News Round-Up
- “IDF says ready to repel Houthi attacks, is striking Gaza ‘at rate not seen in decades’” – The Israeli Air Force says it is prepared to repel attacks by Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, reports the Times of Israel.
- “Netanyahu has failed Israel” – “To win both this war and the aftermath, Israel needs to rediscover the resourcefulness and determination that have ebbed somewhat in recent years under the stagnation and corruption of Benjamin Netanyahu’s long rule,” says Anshel Pfeffer in the Spectator.
- “BBC stops calling Hamas ‘militants’ by default after backlash” – BBC journalists will now refer to Hamas as a group “proscribed as a terror organisation by the U.K. Government and others”, according to the Telegraph. It trips off the tongue.
- “A new generation of hate rises in America” – Writing in the New York Post, Douglas Murray observes that the “outburst of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate” that has been seen across the U.S. is coming from the youngest people in the country.
- “As a secular Jew, I didn’t feel I could comment on the war. Till now” – Deborah Ross responds in the Times to the Artists for Palestine U.K. open letter that published this week, signed by 2,000 luvvies.
- “Israel is trapped by Western guilt” – “Colonial obsessions are undermining Jewish safety,” says Tom McTague in UnHerd.
- “The disgusting bigotry of the poster-rippers” – Spiked’s Tom Slater takes aim at the people who see fit to tear down the posters showing the names and faces of people missing after the Hamas attacks.
- “The media failure in Gaza” – AG deplores the “careless journalism” which saw numerous media outlets swiftly blame Israel for the Gaza hospital explosion, following the lead of the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry and omitting to verify the facts before they did so.
- “Disinformation reporter Ben Collins failed to correct the Gaza hospital story” – Reason’s Robby Soave takes aim at disinformation reporter Ben Collins after he helped spread inaccurate claims about the explosion at the al-Ahli Baptist Hospital.
- “Israel to Greta: ‘Hamas doesn’t use sustainable materials for their rockets’” – Not the Bee salutes the Israeli response to Greta Thunberg’s post announcing that she was on strike in solidarity with Gaza.
- “Heneghan Covid inquiry evidence report” – Carl Heneghan publishes the evidence that he submitted to the Covid inquiry that he didn’t get to discuss at the hearing he attended on October 19th, on Trust the Evidence.
- “Anomalous patterns of mortality and morbidity in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial” – On Where are the numbers, Tore A. Gulbrandsen, Martin Neil and Norman Fenton analyse the Pfizer trial data which the FDA was forced to release, thanks to the Informed Consent Action Network.
- “Federal researchers find evidence Covid mRNA jabs cause seizures in young children” – Alex Berenson reports on a finding that was “quietly released” by FDA researchers: young children had a significantly elevated risk of seizures and convulsions after receiving mRNA Covid jabs.
- “Yet another well-intentioned green folly” – Howard Dewhirst regales Spectator Australia with the tale of the 327-megawatt nuclear reactor in Kalkar, Germany, which was built at huge cost over many years and never commissioned due to green opposition.
- “The climate scaremongers: Luton Airport fire is a stark warning about EVs” – “It is reported that the fire started in a Range Rover diesel,” says Paul Homewood in TCW Defending Freedom, “but it is abundantly clear that the rapid spread of the fire, and the multiple explosions, could have been due only to one or more electric cars catching fire.”
- “If the Conservative Government’s conversion therapy ban criminalises pastors, they deserve to lose office” – “The news that the Government is now determined to ban conversion therapy has convinced me that it is my moral and patriotic duty to oppose the Conservative Party,” says Julian Mann in Christian Today.
- “Being ‘anti-woke’ as a protected philosophical belief” – James Murray and Eric Kaufmann explain in the Critic, why being anti-woke should count as a protected philosophical belief for, meaning employees cannot be punished for it in the workplace.
- “It’s women who want Victoria’s Secret to bring sexy back” – Fiona Golfar cries “hurrah” for the news that Victoria’s Secret has decided to bring sexy back. “Because however much times have changed since the Angels’ glittery heyday, women still enjoy a healthy dose of aspiration,” she says in the Mail.
- “How did your child’s secondary school fare in GCSE rankings?” – The Department of Education has published performance data for 6951 secondary schools, the Mail reports, and Katherine Birbalsingh’s Michaela Community School in Wembley has come out top for the second year in a row.
- “The Westminster Declaration: Artists, journalists, and intellectuals demand the Censorship Industrial Complex is dismantled” – Reclaim The Net celebrates the launch of the ‘Westminster Declaration’, a new initiative aiming to defend “open discourse” against the “Censorship Industrial Complex”.
- “Rights groups push back against EU censorship chief Thierry Breton after he pressured platforms to censor ‘disinformation’” – Reclaim The Net reports that groups such as the Centre for Democracy and Technology, Access Now, and Article 19 are fighting back against Thierry Breton’s push to get social media companies to censor ‘disinformation’ about Israel and Hamas.
- “Armageddon is coming for the Tory Party…” – Guido Fawkes flags George Osborne’s comments on his Political Currency podcast just as the polls were closing on Thursday night. “If they’ve also lost Mid Bedfordshire (which they did), Armageddon is coming for the Tory party.”
- “The state sector is the elephant in Labour’s classroom” – “Labour are making a huge, and obvious, mistake in considering the Government tax treatment of independent schools in isolation, as though the 935 centrally-controlled monopolist didn’t even exist,” says Mr Chips.
- “Can political cartoons survive in an age of sensitivity” – Writing for Prospect, Alan Rusbridger wonders if there is any future for political catoonists, given their job involves being deliberately offensive.
- “When it comes to excess deaths, why is there a deafening silence?” – GB News presenter Mark Dolan responds on to Andrew Bridgen’s speech on excess deaths in the House of Commons.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“The Conservative Government’s conversion therapy ban…”. They are determined to become trans-Labour.
Is everybody aware of what the BBC did during Bridgen’s fine speech:
https://twitter.com/OracleFilmsUK/status/1715402666547757428
We managed to watch it live –
At the HoC? It must have been great to be in the gallery!
I watched it on Parliamentlive.tv, so I missed out on being gaslighted by the BBC. Still, minister Maria Caulfield made up for it at the end.
Love ‘Saint’ Matt..LOL!
Matt Le Tissier
@mattletiss7
I joined quite a lot of people in the public gallery in Parliament today to listen to @ABridgen speech on excess deaths, despite quite a few empty seats not everyone in our group was let in! The few MPs that bothered turning up got quite a shock with the standing ovation Andrew received.
Who was the lone figure on the opposition Front bench?
Good question. Would also be interested in a take on the body language of the various attendees.
He seemed much more interested in his tie than listening to Andrew Bridgen.
Caulfield’s shadow, I imagine.
Yes. An absolute disgrace: state propaganda right between the eyes. That most MPs once again boycotted Andrew Bridgen says a lot about the state of our sham democracy. This won’t have gone totally unnoticed either and I would say that in some ways they’ve gone and shot themselves in the foot. This trend of non-engagement whether it’s one of their own or one of their constituents is not looking good. The subtext takeaway for me is this: “Your government and MPs care diddly squat about you and your dying friends and relatives/just take the bloody booster, it’s safe and effective, and bloody die!”
Agreed – thanks to Twitter/X, at least the BBC’s and the MPs’ appalling behaviour is exposed to the eyes of the world (to some extent). Shameful and utterly despicable.
An interesting article giving an overview of Islamism and just how powerful and prevalent it actually is. It’s written by a psychologist and it’s always helpful to hear their perspective on things, in my opinion; ”Many people and governments are in denial of the war that Islamists are waging. They attribute individual battles to random, independent actors and not to an overarching ideology. They sometimes rationalize Islamist violence and claim Islamists have legitimate grievances. They even blame themselves for the violence Islamists commit against them. To a great extent, this is because they are cowards, intimidated by Islamist terrorism and the censorious pro-Islamist left. Islamists make no secret of their goals. They are clearly spelled out in the voluminous writings of their theorists and the charters of individual groups, including Hamas. We must remember the dictum: “They have told us who they are and what they intend to do. We must believe them.” The world must wake up and face the enormity of this problem. We must not lurch from one atrocity to the next and only express outrage at one group of Islamist terrorists while refusing to recognize the threat of the larger movement. Unfortunately, after striking back against… Read more »
Wahhabis? Is that a diplomatic way of saying Saudi Arabia which is a friend of the UK and anyone else who likes oil? Qatar – friend of UK. Turkey – member of NATO. Pakistan – friend of.UK. Afghanistan – friend of CIA when the harvest is good.
Maybe this is benefitting Other Interests.
“James Murray and Eric Kaufmann explain in the Critic, why being anti-woke should count as a protected philosophical belief for, meaning employees cannot be punished for it in the workplace.”
I guess it depends what is meant by “protected” but it seems to me that unless you live in a theocracy either all “philosophical beliefs” should be “protected”, or none.
Carl Heneghan’s report is an incredible resource; the work involved and the detail provided is much appreciated by this reader, at least, even if the government chooses to marginalise its content.
https://www.politics.co.uk/news/2023/10/20/reform-uk-ukip-and-britain-first-win-a-combined-vote-of-9-4-per-cent-in-low-turnout-tamworth-by-election/
It has been noted that alternative right parties picked up 9.4% of the vote at the Tamworth by-election. Some Conservatives have accused Britain First of splitting the conservative vote. But it is hardly surprising if ordinary everyday folk are literally terrified at the migrant issue in the UK and are thus attracted to a party that takes an unequivocal stand on this issue. It does seem that most of the parties and some of their leaders in this area of politics come with historical baggage that is less than attractive. Which makes it all the more notable that they picked up 9.4% of the vote. Somebody somewhere should be looking long and hard at what motivated that 9.4% of the Tamworth voters to take that option.
One of the statistical facts is that the Tamworth turnout was around 36%, so it’s possible that the new MP’s experience may be a flash in the pan, if the turnout returns to normal in a general election. At least, that’s what the Tory is probably hoping for.
“Some Conservatives have accused Britain First of splitting the conservative vote.”
I’d love to have a serious conversation with one of these “Conservatives” and have them explain why exactly they expect any conservative to want to vote for them. I mean, I doubt people like Sunak give a damn about conservatism with a small or large “c”, but if members or backbenchers really think that the Tory party could be described as conservative then they seem seriously deluded and “conservatism” as a political force is in serious trouble. All they can really say is that they are not as bad as Labour would be.
Your Taxes Enrich Wind And Solar Companies – leaflet to print or share online
After over a week of one-sided moralising articles, Aris Roussinos has published a superb analysis of where we stand in the conflict and our attitudes to it.
https://unherd.com/2023/10/israel-is-no-longer-britains-war/
Not convinced by the article. Why no mention of us centrists, the ones appalled by the carnage being inflicted on both sides, who I suspect make up a considerable minority if not majority of the population? Why no mention of the ‘fog of war’ which the MSM seem utterly determined to perpetuate along their own tribal lines? Why no mention of peace talks, currently being brokered by Russia & involving other regional states? Why no mention of Qatar negotiating the release of hostages (2 US citizens yesterday, hopefully more to come)? Disappointed.
I agree that I think that the majority of people want the killing to stop….. I don’t think it matters to them what ‘side’ you are on, or on neither side….there are also millions of people who won’t even be thinking that much about it at all… I don’t intend to post anything else, personally, on this matter..for the time-being…I think we all know generally what we think, and where we stand.. and it’s just making me upset and anxious if I’m honest, thinking about the ongoing horrific violence… I am personally sick of being battered into making a decision on a ‘side’…Even though I have found myself taking the civilian Palestinian side much more this week than I think I would have, partly because I’ve felt ‘forced’ by the opposite agenda, and simply because if you are watching pictures of dead and traumatised babies and children day after day, it would take a heart of stone not to…..they haven‘t hurt anyone….they are innocent… …but I’m also aware that Hamas have committed horrific acts that require justice….….I will never be able to un-see those horrendous atrocities and truly my heart bleeds for the death of so many innocent people…. We… Read more »
Believe me – that is the most ‘centrist’ article on Unherd since the 7th.
“Can political cartoons survive in an age of
austerity”extreme govt censorship”Fixed it for you.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/shock-tactics-are-all-thats-left-in-the-immigration-crisis/
A cracking look at the problem of immigration in to Europe.
My solution – mass deportation and particularly new arrival islamists. Enough is enough. And if Suella Braverman can make these points so can I.
Yes I think the ‘Uncontrolled immigration is a threat to national security’ ship has sailed a long time ago. We should certainly stop importing more Muslims, after all, there is no litmus test to distinguish them from radical Islamists ( which is presumably why Egypt is refusing to even allow women and children in ), and I think the crime figures speak for themselves across Europe. But I think the damage is done now, and I can’t see them stopping immigration anyway. We know the politicians don’t have our best interests at heart, which goes for all of the current narratives/agendas being pushed. None of them benefit the people. I’m not a fan of polls, even the ones that confirm my bias, but I think this one in Germany is backed up by the rising popularity of the AfD over there, so it might just reflect the reality on the ground. And it was done before all of the recent pro-Palestine riots in Berlin. It’d be interesting to see polls from all European countries really, though they’re far from accurate typically. ”Almost three-quarters of Germans consider immigration from Islamic countries to be a high security risk, according to an Insa… Read more »
HP, I don’t wish to be pedantic, but I assume you mean “Muslims”, rather than “islamists”, the latter being advocates or supporters of Islamic fundamentalism. The problem for me is not only with Islamic fundamentalism, but with a much broader cultural incompatibility between Islam, on the one hand, and British and Western European culture, on the other.
It is a good article, and I agree with its arguments.
Imagine how many more refugees are now going to be flocking to our shores with all this insanity happening in the Middle East, HP? I would guess that this is one of the intended side effects of THEIR war. We need to close our borders to all but the most awful cases.
The question is why is pressure not put on other Islamic countries, like the rich Middle Eastern countries (Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc) or Egypt, to accept Muslim immigrants. Why does the burden fall on Europe and the USA?
Exactly, Michael. However, we seem to be indoctrinated to think that it is ONLY the west that can house/accept refugees, especially muslims. Again, it’s all intended and we are already seeing the rise of densely populated muslim areas in the country – Leicester, Luton, Rochdale and so on. This can’t end well if the predominantly Christian society is being pressured to accommodate Muslim ways. It would make more sense if Saudi/UAE/Dubai played their part but when did sense ever come into it?
A very interesting 7min video on Fox News with the son of a Hamas leader who broke away from the terrorist group, escaped from his family and sought asylum in the U.S. Hamas only serve Iran and have no interest in the Palestinian people other than as cannon fodder and pawns;
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=327147059924507
…in fairness I don’t think the burden falls on us …. never forget that it’s being purposely implemented against us by our own Governments..
I don’t really blame anyone for looking to move to what they perceive as the ‘rich western countries’…that seems pretty normal to me…
..It seems to me that we are the ones who have the ‘abnormal’ response……by allowing unfettered immigration…..…particularly of large swathes of young men, who’s way of life is generally incompatible with ours….
We have to keep the blame where it lies..with our corrupt Governments, who are refusing to implement the will of the people…and the unelected bodies who have set this agenda….the immigrants will come either way..it’s our Government who are allowing it, and assisting in it…
You always have to come back to Agenda 2030…and why Western Countries are allowing themselves to be over-run in a way that even no sane compassionate person can understand.
It’s hard not to assume that it really is population replacement..? Cheap uneducated slave labour with no rights…. versus ….the ones with expectations?…the ones with pensions? the ones with education and aspirations?
So as it’s already in full swing, I assume they want it to continue, and much of what they say is just lip-service…?
Is this the Suella Braverman who is Home Secretary in a government handing out record numbers of visas or a different one?
In light of Andrew Brigdens speech to an empty Parliament, might this be a way forward….?
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/australian-excess-death-probe
Earlier this year, Australian Senators voted down a motion calling for acknowledgment of Australia’s record-high excess deaths, and the need for an inquiry.
Now, the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) has taken it upon themselves to conduct an independent inquiry, and they’re taking it to Parliament House, Canberra.
If in doubt, hide evidence??
Jessica Rose
@JesslovesMJK
So no more weekly #VAERS updates, people. They’re reverting to previous monthly posting schedule.
It’s because there’s no emergency anymore, so there’s no need to allow people to see emergence of AEs in VAERS. For any products. Good thing we have 3 years of COVID data stored.
(She could also ask if there’s no emergency for VAERS..why are they still giving people the shot??)
Updated substack from Kevin McKernan ….in light of Canada’s admission of finding DNA in the vaccines…
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/dna-fragments-detected-in-monovalent?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events
https://dailyclout.io/fda-granted-pfizer-eua-based-on-misrepresented-data/
On Sept 5th a Daily Clout/War Room Research Team uncovered a huge story about there being more cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated in Pfizer’s clinical trial, as well as that Pfizer did not report the 3.7-fold cardiovascular adverse events signal and also delayed reporting deaths so that it favored the vaccinated arm of the trial.
Now, as a follow up to that report, DailyClout reveals that Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, MD, part of that same Research Team, found even more damning evidence showing that Pfizer delayed recording deaths in Case Report Forms (CRFs), which allowed the company to not report those deaths as part of its emergency use authorization (EUA) data filing with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Emergency Use Medication Means Mainly Untested
– latest leaflet to print at home or forward to politicians, media, friends online.