Net Zero is Being Mugged by Reality and the People Are Waking Up
The Net Zero bandwagon was always going to grind to a halt when it bumped up against hard realities. As Abraham Lincoln observed, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. To which the physicist Richard Feynman added the important rejoinder that you can’t fool nature either.
The eco-zealots in the think tanks, the civil service and the Green Blob have been trying to do both. Consider, for example, the oft-repeated claim that wind and solar power are cheap, which is demonstrably false, and carefully overlooks the fact that a renewables-dominated grid would require trillions of pounds of electricity storage to make it function without backup. As a result, we have seen gigawatts of wind and solar power installed, and the slow strangulation of investment in conventional energy sources. However, nature, refusing to be taken in by all the claims of ‘cheap renewables’, has responded with 20 years of relentless electricity price rises.
The silver lining to the very dark cloud of the Ukraine war and the energy cost crisis that followed is that most people now realise that a world with rising energy costs is not very pleasant at all. Others have been awakened, perhaps rather unexpectedly, by the Biden administration’s decision to launch its own Net Zero spending spree. It is rapidly becoming clear that this has the potential to turn into a disaster for the U.K.
Already unable to compete with the cheap energy and cheap labour of the Far East, many businesses are now having to face the reality that they will soon be unable to compete with the U.S. either, because of its abundance of cheap gas and its tidal wave of subsidies. Even companies that have been here for years are now thinking of upping sticks and crossing the Atlantic to take advantage of the green bonanza on offer. The U.K. and much of Europe are therefore facing an exodus of businesses, and a drying up of foreign direct investment. That could be catastrophic for the economy, and for Government finances already reeling from the pandemic.
The realities of Net Zero are also hitting home for the general public. The threat that the project represents to livelihoods and liberties is becoming more evident by the day. Recently, the mathematician Norman Fenton tweeted an excerpt from a Government-funded report that set out what Net Zero U.K. might look like: no airports, no shipping, no beef and lamb to eat, and most food imports eliminated. Sounds grim, doesn’t it? Lots of people thought so, and the tweet went viral, garnering over three million views.
The threat of being effectively locked into a 15-minute zone of a city has also concentrated minds. Anti-ULEZ protests are kicking off, and civil disobedience has followed in their wake, with cameras vandalised, bollards ripped out and barriers destroyed. Awareness of the threat of programmable digital currencies, which would allow the authorities to dictate your purchases (“No beef for you this week!”), is becoming more widespread too.
Seeing such policies alongside the restrictions on movement and lifestyle, and the ongoing censorship of criticism and opposition, many will conclude that climate catastrophism is simply the latest manifestation of mankind’s habitual tendency to totalitarianism. They are right to do so: green fanatics aspire to dictate every aspect of life, for you and everyone else in the world, just as the National Socialists and the Communist commissars tried to do.
So, as more and more of the impacts of Net Zero hit home, word of the economic and societal threat is spreading. Another surge in energy prices next winter or the winter after could prove the final straw for hundreds of thousands of businesses and the public alike. A small ray of hope is that in some parts of the world, the green cult is having to make compromises. The EU was recently forced by Germany to abandon its planned ban of combustion-engined cars. At the recent G7 meeting, ministers refused to set a date for the elimination of coal from the bloc’s energy systems, rolling back a pledge made at the Glasgow climate summit.
Yet most Western governments, including Mr. Sunak and his cabinet, remain almost entirely in thrall to green dogma. The reality is that far too many of them are Net Zero ideologues themselves, and far too many of the rest are cowed by the antics of the eco-zealots and the fulminations of their supporters in the mainstream media. We should expect no real change of direction under the current generation of ministers and MPs.
This inability to tackle the Net Zero cost crisis is almost certain to clear the way for Labour to sweep into power and to do… precisely nothing about the energy crisis. The damage being done to our economy and society will continue, and perhaps even accelerate.
But eventually a turning point will be reached, and the public, mugged by reality, will realise where the Establishment is taking them. They will look at the cold, dark, miserable Net Zero world that Norman Fenton described and will refuse to go any further. They will instead return to the path they have chosen in the past, the path to liberty and prosperity. The established political parties cannot see the inevitability of this reversal, but eventually they will have to accept it, and follow on behind, or face becoming irrelevant.
Benny Peiser and Andrew Montford are Director and Deputy Director of Net Zero Watch.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The majority of the population still appear to be brainwashed by the Green Blob. In many cases it plays into their politics. For the others perhaps, as they say above, when the cost of energy and the restrictions on their lives begin to bite, some will wake up and fulfil Lincoln’s wisdom.
“That
could beis catastrophic for the economy, and forGovernmentour finances already reeling fromthe pandemicpaying people to sit at home doing nothing and having handed over billions of pounds to Big Pharma for completely unnecessary, untested, unsafe and ineffective drugs.”Yes indeed Marcus, I hadn’t read this when I posted.
I am always firing from the hip, hux. It’s called instinct! Speak now, read later, life is too short. 👊
…didn’t £20 million wing it’s way from the public purse to Rishi’s father-in-law, and INFOSYS, after they engineered the ‘emergency alert’….?
They are fricken brazen!
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding yourself in the ranks of the insane.”
Marcus Aurelius (The Roman one)
I thought that the conspiracy theory talk about a foreign standing army was just that, a conspiracy! But it seems more and more likely that when the shyte hits the fan an unbiased, uncaring foreign army is exactly what you’ll need as the British army,would I’m sure, refuse to take up arms against their own.
So import thousands of foreign young men under the guise of immigration, station them around the country, then offer to pay them and give them the right to stay if they join this new army, but, expel them to Ruwanda if they don’t! How many would refuse? And by the way, the EU human rights act would be ignored this time!
Our own government seems to be planning treachery and treason!
“Our own government seems to be planning treachery and treason!”
And it certainly wouldn’t be the first time those in power (“elected” or otherwise) seek to force their will on the masses.
One might even say it’s the norm…
May ye be without leader – an archos.
I think it’s the Civil Service. The (any) government act on the information they are given. Who gives them that information?
Let me correct this Dinger:
“Our own government seems to be planning treachery and treason!”
Our own government is committing treachery and treason and has been for many years.
And on the subject of importing an army myself and ebg have been making this point for well over twelve months and repeatedly.
I agreeingly stand corrected!👍
Soon people won’t have a choice. Germany closing down its final nuclear plants, the UK demolishing it’s coal fired power stations. Those can’t be replaced overnight. Nor can fracking resume immediately or North Sea drilling. A quick thought experiment: Winter 2023/24 is particularly cold (and low wind speeds prevail), the UK, Germany, Holland etc all have major power grid failures due to insufficient electricity generation, millions of homes are cut off for days on end as National Grid battle to avert brownouts. The government collapses and a general election is called. On a tidal wave of public resentment Reclaim are elected with a super-majority and start the task of fixing the situation, but what can they do? There is a massive recession as electricity prices have skyrocketed making 80% of small businesses unviable. Borrowing costs are through the roof and Government bonds are downgraded to junk status. So what can they do? Fracking needs investment which isn’t for coming and requires minimum 6 months even at ‘warp speed’. North Sea investment was allowed to dwindle and the big players in the market are not interested due to ESG and the government won’t guarantee prices so no North Sea gas increase… Read more »
…but it will have been worth it…we will have shown the evil ones (put country of choice here) the error of their ways….….slaver youkrani….and all that…
Can’t fault any of that although I have been making similar warnings for over 18 months.
One slight omission – the depopulation agenda. If national populations are halved – Deagel threatens worse by 2025 – but let’s assume 2030 the pot will have shrunk just as the population numbers have.
2035: the end of civilisation: Where is energy policy taking
https://thecritic.co.uk/2035-the-end-of-civilisation/
A first class piece of real in-depth journalism.
Is the negligence and stupidity of parliamentarians down to ignorance alone? Actually for the likes of the climate committee I think it is but I suspect those at the top such as Fishy and Chunt are more than aware of the real agenda; they are simply happy for the minions to play games.
However, if the Deagel forecasts become reality then all the worries outlined in the above article become irrelevant.
Now there’s a rabbit hole I hadn’t fallen into before. For some context to your comment for other readers, here’s a link: https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/
Yet another piece of weirdness that sits unexplained until it gradually fades out of the consciousness of everybody but a few, where it lingers in the back of the mind unsorted until a way can be found to reconcile it.
Thank you for the link.
The 2025 population forecasts are disturbing. Here are just 3 examples and they appear to extraordinary drops in populations in G7 countries.
China
2017 – 1.4 billion
2025 – 1.4 billion
USA
2016 – 324 million
2025 – 54 million
UK
2016 – 66 million
2025 – 15 million
And there is this from Ivor Cummins:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_41PQ9_Y9Q
Catastrophic Contagion 2025 – Mark the Date, and Be Ready!
In addition, there has been zero indication that any gain of function testing has been stopped.
Thank you for posting that article, it’s about the most lucid assessment of the coming UK energy train wreck I’ve seen outside of this site. Here’s another related article in The Critic readers might find enlightening (or worrying): https://thecritic.co.uk/british-energy-planning-a-horror-story/ The rough 60 year cycle in warming and cooling of global temperatures has been partly obscured by pathological meddling with temperature datasets to match model outputs. Despite this, it seems clear that regardless of human contribution, we’re heading into another cooling phase in the next decade or so – even climate alarmists will occasionally mumble agreement to this. If this coincides with a total (or even majority) reliance on the electricity grid for both heating and transport, the current trajectory makes catastrophe a certainty, as warm living space for possibly millions of people will need to be found during blackouts. If this also coincides with the economic hardship that the green blob is currently trying to inure us to, there will be death on a massive scale (and following this, violence), as societal altruism won’t be a priority. The problem isn’t just generation capacity either. Something never discussed is the danger of concentration into fewer and more consequential points of failure… Read more »
Absolutely first class post. 👍
This article is spot on. However, in addition to the insane objectives of Net Zero, what’s not getting enough attention are the authoritarian psychological measures being planned to get us to accept this nonsense.
Regulating advertising, influencing TV drama and news content, intervention in many markets to edit the consumer choice environment. It’s Orwell and Huxley all wrapped up together.
https://davidturver.substack.com/p/net-zero-behaviour-change-mind-games
“The best way to keep a prisoner from escaping is to make sure he never knows he’s in a prison.”
Fyodor Dostoevsky
Ѳедоръ Достоевскій
An excellent sub article. Thanks 👍
In some ways I’m awed by the seamless marketing job the neo-Malthusians have done – as William Casey of the CIA said “We’ll know we’ve done our job when nothing the American people believe is true”.
Solar panels, wind turbines or electric batteries all employ destructive extraction methods, socially exploitative mining techniques, and are carbon neutral only during use – not including either their manufacture or decommissioning, both of which are subsidised by the taxpayer.
It is the classic tragedy of the commons, privatising the profits and socialising the costs.
Feels as if there is a race on – How to wake people up before the totalitarians shut down free speech?
We can’t. Most are sheep and will remain so forever. The ones who wake up, wake up for themselves. Who knows how that happens? It’s the lightbulb moment, the final syllable of the final line in the final scene of the final act of a very long play. Then a new life awaits.
Godspeed to all!
The “Climate Change (2050 Target Amendment) order 2019. ————This was an amendment to the “Climate Change Act 2008 Miliband”, that forced us in law to reduce emissions by 80% of 1990 levels by 2050. But this new amendment tabled by Teresa May would make it that we had to be NET ZERO by 2050 instead. Incredibly this was waved through parliament without a vote and not a single question asked by any MP of any major party as to the cost and benefit. ——(Except I think one labour MP) How is it possible to approve on mass something like this when there is no one who knows how it can possibly be achieved and no one seems concerned about the massive cost which is estimated to be in the trillions? ——–Question 1—– How can it be achieved? —Answer ——Don’t know. Question 2——How much will it cost——–Answer——Don’t know.—————- Most of the technology required to achieve this absurdity has not even been invented yet. It would actually be very very funny if was not so totally absurd. We often hear of the risks of keeping using fossil fuels, but we never ever hear about the risk of NOT using them, and that… Read more »
“How is it possible to approve on mass something like this when there is no one who knows how it can possibly be achieved and no one seems concerned about the massive cost which is estimated to be in the trillions?”
This sentiment could equally have been applied to JFK’s 1962 speech committing the USA to send a rocket to the moon by the end of the decade. Sometimes you need to set a goal without having any idea about how it might be achieved, and simply let ingenuity and creativity do their magic. Fast forward to July 1969 … and the rest is history. Or is it?
Hi the difference though was additive in that the Americans were not set to loose out directly by this policy .What is being proposed is restriction and withdrawal of basic 20th century modern economy benefits PRIOR to any great invention/discovery .
If a “thing ” is invented that can do all this great .But we should not all be standing in a metophorical Cold dark Nett Zero cave waiting for this to arrive .
Also on a sidenote if such a “thing” was invented what benefits would come to UK and its population?
Based on past performance we might invent it but all the commercial benefits will go elsewhere ..
Thanks, Sinor – I agree with everything you say.
My comment was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek and provocative, since I am on balance of the view that the 1969 moon landing was faked by the Americans. I don’t think it is a good way to proceed at all – to set out a crazy objective and timeframe and simply assume it will happen if you throw lots of money and people at the problem.
I would watch those tongue in cheek comments if I were you.— I presume your opinion that man never went to the moon is tongue and cheek as well. But if not, then perhaps the Russians were just as daft as you and also fell for that idea. But since they stopped it being watched on Russian TV somehow I don’t think they did.
I agree that I need to watch tongue-in-cheek comments – this one clearly didn’t land (pun intended) as I had hoped.
But, I am not clear what you mean by your Russian reference. I am not sure what is proven or demonstrated by the fact that the Russians didn’t broadcast the moon landing (faked or not) on Russian TV.
Do I have to spell it out for you? It seems like I do. ——–The Russians didn’t want their citizens to see the Americans beating them to the moon. —–That isn’t evidence of anything, but do you really think that if the Americans never really landed on the moon the Russians would not know that? ——-But hey lets cut out the failed puns and get ourselves in a tizzy about nothing. ——-Man landed on the moon and that is the end of it.
Of course the Russians and Chinese would know if the Americans had not actually landed on the moon. But the fact that they haven’t gone public with that fact (if indeed it is one) is not itself proof that the moon landing did take place, as you seem to imply. If a blackmailer knows something embarrassing about you, it would be more profitable for him to threaten to disclose that fact than actually to disclose it.
How certain are you on a scale of 100 that the July 1969 moon landing actually happened? Sounds like you are at 100?
The technology to get the moon already existed, and sending men to the moon didn’t impoverish anyone. When the USA sent men to the moon they didn’t have to rip out perfectly good central heating and fob people off with a heat pump that will only give them some tepid water for their shower.. They didn’t have to get rid of perfectly good petrol and diesel vehicles. They didn’t have to stop people eating protein filled meat. They didn’t have to try and stop them flying to Hawaii or Florida for a holiday. Sending men to the moon was not based on the idea that something terrible was about to happen because computer models full of assumptions in lieu of any evidence were wheeled out ———–Nope sending men to the moon has nothing in common with NET ZERO. ——Your analogy is a bad one.
“catastrophic for the economy, and for Government finances already reeling from the pandemic.”
A fine and straightforward article but will writers please wake up and get the easy kicks in as they present themselves:
“catastrophic for the economy, and for Government finances already reeling from” the criminal impacts of pointless lockdowns.
Does anyone actually think they are going to stop this nonsense voluntarily?
There is no evidence, at all, in fact quite the contrary, that at a policy level that they are doing anything differently.
The UN Agenda 2030 is still written into UK law and I have seen nothing that makes me think they are even thinking about changing tack.
The EU is even worse….
I have accepted that I don’t live in anything like a democracy….no one, at a local or national level, are doing anything that the vast majority of the public want….in fact they are openly showing their utter contempt for the population. And even worse, as the Australia-Moderna article shows, they are actually colluding with ‘companies’ and doing people real harm….the fact that people might freeze and starve because of their policies just doesn’t seem to register…
As Wolfie Smith would say…’come the revolution, brother…’
Cough…
Today 10.4% renewablesOnly another 89.6% to go…
If people wake up gradually to one scam does that mean they’re more likely to wake up to others? One would hope the ”waking up” process equates to a general return of critical thinking abilities and a healthy distrust of any narrative pushed by the government, NGOs etc. A bit like the death jabs, why would you be anti-clot shot but never question any other Big Pharma injections? The criminality of these manufacturers is now irrefutable fact. ”Two recent polls have found that despite relentless propaganda promoting the man-made global warming narrative, climate change skepticism is growing globally. A survey conducted by a group within the University of Chicago asked Americans whether humans were causing all or most of climate change. Whereas 60 per cent held this belief five years ago, that figure has now slumped to 49 per cent. A recent IPSOS poll which covered two-thirds of the world’s population also found that nearly four people in every 10 believe climate change is mainly due to natural causes. “Perhaps the most surprising statistic from the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) survey is that 70% of Americans are unwilling to spend more than $2.50 a week… Read more »
Yep, saw this over a week ago. Obviously not on the venerable Technocracy News. Good post Mogs.
Brexit was not a psychological breakdown, essentially bovine, it was a logical first step towards restoring our democracy with a view to improving living standards. The second step is to vote for parties that do not support the elites agenda. This is what the elites are so terrified of and why they are desperate to control the media, both online and terrestrial, and why we should stand up for free speech.
Meant to post on ‘Populism’ article duh
You give custodianship of these matters to the most ruthless entities on the planet, the multinationals, like what happened in 1992 and you seriously expect a beneficial outcome? This is absurd. The fact that we were credulous enough to go along with that, even if purely by ignorance or acquiescence does deserve some chastisement.I hope we have learned this lesson most broadly because that period from 1982-1995 was one of gross indecency on the part of western societies or at least for those who consider themselves to me mensches.
… climate catastrophism is simply the latest manifestation of mankind’s habitual tendency to totalitarianism.
Great stuff. This should be printed on to a tee shirt.
Don’t worry folks Bozo. Came out with. “We’ll become the Saudi Arabia of Wind”. The elite are always good for a laugh 😃
A plea for objectivity in the DS editing standards for Toby et al.
Can you please stop using the word “renewables” and replace it with “unreliables”?
👍👍👍
“They will instead return to the path they have chosen in the past, the path to liberty and prosperity.”
I truly hope so. Unfortunately, in the past many well educated (whatever that means) and ‘clever’ people have been led to mass poverty, starvation and death, and without effective resistance: The Jonestown massacre; Pol Pot; the Great Leap Forward; the Holodomor, for example. In the case of the Jonestown massacre, all within the camp were instructed to take cyanide and commit suicide, with parents administering the cyanide to their children first. Over 900 men, women and children perished with only 80 surviving. All those 900 remained committed to the cult and did not snap out of it.
The simple question is, are we all being incorporated/recruited into a vast global cult and how many have been mentally captured? Did any of the Covid lockdown rules and strategies make sense and how were dissent, and anyone that wanted to leave the ‘group’, dealt with. And then there’s Greta and XR and all their demands. How do they take criticism?
Jonestown Part 7 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX_Ug8DWrUc
Jonestown Part 8 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu8U30O9jrQ