Care Home Residents “Left to Starve” in Pandemic, Covid Inquiry is Told
Care home residents were “neglected and left to starve” during the pandemic, lawyers representing bereaved relatives have told Scotland’s Covid inquiry. The Telegraph has more.
Shelagh McCall KC said the “blanket ban” on care home visits made it impossible for families to check on the welfare of their loved ones and their phone calls “went unanswered over days and sometimes weeks”.
In a damning opening statement to the inquiry, she said some of them were treated “with disdain” when they managed to contact care home staff and their questions “fobbed off”.
She said families were told a resident was fine “only to get a sudden hurried phone call that they were dying”, with some not seeing their loved ones again following the onset of lockdown.
Other relatives reported “a significant deterioration of their loved ones’ physical and mental health” that “was nothing to do with COVID-19”, she said.
Ms. McCall said that “some suspect that their loved one was suffering from neglect, dehydration and starvation”, and medical records were found to be “missing or incomplete” for those that died.
She also predicted the inquiry would hear that residents were forced into agreeing to do not resuscitate plans, and that the evidence would “point to a systemic failure of the model of care”.
Another group representing bereaved relatives said the policy pursued by Nicola Sturgeon’s Government at the start of the pandemic, of discharging untested hospital patients into care homes, was “ultimately a death sentence for the elderly”.
In its opening statement, Scottish Covid Bereaved – a support group for families of those who died during the pandemic – questioned whether SNP ministers considered the science before making their decisions or “marched a few steps behind Boris Johnson into the deadly bedlam that he stands accused of in his handling of the pandemic”.
The evidence was heard on the second day of the Scottish Covid Inquiry, chaired by Lord Brailsford in Edinburgh, examining the response to the pandemic.
An official report found 113 Scottish hospital patients who had tested positive for coronavirus, without later testing negative, were transferred to care homes in March, April and May 2020.
A further 3,061 were sent from hospitals to care homes in the period without being tested. Jeane Freeman, Ms. Sturgeon’s Health Secretary at the time, has previously admitted that “we didn’t take the right precautions”.
Ms. McCall was representing Bereaved Relatives Group Skye, a group of bereaved relatives and care workers from Skye and five other health board areas of Scotland.
She told the inquiry that families wanted to know why Covid was allowed to enter care homes and “spread like wildfire”.
“We anticipate that the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to sign do not resuscitate notices, and that people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place,” she said.
“That residents may have been neglected and left to starve, that families are not sure they were told the truth about their relative’s cause of death, that the usual process for the certification of death was departed from.”
Ms. McCall said the inquiry must investigate potential violations of Article 3 of the Human Rights Act prohibiting “torture, inhuman and degrading treatment”.
“Relatives will speak of their loved ones lacking food, water, and hygiene. That there was inappropriate, inadequate, absent or delayed medical attention,” she added. …
David McKie, representing Independent Care Homes Scotland (ICHS), which comprises 11 firms operating 156 homes with around 13,000 staff. He said the “burden was an extraordinary one and at times intolerable for staff to carry”.
He said ICHS members had “profound concerns across a range of the decisions made by Government”, citing a six-day delay before Scotland followed England by stopping untested hospital patients being moved into homes.
Mr. McKie also highlighted SNP ministers’ “failure to lift visiting restrictions” in summer 2020 and “attempts by the Scottish Government to shift responsibility onto the independent care sector”.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There was no pandemic
Will this Scottish inquiry show up the London inquiry for the establishment self gratificationfest that it surely is?
I’m sorry, I’m not following, Sir Peter. If there’s a possible benefit, what’s the downside?
Won’t it be ironic if Scotlands covid enquiry is more damning of lockdown than England’s? Haven’t heard anything about Lord Brailsford’s form or attitude to date, so for all I know this may be wholly unrealistic and not a serious possibility.
The vulnerable died alone dehydrated in their own excrement thanks to Ferguson et al, these same folk the egregious lickspittle judge Hallet praised to the hilt.
Truly shocking to hear the sad end for these folk and their families. However, the even more shocking news is that those behind these decisions will never be brought to account or sacked.
And sadly, even otherwise-good Sweden adopted this particular bad aspect of the debacle, namely the blanket banning of all visitors to care homes. For a full six months, no less, only to finally lift the ban when…the second wave began in October, ironically.
In hindsight, a blanket ban on visitors, especially one lasting more than a few weeks at a time, went way too far even from a focused protection perspective. Aggressive testing of visitors (AND staff!), minimizing staff rotations, and of course NOT discharging still-contagious covid patients into care homes, would have been far better overall. While otherwise letting the virus run its inevitable course among the general population at large (that is, no lockdowns or closures), and making early treatment and prophylaxis available to all.
But that would have made too much sense, of course.
I compared the amounts and dates of midazolam prescriptions with weekly deaths. In particular, I compared excess prescriptions with excess deaths. Correlation only started when the hoax pandemic started.
Someone suggested, “Of course this correlation exists. Its a drug used as a person approaches the end of their life.”
Yes, but this can swing both ways: end-of-life <—> take midazolam. The end-of-life does not cause a midazolam prescription – but the thought of the outcome does. That ‘thought’ needs scrutiny.
BINGO
And notice how the midazolam prescription trend LEADS the death trend significantly. Let’s see:
Strength of association? Check
Temporality? Check
Dose-response? Check
Coherence? Check
Plausibility? Check
That’s a whopping five out of nine for the Bradford-Hill criteria of causation.
Just more collateral damage for the EVIL people who orchestrated the Plandemic.
It’s a pity that nothing has yet come of the outlier Scottish Daily Express report of 19 July 1023 that Nicola Sturgeon is being criminally investigated by homicide police for over 5,500 deaths in Scottish care homes during Covid, see https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/cold-case-homicide-cops-investigating-30506943.
DS, from now onwards, could you put a placeholder instead of that face? Just the word Sturgeon would suffice. We don’t need to look at it any more. It makes my foot itch.
It can’t be reiterated enough; during the covid scam vast, cowardly sections of society completely lost their heads, including, worst of all, the government. And other sections used covid as an excuse for not doing their job properly. I hope we never have to go through that dystopia ever again.
But thank God that Nicola Sturgeon took care to make sure that her mask matched her blouse…
She had quite the co-ordinating wardrobe of masks, didn’t she? Nicely tartaned too. Such attention to detail was much lacking in other more important areas.
I expect the planning was proportionate with lessons being learned at all times.