The Blob is a Monster of the Tories’ Own Making
Radomir Tylecote has written an excellent analysis in the Telegraph setting out how the Tories are not, as they like to imagine, the victims of the Blob, but its creators. Here’s an excerpt.
After the fall of Dominic Raab, it was a question of when – not if – the Blob would claim its next scalp. And, in the past week, our Home Secretary and former-Prime Minister (again) have found themselves in the firing line.
This points to a crisis which extends far beyond the fate of Boris Johnson. Working as a special adviser, I worried that some civil servants were treating elected ministers, especially Brexiteers, as just another group of ‘stakeholders’. Actual decision-making power has been moving from elected representatives to so-called experts (or, more exactly, bureaucrats).
This has not happened overnight. It is the result of concession after concession that has allowed the state to rise above elected politicians, some of whom have focused on headlines instead of doing their central task: running the state instead of being run by it. For all the complaints of ‘witch-hunts’, of the ‘Blob’, of a Left-wing ‘economic establishment’, there is no mention of how successive Governments enabled it. The huge increase in labour market regulation, much of which did not come from Brussels, has suffused all areas of the civil service. The inability to approach diversity and inclusion from a sensible, rather than a woke, starting point, has allowed the mantra to permeate public services. ‘Treasury orthodoxy’ is partly a failure of those Conservatives too timid to make the case for growth and a smaller state.
A series of reforms since the Blair years made civil servants effectively un-sackable by ministers and unleashed the sock-puppet state-funding of Left-wing charities, undermining the policies officials are supposed to enact. The British people may elect leaders at the ballot box, but are then left watching as those politicians become little more than performing frontmen, PR agents whose job it is to present policies drawn up in Whitehall as ‘conservative’.
This creates all manner of perverse incentives. Ministers who make it to the top are increasingly those who tacitly accept this. “Taking official advice” is now a virtual philosophy of government – and this is dangerous for our society. It tells the British people their democracy is increasingly unable to deliver what they choose. For Conservatives, the result is stasis: dreary, EU-aligned, woke.
Tylecote proposes radical civil service reform to bring the U.K. in line with other democracies and end the increasingly untenable pretence that the civil service is politically neutral. This includes: “Making senior civil servants properly accountable to ministers, sizeable teams of genuinely expert advisers and, like in other democracies, political appointments in departments.”
Civil service reform sounds dull, there are few votes in it directly and it will be extremely hard to deliver, but it’s essential if democratically elected Governments are to be in control of the country again. It should form a centrepiece of any future Government programme.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
While this analysis may have some aspects to it that are accurate I think that the tendency among civil servants to resist elected policymakers began under Blair and has worsened ever since.
Nah.
Blair wasn’t far off the blob’s political position.
Fair enough!
I don’t mean that they opposed Blair, I meant that he managed to poison the well sufficiently in legislation terms to make the blob think it had the right to behave this way.
‘The huge increase in labour market regulation, much of which did not come from Brussels’
Blair’s Britain
‘Civil service reform should form a centrepiece of any future Government programme.’
Yes.
Most of the ones you list snd many others were introduced ahead of EU Dutectives for two reasons. First to try to deny they were EU imposed snd second because the government wanted those measures.
Keep feeding the crocodile until it eats you.
500.000 or so of the uncivil-self absorbed-marxist-servants just at the national level isn’t there? How many at the other ‘levels’? Another 500 K? Don’t know but if roughly accurate the blob is a huge army of 1 million or more from the local council to the communists at Pharma-minster. Unionised. Fire one and the entire army attacks you. You would need to fire 2/3 to get back to some level of sanity. Same for the number of ‘ministers’ and ‘agencies’. Can you imagine the name calling if anyone proposed that….ha ha. ‘Literally Hitler’.
You could go back to the 1980s when Baroness Thatcher initiated the Civil Service Fast Stream. The idea was to get bright young people into senior positions more quickly, rather than have ‘fuddy duddy lifers’ slowly, arthritically working their way into senior positions as they neared the retirement.
Unfortunately, the policy failed to take into account the radicalisation that had started to bleed into UK universities from the USA by then. I remember as a child in that era reading in the Telegraph about professors in the USA facing career destruction for using the wrong words. We didn’t even use the term ‘political correctness’ at the time.
By the time Blair got into power, these very left wing fast streamers were in an ideal position to take over. By 2023, senior civil servants nearing retirement are from the first two generations of fast streamers. At this point, the Civil Service can’t be reformed: it needs sweeping away and replacing with government-appointed organisations reporting to ministers and secretaries of state whose contractual job is to carry out the Goverment’s orders. When a government changes, the next government brings in its own people.
It’s the only way this can work.
Bear in mind that civil servants struggle to become giddy Duffy because they retire so young.
I think there has long been a tendency for Civil Servants, or the equivalent Council Officers in local government, to drift into the attitudes of the Party which has been in place over a long term. It can be awkward when there is a democratic change. However, given the nature of politics, the office holders are often more competent when it comes to real life issues, compared with the latest incumbent in the political roles.
Yes, Minister.
“the office holders are often more competent when it comes to real life issues, compared with the latest incumbent in the political roles.”
I didn’t notice that during covid. The civil service seemed very happy to go along with covid fanaticism.
They may be “competent” but they are not accountable, and many decisions involve weighing up conflicting priorities and those are quite properly political. Although Tegnell did a fantastic job in Sweden, I think the conclusion that many people came to that “public health” decisions should be left to “technical experts” was wrong. Those decisions were political, having taken advice from the “experts” accompanied by a pinch of salt. Anyway, the “competent” experts in this case were Whitty, Vallance, Van Tam et al.
I don’t understand the fealty to these parties I have found them all loathsome for a long time. Do you really understand the sort of challenge that faces us in the sense of getting this country back together again? This requires serious ability. You look at the sunken gimlet eyes of Matt Hancock – this should be a wake up call. In this time either we rise to the occasion or we don’t but you are certainly not gong to get any help from the political class.
What worries me in the reform is that the only selection pool for people who can do the jobs in these new bodies are the same people from the old bodies. Its like the NHS, you can’t throw all the doctors away and just get new untainted ones. Its hearts and minds, and from research, although some can be ‘turned’, about a third of those involved can’t be persuaded or ‘un-brainwashed’. This is a problem that will take generations to fix.
With effective Minister, supported by a robust PM, all things are possible. Things have or haven’t happened because the party in government wanted it.
It will take several decades and the outcome will be a deterioration on what we have now. But that doesn’t mean that individuals can’t go off on their own and establish communities amongst themselves. Because frankly many of us will face such a choice very soon and it is important that if we do we look after ourselves and we allow others to join our tents. It sounds a bit premature but really this is where the future lies.. If you care about people and the future then you will help design the best way forward.
The Civil “Servants” and selected “experts” that (we are informed) have been carefully picked to represent “The Sattled Science” are infamous for incompetence, lying, huge exaggeration, malice.
There is only one statement from the lot of them that I believe can be accepted as true.
Professor Pantsdown, no less:-
“We realised we can get away with it.”
Labservatives! What’s new?
Another pointless lamb to the slaughter!
Who f-ing cares? They are all donkeys 🫏!
We need leaders not rulers!
Join the dots…….. The UK population giving clear mandates to a Govt about sovereignty and independence but has been ignoring this on multiple mandates. Even a large majority of 80 cannot change anything? NGOs like as is “Just Stop Oil” and other high-profile NGOs, are probably financed via the Charities act at best and probably international, European and even our Government to cause frustration and chaos. Effective ESG/Climate bans on anything that will curtail industry, agricultural production and travel freedoms. Non-competes with the EU despite “so-called independence” Aligning of G7 Corporation Taxes since 2022 in Cornwall. Again non-compete clauses. (This is why Truss was kicked-out ASAP – she did not read the script and we quickly got an unelected Technocrat middle-manager) Lockstep on banning short haul flights – first France, then Europe, UK and then G7. UK Govt still obeying ECHR, though we do not need to, incessant legal and illegal immigration without any control etc…….. Cause inflationary issues with taxpayer paying for their own accommodation etc…. Online Safety Bills being introduced online worldwide – to aid Propaganda, stop mis-information, and protest coordination by the populous. PESCO – Permanent European Structured Cooperation Organisation – a Pan European (and succession of… Read more »
This is the Not-a-Conservative-Party’s attitude:
Civil Service reform …. too difficult
House of Frauds reform ….. too difficult
BBC Poll Tax reform ….. too difficult
Electoral system reform ….. too difficult
Devolution disaster reform ….. too difficult
NHS reform ….. too difficult
And don’t forget, pre-2016 …. EU reform (or UK membership terms reform) ….. too difficult
If you want REFORM you’ll never get it from the Not-a-Conservative-Party.