Professor Fired for ‘Faking Data’ to Prove ‘Systemic Racism’ Infests America’s Criminal Justice System

Eric Stewart, a professor at Florida State University, has been fired for falsifying data in research papers purporting to show that American society is beset with racism. The New York Post has more.

The academic was fired after almost 20 years of his data — including figures used in an explosive study, which claimed the legacy of lynchings made whites perceive blacks as criminals, and that the problem was worse among conservatives — were found to be in question.

College authorities said he was being fired for “incompetence” and “false results”.

Among the studies he has had to retract were claims that whites wanted longer sentences for blacks and Latinos.

To date, six of Stewart’s articles published in major academic journals like Criminology and Law and Society Review between 2003 and 2019 have been fully retracted after allegations the professor’s data was fake or so badly flawed it should not have been published.

The professor’s termination came four years after his former graduate student Justin Pickett blew the whistle on his research.

Pickett said they had worked together in 2011 researching whether the public was demanding longer sentences for black and Hispanic criminals as those minority populations grew, with the paper claiming they did. But Stewart had fiddled the sample size to deliver that result when the real research did not, Pickett said.

When the investigation into Stewart began in 2020, he claimed he was the victim and that Pickett “essentially lynched me and my academic character”.

After 16 years as a professor of criminology at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Provost James Clark formally notified Stewart he was being terminated in a July 13th letter.

“I do not see how you can teach our students to be ethical researchers or how the results of future research projects conducted by you could be deemed as trustworthy,” Clark wrote to Stewart, who has been absent from his role since March.

Clark said as well as the six officially retracted studies, other work by Stewart was “in doubt”.

The retracted studies looked into contentious social issues, like whether the public perceives black and Latino people as threats and the role of racial discrimination in America’s criminal justice system.

One 2019 study, which has been retracted, suggested historical lynchings make white people today perceive black people as threats.

Stewart floated the idea “that this effect will be greater among whites… where socioeconomic disadvantage and political conservatism are greater”.

Another retracted 2018 study suggested that white Americans view black and Latino people as “criminal threats”, and suggested that perceived threat could lead to “state-sponsored social control”.

And in a third, Stewart claimed Americans wanted tougher sentences for Latinos because their community was increasing in numbers and becoming more economically successful. …

But the disgraced professor was able to rise to prominence as an influencer in his field despite his studies from as early as 2003 now being retracted.

Stewart was a widely-cited scholar, with north of 8,500 citations by other researchers, according to Google Scholar — a measure of his clout as an academic.

He was Vice President and Fellow at the American Society of Criminology, who honoured him as one of four highly distinguished criminologists in 2017.

He was also a W.E.B. DuBois fellow at the National Institute of Justice.

The professor received north of $3.5 million in grant support from major organisations and taxpayer-funded entities, according to his resume.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10navigator
10navigator
2 years ago

Abe Lincoln was right. “You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”

Mogwai
2 years ago
Reply to  10navigator

But seriously though, do they attain the title of ‘Professor’ from pulling a Xmas cracker or opening a fortune cookie these days? Especially in the US, I’m noticing. But time after time, no matter the context, I’m seeing that such an academic attainment is based on total BS. Probably it reflects the general corruption and complete shambles that academia is in nowadays full stop. Shameful though.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I imagine that in the US at least if you want to be a Professor of Bullshit Studies then as long as you are not obviously illiterate then what counts are your politics and your race/sex etc. At least in most colleges outside a very few privately funded colleges that still have actual right wing people running them.

CHRIS
CHRIS
2 years ago

No doubt Professor Stewart is one of the Obama’s disciples for whom the demand for racism far exceeds the supply.

FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  CHRIS

He can easily migrate to the NASA, Korona or Klimat cults and pick up where he left off. They specialise in fraud.

stewart
2 years ago

There is a problem that is growing and festering and will sooner or later need to end in some sort of resolution, peaceful or otherwise.

There seem to be two parallel universes, so to speak. One governed by established power that includes most of the mainstream corporate media. It is populated largely by people living in a state of total delusion, completely indoctrinated by and faithful to our institutions.

The other is like a ghetto of entrepreneurs, independent thinkers, independent media, sone rebellious bits of the establishment media like the NY Post or Fox News and the part of the population that is either resistant to being hypnotised or has woken up.

These two universes are drifting apart more and more.

This news about the cheating professor will not be seen by anyone in the first group. Nor will they see any news that contradicts the establishment narrative on anything.

So you have a population split in two with each side increasingly thinking the other is mad.

This cannot end well.

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

It’s the so-far most developed form of the tribal two party oligarchy where meaning is nothing and association everything. It also has already not ended well.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Indeed it will not end well. Allied to this is that the fact that everybody seems to hate white people and our civilisation, including quite a few white people. That won’t end well for us either.

RW
RW
2 years ago

I like to paint a more optimistic picture of this: Our culture is a magnifcient tree which has grown for about 1 ½ millennia. On a large and somewhat misshapen branch of that are the wokhurt’s dwellings. They hate the tree because they believe it’s what stops their branch from rising into the sun above all other branches. Hence, they’re tirelessly working to sever this branch from the trunk. Regardless of their Black is the new white!-style beliefs, the eventual outcome is certain and the tree will be better off without the deformed branch.

[based on the German idiom den Ast absägen auf dem man sitzt,
which describes an idiotic action which will end up harming the people engaged in it]

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

I hope you’re right. Greece and Rome sort of fell but sort of carried on. It may just get worse before it gets better. The power of technology to control is a worry for me though.

RW
RW
2 years ago

You idea of the past is possibly a bit too rose-coloured. The Christan church not only brutally eradicated the cultures of the various peoples of Europe it came into contact with as thouroughly as it could, it also violently suppressed all information about the times before it had assumed the sceptre of the world. And this means violently. Even people learning to read in order to read the bible on their own came already preciously close to being burnt at the stake for this transgression[*]. The church was the sole authority regarding the nature of the universe and mankinds past history. It had created an almost entirely fictional alternate history for propaganda purposes[**] where the world was neatly split into two parts: What the church approved of was the work of God. And anything else was the work of the devil and consequently, evil and prohibited. This state of affairs lasted for over a thousand years(!) before European people gradually regained access to their real history starting with the so-called renaissance, literally the rebirth (of Europe). We survived that and (mostly) tamed the church in the end. If the vicitims of hypothetical extreme weather events and deadly mutant colds will… Read more »

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Well indeed things got worse before they got better; I fear the same thing will happen again.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Toby Young

Where do you think Cummings (sorry, cannot refer to one of the chief cheerleaders for UK lockdowns as “Dom”) sees himself between A and B? And where would he put me, a thick as a brick member of the public, voter, taxpayer and non-“insider”? I’m not sure his “birfucation” is at all the same thing as stewart’s. Does Cummings consider Joe Public in his categories? I think stewart was very much referring to the kind of people who might read DS, not different forms of “insider”. Perhaps I am missing the point.

stewart
2 years ago

What a good question. Where does Cummings see himself? As the voice of logic and reason standing calmly in the middle (or perhaps above) observing the madness around him, would be my guess, judging by the equivalency he seems to describe between the two sides.

I certainly don’t see equivalence between the two. For one, there is an unquestionable power imbalance. The establishment has all the power and imposes its ideas on all of us daily. The most the “outsiders” can hope for, at least for now, is to slow down the relentless advance of the establishment agenda. Turning anything back at this stage is a pipedream.

I don’t see much moral equivalence either. One is imposing itself on the other relentlessly and with no concern for the ideas or views of the latter.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

He does not seem to have repented from his support of lockdowns; the thought of him having any further influence on UK politics fills me with disgust.

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

I suspect the lockdown repentance started at around the same time he had to sit in the garden of No.10 and grovel to the media hounds he, Gove, Handcock, Johnson and Sunak had set running.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Perhaps I missed something but last I heard Cummings was still defending lockdowns etc.

RW
RW
2 years ago

Did you hear the news? A social scientist was caught red-handed using fake data!

Didn’t you just say he was a social scientist?

[*] A so-called social scientist is anybody whose Science® consists of collecting and publishing statistics of unverifiable anecdotes about other people.

TheGreenAcres
2 years ago

It’s sad but it’s easily explained when you understand the motivations behind it. Much like with climate activists, the race theorists have already decided that the problem is real. Therefore when the data doesn’t fit the narrative it must require adjustments in order to get the right results. These are activists not scientists.

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

The claim that one-off anecdote collections about vanishingly small population samples would mean anything and/ or enable people to predict the future is already BS. It really doesn’t matter if the anecdotes were recorded correctly. Nobody can assess whether they’re true and even if they were, nothing could be inferred from that about all the people who weren’t asked.

Mogwai
2 years ago

So quick to jump on the victim bandwagon and milk that racist/oppressed narrative for all that it’s worth that it is now basically part of their culture. The lies are taught and handed down generation to generation, no contradictory evidence to their internal dialogue will be remotely acknowledged. If these racist idiots, banging on about reparations, white-supremacy and whites being the only slave-traders, were to stick their heads out of their affluent Western bubble and take a look at what is going on in majority Muslim countries in the present day then their brains might short-circuit.
This clip is horrendous. I don’t know the context or where this is exactly but these don’t look like animals to me and I can make a guess that many will be children. Note the colour of the men’s skin also;

https://twitter.com/BFirstParty/status/1695345519059488978

Mogwai
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Oh hi Mr Hardliner. Seems you’ve been enjoying removing and editing my posts once again without having the basic decency to explain why. What, the word ”black” is a problem for you? Despite it being factually correct?? ”Free speech for the win!”

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Look forward to seeing some more info on what was removed/edited and why.

Mogwai
2 years ago

It was just a short clip of a couple of white idiots kissing the boots of some black idiots and I called the former “traitorous morons”. It definitely wasn’t any more controversial than the one the mod decided to leave alone above. But putting the word “black” in front of the word “racist” is obv deemed too non-woke and too factual. Hard lines i guess…🤷‍♀️ but it says a lot about who’s running the joint and the DS team’s stance on censorship, don’t you think? Double standards.😑

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Interesting; thanks. Race is a touchy topic and one likely to get a website on blacklists and attract unwanted attention. As a free speech absolutist I would say your comment should stand.

Mogwai
2 years ago

Well by removing it, without explanation either, it automatically infers that the word “racist” only should apply to white people, and even though we’ve shared many examples of black people attempting to rewrite history or hate on white people, we’re not allowed to call them “racist”, which just screams ‘double standards’ to my mind.
Anyhoo, good to know I’m in more than one person’s bad books.👁😆 ‘Free speech’, like democracy, looking more and more like a facade, where the parameters of what’s allowed can be shifted depending on who’s in charge.

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I managed to catch that. But this looked like some pretty bizarre fetish to me 🙂

Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

I think it’s fair to say that he has proven himself to be an anti white racist bigot. Who would have thunk it?

Mogwai
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Yeah don’t say ”black racist” whatever you do or you’ll get your posts poked around with and edited, if not outright removed entirely. P.S I think Hardliner is insinuating I’m a white supremacist, LOL.

Brett_McS
2 years ago

Fired??? Just more evidence of racism!! /sarc

RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Of course. According to the article, the guy is now touring his circle of fans and claiming that he has been lynched. In due time, he’ll doubtlessly come to the conclusion that he hasn’t only been murdered but even genocided.

The real problem are the people listening to these kind of stories.

Corky Ringspot
2 years ago

Hard to overestimate the influence on public perceptions that such trickery could have. It’s one thing to prop up a bar and gob on about it – quite another to spend years acquiring academic respect while calmly injecting poison into the social bloodstream.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago

How the mighty have fallen 🤣
It wasn’t Wilson Pickett that dobbed him in it?!!
Seriously, is this the result of affirmative action?