After Three Disastrous Years, the NHS Covid App Has Finally Been Put Out of its Misery
The NHS Covid App, which has been put out of its misery at the age of three, was an example of the Government thinking that technology is the answer to every problem, only to then waste billions on an IT project that doesn’t work.
The idea was simple. If at least 50% of the U.K. population would install an app on their phones, it could use Bluetooth to detect proximity of its users and alert them if they had been close to someone who later tested positive for COVID-19. What could possibly go wrong?
An NHSX development team was assembled in March 2020 and it only took two months for it to show all the signs of a typical government IT project. It started with huge publicity in the press and broadcast media and progressed to the inevitable pilot scheme (on the Isle of Wight) quickly followed by Matt Hancock having to backpedal on the rollout date. Heads rolled at NHSX with managers Matthew Gould and Geraint Lewis ‘stepping back’, former Ocado and Apple executive Simon Thompson being drafted in, and development transferred to the Switzerland-based Zühlke Group. Personnel was only one of its problems. It had a centralised design which raised security concerns and led to a public letter of concern from security experts. More damning was the problem that it could not access Bluetooth with the screen locked. Solving that problem would mean doing things the way Apple and Google wanted them done and that ruled out a centralised design. So, by the end of June the app had been scrapped and Lord Bethell could only say that the release would be some time “in the winter”. Under intense media pressure the app was redesigned according to Apple and Google’s specifications and by September 24th it was ready for launch.
With wild claims such as “for every one to two people who download the app, an infection could be prevented” it enjoyed six million downloads on its first day with the app second only to Zoom in U.K. app stores. Even if you didn’t want it on your phone, it became hard to avoid with scanners in shops, pubs and restaurants becoming part of all our lives. Was venue check-in effective? As I pointed out at the time in Lockdown Sceptics, despite millions of check-ins in thousands of venues, only four had been flagged as risky by the end of October 2020. But never mind the data, NHSX claimed that venue QR codes “will help avoid the reintroduction of lockdown measures and support the country to return to a normal way of life”. Two further national lockdowns followed.
Not living up to politicians’ propaganda is one thing; doing serious damage to the economy is another. By July 2021, a combination of mass adoption of the app and relaxation of social distancing following ‘Freedom Day’ led to what became known as the pingdemic. So many people were isolating that trains were cancelled through lack of staff and there were food shortages in supermarkets. Even the Prime Minister had to take time out. The Chief Executive of M&S said the chain had “a major issue” and the Managing Director of Iceland said: “We are in the unprecedented position of having to close stores due to staff absences – not because of COVID-19, but because of a broken and disruptive Track and Trace app.”
Despite causing economic and social carnage the app was not disabled or withdrawn. Like so many other policies rolled out during the pandemic, it was a simplistic idea that the Government went all-in on and then could not abandon despite all the evidence against. April 27th 2023 will be its last day, but will anyone mourn its passing?
The author is a tech wizard who would prefer to remain anonymous. He has written many anonymous articles for this site.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Not sure they really thought it was the answer to “Covid”. It made for good theatre, juicy contracts for cronies and normalising state tracking of its citizens.
BINGO
Thank you for a very concise and accurate summary tof…
“And it’s good night from him…
😀😀😀
Reculer pour mieux avancer.
Lessons learned, basic data and foundations in place for social credit scores via digital IDs and CBDCs.
Betcha.
Very possibly.
Or maybe it’s the end of track and trace delusions for a long while.
In both scenarios, this would be the first step.
Let’s see. For now I’m celebrating.
It might be vaguely interesting to see the accounts of the organisations that benefited from it. I never used it – didn’t have a phone that could in those days, but I don’t think I’d be conned into using it at all. It was teetering at the brink of breaching into GDPR, and misusing the transmission technique as well.
Never gave it a thought. Well I suppose I did – GTF!
You can bet the source code won’t be deleted, merely archived.
What was the cost of this, something in the region of £37 billion.
To put into perspective, the most science experiment in our history is the JWST, a snip at $10 billion.
37bn was the cost of track & trace. The testing kits, the test centres, the labs, the app was just one part of it. But ultimately it was all pointless for a disease with an IFR similar to or lower than flu.
And some of this £37 bill. went on traffic infrastructure to cement the ULEZ etc.
JWST?
James Webb Space Telescope.
Thanks. Not that I am any the wiser.
“it could use Bluetooth to detect proximity of its users and alert them if they had been close to someone who later tested positive for COVID-19.”
“With wild claims such as “for every one to two people who download the app, an infection could be prevented”
A correction: there was no test for Covid, the tests were for presence of viral fragments, real or artefact. Not the same thing.
Transmission works if A is infectious and B is in contact with A. B knowing some time after, that A (might) have been infectious won’t stop B being infected. Too late.
I have read that in Ayurvedic and Traditional Chinese medicine teachings and practice the concept of contagion does not even exist.
Can we have our money back, then?
😀😀😀
I’ll have to take on trust the claim that it didn’t work, as I have never downloaded it.
I suspect that a real lot of smart government projects (smart usually meaning Uses computers for supposedly intelligent control of supposedly stupid masses) are really nothing but clever IT salesreps selling stuff everyone in IT knows to be unworkable, obsolete or broken to politicians who don’t.
Unworkable Can be made to work in small-scale experiments but will collapse in the real world.
Obsolete Has been discarded as superior technologies emerged, eg, intelligent network packet steering, as opposed to best effort packet switching, the technical underpinning of the internet.
Broken Software equivalent of the perpetuum mobile. Great idea if it wasn’t impossible to create,
An NHS IT project being a waste of money, again, surely not?!
It is impossible to spend the billions that were spent, on a software ph9ne app in that short period oof time. Britain could have built 2 aircraft carriers or sent a man to the moon. How much of that m9ney went to fraudulent claims and cronies? That is the only way that so much could be spent in such a short period of time. An audit and investigation should be held to expose the corruption.