Covid Juice 3.0 Hits the Shelves in Germany, With Interest at Such Record Lows That Many Doctors Have not Even Bothered to Stock it
The latest Covid Juice release is for sale in Germany as of Monday, and Health Minister Karl Lauterbach was first in line. There’s abundant evidence that he’s not a great fan of vaccination; he got his third dose in secret, well after the rest of the vaccinators, and his claims to have gotten a fourth are subject to considerable doubt. No matter: he’s learned from past mistakes, and while he’s denounced the “exorbitant” profits of vaccine manufacturers and called vaccine injuries “dismaying”, the Vaccinator Stand is the only booth still open at the Covid Circus, so Lauterbach has made himself the face of it. He turned 60 in February, so technically he counts as old and vulnerable enough to warrant a fifth (or a fourth) vaccination.
From Die Zeit:
[Lauterbach] has ruled out state virus measures despite rising infection statistics. Germany is “much better prepared”, he said, and there is additionally “broad immunity” in the population. “We don’t need any contact restrictions” …
Voluntary masking is still advisable for those who are infected and cannot avoid social contacts, said Lars Schaade, the President of the Robert Koch Institute.
Lauterbach advises caution despite the lack of Government action. Corona is “not a cold”, and permanent damage – for example from Long Covid – remains a possibility. Lauterbach therefore recommends vaccination above all for people who are particularly at risk. “People over 60 years of age and risk groups should get vaccinated, preferably against influenza as well,” said the Minister.
In a separate piece timed to coincide with the rollout, Die Zeit called up a Bremen epidemiologist who says he expects masks to return to clinics and care homes, and who holds out hope for expanded vaccine recommendations in the course of the winter. I’m quite sure some care homes will once again impose inhumane mask requirements, but there’s no chance vaccine regulators will urge wider uptake. We’re in a long, slow process of deradicalisation, and that only runs in one direction.
On the Left, Tageszeitung (taz)– basically a cut-rate German Guardian – has already registered its displeasure that the vaccines are a) no longer free and b) no longer being urged on absolutely everybody:
It’s not so easy to stay healthy in Germany. Now that virtually all protective measures have been lifted, vaccination is also on the block. The Standing Commission on Vaccination (STIKO) couldn’t bring itself to recommend the booster for everyone. Now only certain, narrowly defined risk groups are allowed to be immunised… The rest will have to explain why they want to be vaccinated. …
What is more, because the health insurance companies hide behind the STIKO recommendation, you have to pay for the vaccination yourself. At a cost of probably just under €50 per jab. In view of the vaccination campaigns ‘Sleeves up’ (2021) and ‘Vaccination helps’ [2022], this is totally absurd. The Federal Ministry of Health spent €287 million and €38 million on these campaigns. The motto for 2023 would then rather be: “Well, let’s see.”
In the USA, the CDC recommends vaccination for all people over six months of age. From the very start of the pandemic, STIKO has acted with extreme hesitation and thus contributed to the general uncertainty. It’s partly responsible for the growing number of vaccine sceptics in Germany.
Indeed it’s interesting that the Health Ministry has so quickly forgotten its vaccination appeals from just last year. With a little more introspection, taz might’ve drawn some important conclusions from this curiosity. As for STIKO and vaccine hesitancy, I fear they’ve gotten it backwards. The regulators are plainly trying to preserve remaining public faith in vaccines by reining in their mass Covid jab campaigns.
Holger Schelp, Chairman of the General Practitioners’ Association in Bremen remarked to local media this morning that there will be no “great rush” for the new jabs, admitting that “interest is so low that many practices have not even ordered the vaccine”.
The official recommendation… is that everyone who is 60 or older, or who belongs to an at-risk group, should be vaccinated.
The evidence supporting this recommendation isn’t very strong though. It’s based on small numbers. We doctors don’t know how many people we’d have to vaccinate to prevent an infection, or how many we need to vaccinate to prevent a death. … I think that’s a bit embarrassing for a large-scale vaccination effort.
Most colleagues therefore tell their patients the official line, and then add unofficially that, in all honesty, there is no good knowledge about whether they should get vaccinated or not. Patients should therefore go with their gut feeling. We also don’t want to vaccinate anyone who might feel pressured to get the jab. We want them to say: “Yes, I need it.” Or to say with a clear conscience: “No, I’m sceptical, I’m not going to get vaccinated now.” (emphasis added)
That may not sound like much, but you need to remember that these are words from an important medical bureaucrat in the most heavily vaccinated German state.
This, then, is how it ends. All the Very Important Science People have been wrong about everything, which means that none of them can pull the plug on this farce. They’ll continue their doubtful performances, selling slightly updated versions of failed pharmaceutical products and making claims well in excess of the evidence to an ever shrinking audience of virus enthusiasts. These dead-enders will shriek that they’ve been abandoned; they’ll write long meandering columns full of hand-wringing about “crowded waiting rooms, trains, classrooms and offices”, pleading that we need more “hybrid teaching” and more vaccine outreach, all of it to a suddenly indifferent political class. With all eyes on the upcoming state elections in Bavaria and Hesse, nobody cares what they have to say. The major papers are closed to their fears, although virologically nothing has changed since last Fall, when Covid was dangerous enough to warrant lingering mask mandates and wall-to-wall vaccine marketing. Even virus fangirl Christina Berndt has been brought into line, penning mild vaccine FAQs for the Süddeutsche Zeitung. Forgotten is the Oktoberfest scaremongering to which she treated us just 12 months ago.
Covid was the original focus of the Plague Chronicle, and for that reason it will always be an important theme of this blog – but as political stories go, this one has played out. For lockdowns and mass vaccination to come back, they’ll need a new virus. I have no doubt at all that they’re already looking for one.
This piece originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
From Dr Mike Yeadon & actually pertinent to the article!
Here’s another piece of “the science” that it’s worth reading. It’s not long & the outcomes may surprise you.
Next time they say there’s a pandemic, my strong recommendation is to channel MEP Christine Anderson and tell them no (or “Hell, no).
Once you do that- and it’s appropriate – they’ve lost their power to frighten you into all sorts of things you’d rather not do.
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/trusttheevidence/p/how-cochrane-review-a122-became-a
Dr Mike Yeadon now believes Covid was an imaginary virus.
He must have read my Twitter bio:
“UK healthcare for 21 years. The only person on planet earth to diagnose Covid 19 correctly, on DAY ONE, as Mass Hysteria over an imaginary illness.”
It’s Paramaniac9 if you want to follow but be aware even Elon can’t stomach what I say and has continued to ruthlessly shadowban me.
They knew that already in terms of the projected uptake. They measure things to the millimetre. They want to engender a discussion between opposing camps by introducing this measure at this time. It is esentially a dual use barometer and distraction. If you look at what they are trying to stifle you will see that it is any discussion of the consequences of nuclear war.
A doctrine took hold in the 1990s which postlalted that nuclear war isn’t that bad at all and is essentially winnable. This became an economic strategy based upon this model. That is why it will be very difficult to dissuade the Anglo-Americans from going nuclear. There is strong resistance within the American armed forces but I am not sure that this resistance will be enough. The trouble is that on every level the West is in serious trouble and so it might be concluded that catastrophe is the only way out.
I’m intrigued:– ‘nuclear war isn’t that bad at all’. Compared to what? ‘Essentially winnable’. Who’d determine who the winners and losers are? Anyone left standing would be unlikely to feel predisposed to make a judgment I’d say. ‘Catastrophe is the only way out’. Pass me my revolver. I simply cannot conceive of anything approaching the untold suffering, misery and death that would be unleashed by thermonuclear conflict. For those involved, it would certainly be the end of civilisation.
(Though we trained to throw a ‘bucket of sunshine’ at the enemy 50 years ago, we were in no doubt of the consequences for both sides).
So true, 10navigator. Behold the perils of “analytical” versus “gist” thinking. While nuclear war *technically* may not be the absolute worst thing that could ever possibly be conceived, as someone could always conceive something worse perhaps, it is certainly more than high enough on the “worst case scenario” list to be prudently avoided at all costs. Even a fairly limited nuclear exchange could be enough to end civilization as we know it. I would actually feel more sorry for the *survivors* than the deceased at that point, due to what they will have to deal with in the aftermath.
No one really wins a nuclear war. The best that one could hope for is a very, very hollow Pyrrhic victory, and it goes downhill from there.
The global elite won’t do anything that actually jeopardises their own safety, that’s why Covid had to be mild and easily treatable. Much easier to control the population via fear with less personal risk to them.
Looking at the picture, isnt that Mike Yeadon? Don’t tell me he’s controlled opposition after all?
That’s a covid hoax compliant political drug pusher politician.
It is amaxzng how many people whether they be right or wrong will happily sell out. I think a division occurs quite early on maybe at age 18. I don’t want to go into it but the point is that given the precariousness of our future, any hopes of material advantage in ten years time are predicated upon nothing. The very notion of value will change. A time is coming where a man’s word will be his bond. It is disappointing and shattering to realise that the old way has died but it is even more tragic to cling to it. You can get wise to it in the present and you can prepare in the same way you did before. Don’t be a schmuck when it happensdon’t be like some fool who was knocked over the head. Apply your energy to understanding it completely.
“I have no doubt at all that they’re already looking for one…”
The harsh reality of virology is that there will always be hospitalizations, there will always be deaths with viruses to blame for them. All that needs to be done to create the illusion of a pandemic (even if there isn’t one), is to single out a new pathogen and start presenting the statistics pertaining to this chosen pathogen to the public to create a scare.
If there is widespread vaccine refusal then this will be singled out as the culprit for a large number of excess deaths because some computer model says so. If there is widespread vaccine uptake, then this will be hailed as the saviour as the statistics start to fall off naturally because it’s been tested and shown to be “safe and effective”… and because some computer model says so.
And remember that they relaxed the rules for writing out the death certificates (at least in England), so it might just be less popular in the trade to jot it down as a cause for a while. Not only that, if it stays as it is, something new might just be one Dr’s opinion. A modern equivalent to Harold Shipman, perhaps.
It is easy to see the very foundations of virus theory as essentially a rationalisation of a business model. Up until now we might have assumned that they always meant well. What if they never meant well or haven’t for a very long time at least. It changes everything. For those who despair at our times can you imagine how much worse it would’ve been if we didn’t go through this recent madness. It is these times that have brought all the good souls to the surface we shouldn’t forget that.
Indeed, people are responding with a resounding (yawn).
They will come out with something far more frightening and it will be in those moments that the steadfast will need to assert themselves. They will attempt it on every level. It is the intelligence and level-headedness of the masses that keeps these people in bay. A frightening prospect perhaps but I think strongly that our side is winning against the odds.
Nipah is the latest potential candidate, doing the rounds in Kerala as we speak. A paramyxovirus with a 50 – 75% kill rate. DEEP VZN, a US military bioweapons research project, has been ‘investigating’ – although funding has been pulled recently (as per Meryl Nass). Is apparently treatable with ivermectin, doxycycline and mebendazole (so watch out for those being pulled again) plus the usual sensible immune system support, although if you look at the CDC website its the covid playbook all over again – no treatment, no current jab (yet), only run-death-is-near and expensive monoclonals.
Nipah is indeed very deadly, but that is actually its greatest Achilles heel: it is far too “hot” to spread under the radar and become widespread, and thus realtively easy to contain. Same with Ebola and Marburg. Or SARS-1 and MERS, for that matter. Unlike SARS-2 (Covid), these super-hot viruses don’t know how to be subtle. (And last I heard, Nipah has already been contained for the most part.)
The headlines for this were ‘Parts of India in lockdown’.
I read the article – it was one town Kerala that had closed down. Nipah is endemic in parts of India just as the zika virus is in parts of South America. MSM really ramps up the fear factor. Just like when dengue and yellow fever were to invade Europe. Masive scaremongering.
I’m no virologist but I did take an interest in what happened during the pandemonic. Essentially, as I understand it, the more lethal a virus is, the less it will spread as it needs a constant supply of otherwise healthy people to infect. If it kills people too readily the supply dries up. I am willing to bet everything I own that we will not face an existential threat from such an outbreak despite the best efforts of big Pharma and the WHO.
That’s it in a nut shell and that’s exactly why even this gain of function ( which should be banned, needless to say ) palaver is unlikely to ever result in some virus so deadly that it takes out half of the world’s population. It just couldn’t simultaneously be highly transmissible whilst staying virulent enough to do real damage. Hence the massive, military grade PsyOp, hence the obsessive, fraudulent testing, which was often mandatory, to catch all of those ‘asymptomatic cases’, hence the myopic focus on Convid 19 and to pot with all other respiratory viruses and illness, such as flu and pneumonia which never went away, and hence the removal of early treatment options ( vit D, HCQ, Ivermectin ) and intervention with antibiotics. The ‘pandemic emergency’ had to be completely manufactured. Having said that mind, I wouldn’t want to live within a 5 mile radius of Porton Down, for instance. Oh, and hence the denial that natural immunity was a thing and that our innate and adaptive immune responses were never going to be adequate to protect us from this ”novel threat”. It seriously was a blatant load of cock and bull when you take a bird’s eye… Read more »
Meanwhile, I see the fascist net of censorship grows ever tighter as they’ve just passed the Online Safety Bill in parliament; ”The Online Safety Bill has passed its last parliamentary hurdle in the House of Lords, meaning it will finally become law after years of delay. The flagship piece of legislation will force social media firms to remove illegal content and protect users, especially children, from material which is legal but harmful. Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan said: “The Online Safety Bill is a game-changing piece of legislation. Today, this government is taking an enormous step forward in our mission to make the UK the safest place in the world to be online.” https://news.sky.com/story/online-safety-bill-to-become-law-in-crackdown-on-harmful-social-media-content-12965080?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter If you want to read the real deal, not some msm highly edited drivel, I thought UK Column did a great piece a while ago. Worth revisiting; ”In other words, the OSB is full of references to legal concepts and terms which no-one can decipher—including the Members of Parliament who will vote on it. Once it becomes law, it will then be adapted through secondary legislation and Ofcom regulation, as yet unwritten. Unless stopped, MPs will be creating a law that has no defined parameters. This will… Read more »
More scientists finding more of that pesky DNA contamination. This is going to keep on going isn’t it? How many people are literal walking GMOs by now and what risk does this pose to your offspring, should you even be able to have any?
https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1704186381562421712
Okay, we all know this is wrong. How do we stop it?
The people who fund and support misinformation and disinformation, whilst claiming it is not, have money and resources.
Who has the money and resources to stop this nonsense?
By what mechanisms can we stop it?
Elected representatives are completely useless as we have seen from MPs and government ministers. They will keep their mouth shut and do nothing, supporting by inaction, all of this dangerous nonsense.