Is the Vaccine Injury Speculation Surrounding Bronny James’ Heart Attack a Conspiracy Theory?

The Daily Mail has a piece on Bronny James, the son of NBA star LeBron James, who was recently rushed to hospital after suffering a heart attack during practice at the University of Southern California. Leading U.K. doctors are dismissing the theory that’s vaccine-related and describing those advancing it as anti-vaxx conspiracy theorists, including Elon Musk. The BBC is also chiming in. But Dr. Guy Hatchard says if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… Here’s an excerpt:

At the same time as Bronny James was suffering a tragic heart attack and its aftermath, Swiss scientists finalised a scientific paper for publication entitled Sex specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination. This is a landmark study because it is a gold standard, carefully-planned, prospective study with a rigorous schedule of tests rather than an incomplete retrospective assessment of past events.

777 health care workers were tested for myocardial damage three days after booster vaccination and compared to the same number of controls. 40 of them (1 in 20) had elevated troponin levels indicative of damage to cardiac cells. These people (65% of them women) were subject to follow up tests and 22 of them (1 in 35) were judged to have vaccine-induced myocardial injury. This careful study proves that myocardial injury has been massively underreported. The Mail reports that the U.K. Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had previously estimated a rate of just 1 in 666. Now known to be wrong by a factor of 20.

By no stretch of the imagination can myocardial injury be judged to be “extremely rare” as the Mail suggests. Nor, according to this detailed discussion by Dr. John Campbell is this level of risk something any of us would consider taking on unless we faced imminent death as an alternative, which we don’t. For another discussion see this informative substack article.

Fortunately, the short term effects among those tested in the Swiss study did not include severe outcomes, but another prospective study completed in 2022 in Thailand on 314 high school students did find such severe effects. It is well known that myocarditis has both short term and long term outcomes. The elevated rate of excess deaths from heart disease in the general population does point to the need to ask questions. Asking them publicly does not amount to a conspiracy. The dismissal of these claims suggests there is an attempt to cover up on the part of the same doctors who coerced us to take the jabs and told us they were effective and safe (they aren’t).

Other causal factors for the steep rise in excess deaths from heart disease suggested by the Mail include the rise in ambulance response times to cardiac incidents from 30 to 90 minutes. It is surely not too hard for the newspaper to realise that if there are more cardiac events there will be longer response times, not the other way around. Another suggestion widely touted until recently was a supposed failure to prescribe statins during the pandemic, this disappeared from newsprint pages when it was realised that statin prescriptions have actually not decreased.

If you want to know just how convoluted denial of responsibility can become, read a translation of an article from Sweden where a 30 year-old man died after receiving a booster jab. The Government paid his family financial compensation but listed the event as the result of a medicine given in error rather than suffer the embarrassment of calling it a vaccine related death. A paper analysing autopsy results following Covid vaccination underlines the intended obfuscation of this kind of doublespeak.

Behind this posturing and denial of responsibility lies something much darker with more chilling implications for public health. It is not just heart attacks that are up to levels never seen before. Ditto for cancers, kidney injury, neurological injury, strokes, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, stillbirths, cognitive decline and crucially unexplained deaths.

These statistics point to the need for probing questions of a different type. Are the vaccines or indeed Covid infection, which the balance of evidence now suggests both came from a biotech lab, causing generalised immune instability and more worryingly, how long is this going to go on, and how bad will it get?

Sometimes you find that you have to face up to extreme challenges in your personal life. Our responses to these crises define who we are and what we can become. This can require admitting to ourselves and others that we got it all wrong. Apology and humility build character and support honesty.

Crises can also engulf the whole of society. The casual dismissal of questions about vaccine safety shows we have arrived at just such a societal crisis. A crisis of health and truth whose dimensions appear to dwarf anything civilisation as a whole has had to face in our lifetimes. The beginnings of this crisis are no doubt lost in history, but the turning point came when some decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry at the start of the pandemic decided it would be safe to unleash biotechnology on the general public. We are just at the beginning of this era. The WHO 2030 Agenda predicts that we will all be subject to hundreds of novel vaccines within the decade.

Worth reading in full.