Anti-Ulez Protesters Warn of French-Style Unrest as London Cameras Vandalised

Organised groups are sabotaging and stealing cameras being installed across London to enforce the expansion the capital’s ultra-low emissions zone (Ulez) in the latest example of grassroots resistance to the anti-car policy. The Times has the story.

Campaigns that have sprung up to fight Ulez, low traffic neighbourhoods, clean air zones and 15-minute cities are now uniting with groups of disaffected farmers, truckers and bikers to pile pressure on ministers to reverse what they say is a “war on motorists”.

A new group calling itself U.K. Unites, which claims to bring together campaigns supported by more than 2.5 million people across Britain, is warning the Government to expect civil disobedience on a “huge scale” unless there is a change of approach.

Phil Elliott, 59, the veteran campaigner behind the initiative, said: “People aren’t bluffing. There are just so many things wrong across the country affecting so many people and stressing them out, how could there not be civil disobedience?”

The semi-retired HGV driver said the Ulez expansion might be the event that “makes the country go bang”.

He said: “People just can’t afford new cars or the charges — people like carers who are on crap wages. They’re desperate.”

A group of self-proclaimed “freedom fighters” describing themselves as the “Blade Runners” has already taken down hundreds of cameras in their campaign against the Mayor of London’s plan to extend Ulez to the outskirts of the capital by the end of August.

The extension means that nearly 300,000 motorists in boroughs from Bexley to Enfield will either have to upgrade their vehicles or pay £12.50 a day to drive into London. Sadiq Khan, who was re-elected in 2021, says the scheme will improve air quality and help to save lives, although five Tory-led councils are trying to block the plan, claiming it is unlawful.

Elliott said he believed that if the Ulez expansion went ahead, Britain would witness protests similar to those seen recently in Holland and France. “We’ve got all these people who are fed up being ignored. You don’t need to be in power to get change, you just need pressure and numbers. We aren’t French — but there’s a lot of people saying we should be like the French.”

He warned that his group had the ability to disrupt the food supply chain and said he had already been in contact with Dutch farmers who had caused huge disorder with their protests. He said: “Farming, haulage, food supply — you name it, we cover it. Remember, people need food to eat, and the farmers are working with us.”

“Improve air quality” – even though London’s air is the best it’s ever been.

Might there be an ulterior motive, perchance?

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monro
2 years ago

Low emission zones do not improve air quality. ‘We found no evidence of a reduction in the proportion of children with small lungs over this period, despite small improvements in air quality in highly polluted urban areas during the implementation of London’s LEZ.’ ‘Impact of London’s low emission zone on air quality and children’s respiratory health: a sequential annual cross-sectional study’ The Lancet 14 Nov 2018 The only way to improve urban air quality would be to ban diesel engines. ‘A previous Policy Exchange report found that 12.5% of London’s total area – containing 3.8 million workers, as well as 979 schools attended by a quarter of London’s school population – exceeded legal and healthy limits for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in 2010. Diesel cars and vans cause 70% of NOx emissions in London. Car manufacturers have systematically failed to control NOx emissions from diesel cars and vans, with recent evidence showing that diesel cars sold until 2014 perform no better on average than diesel cars sold in the 1990s (in terms of real-world NOx emissions). The latest diesel cars show some improvement but still exceed emissions standards by around 4 times on average.’ Policy Exchange 2023 Who encouraged the use… Read more »

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

I support these people 1,000%. Talking is getting us nowhere, not that I ever thought it would because this is a fight we cannot afford to lose. This is a fight for freedom and not just about the right to travel as and when we want. Quite possibly this will become The Hill to die on because if we lose we sure as hell will lose on the other fronts – digital passports, CBDC, denial of healthcare (already occurring), and of course the 15 minute cities will simply become ghettos.

Direct action is the only action that TPTB will take notice of.

“Lock and load.”

Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Touché, vive Londres!

VAX FREE IanC
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

With you (and them) all the way HP.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

Thanks VF.👍

WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

More movement on the legal front too:

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/high-court-accepts-two-more-175013734.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucXdhbnQuY29tLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL2pN-M6UVm9Ux542XhuloARGmzZ26dBhAKOOPo3atY872y09ZzWc_5Vk1JNujd9DXdnGxcmbItJNGC5LUiYLFyY_L0BQKrC7C6jZNwzNhPz-jp2kKXeSRsMNvbUjBH0-evoXJcyfgYA3XHHRcTlYpKwkcVzPeosESD6SJdimlYk

‘According to Hillingdon Council, the two additional grounds for challenge – newly accepted by the court – are that there was an “unfair and unlawful consultation in relation to expected compliance rates in outer London” and, in relation to the scrappage scheme, “irrationality due to uncertainty and inadequate consultation”.
The two previously accepted grounds for challenge were that Mr Khan acted beyond his powers in expanding the Ulez by varying the existing scheme order rather than issuing a new charging order, and that he failed to consider including motorists living in the “buffer zone” on the edges of London in the £110m vehicle scrappage scheme.
Commenting on Friday, Nick Rogers, City Hall Conservatives transport spokesperson, welcomed the news that additional grounds have been accepted by the court.
He said: “From the evidence that has been uncovered, it’s obvious that Sadiq Khan does not have the legal basis to proceed with his Ulez tax plans, which take money from charities, small businesses and low income Londoners who cannot afford a new car.

JXB
JXB
2 years ago

Les gilets jaunes targeted speed cameras to make their point. Favourite was to wrap them in black bin-liners then douse with petrol and set light. Among other things this melted the plastic all over the camera lens, flash unit and radar sensor.

After a couple of repeats ‘the authorities’ stopped fixing them.

RDawg
2 years ago

Words alone cannot describe my utter disdain for Sadiq Khan. He is the most illiberal, undemocratic, totalitarian, dictatorial, Maoist, disgusting little weasel ever to grace this planet. If we really want to clean up air pollution, perhaps we should gag the woke moron and ban his hot air emissions from ever being uttered again. Have you seen he’s just released his new propaganda book too?! 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮

MikeAustin
2 years ago

Air quality? Has anyone seen the clips of people comparing air quality on London roads with that in the Underground? e.g. this one?

Being someone liking tech toys, I bought an air quality meter. I live in Bristol, near the Downs. I measured PM2.5 on the Downs – a wide open grass area – and at the top of Blackboy Hill – full of traffic on a Friday afternoon. No difference! Both were within the current 20 ug/m3 limit and the future10 ug/m3 limit.

Another quick point: has anyone noticed the converging in price of petrol and diesel? I have seen them selling at the same price here. Apparently, in South Wales, diesel is cheaper. Could people not be using diesel, or diesel cars, partly due to ULEZ restrictions?

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

We have noticed a similar convergence of prices between petrol and diesel and it seems rather odd 🤔

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

Blackboy Hill 🙂 I’m astounded the woke morons who infest Bristol haven’t pulled it down.

MikeAustin
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Blackboy Hill derives its name from an inn that has long since disappeared. The name may have referred to young boys climbing up chimneys.
It is a part of Whiteladies Road that runs from the city to Clifton. Neither names have anything to do with the slave trade.
However, if you look on maps, Blackboy Hill does not exist. The complete road is called Whiteladies Road. But it is still commonly known as Blackboy Hill, except by visitors who never became accustomed to it.
There have been moves to rename it, but it does not officially have the name Blackboy Hill. It is a local nickname. Wokery will have to find some other way to censor traditionalists.

Epi
Epi
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

I live in an area in Bedford called Black Tom nothing to do with slavery, named after an 18th century Highwayman who after he’d done his deed took his victims and slit their throats down Cutthroat Lane now Sainsbury’s Fairfield Park. I always call it Sainsbury’s Cutthroat Lane but I don’t suppose that would go down too well with the punters.

VAX FREE IanC
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

Thanks for that link, Mike, very enlightening. I believe I will be sharing that.

Applause sm.jpg
WyrdWoman
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

That vid is a shocker! Perhaps there’s a legal case to be made that by forcing people off the road and onto public transport which already breaches air quality regs, Khan is knowingly complicit in exposing even more people to unnecessary/avoidable health risks (or something like that)? Might be worth a punt by some enterprising lawyer somewhere.

NeilofWatford
2 years ago

Grass roots resistance = Direct Democracy.
There are more of us than them and it terrifies them.
Add this to the strategy of mass boycotting woke corporations, taking your kids out of woke classrooms, suing teachers for using pornography in schools.
They’ll get the message.

GrouchoMarques
GrouchoMarques
2 years ago

The shape of the graph has the same as appearance of a major endemic disease at the point when a miracle vaccine was introduced. Funny that.

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

I wonder if the presence of so many French citizens in London is influencing the behaviour of the usually far too placid English?

We certainly have a lot to learn from them when it comes to “protesting” against a dictatorial, undemocratic demagogue.

beaniebean
beaniebean
2 years ago

I have for a long time now thought we were heading for civil disobedience on a grand scale. Ordinary people are ignored and seriously disadvantaged by those in power and there must come a tipping point. The pandemic, Net Zero and the gender wars have all highlighted the out of touch, elitist, top down approach that dominates politics. Propaganda, censorship and cancellation can only work if people don’t understand what’s happening. Thanks to the Daily Sceptic, Substack etc the scales have fallen from our eyes.
I am by nature a conforming, law-abiding citizen and never believed I would ever support civil disobedience but after the last three years I now trust the rebels far more than the authorities. Vive la revolution!

Spritof_GFawkes
2 years ago
Reply to  beaniebean

I agree. I have spent my whole life obeying rules and laws but the covid debacle made me realise that the rules are not necessarily the for the good of all. Although I have not yet broken any specific laws myself, yet, I just confess to a grudging admiration for those who disregard them (at least insofar as they don’t cause harm to other people)

morganlefey
morganlefey
2 years ago

some of my silken-tongued learned friends are now raising the question of whether Lafayette’s dictum “When the government violates the people’s rights, insurrection is, for the people and for each portion of the people, the most sacred of the rights and the most indispensible of duties” could indeed possibly now be lawful under these circumstances

varmint
2 years ago

Maybe these activists can wear “Just Start Oil” T-Shirts. ————But it is maybe hypocritical of me to encourage wilful damage just because I happen to agree with their argument. After all I don’t agree with the “Just Stop Oil” protesters or their means of protesting.

Epi
Epi
2 years ago

Sounds brilliant how do I join? Or contribute?

GrouchoMarques
GrouchoMarques
2 years ago
Reply to  Epi

.

Mybodymyfuckingchoice
2 years ago
Reply to  Epi

Exactly my question.

Rowland P
Rowland P
2 years ago

Diesel is cheaper than petrol in Italy which makes sense in keeping the price down for commercial use. There is too much paranoia about air quality

Mybodymyfuckingchoice
2 years ago

Where is the info or links to join and support UK Unites?

VAX FREE IanC
2 years ago

Genghis needs to be ousted, he truly is an evil self-serving, mendacious, blackguardly, deceitful, putrid, evil weasel. Many will have seen this video of him being questioned about the purchase of his ULEZ cameras. It’s worth watching again if you have and very much worth watching if you haven’t. What a total slimeball!
https://www.facebook.com/TogetherDeclaration/videos/9400281276650412/?extid=CL-UNK-UNK-UNK-AN_GK0T-GK1C&mibextid=1YhcI9R

djmwright
djmwright
2 years ago

TfL says 9 out 10 vehicles already comply. They’re introducing a scrappage scheme for the 1 out of 10. And every year more old cars are retired and more electric cars and hybrids are bought. Its fair to say that in a few years 95 out of a hundred cars will comply. You have to wonder why Khan is doing this. I suspect the congestion charge will morph into a climate change charge and all car users will have to pay it.

Mybodymyfuckingchoice
2 years ago
Reply to  djmwright

100%