“I’m Glad I Never Fell for the Electric Car Boondoggle”

In this week’s Spectator Toby has written about how relieved he is that he decided against buying an electric car a couple of years ago. Here’s an excerpt.

A couple of years ago I thought seriously about buying an electric car. Not a hybrid, but the full monty. There was one in particular I liked the look of and I even contacted a dealership to ask whether they’d accept my diesel-powered VW Touran in part-exchange. The answer was yes, but it was still eye-wateringly expensive. Was it worth it? I tried to persuade myself it would be, given the savings on fuel costs, the waiving of the congestion charge, etc.

Boy, am I glad I dodged that bullet. Scarcely a day passes without a new horror story about electric vehicles in the press. Over the past week alone, we’ve learnt that some popular models are depreciating at twice the rate of petrol cars, that the number of free electric chargers on Britain’s roads has dropped by 40% in the past 12 months, and that the sheer weight of their batteries means these cars could be banned from bridges and multi-storey car parks. It’s carmageddon!

The model I was eyeing up supposedly had a range of 275 miles, which meant I could drive to any QPR away game on a single charge. The northernmost club in the Championship is Sunderland, which is exactly 275 miles from my house in Acton. But we now know that the manufacturers’ range estimates are wildly optimistic. For instance, Giles Coren was told his Jaguar I-Pace, which he bought in 2020, had a range of up to 292 miles, when the reality was 220. Being a Hoops fan like me, that’s one of the reasons he’s ditched it. I cannot imagine the frustration of desperately searching for a rapid charging point as a succession of warning lights comes up on the dash, with 70 miles to go and kick-off less than two hours away.

But what would have really annoyed me is the feeling I’d been sold a pup by a Government keen to burnish its green credentials. Okay, I might have got in under the wire for the plug-in grant of £1,500 – the Government scrapped that on June 15th last year – but what about the exemption from road tax I’d been promised? Jeremy Hunt announced in the Autumn Statement that electric car owners will have to start paying vehicle excise duty from 2025.

Then there’s the fact that electricity costs have increased by 66.7% in the past 12 months, wiping out most of the savings I would have been banking on. That may not be entirely the Government’s fault, but failing to invest in nuclear, banning fracking and inflating energy bills with green subsidies hasn’t helped.

He notes that a recent report by the Global Warming Policy Foundation estimates that the cost of replacing natural gas back-up in Germany with large battery storage facilities – necessary because wind and solar power are so intermittent – “is a multi-trillion dollar project, likely costing a multiple of the country’s GDP, and thus completely infeasible”.

He concludes: “The truth is that virtue-signalling politicians have pledged to wean us off oil and gas without any serious plan for what to replace them with.”

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
2 years ago

“The truth is that virtue-signalling politicians have pledged to wean us off oil and gas without any serious plan for what to replace them with.”

I suspect some of these politicians know very well what will replace oil and gas for the masses – rationed electricity and restricted opportunities. Rich politicians and their mates will have quieter roads and aeroplanes, and will not be freezing in the winter.

huxleypiggles
2 years ago

A very reasonable appraisal tof.

JXB
JXB
2 years ago

I disagree, they do have a plan for what to replace them with.

Nothing.

transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

Yup

JohnK
2 years ago

And in the meantime, in Germany one of the significant sources of electricity generation is lignite (brown coal). A summary of global stats here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lignite

JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

Yes but on.y temporarily until the are able to make more wind and sunshine.

George L
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

:-))

NeilParkin
2 years ago

Toby, mate, I had no idea that while suffering the abuse and cancellations, over the last three years, you’d done all of that while you were a QPR fan.

Respect, and my deepest condolences…

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  NeilParkin

Um, it was Will Jones who wrote the piece, but I get your sentiments.

NeilParkin
2 years ago

If I might be permitted to be ‘technicaly correct’ (the best kind of correct…) Its Wills article, but the football part is quoting from Toby’s piece in the Spectator.

1-0 to me, I think…

BurlingtonBertie
2 years ago

This recently published paper for which I can only read the abstract, is worth a look at ATL, as it appears to lob another grenade on the spurious claim that CO2 rises are all down to human activity.

https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Abstract/2022/02000/World_Atmospheric_CO2,_Its_14C_Specific_Activity,.2.aspx

Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

The serious plan is to replace oil and gas with nothing.

************************************
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane 

Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field 
near play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE

Mogwai
2 years ago

They have no idea what has caused 32,000+ excess deaths in the UK last year, but they definitely know it’s not the one thing they haven’t mentioned. Old-age, obesity, dementia, heart disease, heat….. I don’t know about you but at this stage, when I read articles like this, I get the distinct impression they’re blatantly taking the Mick now! 🙁

”This then brings up another problem, in that a lot of Brits are dying, but not necessarily of a specific cause.
So whilst a heavily ageing population may be throwing up yet another problem, it doesn’t quite explain why over 30,000 more people than usual died from May to December last year.
For March and February of this year, symptoms, signs and ill-defined is the leading cause of excess deaths, before that in January it was influenza and pneumonia.
And throughout the year, other causes emerge dramatically as the leading cause of excess deaths.
Heat in particular persistently returns during the summer, and given climate change will only continue to pose such a fatal threat.
On the country’s hottest days there is inevitably a spike in excess deaths as thousands succumb to it.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/brits-dying-tens-thousands-dont-29955386

Jon Smith
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

My local doctors surgery has “Never known the demand for heart monitors to be so high”…
I wonder why that is…
I’m starting to see these statics in front of me, several in my community needing monitors, several seriously aggressive cancer relapses, several with illnesses where the doctors simply says.. “we don’t know” (now go away and stop bothering us)
Having a health service is now only for the weathly and illegals…

Jon Smith
2 years ago

On the Cobolt front…

FgVVSMBWYAAM-gE.jpg
DomTaylor
DomTaylor
2 years ago

How about moving away from electric car / renewable energy bashing and confront the real issues: domination of world energy supplies by a corrupt cartel of suppliers with notable psychopathic tendencies and a world reverse currency controlled by similarly psychopathic bankers that, for the past fifty years, has depended on artificial restriction of the production and purchase of oil? Does exposing the Climate Change scam mean we should overlook Rockefeller’s shenanigans in China, the Iranian Revolution, two Gulf Wars, the Ukrainian war, numerous Latin American and African coups and brutal dictatorships, the House of Saud and its suspected funding of extremist groups, the destruction of historic city centres and local bus / rail service to coerce people into buying cars and hence more oil, abysmal air quality in many modern cities? Oil companies are not our friends and the human cost of securing oil and natural gas supplies is atrocious even though the climate cost may be a chimera. It’s to break-up the cartels and bring in some real competition: renewables and electric energy storage, yes, but also local coal and fracking and indeed anything else that can be made to work safely and with tolerable environment impact.

Freddy Boy
2 years ago
Reply to  DomTaylor

Yes they destroyed our Railway network because there was more money to be made from a man in a car than him buying rail tickets ! We could get everywhere on our trains & they said f- ck em ! Nothings changed !!!..,

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

Except the private car is by far the best way to travel. It takes you from your front door to anywhere else in the country. My nearest train station is 8 miles away, and it has always been 8 miles away even before most people had cars. To use the train, I would first have to travel those 8 miles by bus or some other means. Whereas now I lock my front door and enter the vehicle sitting in my drive and go wherever I need to go. No train or bus could ever provide what a private car provides.

varmint
2 years ago

The best way when it comes to considering whether to buy something or not is to consider————What is the purpose of this product? Is it part of the Green Agenda? If it is then it will almost certainly be more expensive, less efficient and mostly both. So I put a rule in place. If it is allegedly GREEN and if it is subsidized by government and government are putting mandates and taxes on the alternatives, then I will NOT PURCHASE those items. I will not have a smart meter. I will not have an electric car. I will not stop eating meat. I will not buy a bicycle and leave my car in the drive. etc etc etc. —–My local paper has a GREEN page each week. Last week they were advising readers not to buy items and instead borrow them from a neighbour. They suggested that everyone in the street having a lawnmower was bad for the planet and that we should all share a lawnmower. This week they advised ladies not to buy a new hat for a wedding and to maybe wear an old dress rather than get a new one. Up the other side of the… Read more »

RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

It isn’t Eco Socialism. It’s Eco Communitarianism ie Communism for the 21st century.

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Communism, Socialism, Marxism, etc etc. They are all the same thing…..Choose whichever one you like.

George L
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Yes.. the WSWS World Socialist Website was well on board with the covid nonsense. Pushing out as much fear as governments.

Rather ironic that the Marxists and Trots are fully onboard with the so called elite Capitalists. But then again its no surprise.. it was exactly the same team involved in the Russian Revolution.. bankers and Bolsheviks..

Hester
Hester
2 years ago

It is not and never has been about getting us to buy electric cars, think about it, the materials required to make the car function in the battery are rare and difficult to find and mine, and its becoming increasingly so, if everyone in the world were to try and replace their fuel car with an electric one, there is not enough of the raw materials to allow for replacement. The reality is they, the elite, you know those ones who fly around the world in private jets, and many whose wages we pay they want us in our homes, they don’t want us to have personal cars, they can have them, because they are important, they are the ones who shape our world and decide what is right for us, not them. Why else the push for the 15 minute cities? why else the push for home working?, internet shopping?, why else the push for a digital currency? Its all about keeping us in our prescribed “ghettos”, having the cameras to watch us, and the controls on what, how and when we can spend our money. They are saving the Planet, one planned death of a human at a… Read more »

varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Hester

Yep, exactly. Nor do they want you having energy, or meat, or flights to Florida and Tenerife. “Sustainable Development” will remove everything you have and replace it with something you don’t want and then charge you more for it. eg taking away your gas central heating and fobbing you off with a heat pump which is about as much use as a paper toothbrush. Or taking away the coal and gas fired plants and forcing you to pay for unreliable wind energy and then insisting it is cheaper even though your electricity bill tells you it has doubled in price.

George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Hester

So true.. well summed up..

NeilofWatford
2 years ago

‘That may not be entirely the Government’s fault’.
It IS entirely the government’s fault.
If we fracked and drilled we’d have excess cheap energy, even becoming an exporter.
Everything starts here and the Sunak/Hunt Globalist partnership nullified it, as per their mission.

MichaelM
2 years ago

I am truly disgusted to learn that electric car owners have been exempt from road tax despite the fact their cars are around 500kg heavier than a similar petrol car and therefore more damaging to roads and bridges.

Yet another example of a breach of the Social Contract between government and citizens. We accept the need to pay taxes in return for public services, but only if it is done in a manner that purports to be fair.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago

Caveat emptor? Did nobody who fell for the “An EV is better for the planet” BS from the Government not remember the previous BS about diesel being safer that petrol cars? Serves the Virtue Signallers right for being so bloody stupid as to be taken in by the pond life that pretends to govern our country.

Big X
Big X
2 years ago

The fact that people get “climate anxiety” gives me anxiety.

lymeswold
lymeswold
2 years ago

Sad that we have to import yet another ugly, idiotic-sounding American expression like boondoggle into the English language.

JXB
JXB
2 years ago

‘A couple of years ago I thought seriously about buying an electric car.’ Seriously? Were you unwell at the time? There is no rational argument in favour of EVs. Buying them and charging them is supported by subsidies and taxation = theft from other citizens. They weigh about 500kg more than a conventional vehicle, which means more momentum and therefore worse outcomes in crashes. It ensures greater tyre and brake pad wear. Batteries are temperature sensitive with reduced output (range) and longer charge times at colder temperatures. Heating/aircon/other electrics wholly dependent on the batteries reducing range… or be cold or hot and no GPS or music. Range and ability to hold charge and speed of charge will deteriorate with use. Replacement batteries about £12 000, meaning low second hand value. Home charging is impractical unless you have a garage or driveway. Charging points are scarce and queues likely as more EVs are in use. Long journeys will be very long. There is a significant fire risk and whilst it is true ICE engine vehicles also catch fire they can relatively easily be put out by foam/powder extinguishers. Battery fires cannot be put out, they have to burn out whilst the… Read more »