Have We Passed Peak Green?

Farmer rebellions in the Netherlands, Macron calling for an end to green EU laws, Germany returning to coal, the EU U-turning on the combustion engine ban, new drilling in the North Sea – the signs are all around that the world has passed Peak Green, says Fraser Nelson in the Telegraph. Here’s an excerpt.

A few days ago, I received an email from my local council offering ‘climate anxiety’ therapy for those worried about global warming. It was too interesting an invitation to refuse. A ‘climate psychologist’ convened the group and asked for their feelings: afraid, angry, helpless and guilty were the main words offered. Such anxiety is natural, he said, but can be remedied by “distancing” oneself from negative climate news. He didn’t quite say how such a feat could be achieved.

For children it would mean avoiding school, where much of this is now built into the curriculum. It would also mean avoiding television or radio news, seldom short of climate gloom. This week, for example, the BBC announced that the planet is “predicted to pass the 1.5 degree global warming threshold in the next few years”, a tipping point after which terrible effects become irreversible. This was followed up by a guest saying how global warming would be worse for Europe than Bangladesh. But the balancing good news – of which there is plenty – was never mentioned.

We’re now familiar with the lack of scrutiny or perspective when the subject is discussed. Some newspapers tell writers to avoid neutral phrases like ‘climate change’ and instead say ’emergency’, ‘crisis’ or ‘breakdown’. Politicians have tended to compete with each other to see who can ring the alarm the loudest. Ed Miliband wanted to decarbonise electricity by 2030; Theresa May made Britain one of the few countries in the world with a legal target to hit Net Zero by 2050. But just how much would this cost? No one was really told.

Now, the bill is beginning to land – and reality beginning to bite. Dutch farmers recently drove tractors into The Hague to protest against its green diktats. In Germany, where the war in Ukraine has brought a new energy realpolitik, wind turbines are being dismantled to make way for an expanded coal mine. Sweden’s 27-year-old environment minister has been quietly diluting the green laws she inherited. Emmanuel Macron – famously chastened by the gilets jaunes – last week called on the EU to stop its barrage of green legislation, saying that enough is enough. We might just have passed Peak Green.

It’s all moving quite quickly. Last autumn, Germany signed an EU target to ban the sale of internal combustion engine cars by 2035. It now opposes the idea, as do Italy, Poland and Czechia. That’s not to say the green agenda is collapsing under the pressure of public scorn: it’s simply being subjected to the kind of scrutiny that was never applied in the first place. How much will it cost? What will it achieve? Germany’s transport minister has been making a good argument: what’s the point in electric cars if the power that drives them comes from burning coal?

Rishi Sunak has been quietly dialling down the green agenda he inherited from Boris Johnson, using the language of Net Zero while adding his own dose of realism. He has created the ‘Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’ – the first part of the job being the most important. So he has authorised new drilling in the North Sea and even the opening of a new coal mine in Cumbria, both projects over which Johnson prevaricated. His recent energy security speech was given in a fusion research centre in Oxfordshire: a nod to his hopes for technology, not diktats, to make the green running.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: Ross Clark takes up a similar theme in this week’s Spectator, saying ‘Europe is turning against Net Zero‘.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TheGreenAcres
2 years ago

I seem to recall from the Covid experience that the behavioural psychologists recommend dialling back the pressure a bit every so often before tightening the screw further. It increases compliance from the plebs apparently.

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Couldn’t have put it better myself. Never let your guard down, but enjoy life while you’re at it. There’s never any shortage of delusional nasties who are just dying to spoil other people’s fun.

Roy Everett
2 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Yes. It:’s what Alfred Biderman called “occasional indulgences”.

ekathulium
ekathulium
2 years ago

Perhaps the most frightening thing about England today is the callous nature of the régime really ruling us [5 mins.]:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AWTt86Ja6Z6lgWb4o4xMTipSUOWcLA82/view
As the professor rightly observes, this behaviour(delivering uranium shells to the Ukraine) is morally bankrupt. Rule by psychopath is terrifying and has always ended in suffering and disaster

Jane G
Jane G
2 years ago
Reply to  ekathulium

My device can’t play this link – can you give us a clue?

ekathulium
ekathulium
2 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

Try switching on your VPN and then it´ll run.
The problem is probably due to the British government´s censorship of news from channels like Sputnik and RT.

lymeswold
lymeswold
2 years ago
Reply to  ekathulium

Of course the ‘depleted uranium radiation cloud’ story is denied. But clearly, irrespective of its veracity, the possibility it might happen at a later date exists. Are we approaching peak stupidity?

NeilofWatford
2 years ago

All very good, but where was Nelson and his Spectator when this madness was being imposed?
The answer, is it was happy to appease adverisers and sponsors, as well as maintaining access to Parliament, by cowtowing to the climate scam.
As always, I remind readers of the inconvenient truth that CO2 is vital for healthy plants and makes us 0.04% of the atmosphere and that man’s contribution is 0.0004%, the rest being natural.

Shimpling Chadacre
2 years ago

If as much money had been spent on research looking at the positive consequences of higher levels of atmospheric CO2 – plant food – and a gently warming climate as has been wasted looking for the reverse, no one would give the doom-peddling end-is-nigh eco-loons the time of day.

Alan M
Alan M
2 years ago

Sadly, when I said on “linkedin” recently that maybe we’d be better off looking at how we could adapt to climate change (from whatever cause) it was logged as “misinformation”.

Alan M
Alan M
2 years ago

How does one receive an email from the council asking if you’d like to go on an axiety course? I’d be there like a shot. It would be great fun.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
2 years ago

Yes but it is too late. There is simply not enough time to offload western interests off this train. Sadlt they kept the charade going on long enough. In terms of the future you look me in the face abd say something with confidence.

JohnK
2 years ago

A related issue was almost presented by Neil Oliver on his show on GBN this evening, involving an interview of Alex Epstein on the topic that “fossil fuel” has been, and continues to be good for us. Loads of common sense items on his site: https://energytalkingpoints.com/

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

Yes, I saw the Neil Oliver program. Alex Epstein did his normal common sense assessment of fossil fuels as appears in his 2 books, both of which I have read. Then on comes Tom Burke.———— He spouted the usual stuff that we have come to expect from the alarmist camp and had the audacity to want to call those not subscribing to this “climate emergency” evidence free kind of cherry picked science as “flat earthers”. Notice how Epstein stated his case about fossil fuels without the need to bad mouth anyone, but Burke has to indulge in that name calling because these people are so convinced of their moral superiority that they simply cannot bear alternative viewpoints. —————–Neil Oliver to be fair did a reasonable job in the face of being confronted with the bully tactics, but there were various times when he could easily have stepped in to correct the many things Burke said that were simply NOT TRUE. ——-Like eg “Renewables are now cheaper than fossil fuels”———This is absurd. Government have interfered so heavily in the energy market with favourable policies towards wind and sun, while at the same time hammering fossil fuels with all manner of mandates… Read more »

bfbf334
2 years ago

“Have We Passed Peak Green?”
We can only hope

varmint
2 years ago

Basic global warming science is quite simple. ——The sun sends down it’s heat and some is radiated back to space where it can be trapped by greenhouse gasses like water vapour and CO2 causing a bit of warming. ——————-Everything else we hear on Mainstream News about what the increase in CO2 will do regarding storms, floods, droughts, sea levels etc is based entirely on computer modelling full of assumptions. We often hear mainstream media refer to these models as “the science”. ———-Nope, models are not science, anymore than a pocket calculator is mathematics.—– Basing energy policy on the output from speculative climate models with little predictive value has to be one of the silliest things politicians have ever done. (and that is me trying to be polite). This is what happens when ideology trumps common sense. But that common sense is very famous for its uppercuts to the chin when you are not expecting them. Macron, Sunak, the Germans and all the other pretend to save the planet UN lackeys are starting to feel the whoosing air whizz by their faces now as the real world takes a swipe at their Green Absurdity, and how many rounds western politicians can… Read more »