Twice as Many People Are Dying from Winter Cold Than Summer Heat – Yet Government is Impoverishing Pensioners to Subsidise Renewables
When the Daily Telegraph’s Review section previewed Wednesday’s edition of Channel 4’s Dispatches – Britain’s Forgotten Pensioners it expressed scepticism at some of the statistics in the forthcoming programme:
Some of the figures quoted (such as that 45 people died every day last winter – more than 4,000 deaths – as a result of being unable to heat their homes) seemed inconceivable enough to invite referral to Radio 4’s More or Less for further analysis.
This extraordinary and troubling figure of 4,000 deaths comes from a study by National Energy Action. Three days before the above quote hit readers’ doormats, Bob Ward, Chair of London Climate Change Partnership, told Dr. David Bull on his TalkTV show that the temperature “astonishingly went above 40 degrees last summer and it killed 2,000 people”.
There is no readily available statistical basis for them but if one were to take these two figures at face value, then an admittedly over-simplistic conclusion might be that winter cold kills twice as many people as summer heat. While it appears that Western civilisation is being put into reverse gear to prevent global temperature rises, what is being done about the former?
The Telegraph’s incredulity at the concept of people dying of cold is comparatively recent. In February 2015, it reported: ‘Winter death toll “to exceed 40,000”‘. Dame Sally Davies, then the Government’s Chief Medical Officer, wrote in the Cold Weather Plan for England 2014-15:
Excess deaths are not just deaths of those who would have died anyway in the next few weeks or months due to illness or old age. There is strong evidence some of these deaths are indeed ‘extra’ and are related to cold temperatures, living in cold homes as well as infectious diseases such as influenza.
If one looks for this year’s Cold Weather Plan, it turns out than in a suitably Orwellian touch it is now called the Adverse Weather Plan. There is as now as much content devoted to “extreme heat and heatwaves” as to cold.
Deaths from cold among the elderly used to grab people’s attention. The late MP David Amess was so appalled to hear of the death in a cold house of one of his Southend constituents that he campaigned for and secured the Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act in 2000. Fuel poverty declined from 5.1 million households to 1.2 million households between 1996 and 2004, partly as a consequence. As to where it is in 2023, the estimate from National Energy Action is 7.5 million households.
The fact is that Government and media have succumbed to a bad case of climate emergency tunnel vision, which means their limited attention is focused on ‘soaring’ temperatures, heatwaves and the weather map being coloured red after the news. Of course, there is an impact from the war in Ukraine but elderly people will die again this coming winter not just because of the chronic failure to secure the U.K.’s energy supply by successive Governments. It is also caused by the vast transfer of wealth from struggling pensioners to asset owners in the renewable sector. Energy bills are unnecessarily high in no small part due to the innumerable subsidies that go to, among others, wind turbine providers being awarded constraint payments for switching them off in high winds.
The Dispatches documentary makes for hard viewing and I defy anyone not to be touched by the despair of those featured. A few days before watching it, I was at a dinner where I saw a former colleague. Heir to a considerable fortune, he cheerfully told me that he’d received a five-figure grant towards the cost of installing a heat pump in the pond beside his equally considerable North London home.
Ian Price is a Business Psychologist. Find him on Twitter.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I along with many friends/acquaintances installed solar panels in 2012. We got a significant group discount on the deal & subsequently benefitted from the ‘feed-in-tarif’, now £0.63/kWh. Plus, use of the electricity generated. These installations are earning about £3,000 /year in direct payments + providing owners with at least £500 worth of electricity per year.
To participate in this scheme, cooked up by ‘man of the people’ Ed Milliband, all you needed was a South facing roof and a spare £12,000.
The net result is that the better off in the village are in fuel excess while the poor in the village struggle to heat their homes.
Couldn’t you organise some extra long cabling and sell some of your leccy at a discount to the poor?
I’ve got an extension in my shed called Bob!, you can borrow that if it’ll reach😉
And the people that produce 75% of the worlds solar panels (the Urghurs) are virtually imprisoned in forced labour camps in China! But, hey ho, at least there green!
Simple fact of life:- it takes more effort and energy to warm up than it does to cool down!
Being hot is inconvenient and irritating, being cold is life threatening
The UK’s stupid energy policies results in us having some of the most expensive power costs in the world. My parents are paying about £320 a month to cover their gas and electricity. In the USA, it would be about £50 a month. That is unacceptable. The energy policies need a complete overhaul!
So correct!
Assuming your parents were fortunate to live in a “red” state that hasn’t drunk the climate change koolaid. Places like California that have gone all out for renewables have power prices at least double the US average.
Even in the blue states, there’s outrage at fuel costs being terribly high when they’re half the price of the UK.
Absolutely.
Kill off the pensioners, reduce the population, promote climatism.
It’s all part of the plan.
Yes, collectivist cults don’t mind killing millions for the ‘greater good.’ Communism, if it succeeds will bring about the most ‘peaceful’ world of all, because everyone will be dead!
”London Climate Change Partnership”! Good grief, easily one of the biggest scams of the century. In fact, we’re certainly living through a very scammy period in history. They’re everywhere! Time for a sensible Patrick Moore dose of reality, ta very much.
https://twitter.com/DrLoupis/status/1667250613652955138?cxt=HHwWhICxpbDmoaMuAAAA
“There is no readily available statistical basis for them but if one were to take these two figures at face value, then an admittedly over-simplistic conclusion might be that winter cold kills twice as many people as summer heat” This number in fact massively underestimates the discrepancy between excess deaths caused by cold versus heat: “Each year in England and Wales, there were on average nearly 800 excess deaths associated with heat and over 60,500 associated with cold between 2000 and 2019, according to a new study published in The Lancet Planetary Health” https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2022/both-heat-and-cold-increase-risk-death-england-and-wales-rates-vary-across This 800 excess heat-related mortality figure is in fact just 1.3% of the 60,5000 cold-related one rather than the 50% implied by this article. Regardless of specific proportions it is self-evident that common sense perceptions of elderly, impoverished, disabled and generally vulnerable people suffering horrendously, and becoming ill / potentially dying if they can’t afford sufficient heating during freezing periods (ie most of winter) massively outweigh any downsides of the relatively rare periods of hot weather experienced in the UK (think shirt sleeves and ice-cream) are correct. And yet for thirty years the entire focus of energy and general economic policy (pursued by all the main… Read more »
Yes, I became aware of the Lancet paper when Bjorn Lomberg posted it on Twitter. You’re absolutely right in everything you say above. The Lancet study suggests cold deaths are greater than ones from heat by a factor of not two but 76! Unforgiveable willful blindness from successive governments.