Is Britain’s Electric Car Revolution a Race Against Time or a Costly Gamble?

Boris Johnson’s ambitious plan to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030 is floundering as the scale of the undertaking becomes clear. The affordability of electric cars, the need for extensive charging infrastructure, and the risk to industry jobs are just some of the hurdles that are derailing the country’s green industrial revolution. Will the U.K. be ready, asks Matt Oliver in the Telegraph, or is ‘carmageddon’ inevitable?

With a year to go before Britain hosted the Cop26 climate conference, Boris Johnson was preparing to make an eye-catching announcement.

The then-prime minister was poised to set out his 10-point plan to spark a green industrial revolution – and the centrepiece was a vow to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030.

A highly ambitious target, this was five years sooner than the deadline he had set just nine months earlier, which car industry bosses dismissed as “a date without a plan”.

It was also a decade before the target outlined by his predecessor, Theresa May, only two years beforehand.

“Our green industrial revolution will be powered by the wind turbines of Scotland and the northeast, propelled by the electric vehicles made in the Midlands and advanced by the latest technologies developed in Wales, so we can look ahead to a more prosperous, greener future,” Mr. Johnson said in November 2020.

His speech, the Government said, would put the U.K. on course to be the fastest G7 nation to decarbonise road transport.

Yet the new sales ban – described by the Society for Motor Manufacturers and Traders as “immensely challenging” – represented a huge gamble, with the potential to either turbocharge or tank Britain’s domestic car industry.

And astonishingly, for such a consequential policy, no detailed proposals to achieve it had actually been drawn up.

Instead, Johnson and other ministers hoped the stretching target would cement demand for electric vehicles, galvanising businesses to manufacture supplies and build the legions of chargers that would be required.

“It’s like the classic example of putting a man on the moon,” one former minister involved in the policy says.

“When Kennedy said ‘We’re going to put a man on the moon’, he did not know how they were going to get there. He just said this is the target – and they got there.”

Fast forward to today, however, and the scale of the undertaking has become clear.

Electric cars still remain unaffordable for most households, while a huge upgrade of the power grid will be needed in order to boost the number of vehicle chargers in Britain from 42,000 at present to the more than 300,000 being sought by ministers.

Meanwhile, to serve demand for vehicles domestically, around five battery ‘gigafactories’ are needed in the U.K. – with hundreds of thousands of industry jobs at risk if they are not secured.

Experts say we are now at a crossroads. A report published this week by the Climate Change Committee, the statutory Net Zero watchdog, said that rising electric car sales were promising but work to build chargers “now needs to scale up more quickly”.

Separately, industry leaders say time is running out for Britain to secure the gigafactories that will be the bedrock of its future car manufacturing base. A failure to do so, while sticking with the 2030 ban on new petrol car sales, threatens a jobs bloodbath.

As the clock ticks down, alarm is growing that Britain will simply not be ready for 2030 – and a delay is increasingly likely.

The U.K.’s commitment to reach Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050 will require emissions from vehicles to be almost eradicated.

Surface transport, including cars, accounts for the biggest chunk of Britain’s annual carbon emissions, representing 23% last year.

This was about 105 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, the Climate Change Committee’s latest report says, which was 3% up from 2021 but 8% below pre-pandemic levels.

The reduction was mostly down to increased working from home, rising fuel prices and so-called low-traffic neighbourhoods, with a small contribution from rising electric vehicle sales.

But a crunch point is fast approaching at which sales of electric cars – which have much lower lifetime emissions than petrol ones – will need to do more of the heavy lifting.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
2 years ago

Neither

It’s some combination of mad and evil

Hell bent on destruction

Mogwai
2 years ago

Just a tiny dump this time, in the shape of the Isle of Man. Once more, the deaths increased post ”safe and effective” bioweapon rollout. Is there anywhere that didn’t have more deaths from 2021 onwards than before the miracle vax was available and we only had our immune systems to protect us from a deadly virus? ”The Isle of Man sits right off the coast of the UK. Despite its potential to isolate itself in the face of a deadly, indiscriminate, transmissible virus sweeping across the planet, it relies heavily on the mainland so it could not keep “COVID” out. Curiously though, even though allegedly representing more than 1 in 5 deaths at its peak in April 2020, COVID didn’t make a blind bit of difference to the island’s overall mortality, not even in that month. In other words, the only ones who died were going to die anyway, testing positive or even seriously infected and diseased, or not. Even more curiously, Isle of Man’s COVID death toll itself was almost four times higher after the roll out of the “vaccine” that was supposed to save everyone from a COVID death – mysteriously, only really taking off, rather unseasonably, in the middle of… Read more »

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

What a firkin Pfisser.

Jon Smith
2 years ago

Brutal is how the transition will be, those that can’t afford an EV then it’s great news for them, one less on the roads..
Do they care about a “jobs bloodbath”..
Do they care about the self employed tradesmen driving vans in now non compliant ULEZs…
Did they care about businesses going bust during lockdown,freedoms, civil liberties..
Do they care that the “vaccine” is killing many people??

Change the vernacular please… They don’t care.
They have orders and they shall obey… Regardless.

richardw53
richardw53
2 years ago

Sorry, the naive dream that we will make the vehicles ourselves is just that – a dream. China owns all the technology needed to supply our vehicles and batteries, and most of the natural resources required. As they are a developing nation, we don’t need to worry about human rights abuses and slavery. Politicians just don’t understand how completely f*cked our industrial base is – nor does the media – as a result of globalisation.

NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  richardw53

We have given away the capability to do much manufacturing so that the CO2 can be on China’s ‘carbon account’, and not ours. Even if we wanted to start wide scale manufacturing again, the skills are being lost, and no-one is training the next generation on the basis that they wont be needed. China must be laughing up its sleeve at the stupidity of our leaders.

Dinger64
2 years ago

Reality check: I.c.e vehicles are the only viable modern engine to power the western world! Wishing and dreaming for alternatives does not create a replacement.
Maybe some new power in the not so distant future may do so, but for now, logically and physically, we are stuck with them.
By all means let us replace fossil fuel vehicles, WHEN, there is an equivalent technology to do so, NOT at any cost! Let common sense and human limitation prevale!

Sinor
Sinor
2 years ago

This just reconfirms how mad the whole policy is as its built on sand and powered by unicorn dust.
The minister who used the “Kennedy going to the moon “analogy needs naming and shaming .If the US went to the moon or not , by whatever date it had no immediate impact on the average Americans life .
What is being proposed are Authoritarian and deluded plans that will impact the whole population,well most of us, on a day to day basis.!!!!
We are talking about home heating, Electricty costs and personal affaordable mobility .

The ,evil idiots , who wrote this policy ,Pig dictator et al , with no real plan or basis are trying to trash the last 130 years of our countries and peoples lives .
The Goal, they all want a Gold star for being the first to trash a modern economy and get brownie points from the UN for supporting the 2030 agenda .
To put it bluntly they are all Cnuts and this if nothing else will cause a massive revolt .
Out of touch dickheads all ..

Epi
Epi
2 years ago
Reply to  Sinor

I would put evil in front of dickheads.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

For all those looking to argue pro’s and cons about EV’s – Get a Grip.

Will L
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Grip it must be.. no pro’s.. all cons..

JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  Will L

Isn’t the whole thing a con?

MikeMayUK
2 years ago

Having grown up with people of Asian descent and working with many during my career, I wondered whether “Rishi” was short for something so I googled it. Apparently Rish is 1a term for an accomplished and enlightened person.”

So it’s not short for Rishi Sunak, then.

Less government
2 years ago

“EVs  which have much lower lifetime emissions than petrol ones – will need to do more of the heavy lifting.”
Hogwash.
Every EV is an environmental disaster on 4 wheels. Apart from the naive, gullible Tesla twits virtue signalling their complete ignorance about what is and isn’t good for the planet, most of us know it’s another scam to impoverish us and restrict our freedom. Massive batteries, full of toxic rare earth minerals and chemicals, extremely difficult to recycle, are a disgusting, ludicrous alternative to incredibly clean efficient ICE cars that largely emit Carbon dioxide which is Beneficial to the planet.
Our car industry is being deliberately destroyed, our astronomical energy costs are deliberately fabricated and Net zero policies are a pox on all of us and telling our children that the planet is going to collapse in 5 years time is an evil, miserable lie.


7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago

Absolutely spot on, Less Government.
And obviously no-one gives a shite about Congolese child miners or Uygher slaves’ contributions, nor the enormous increase in mining and processing minerals and certainly not the fire risks. And so on for pages.

But you are right. ICE motors main “emissions” are beneficial. Their “air pollution” is absolutely trivial and all the “pm2.5s” and Nitrogen Oxides and the rest are enormously, obscenely exaggerated.

The aim of the whole plan, including 15 minute ghettos, is to control the plebs.

And by the time the plebs wake up, it will be too late.

Will L
2 years ago

Well said.. every word true..

JXB
JXB
2 years ago

Given that wind produces in aggregate no more than 30% of its alleged capacity, and so intermittently it needs near 100% back-up from fossil fuels, mostly gas, in constant readiness, the electricity used by EVs (if they can get any) will come as a result of higher CO2 emissions than ICE vehicles,

This on top of the higher emissions from manufacture and disposal compared to ICE vehicles, makes EVs unable to achieve their supposed objective.

V Detta
V Detta
2 years ago

But, but…..the residents of Ambridge (in BBC’s The Archers) have now happily accepted the plan to have a charging station in the village. Of course not one of the residents in the furore about it pointed out that EVs are simply swapping one form of pollution for another. BBC as usual using the story to push the ‘Climate Catastrophe’ agenda….. Nowadays I reach for the off switch…

Epi
Epi
2 years ago
Reply to  V Detta

Just don’t watch or listen to the BBC they are lying cheating government propagandists. Their behaviour especially over the last 3 years has been nothing short of shameful, nightly death porn, net zero nonsense, ignoring anti Lockdown marches promoting death jabs the list goes on and on just a disgusting outfit.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Epi

Seconded.

Will L
2 years ago
Reply to  V Detta

F*** the Archers.. they’re just ‘simple folk’ who don’t know any better.. 😉

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

“Green industrial revolution” is an oxymoron. There is nothing industrial or revolutionary about “green”.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
2 years ago

As a qualified engineer, I can confirm that EVs are the Betamax of the automotive industry. The government will soon announce that our nuclear warheads will be fired from a milk bottle.

LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
2 years ago
Reply to  Covid-1984

I’m sorry … Betamax was quite good – they are the Philips V2000 or the Elcaset. Neither of which, I suspect, most people will have heard of.

JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  LaptopMaestro

No dispute Betamax was good, but it couldn’t compete in the marketplace with VCR. That’s the point.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago

An “ambitious plan” generally has some basis in reality. Johnson’s EV ‘plan’ was no more than vacuous virtue signalling to ensure he could get his brain in close contact with his current squeeze. That has always been his key priority. Add to which, he thought wouldn’t be around when the whole policy was seen to be a crock of 5H1t. At least he was right on this🤣

lymeswold
lymeswold
2 years ago

I’m tiring of seeing the Daily Sceptic repeatedly regurgitating nonsense from the Daily Telegraph.

Will L
2 years ago
Reply to  lymeswold

Yes.. me too..

varmint
2 years ago

Funny how it is all “Green Crap” till they get into government, and then all of a sudden they are going to save the planet harder and faster than every other country. But everything GREEN is about coercing, bribes, subsidies and misinformation about the phony climate crisis, because no one would ever build a wind turbine or electric car if it were left up to them because it is all totally uneconomical. No one had to be bribed into getting rid of their horse. They got rid of their horse because vehicles became available and it made economic sense to do so. Getting a vehicle saved them time and money. Everything GREEN on the other hand costs us money and is mostly worse than what it replaces. So we all have to be convinced that we are “saving the planet”, when infact electric cars eg once you look closely, don’t save anything at all. It is all done for ideological political agenda purposes. ————-Wake up people or you will soon have no car at all, and no gas central heating, no holidays abroad and no beef. And that is just the start of your impoverishment, with a lot more to… Read more »

Sinor
Sinor
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Spot on V .Why do you think sailing ships and windmills died out originally ..

Will L
2 years ago

Electric cars.. Net Zero.. Carbon Neutral.. there’s stupid and how do you top that. I’ve already mentioned three example.. 😉

LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
2 years ago

Costly is an understatement.

JXB
JXB
2 years ago

And where will all the materials come from needed to build batteries, electric motors, grid infrastructure and where will the electricity come from, particularly when domestic gas use must be replaced by electricity? The place to start is the start of the process – the mining of the ores and minerals, the processing and the component manufacture. Where do we see the efforts to increase the scale of raw materials and component output to meet the demand – and not just for the UK? Nobody seems to be considering that residual value plays a key role in funding replacement vehicles. If EV sales increase, and as doom-day 2030 approaches, the second hand ICE vehicle market will be glutted, with residual value ending up as scrap value and many not able to finance another vehicle. Car rental and lease companies make most of their money out of residual value at resale on the second hand market. Will investors stop providing capital for vehicles which have little or no residual value. Will they provide capital for EVs which have low residual value because of loss of battery efficiency with use and need to replace at high cost after a few years? Many… Read more »

AllMouthAndTrousers
AllMouthAndTrousers
2 years ago

Neither.

Stop framing eveything as a choice between A or B.