New Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study Shows How Hearts Get Damaged

In a new laboratory research letter, scientists from the Giessen Institute of Physiology (Germany) and the National Heart Laboratory of Semmelweis University (Hungary) finally were able to pinpoint some mechanisms of how Covid vaccines damage hearts.

The paywalled peer-reviewed study in the British Journal of Pharmacology is here.

[T]his study investigated the effect of mRNA-1273 [Moderna] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] on the function, structure, and viability of isolated adult rat cardiomyocytes over a 72 hour period.

Key Results

In the first 24 hours after application, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 caused neither functional disturbances nor morphological abnormalities. After 48 hours, expression of the encoded spike protein was detected in ventricular cardiomyocytes for both mRNAs. At this point in time, mRNA-1273 induced arrhythmic as well as completely irregular contractions associated with irregular as well as localised calcium transients, which provide indications of significant dysfunction of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2).

In contrast, BNT162b2 increased cardiomyocyte contraction via significantly increased protein kinase A (PKA) activity at the cellular level.

Conclusions and Implications

Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events.

What This Study Adds

We already know, based on cardiac damage markers in humans, that Covid vaccines cause heart damage, sometimes hidden, that is far from rare.

What is not as clear is: what exactly happens to the hearts that raises the biomarkers of damage?

Since scientists cannot remove and slice the hearts of living humans, the mechanism of this damage remains mysterious. It does not help that the FDA, Pfizer and Moderna refuse to release data from follow-up myocarditis studies.

https://twitter.com/birb_k/status/1699060876379316732

The German/Hungarian study we are reviewing contributes a detailed, in vitro laboratory analysis of what exactly happens to heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes) under conditions typical for a recipient of Covid vaccines.

The authors, Schreckerberg et al., first refer us to a biodistribution study that measured the concentration of Covid vaccines in the hearts of Wistar lab rats after vaccination. The scientists applied the same concentrations to the heart cells of young male rats, as well as human heart cells:

In this study, the amount of mRNA used was calculated from the lipid concentration detected in the rat heart two hours after injection of 50μg [3H]-labeled LNP mRNA.

Scientists used cell cultures to conduct an experiment unaffected by the many complications of testing the hearts of living organisms. They had proper control groups – Petri dishes with heart cells that did not receive the mRNA injection.

The heart cells, called cardiomyocytes, underwent deleterious changes after in vitro ‘vaccination’. Compared to the control group, the vaccinated heart cells malfunctioned in various ways:

The authors explain how both vaccines damage heart muscle cells:

Immune Reaction Was Excluded by Design!

Much of the wider discussion of ‘myocarditis’ involves hypotheses of the heart being damaged by our body’s immune rejection of heart cells.

The Schreckerberg study we are discussing purposely excluded such immune reactions because it used cell cultures without any immune cells. And yet, the researchers detected deleterious effects on heart cells (cardiomyocytes). There are more causes of heart damage than immune reactions could explain, the authors show by excluding any immune-related factor.

We must appreciate the authors’ intent to concentrate on one particular aspect of vaccination.

The Authors Make a Strong Anti-Vaccine Conclusion

The times are changing! Here’s the most amazing part, rarely seen in peer-reviewed studies published in scientific journals. The authors do not mince words and say we must re-evaluate giving people mRNA vaccines due to their cardiotoxic effects.

I appreciate the elegant study by the German and Hungarian scientists, although I wish this research had been done before billions of people were poisoned. Sadly, little will change now – but the truth is finally coming out.

Do you think ‘science’ will ever focus on helping vaccine-injured people, or will it continue to gaslight and ignore them?

This article was first published on Igor’s Substack page. Subscribe here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10navigator
10navigator
2 years ago

The ‘experts’, including the BBC, forming Dr Aseem Malhotra’s dissenters are looking more foolish by the day.

JohnK
2 years ago

The existence of this report suggests that the decision to reject the offer of using it a couple of years ago was wise. It seems to show that the underlying design is essentially flawed. It also demonstrates that there has been a lot of blatant lying to the general public to encourage the use of the C19 jabs.

It also suggests that the whole concept of “emergency use authorisation” is open to doubt, especially when it is used for political and/or financial reasons.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

There was never an “emergency”.

I cannot recall if it was Whitty or Vallance that texted Hancock saying “there won’t be a mass vaccine rollout because covid is mild for most and we would never be able to get a vaccine fully tested – it’s too mild to justify an emergency rollout” or words to that effect. That was a massive reveal from the Hancock Whatsapp messages that the MSM chose to ignore.

I really struggle with the “vaccine” business now. Almost everyone I know including close friends and family are “vaccinated” (despite me advising them against it) but I don’t want to say to them “well, your heart might well be f—ed because of the vaccine”. They all seem OK so far, healthwise, other than getting colds more often than I do.

Valerie_London
Valerie_London
2 years ago

Referring to your last paragraph, I wish I could say the same.

My partner’s best friend died of a sudden heart attack at B&Q on Christmas Eve 2021 2 weeks after his ‘booster’.

My best friend’s brother in law died suddenly of some weird blood disorder in a forest in Scotland, aged 51 and otherwise healthy.

Same friend and another female friend treated by chemo and aggressive operations following cancer diagnoses last year. One of them has to go for another aggressive round after the cancer was found to have returned – a few months after her 3rd booster.

My ex’s 50 year old sister still in hospital months after massive blood clots turned into a massive stroke and left her partially paralysed. She is BME and hadn’t wanted to take it in the first place but her family talked her into it.

My 25 year old neighbour miscarried 4 or 5 months after her first jab.

I’m sure I’m missing some, but you get the picture.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

Sorry to hear that. Guess the people I know got lucky, so far. My MIL died having been vaxxed but she was 80something and had other health issues so hard to know the real causes.

JeremyP99
2 years ago

My wife had a patient who is a nurse at the RUH in Bath. Hubby a consultant there. When my wife asker her what it was like there during Covid, she said the wards were all empty, maybe three people in ICU.

She was however very concerned as six of their colleagues – all fit, sporty middle aged medics had had to retire as a result of cardiac and stroke problems.

Hmmm.

If you want proof positive that the jabs are more dangerous than Covid, have some official figures.

From Feb 2020 to Dec 2021, <10k died FROM Covid (“With Covid” being an entirely fraudulent count), 1 under the age of 14 and less than a hundred aged less than 50.

MHRA figures show c2000 dead in that period from the jabs. The did state publicly that they believe (as did the CDC in America) that maybe only 2% to 10% of adverse reactions and fatalities are actually reported with the yellow card system.

So let’s be generous, and accept 10%. In which case, 20,000 died from the jab, TWICE as many from Covid.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021

ActualDeaths.PNG
DS99
2 years ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

I’ve got a similar list – when I think about it, I’m gob smacked that the world is just carrying on as if all this is normal. I guess if you’re under 40 you might not have the perspective but it’s a bit like autism, if you’re over 50 you know that it never used to be like this.

Valerie_London
Valerie_London
2 years ago
Reply to  DS99

I think there is an awful lot of cognitive dissonance going on at the moment.

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

The husbands of two of my friends, both in their late ’50s, have had serious heart attacks. One of them has had two heart attacks and a blood clot in his leg.

JeremyP99
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

One of the two recent winners of the Noble Prize for Medicine warned in 2018 of the intrinsic dangers of the mRNA vaccines.

Then pretended he didn’t.

Mogwai
2 years ago

How many more studies do we really need that show the same exact thing time and time again? Do people really think that when they reach 1 million studies that prove the toxic jabs are in fact toxic that the regulators will suddenly remember they’re meant to be regulating and all of the death jabs will be removed from the market? This is going to go on until infinity and beyond isn’t it, and literally nothing will change. We’ll still all be here in another 3 years time ( 3 million studies later…) moaning about the same old stuff, ad nauseam. Cheeky off-topic insertion, because no-one visits the Round-up at this time, if this footage from Gaza is legit, concerning the hospital that was hit by a wayward rocket, it appears that the only casualties are a bunch of cars because it hit the car park. Hospital building seems to be completely unscathed. But that didn’t stop Hamas from jumping straight in blaming the IDF and saying there were ”500 killed”. Further confirmation that they are abject liars and Jew-haters; ”The footage shows that Gaza’s Al-Ahly hospital was not hit. The Islamic terrorists Hamas lied openly. They want to start… Read more »

MikeAustin
2 years ago

I suggest everyone has a look at the impressive Urgent Expert Hearing on Monday 10th October by the World Council for Health here, This was conducted by Professors, Doctors and Scientists in labs across the world.

Essentially, the experimental covid jab interventions contain undeclared ingredients that the pharmaceutical companies have kept quiet. Some of these could not have been due to accidental contamination. They are possibly cancer-promoting – and a reference was made to the term ‘turbo cancer’. There is DNA contamination, and the jabs tested before rollout were not the same as the public received.

There is enough evidence now emerging to prosecute.

ebygum
2 years ago

This is very good news, but heart problems are only one adverse reaction….there’s a long way to go….
but if the dam is dam is breaking here’s hoping Gastrointestinal problems….blood and lymphatic, nervous system, skin, muscle and skeletal, and thoracic and respiratory disorders …..and all the other problems that have been reported in their millions, now get a look-in…..

Valerie_London
Valerie_London
2 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Turbo cancers, strokes and blood clots. Probably whatever you are most prone to getting – it will gift it to you prematurely.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/how-is-nuremberg-code-enforceable

A case coming up in Costa Rica in November where apparently the Nuremberg code is enforceable.

Thanks to Dr Mike Yeadon.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago

It does bite through certain kinds of tissue.The top of your mouth is similar to heart tissue. Does anyone really understand the seriousness of creating a pathogen that will be with us forever. That with our methods and deepest understanding of science there is no way to get rid of it. When you start tampering with things on this level you invite the introduction of very dark forces into our world and there are other forces that keep a watch on these things. The nuclear explosions in the 1940s and 1950s brought into our world entities that shouldn’t really be here. There needs to be an urgent re-examinaton of the intellctual history of the West in order to correct a catastrophic path. The outcome among the higher beings is unknown but the good outcome is fed by human understanding.

Rose Madder
2 years ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

Hello J. Do you have a source for “ top of your mouth is similar to heart tissue”?

I was wretched with sore tongue and partial loss of taste way back when.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

I went through a time where I had a huge sore on my mouth and then two of my previosly healthy back teeth just fell out. The attack was ummistakable in that it was the whole roof of my mouth and the pain was immense. It hasn’t recovered yet. I could tell quite clearly that when it invaded it was very different from anything before. The focus on certain kinds of tissue. If it had got through to my heart then it would’ve been sayonara.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago

None of it is much consolation whether it affected you or someone else. Honestly we are going to just let it go? We are talking about an act of malfeasance that is probably the biggest in human history. The death toll stands at over 20 million, the disabilty numbers are almost incalculable. For me that is a deal breaker. I am not naturally paranoid but I am paranoid and proud given their recird.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago

What you might call ‘science’ has failed on every level. Not to mention the promoton of a vaccine that injured people and the median affects are just becoming apparent. I have noticed it in my job the number of young people turning up with stage 4 cancer literally with a couple of weeks to live.This is a seruous matter.. You need to have a good look at those in charge.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago

It will worm its way deeper and deeper into your system. As if it is something that has been there all along. Just like we dismiss the people around us who lack vitality. This is forever and likely to become much much worse. You really need to understand this as a necessary truth, Because the implicatons of this are far bigger then we have ever considered before.

Valerie_London
Valerie_London
2 years ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

I understand your passion and fury, and I feel it too. I have felt some sense that there might be some reckoning somehow, but I’m also prepared to be part of some uprising or other if necessary. Right now we know all sorts of behind the scenes battles are being fought, but not in the public eye, so it’s hard to trust that it will lead to any kind of breakthrough.

Trust me, many of us are ready to do ‘something’ when we know that something will make a difference.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
2 years ago

https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas

Para 14.

Increased levels of mir 15 This mechanism is not the result of immune rejection per se. It was postulated January 2022.