News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dinger64
2 years ago

“The wind and solar power myth has finally been exposed”

Finally?? I’ve known since being a kid at school that batteries don’t last long! Why do they suddenly think they are the future?
Australia’s mega battery:
Total cost over 11 years is $84 million!
It can power 1 million homes for 30 mins!
Divided up per household, that’s $8.40 for half an hour worth of electricity! Then, times that by all the homes in the country and times again by how long it will have to provide power if the wind stops,God save us, for any longer than 30 mins! Oh my!

Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

(Not to mention the kids in the Congo,shussh!)

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

As of now, wind is at 2.8%. We seem to buy at least 10% from evil nuclear France.

National Grid: Live (iamkate.com)

Mogwai
2 years ago

Excellent epic thread ( 20+ Tweets ) from Dr Simon Goddek. The real pandemic. Although I do disagree with no.16 as women taking birth control can hardly be seen as a negative thing. Maybe he’s strict Catholic or something…

https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1655993571562881029

Monro
2 years ago

‘Lockdowns lasting impact’ is, in fact, Blair’s Britain.

Blair reinvigorated the state/public sector and the similar ninnies that followed him enjoyed the power that the massive public sector now gave them.

I know this from talking to Conservative MPs.

Lockdown was a direct consequence of an overmighty state and statist mindset throughout Whitehall. The true size of the state today in Britain is revealed in today’s DT: 10.6m employees, 33% of all workers, up from 25% under Blair.

No wonder all roads have potholes, public transport is a shambles, the NHS, defence procurement, border force, the Met.

Blair’s Britain made even worse by the heirs to Blair.

And few on here believe that the covid shambles was due to incompetence.

Look around you. Not much works. Why would the incompetent statist response to covid be any better?

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

And another thing. Great article in the DT today by Allister Heath about the burgeoning foreign policy and success in foreign trade of China.

How do we really expect to succeed in all our historically lucrative overseas markets, hampered, as we are now by massive tranches of restrictive export regulation from the Blair era, passed to us by the EU, OECD etc. gold plated by our very own sclerotic trade ministry?

Global Britain? We don’t even have a Royal Yacht, previously responsible for the signature of billions in contracts across the world.

ellie-em
2 years ago

Re:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/10/trans-starbucks-barista-investigated-police-alleged-assault/

Another example of how certain males – who are deluded pretend they are female but never will be – feel they are exonerated from their abuse of women, think they have a special status and therefore believe they are justified in the abuse. 

ebygum
2 years ago

Senator Malcolm Roberts from Australia has been one of the sensible standout politicians in relation to the scamdemic..but in this article he is highlighting the WHO
“Standards for sexuality Education in Europe”….something I wasn’t really aware of, and it’s scary as hell..especially if countries are willing to sign over their sovereignty in relation to various matters..and we know they are..

Well worth a read….

“The World Health Organisation has orchestrated a ‘framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists’ titled, Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe.
Its purpose is to standardise (in other words override) the diverse teaching practices of each sovereign nation within Europe and the wider international community with regards to sexual education…
Having all-but forced European nations to comply, the United Nations is seeking to expand a similar framework to all UN member states – including Australia. This framework is called International Guidance on Sexuality Education, produced as part of UN Education 2030 and counter-signed by UNICEF. The WHO are now actively promoting the framework….

https://zephr.spectator.com.au/2023/05/children-targeted-by-who-standards-for-sexuality-education-in-europe/

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Having just sped-read this WHO document, especially the Matrix (?!) in section 2 in reference to what children at various stages should be learning about, I must say that I am appalled. Personally, I came to know about sex in a natural way that wasn’t ‘taught’ in any classroom. I certainly wasn’t ‘given information about early childhood masturbation’ between the ages of 0-4 years! I didn’t need to talk about my gender identity or about pleasurable sensations in my body and I wasn’t helped to develop a ‘positive attitude to my body’ either. I was an infant just enjoying being alive and playing a lot. Between the ages of 4 to 6, I wasn’t ‘enabled to talk about sexual matters. I was a kid and played a lot. I could go on… This is wrong, wrong, wrong on every level. Who are these people who are pushing these agendas on our children? For what reason? The subject matter is totally inappropriate for children this young. They are playing ffs and this type of information will just confuse them. Who are The WHO to create such nefarious frameworks? Evil. Any teacher involved in such practice should,be ashamed of themselves and/or thrown… Read more »

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago

The sexualisation of children is part of the primary, overriding policy that explains pretty much all of the other policies commonly described as mad or moronic, which is the destruction of European Christian civilisation.

Paedophiles, who are seriously overrepresented in the ranks of politicians, are used to push this sexualisation. They support it because they want to be able to legally rape children and the legalisation of child rape would remove one of the sticks their masters use to control them.

Mogwai
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Well these guys in Belgium have the right idea;

https://t.me/schildenvrienden/222

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago

There are few points in the Jeremy Warner article (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/05/09/covid-officially-over-appalling-cost-response-become-clear/) in the Telegraph which I agree with: 1) Politically, it would have been virtually impossible for the UK to have stood alone in remaining open even as virtually the whole of the rest of Europe was closing down. The Government would have fallen within weeks if it had stood by and done nothing. I partially agree but only because the Government were already divided. Sweden was able to remain mostly ‘open even as virtually the whole of the rest of Europe was closing down’. The Government at the time was not so much doing U-turns as doing doughnuts. If half as much effort had gone into reassuring the public compared with that which went into ‘scaring the pants off’ them the Government might have been able to lead the people through not locking down. 2) Instinctively, Boris Johnson, then Prime Minister, was against lockdown, preferring instead the idea of “herd immunity”, but then he became seriously ill himself, and ended up fully embracing the made-in-China response. That’s revisionism. After his recovery from being seriously ill with Covid he was accused of saying ‘I don’t believe this bullshit!’. He was weak, not… Read more »

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Excellent post! Thank you.

‘Politically impossible….’

It should have been politically impossible for a democratically elected government to lock the country down without proper parliamentary scrutiny or a detailed cost benefit analysis in defiance of accepted constitutional precedent.

It should have been impossible to spend over £400bn on trashing the economy.

That it was not impossible is a powerful argument for sweeping constitutional reform.

How many lives did the lockdowns save?

Look at the shambles of the NHS now.

Read ‘As If Expendable’, the Amnesty International report into the 2020 NHS hospital clearances and the number of lives lost as a direct consequence.

Lockdowns did not save any lives. On the contrary, they have killed tens, if not hundreds, of thousands before their time.

The great British public, in their hearts, know this and will have their say next year…….

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

The great British public, in their hearts, know this and will have their say next year…….

Unfortunately, I think the great British public will not remember that many Labour and other opposition politicians were calling for more draconian and quicker lockdown than the government enforced.

Jeremy Corbyn (remember him?) asked for the government to work with him in preparing the lockdown legislation (see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-51916076) and promised not to challenge it in Parliament. The Coronavirus act was passed in both houses without any Members or Lords of any party calling for a division (vote). The Scottish Parliament gave immediate formal Consent (as it impinged on devolved powers) again, without a vote.

So who can the great British public vote for at the next General Election in order to have their say? Reclaim?.

Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

They will do exactly what they did to Callaghan, Major, Brown and, yes, that means they will vote in an even greater nincompoop.

Things are going to get a lot worse before they can get better.

The size of the labour majority is probably irrelevant.

Big majority: even bigger state (already at 33% of the workforce), tax increases to pay for it and less personal liberty.

Small majority: PR and even more lunatic net zero policies, tax increases

What a shambles. Well done Bunter….not.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Politically, it would have been virtually impossible for the UK to have stood alone in remaining open even as virtually the whole of the rest of Europe was closing down.

The Government would have fallen within weeks if it had stood by and done nothing.”

We stood alone in 1939 / 40 but then we had a PM:

“We Will Never Surrender.”

BurlingtonBertie
2 years ago

A Tweet which is well reading in full: “A lot of people are getting upset having their conduct during covid compared to Germans supporting the rise of Nazism. Let’s recapitulate. A fifth of the population was legally classified as unclean. They were barred from most public spaces, including theatres, restaurants, movies, pubs, clubs, swimming pools, sporting events, concerts, conventions, etc. To access public facilities, people had to carry a digital mark with them so authorities could confirm they weren’t unclean.  The unclean were fired and barred from most jobs: education, healthcare, courts – all public sector work, most major union jobs and a wide smattering of major private employers. When they were fired, the unclean were denied employment insurance, the reasoning being that they had been fired for cause on account of being unclean. The unclean were banned from travel on trains, planes, and chartered boats. They had no legal means of leaving the country. Even if they wanted to, they could not escape the country that obviously hated them so. It became illegal to socialize with the unclean. They weren’t allowed to attend weddings or funerals, or visit sick relatives or friends in hospital.  Special laws were made for the unclean… Read more »

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

Absolutely spot on. Glad it has been put out.

Thanks for the find BB.

BurlingtonBertie
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It’s a sober, unemotional response which hits the mark.
Now share the heck out of it!

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-wefs-agenda-for-britain-event/

A public event to be held in London to discuss the Reset.

May 24th. Tickets £20.

Chris P
Chris P
2 years ago

The WHO have declared the Monkeypox global health emergency over. According to the CDC, the death toll was 129 or about 0.0000016% of the global population. Governments think it is alright to trust this organisation with powers over their people whenever the WHO decide there is a global health emergency?

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

https://off-guardian.org/2023/05/11/get-ready-for-pfizers-turbo-charged-guided-missile-cancer-drugs/

A first rate essay on how Big Pharma are willing, greedy accomplices in the depopulation agenda.

Karen Hunt at Off-G.