the fundraiser for his legal costs here. All funds raised will go towards legal costs only and if there are any left over they will be donated to a fund for the vaccine injured or to support other doctors whose medical free speech is under threat.
Dr. Malik writes:
My name is Ahmad Malik and I am an honest surgeon passionate about free speech and medical ethics.
I have been suspended without pay and cancelled because I dare to challenge the Government narrative, defend informed consent, oppose mandates and lockdowns, question experimental jabs and insist that there are only two biological sexes.
I am raising funds to take legal action against the hospital to lift my suspension and stop the attempts by organisations to censor me.
It will set a precedent that organisations cannot bully, harass and censor those that speak up for medical ethics, and encourage others to speak out.
I am up against large organisations and my case is complex. Legal costs will easily run into the thousands. I need a decent fighting fund which will give me the best chance of being successful.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
FSU case?
I don’t understand why people cannot see the value in holding membership of the FSU. It really is a JSFDI.
Anyway I will make a contribution. We cannot afford to see people like Dr Malik suffer for the cause.
Totally agree on both counts and have done likewise
Yep, Dr M has some of my cash pledged too.
His employer and the GMC are beneath contempt.
I have been a Gold member for three years although I have very recently downgraded my subscription.
Agree. So far I’ve managed to dodge getting into trouble with my super woke US mega corp employer, but not hard to imagine having to call on the FSU’s services once day.
Just remember, make the FSU’s job easier by always being polite and accurate in the kind of communications at work that could get you in trouble.
I fear his chances of a fair hearing in a court of law are on a par with Captain Blackadder’s when he shot speckled Jim.
There is a case law precedent set. Dr Sam White won his case against the GMC on the basis of his Human Right to free speech. The judgement mysteriously was removed from the site where court judgements are posted online…. Funny that.
I was always a bit wary of doctors and the medical profession before covid. But since then my feelings van only be described as deep distrust. And of course this sort of thing only increases it.
All the evidence suggests that the entire profession has been commandeered by pharmaceutical companies for the purpose of selling drugs.
And that is what I will be thinking the next time I visit a hospital or a doctor.
Well said and fully in agreement. They are part of the cabal – an evil, money and power hungry mob who destroy any in opposition. Akin to the ancient mobs or tyrannies in Athens that would destroy anyone (eg Socrates) who offended the polis narrative. Anyone who mindlessly states we have a democracy, or free speech is simply an uniformed lunatic. Malik is going to lose everything because he had the moral and intellectual courage to call a cat, a cat.
I don’t think many are evil but most are spineless, arrogant and willfully blind. Even if they do recognise what’s going on they are fearful of speaking out. Dr Malik is warrior and deserves all our support.
My son was killed by the covid jab at the age of 39. I am retired doctor. Dr Malik is right in this matter. We must support him.
That’s awful as well as criminal.
My heart goes out to you.
Thanks for posting. I don’t know what to say about such a tragic loss. I feel sure your commentary would be most welcome here if that helps in any way.
Deepest sympathies.
I am so sorry to hear of your loss.
Agree. we must not give up the fight to prevent the death and destruction of people’s lives in memory of all those who succumbed to this madness and evil.
The article and Dr Malik’s statement are rather light on background detail. For example, what hospital has suspended him without pay? Is there some reason for not disclosing this? What are his qualifications and experience that qualify him to speak out about the jabs? The only thing we are told is that he’s an honest surgeon. I’d feel more comfortable if I knew more about the situation. Right now as a prospective donor I feel uneasy about the thinness of facts.
SteveHoffmanUK – see https://www.doctify.com/uk/specialist/mr-ahmad-malik and https://facilities.hcahealthcare.co.uk/london/the-princess-grace-hospital-part-of-hca-healthcare-uk Whether he is directly employed by Chiltern Hospital or LCA Healthcare is less important that who took the decision to refer ” complaints” whether real or confected to GMC and on what basis they acted. I will contribute but want more info too
Thank you for the links – very helpful in filling in some of the blanks.
“What are his qualifications and experience that qualify him to speak out about the jabs?”
What are anyone’s?
Intelligent dispassionate adults are able to see things that the paid agents are not permitted to.
Well, if they had anything like a brain, Oh, and also a sense of right and wrong, (a rarity these days ), they might be able to do so.
lol.
And stick to the “Do NO Harm” oath, Then there is bio-ethics & Nuremberg code.
Yes exactly. For eg who the hell is Dame Hallet running the fake Rona inquiry? What is this fat lady’s qualifications? She seems happy to ask any sceptics reviewed by the panel for a long list of credentials. Maybe she can recite hers first.
That’s right, no-one needs a ‘qualification’ to question the imposition of these disastrous taxpayer-funded vaccine products.
The simple truth is that the Covid “vaccines” have a direct temporal relationship to excess deaths in countries around the world with excess death spikes of 40% and sustained elevated deaths of as much as 20% in some places.
Statistics from multiple sources and analyses show this beyond any reasonable doubt.
Those responsible must be held to account somehow, the only method available is concerned members of the public doing their bit.
He is a medical doctor & as such has been trained to think critically, review the clinical presentation of his patients & then offer his medical opinion. He’s more qualified than you or I as non medics to make his medical opinion on the safety of these injections public. He’s upholding the very best of medical ethics.
No medical training is needed to know that:
1) According to the Government’s own stats, the disease posed a trivial threat to the vast majority of people. as Whitty admitted; and
2) The unneeded jabs couldn’t possibly have been properly tested and what little testing was done wasn’t carried out by independent bodies and was known to have been rigged.
I concur, I was responding specifically to Steve Hoffman when he asked what Dr Malik’s credentials for making such a statement were.
Anyone with an ounce of critical thinking ability has the right & the credentials to voice the opinion that these products are designed to be toxic bioweapons.
Anybody is entitled to ‘speak out about the jabs’.
These are highly controversial medical interventions that have been pressed upon the public, and there has been a coordinated effort to suppress dissent.
For an Australian perspective, see my email to the regulator of health practitioners, AHPRA: Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent – the AHPRA Position Statement 9 March 2021, 31 July 2023.
If you’ve been following the course of events over the last few years, particularly as conveyed by the scholarly and humane creators and supporters of this website, you won’t have a problem filling in those blanks with little if any need for more evidence than is provided. If you can afford it, do make a donation – there’s no con here.
Excellent post 👍
Unsure why you’re getting so many downticks. I assume you’ve only just woken up to what’s going on. A search of this website will provide you with references and summaries of the lies we’ve all been subjected to over Covid and the so called vaccines. Dr Malik is a brave person to speak out. Oncologist Prof. Angus Dalgleish is another. There are many more but not enough to stop the continuing promotion of the jabs.
For some of the latest findings of concern see Jessica Rose’s latest substack post “Unacceptable Jessica”.
I’m also surprised at the downticks. I was criticising the article, not Dr Malik. Why doesn’t it give the name of the hospital that suspended him? This seems to be a rather basic fact if an injustice has been committed. “Who did this?” would be a question that the average reader would reasonably ask. Writers should not expect their readers to go searching through past articles or search the Web to find this out.
I agree it would be interesting to name and shame the employer but I don’t think it would answer the question of who is behind this, i.e the corrupt vaccine “industry” that wants to keep control of the narrative.
The legal profession wins again regardless of what the truth of the matter is.
I fear this will be a lost cause, if my own experience of the GMC, another professional standards organisation and the courts are anything to go by. All that happens when this type of case crop up is that the adjudicator (or judge) decides what evidence will be talked over, which parts of which documents remain redacted, and who are “acceptable” experts. Almost invariably the outcome will be whatever best preserves the image of the profession while hiding any embarrassing errors or malfeasance. One thing that will not emerge is truth.
Agree that our institutions are totally corrupted, including the NHS. We will need to form parallel institutions outside of state control. Difficult to envisage I know but the establishment is maiming and killing us so we have no alternative.
What an utter disgrace that such an honourable man be deprived of his livelihood for having the temerity to question “The Science”.
Doesn’t matter we live in a time of revealing. Just consider how quickly things become revealed compared to 60 years ago or even 10 years ago. It will be there for those who have the heart to accept it and it will be warts and all. Given the tempo of our times I wouldn’t worry to much about the temporal. It is like trying to slow down a crash. You can’t do it and you can’t apprehend it or comprehend it. Just absorb these times and develop your spirit accordingly.
There ae still a lot of Englishmen left who will fight. Don’t be dispirited by looking at trends or social media. There are people of rock solid integrity out there and many of them are only now discovering the truth. I think that there is a genius to the English language and the geography of these islands that will always call forth the spirit in a time of need. There are a lot of fine Englishmen who just live quiet lives and keep their mouths shut.
Thank you Ahmad Malik, for holding firm to medical ethics, and the vitally important principle of voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination. It’s outrageous that Ahmad has been suspended for speaking out. Just as happened to Andrew Wakefield, they’re trying to crush him, to shut him up and, in the process, threatening the other doctors and practitioners to toe the line and not question the narrative. They’re doing the same thing in Australia, where by suspending a few doctors who questioned the Covid narrative and gave vaccination ‘exemptions’ to their patients for the Covid jabs, they have ensured other practitioners will shut up, they’ve been effectively conscripted to support the government’s Covid-19 vaccination rollout without question. It’s a dire situation! The medical system in Australia is so dangerous now, because those critical thinking practitioners who would call things out, have been eradicated from the system, including those who refused to comply with jab mandates. In regard to ‘exemptions’ these shouldn’t even be happening – how can people be given an exemption to NOT have a vaccination, when they’re supposed to be giving their voluntary informed consent to this medical intervention, or declining it if they so wish? It’s… Read more »
Donated, especially because the initial complaint was anonymous. There is something particularly loathsome about scum who want to destroy someone without having the guts to do so publicly without evidence. Second only to organisations who run kangaroo courts on this basis 🤬
Donated and will check in a few days if I need to top up. Easy way to fight back and there is no doubting his credentials (although as a rule of thumb it’s not a bad idea to check the veracity of these crowdfunding efforts). Unfortunately as they play this game so must we.
You can watch Dr Malik on YouTube. He’s been a sceptic for some time but is not as well known as Dr Campbell.
https://www.youtube.com/@docmalikpodcast
Donation made. If you cannot trust your doctor to give medical advice based on their knowledge and experience rather than propaganda and payment from Big Pharma, you cannot trust your doctor.
I would trust Dr Malik. I have no longer have similar trust in the vast majority of NHS medical practitioners.
A worthy fight indeed -I have joined others in pledging a donation.
We need to know who reported him and their paymasters/motivations. They shouldn’t be able to hide behind a cloak of secrecy.