Decades of Mismanagement Are Dooming Britain to Decline

It seems that not a day goes by without further confirmation that the Government has been totally incompetent for decades – so this is an observation not confined to any one party.

The most recent news is the pending disaster in many buildings, entirely due to the use of a special reinforced aeriated concrete (RAAC) from the sixties onwards, which was known to have a shorter life than normal building structures. It was highlighted in 2018 and it would appear that in spite of this tsunami of consequences that would be inevitable very little has been done about it. The implications for education could not come at a worse time, after education at school, college and university level was already irredeemably damaged by the completely pointless and unnecessary lockdown imposed by ministers. In this they had very little justification, other than recommendations from an extremely incompetent and not fit for purpose Chief Medical Office and SAGE.

No need to remind everyone that Sweden did not close schools yet it had one of the best outcomes of all Western nations, without a single day’s education being lost for its schoolchildren and one of the lowest death rates from Covid and the consequences of lockdown in the Western world.

It has been asked why, since the issue with schools and RAAC was known in 2018, weren’t the schools all inspected and catalogued while they were closed.

A crisis in education has been building every since the Tony Blair mantra of “education, education, education” was translated into a goal of 50% of all students going to university. For some years it has been clear that this has resulted in far too many people going to university to do totally unnecessary degrees and be saddled with lifelong debt that in the majority of cases the taxpayer will be picking up. The law of unintended consequences means that many of these students who have wasted three years and tens of thousands of pounds for a degree that has no use have deprived the workforce of no doubt very able-skilled workers. This is why we now have a situation where there is an enormous shortage of useful skilled personnel with enormous impact on the building industry and maintenance experts. A further consequence of this – I’ll leave it to you to decide how unintended it was – was to flood the country with such workers from abroad, particularly the EU, and turn a blind eye to the consequences.

The NHS, which is the country’s biggest employer and for which plans have been announced to make it up to 50% bigger in personnel terms, has not benefitted from any university expansion for medical students, resulting in a severe shortage of doctors.

No minister could possibly deny the changing demographics, whereby the population for the last 20 to 30 years has become older and more infirm, requiring more and more resources. In spite of this, the Government refused to open the number of places for medical students in the U.K. on the grounds of cost, which has resulted in having to import more and more doctors from abroad, often on agency contracts costing three times the price of normal salaried personnel.

The situation for nurses is probably even worse, having adopted an ill-thought through plan to train all nurses to degree level. Good nurses do not need degrees and the NHS was supported previously by an army of nurses who trained on the job and more importantly were paid. How on earth do we expect to have enough nurses when not only do they have to undergo a degree but also pay for it. Steve Barclay is another Health Minister in a long line of Health Ministers, all the way back to Ken Clarke, who have instigated major reforms of the health service, most of which have backfired or are clearly not accruable – in Barclay’s case, gladly informing a meeting of health professionals that his department had employed 40,000 nurses for the NHS last year while omitting to say or explain why 50,000 had left. If this continues, it is clear there will be no nurses in a very short time. The major management reforms, which appear to be continuing with no loss of momentum – such as a recent decision to employ super regional managers at nearly £300,000 a piece in order to address a severe shortage of staff on the frontline!

Over-management, de-professionalisation of doctors and complete destruction of morale in frontline staff have been the approach that has been pursued relentlessly over the last decades. The NHS has been made to suffer waves of reforms, with change after change and no sense of irony at the wry observation that things are bad enough as they are. The constant change in doctors’ contracts, again, like education, goes all the way back to Tony Blair who destroyed the GP services in the country by giving them a contract that allowed them to opt out of night and weekend care for a very small change in income, which nearly everyone accepted. I now find that constant change in contracts is a major reason why the NHS is failing so badly, with not only millions on the waiting list but also the numbers dying on it ever increasing, arguably because of management neglect. 

One of the reasons for the inability to bring the waiting lists down, which many predicted would be the obvious long-term effect of a lockdown (even if it had only been a few weeks, as promised), is the sense of injustice and need for recognition by all medical staff. In the junior doctors’ case they have for the first time in years elected to go on a series of rolling strikes. What has been most amazing about the strikes is that they have demonstrated that they are already working to rule and are nothing like the junior doctors of my generation and, indeed, many since. One director of a major surgical service told me that the hospital operates much more efficiently without the junior doctors as senior doctors can go in, diagnose and treat within 10 minutes, as opposed to an hour plus for junior doctors’ engagement.   In the old days there was a ‘Firm’ system where every junior doctor was formally attached to a team of consultants and senior registrars, which not only enabled good education, teamwork, feedback and so on, but was also fantastic for mentoring and support – things sadly lacking today, resulting in professionals going off on sick leave far more commonly than used to be the case.

However, appallingly bad decisions like these are not confined to education and the NHS but seem to permeate the whole of society.  When I grew up everybody had faith in the ‘system’ in that the civil service was competent and would deliver in all areas, from truth and justice and police competence to belief that their tax concerns and pensions would be dealt with swiftly and properly. However, it would appear not any more. It is clear that the Civil Service and the increasingly wasteful and completely useless local governments have, in many cases, been infiltrated by specialist groups and ‘charities’ campaigning for rights, which has resulted in a raft of legislation protecting minorities. Although initially justified, this has gone on to be a rolling behemoth, infiltrating every administrative aspect of the Government and effectively paralysing it.

Another obvious analogy is the way the Government displaced reinforced concrete with a much poorer substitute, leading to the inevitable collapse that we are now starting to see in buildings. Many fundamental aspects of society have collapsed or are on life support in the U.K., mainly due to the unintended consequences of Government actions going back decades. The problem with transport is everywhere to see and involves trains, main roads and even urban movement, whether it be in constant strikes or the almost permanent feature of dangerous and damaging potholes in every city and town that I have visited in the last few years. Even flying, with its impeccable safety record to date, is suffering from the lack of an upgrade in the air traffic control system in this country, while also reeling from strikes across Europe and in the air traffic control networks, adding to constant inefficiencies.

Then there is the water and sewage facilities. Privatised under Thatcher to improve the service and keep future costs off the book, this has led to total privatisation, leading to the opposite of what was intended. Whereas all the money was meant to be used efficiently for improvements and keeping all the infrastructure up to date, having the vision to repair ahead, we now have a crumbling, failing system where the money that should be spent on investment now goes in enormous dividends to the overseas investors who have bought most of these companies.

It is just as bad when it comes to gas and electricity – witness the crumbling gas infrastructure, which greatly contributes to the numerous roadworks in every region in the country, as well as the crumbling national grid, which cannot possibly cope with the Government’s electrification Net Zero plan. The decision to close down power stations long before there were reliable replacements is inexplicable given the unreliability of renewable energy generation in the absence of the ability to store it.

Thus, it would appear that the country has been beset with poor government for at least two and half decades, with political parties and Government ministers who have failed to think through the very obvious consequences – unintended and intended – of many of their actions. Did they think such strategic thinking was not necessary as the problems would not manifest until they had long since gone from office? It certainly now feels that all the chickens are coming home to roost. Virtually nothing that we used to take for granted, even as recently as the 1980s, is working any more. The very worst aspect is that there is a permissive miasma that nobody really seems to care or that nobody, more importantly, is being held responsible and to account for all the numerous failings.

Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stewart
2 years ago

Governments aren’t efficient nor should we expect them to be because they can’t be.

Governments need to get out of the way. That should be the aspiration. Stay out the fucking way and let the people get on with it.

Set the minimum set of rules to have basic order. The people and the invisible hand of the market will for the most part do the rest and quite well. Not perfectly, but far far better than any group of central planners.

Please, please, please stop asking government and the state to do what it can never do. It can’t run things well, it can’t be efficient. It simply needs to stop doing so many things and get out the way.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Government is very good at moving public wealth into private hands. In that respect, it is a perfectly crafted machine.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

It is entirely the other way around; socialist fascism.

Where did any ‘public wealth’ come from?

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

I’m sure you’d agree that the government provides a conduit for transferring the wealth of the majority into the hands of the minority.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Socialist fascist government exists to transfer money from the private sector to the public sector.

So yes, in so far as the public sector is a minority but, eventually, the public sector becomes a majority and, ultimately, in due course, the state fails, with catastrophic effect.

‘A third defining characteristic of economic fascism is that private property and business ownership are permitted, but are in reality controlled by government through a business-government “partnership.” As Ayn Rand often noted, however, in such a partnership government is always the senior or dominating “partner.”

Economic Fascism, Thomas DiLorenzo

‘….government restrictions henceforth must be accepted not to hamper individualism but to protect it.’

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Smudger
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Government is good at moving money into rich peoples hands.

DickieA
DickieA
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Well said

DomH75
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Agreed. The state should also get out of the education business altogether. They used a report about a small, convenient bunch of schools run by ‘a major religion that isn’t Christian’ to claim kids were being taught terrorist ideologies. Who knows if it was true or they made it up? But it meant that the state could interfere even more with schools, forcing sexual perversion and climate paranoia on little kids. If the state got out of education and simply provided a voucher, parents could choose what school to send their children to. If they want their football-mad son to come home in a dress calling himself ‘Susan’, there will be a school for that. If they want their son to go to a Catholic school with rigorous educational standards, school uniforms and strong discipline, all the way up to corporal punishment and no gender or climate nonsense, they should be able to find that one too. End of the day, bad schools will fail and shut down while good schools can expand to more campuses and take over the old, failed ones. We were promised a ‘bonfire of the quangos’ 13 years ago. It never happened, because the politicians,… Read more »

sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

“No government has the right to decide on the truth of scientific principles, nor to prescribe in any way the character of the questions investigated. Neither may a government determine the aesthetic value of artistic creations, nor limit the forms of literacy or artistic expression. Nor should it pronounce on the validity of economic, historic, religious, or philosophical doctrines. Instead it has a duty to its citizens to maintain the freedom, to let those citizens contribute to the further adventure and the development of the human race.”
Richard Feynman

NeilParkin
2 years ago

Yes, yes, but apart from that..?

With respect to Prof Dalgliesh, you dont need a Profship to see this. The question is ‘what on earth can we do to reverse it’, or failing that where in the world can I go and recommend my kids go to avoid living in a communist hellhole that we are becoming. Singapore..? Anyone..?

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Not sure Singapore would be top of my list.

A strongly Republican state in the US would be a good bet, failing that I wouldn’t go to a rich world country. Hungary? Uruguay?

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago

Spanish is much easier to learn than Hungarian, and millions of us already know enough to get by in non-touristy areas.

NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

What a sad state of affairs….

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

True. Hungary seems like a country with some degree of sanity left, and I did personally know a Hungarian once and the culture sounded promising. I know very little about Uruguay other than it is fairly stable for a country in the Americas and the population is predominantly Spanish. I’d go to the US but I don’t have enough money to get in easily – you need a few million.

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago

Uruguay is in the most ethnically European part of South America: SE Brazil, Uruguay, NE Argentina.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

You can enter the US very easily from Mexico. It seems to be the trip du jour currently. And once in, send for your belongings.
😀

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

True but I would want to be there legally

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I once entered the USA from Mexico without formal permission: I managed to charm the female officials into letting me back in after I went to Mexico by mistake at Nogales!

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Texas

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

A variety of horrible climates and majority Mestizo before too long.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Invasion of the Californians: The 10 States Seeing the Biggest Influx of New Residents from California

  • Texas is the top destination for departing Californians, with 13.71% of California moving interest toward the Lone Star State.
  • Florida is #2 with 7.49% of interest. This confirms other reports that Californians are flocking to The Sunshine State.

Or Alaska

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The government has a product called “regime change” but it’s export only.

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago

Everything makes sense if you understand that the objective is the destruction of European Christian civilisation and that, although lots of morons are used – how thick do you have to be to believe there’s a climate emergency, that it is possible to change sex, that “diversity” is a strength or that there was ever a very dangerous new disease gong around – the people directing things are very far from being stupid.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago

Incompetence. Just an unfortunate series of cockups.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

Dr Dalgleish is correct about the collapsing of our country but totally wrong to ascribe it to incompetent politicians. The collapses are deliberate and have been planned for. Dr Dalgleish states:

The decision to close down power stations long before there were reliable replacements is inexplicable given the unreliability of renewable energy generation in the absence of the ability to store it.”

Well, if the intention is to destroy public morale, frighten people by ensuring they can no longer keep themselves warm and make them poorly as a result surely the best way is to get rid of fossil fuels.

Dr Dalgleish – it’s the Agenda 2030 depopulation agenda.

Monro
2 years ago

Latest revelation:

Chancellor states unable to cut taxes due to interest payments on national debt. Interest rates high due to inflation. Inflation high due to quantitative easing during and after covid lockdowns.

Errr….would a cost benefit analysis regarding lockdowns, as requested by treasury chief secretary Jesse Norman prior to introducing them, perhaps have helped?

Clue for cabinet halfwits: Yes!

Blair’s Britain. May’s Britain. Bunter’s Britain. What a bunch of hopeless nincompoops!

Vote for independent candidates!

Jon Smith
2 years ago

I’ve come to terms that we are a third world country…
We don’t need to import immigrants to prove the point…

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/sunak-and-the-mildest-possible-net-zero-flip-flop/

From today’s TCW. A lukewarm thumbs-up for Fishy’s row back on net zero.

I suppose it does raise half a smile.

JohnnyDownes
2 years ago

Is anybody surprised by this?
The common factor is (obviously) the civil service. Underworked, overpaid, and egregiously over-pensioned.
There should be an annual head-count reduction of 15% for the next five years, then re-evaluate.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnnyDownes

“There should be an annual head-count reduction of 15% for the next five years, then re-evaluate. sack the remainder”

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-climate-scaremongers-shoddy-dams-to-blame-for-libyan-floods-not-global-warming/

Paul Homewood at TCW with his Friday takedown of “global boiling.” Always an excellent read.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/shake-the-money-tree-sunaks-answer-to-everything/

This article doesn’t provide any answers but does prove how this country has for many years now been managed from elsewhere.

Mogwai
2 years ago

”This just in!” Russell Brand’s just released a quick clip here. How much you betting his audience just grows off the back of this manufactured, fake ‘scandal’?
”Let’s get ready to Rumble”

https://twitter.com/rustyrockets/status/1705325563936747847

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Thanks Mogs. He has come out fighting and that’s what we need.

UK government up to their necks in this shit. Here’s Kit Knightly’s take on this over at Off-G:

https://off-guardian.org/2023/09/21/british-mps-are-trying-to-cancel-russell-brand-but-why/

DomH75
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

The Mail’s already pumping out disinfo. Apparently I have to spend £60 to watch Russell Brand’s live shows! Never had to do that before! Just tapped one on Rumble now to check. Worked fine! They’ve also zoomed in on and darkened the screengrab from his item to make him look sinister. They’re also using the word ‘cult’ in relation to his subscribers (which also happened to Stefan Molyneaux!) The reason the Mail is pushing the Russell Brand story is less him and the women who have made the allegations and more them wanting to use it to go after the BBC and Channel Four.

The fact the British state has involved itself in all this is making headlines around the world. We became the first overt surveillance state in the free world under Major, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that we’re piloting full-blown tyranny!

True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
2 years ago

I remember an episode of the show Endeavour that featured the disastrous consequences of the phenomenon of “concrete cancer”, which is when the steel reinforcements corrode when the sand used is beach sand that still has salt mixed in.

iconoclast
2 years ago

Whitehall’s chinless wonders.

Senior Whitehall Mandarins.

Castorp
Castorp
2 years ago

And the author hasn’t even touched on the global facilitation of tax evasion via the overseas territories.
Britain is a banana republic.

JeremyP99
2 years ago

“Thus, it would appear that the country has been beset with poor government for at least two and half decades,”

Starting in 1997. Wonder who came to power then? Anyone?

jsampson45
jsampson45
2 years ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

Operative phrase is “at least”. Centuries might be nearer the mark than decades.

Alan
2 years ago

It isn’t poor government that is the problem, it is too much government taking instructions from big corporations and intellectuals.

ekathulium
ekathulium
2 years ago

The whole problem arises from the concept of “managers”.
Able people don´t need managed. They may need assistance, in which case let them hire administrators.
That is how hospitals used to be run. Nurses were in charge, not “managers”. The nurses appointed administrators for the many organizational jobs that needed done.
Similarly clinics and surgeries were run by doctors. They didn´t need “managers” but often needed administrators.
Doctors and nurses prioritize clinical needs.
Managers prioritize their own needs to rise up the greasy pole.