News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rose Madder
2 years ago

To keep the flame alive, here’s a pretty decent summary of where someone thinks we are at. Found in comments on another blog, if the moderator permits. It is quite long: (Point 5 made me sit up and think) “Let us consider the business model of Big Pharma around 1980. One methodology for doing this is called a SWOT Analysis. SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. A big Strength is the unique power of the patent system in the drugs market. A company which owns a patent for a drug which is in demand and has no serious rival literally has a licence to print money. The monopoly price is often set at a level which has little relationship with production costs. Many of the Weaknesses are the flip side of that strength. Getting a new drug through the testing and licensing process is a long and expensive business. If the drug fails to be approved, a lot of money is wasted. Patents always expire – the gravy train of any particular drug always comes to an end. Another big Weakness, and I apologise if this sounds callous but I am trying to put myself into the shoes… Read more »

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

Good post. I would say however that the likes of Rockefeller and Gates do not have to bribe the media. They own the media! It’s all about money ultimately. If Gates was just a moderately successful software salesman, he wouldn’t have had nearly enough financial clout to get him in the door of the WHO and elsewhere. Money can be splashed about wildly when you have so much it’s obscene. He can fund universities and medical research like no one else just as governments withdraw funding. It is so unbelievably corrupt that those actually involved in it cannot see it for what it is. Gates’ failed experiments with mass vaccination should have had him in a court of law but his moneybags ensure he gets to continue to jet about pronouncing on health matters.

Rose Madder
2 years ago

Thanks ed. part 2 6. Perform medical trials in non-Western jurisdictions where corruption and weak government are endemic, so that damage to participants from medicines trialled can be handled without serious financial penalties. 7. Consistently lobby governments and regulators for rulings which are financially advantageous to your industry and your favoured company e.g. emergency use authorisations for drugs which have not yet completed Phase 3 trials 8. Perform regular “germ games” where likely players in the management of a worldwide pandemic come together in a tabletop exercise to practise their response. The last of these before the pandemic was “Event 201”. This is well worth googling. Needless to say, the participants were not practising for waiting for herd immunity to be achieved as the pandemic ran its course. 9. Amplify any outbreak of infectious disease so that it looks as dangerous as possible. If the paradigm is going to shift, it is most likely to do so in a crisis situation, or a series of events confected to look like a crisis. 10. Maximise the order book by offering a regime of treatments which require regular application to prevent disease. E.g. Vaccines with regular boosters. 11. Keep general publics in… Read more »

JeremyP99
2 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

Yup. This paper fingers Gates for this

https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=annlsurvey

“ABSTRACT In recent years, the number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the international arena has vastly increased, generally making a positive impact. But, as this influence has deepened, governments in the developing world and scholars have scrutinized the work and accountability of NGOs given they are mostly independent and not subjected to international law. While NGOs must adhere to the domestic laws of the places within which they work, adherence is dependent upon the strength of enforcement of those laws. Proponents argue that this independence is essential for NGOs to effectively carry out their work. However, a review of healthcare programs funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Gates Foundation) calls into question current accountability measures of NGOs in the healthcare sector and can shine a light on weaknesses and potential areas of improvement in the current accountability regime for NGO”

Mogwai
2 years ago

More on McCullough et al’s paper about the autopsy results in vaxxed individuals being retracted, as well as the pulling of other papers that didn’t kowtow to the narrative;

”In an email to The Epoch Times, co-author Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor emeritus and senior research scientist in epidemiology at Yale, said he believes the paper was censored by The Lancet’s publisher, Elsevier, at the behest of the Trusted New Initiative (TNI), or a derivative organization of the TNI, based on the “study results providing strong evidence that some COVID-19 vaccine injections can have severe adverse effects leading to death.”
“This is my impression, given that the paper was removed at its preprint stage, before scientific peer review, and without any other professional scientific involvement in the censorship decision,” Risch added.
The Trusted News Initiative is an industry collaboration of major news and global tech organizations whose stated mission is to combat the spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.
TNI partners alert each other to disinformation that poses an “immediate threat to life so content can be reviewed promptly by platforms, whilst publishers ensure they don’t unwittingly republish dangerous falsehoods.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/significant-covid-19-vaccine-study-censored-by-a-medical-journal-within-24-hours_5388409.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=DrLoupis&src_src=partner&src_cmp=DrLoupis

Mogwai
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

More on the TNI here. I can’t verify this as there’s no source, just a Twitter post. Does this sound accurate to you? ”OmniGOV – the public brainwashing operation; The British Government uses an advertisement giant to build media campaigns and create an approved “single version of the truth” about topics such as COVID, the war in Ukraine, migration and undesirable political forces. These campaigns are then pushed out through a cooperative global media cartel formed by the Trusted News Initiative that includes Meta, Google, WSJ, Reuters, BBC, the European Broadcasting Union, AFP, the Financial Times and others. The company, Omnicon, was awarded a 4 year contract with the UK Government in May 2018 (which has since been renewed in 2022). Less than 3 weeks later the UK Prime Minister announced that the G7 group had agreed to her “Rapid Response Mechanism” – created to assert common narratives to the G7 public. Less than two weeks after the WHO declared the global pandemic, the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group in Emergencies (SAGE) recommended to: 1 – use mainstream media to increase sense of personal threat 2 – use MSM to increase sense of responsibility to others 3 – use social… Read more »

Chris P
Chris P
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Robert F Kennedy Jr is suing the Trusted News Initiative.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

If Labour seizes on the Huw Edwards story to regulate the press, we all lose” – Attempts to gag free and fearless newspapers would do serious harm to the functioning of democracy, warns Fraser Nelson in the Telegraph.

Where were the ‘free and fearless newspapers‘ to challenge the lockdown lunacy?

Jon Garvey
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

For “free and fearless,” read, “knowing what will sell well.”

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Journalists looking at their mortgage payments and bills and deciding that they’d rather have a job and live in a totalitarian state than be out on the street, homeless, jobless, torn apart from their families and denounced as a conspiracy theorist. Courage is a rare thing and seemingly intelligent people don’t necessarily have it.

DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago

Interesting article on Starmers relationship with the press: https://declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-special-relationship-with-the-murdoch-press/

Jon Garvey
2 years ago

“How the Mob Turned on Huw Edwards.”

An astute article, making the same points I tried to make in a comment yesterday (and got a number of downvotes).

Remember that, whatever the particular situation, the phenomenon we have all noted since 2020, that more or less defines our scepticism, is the way crowds go mad together and end up condoning evil. It is much harder to step back and consider what is evidence, what is not, and how much it matters. Crowds lynch first, and weigh the facts afterwards, and that’s wrong even if the victim turns out to be guilty.

For the inquisitive, the phenomenon of scapegoating individuals was explored in depth by Rene Girard – who saw it as the defining evil of mankind (possibly an exaggeration). Girard sees Jesus Christ as the ultimate scapegoat – and the antidote to our propensity to target them, which makes Giles Fraser’s mention of Christ interesting – perhaps he’s read Girard.

Since COVID, I’ve become entirely sceptical of crowds.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

I’ve not read the article but share your scepticism of crowds and as I posted yesterday I am uncomfortable with the idea of an employer “investigating” employees for things they’ve done in their private life. I saw some good arguments as to why someone in a prominent position as a state employee like Edwards should be subject to such investigating and punishment whereas say people like us should be allowed to post messages and engage in activity our employers may dislike without sanction, but I am still not convinced.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

“Inside Elon Musk’s plan to turn Britain into a ‘virtual power grid’” – Billionaire Elon Musk is eyeing Britain’s retail energy market, despite criticism that his attention is already spread too thin, says the Telegraph.Elon Musk has attempted to launch rockets into space, drawn up plans to blanket the skies with satellite internet coverage, and spent $44bn on the takeover of one of the world’s biggest social media companies. – ‘attempted to launch rockets into space‘? Erm. a bit more than attempted. I particularly liked the vertical landings of SpaceX falcon rockets. Thunderbirds are go! – ‘drawn up plans to blanket the skies with satellite internet coverage‘? Starlink is enough of an actual thing that astronomers hate it for messing up their observations and it’s used for comms in conflict and disaster areas. If Elon Musk ‘attempts’ and ‘plans’, how should we describe our governments’ efforts? I think his biggest failure was to not use his purchase of Twitter to withdraw it from use by hostile governments (eg Australia, EU) before there was a possible alternative from the Zuckerborg. The article mentions the regulatory hurdles his new company might face in supplying energy to retail customers. Yay, way to go… Read more »

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  Chris P

Yes. I recall he made noises about maybe somebody else supporting it financially rather than Starlink company giving the service free of charge. It also shows that Starlink is a bit beyond the ‘planning’ stage.

Whatever our views on Ukraine I think it qualifies as a ‘conflict area’.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

What was it? Describing the EU and Oz governments as ‘hostile’? They’re certainly hostile to free ‘speech’ on Twitter – as are too many other governments.

Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

““The BBC is self-destructing”. We are waiting not so patiently with fingers crossed and bated breath, but they are still here, peddling lies and demanding money with menaces.

EppingBlogger
2 years ago

What would be the point of finding hydrogen beneith our feet. The drilling to extract it would not be permitted.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Nope. Not ‘renewable’.

Gefion
Gefion
2 years ago

If Toby Young had suggested that someone run a sword through Ms Moran’s face then there would be an enormous outcry but as it’s the other way round it seems to be unremarkable.
She’s a very confident person, too full of herself I think but seems to be able to say what she likes.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Gefion

“She continued: ‘Oh, Germaine Greer. You’re still MAGNIFICENT. Please end this brilliant monologue by running a sword through Toby Young’s face.’” “I joked about this at the time…But the truth is, I was quite upset. I racked my brain, trying to think of something I’d said or done to her that could have prompted such a visceral hatred – and came up blank. On the contrary, I could only remember behaving decently to her when she worked for the Modern Review, always trying to be encouraging, telling her she was going to go far, etc. Since those days, I’d looked at her burgeoning career with a kind of paternal pride. I knew her politics were different from mine, but I didn’t let that colour how I felt about her. I was pleased she’d become so successful. So her comments cut me to the quick. The only explanation I could come up with is that sending the right signals to her political tribe – saying something she knew they’d approve of – trumped any other considerations. She was just joining in the chorus of abuse I routinely get on Twitter, without giving a thought to how it might make me feel. Our… Read more »

JohnK
2 years ago

JC’s recent report on Australian records https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l6Q2r5VWLo&list=WL&index=6&t=18s “Bad Australian vaccine data” – the product itself, not the quality of the data.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

“Wuhan officials tried to suppress Covid info when pandemic began” – Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief of the Lancet, told the Covid Inquiry that Beijing failed to inform international health bodies of the rapidly rising virus threat, reports the Mail.

Better late than never I suppose. This BBC article from 7 Feb 2020 shows ‘we’ knew China had attempted to suppress the news quite early on:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-51409801

Li Wenliang: Coronavirus death of Wuhan doctor sparks anger

Last December he sent a message to fellow medics warning of a virus he thought looked like Sars – another deadly coronavirus.

But he was told by police to “stop making false comments” and was investigated for “spreading rumours”.

Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
2 years ago

I just voted for London Calling and The Weekly Sceptic at The British Podcast Awards, I used different email addresses for each, not sure if it is necessary.