Covid Vaccines Must Be Suspended and a Full Inquiry Launched into How They Were Approved, Say Experts
COVID-19 vaccines must be suspended owing to the level of reported injuries and deaths across all age groups and a full inquiry launched into the MHRA, the regulator which approved them, a group of experts has said.
In a groundbreaking new report sent to every member of Parliament, the Perseus group – a team of experts from the fields of medicine, pharmaceutical regulation and safety management – has set out in detail the numerous concerns raised by experts globally about the vaccines and the specific concerns about the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) responsible for giving them the green light.
“MHRA announced that it has morphed from ‘watchdog’ to ‘enabler’. Would anyone be concerned if that was said by the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the Civil Aviation Authority or the Defence Safety Regulator,” Perseus group spokesman Nick Hunt said.
The evident lack of interest in post-rollout issues with the COVID-19 vaccines was highlighted as particularly shocking.
Before the rollout in December 2020 the MHRA promised a rigorous “four-strand proactive vigilance” of Covid vaccine safety. But freedom of information requests have revealed that very little of this work is being done. The single report supplied from the “Targeted Active Monitoring” strand was 15 months old, from August 2021, the report says.
The group slams the MHRA for failing to act on problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine for months after many other national regulators suspended and withdrew it for certain age groups. The MHRA also continued to ignore “ever increasing evidence of Covid vaccine risks, notably blood clotting, heart inflammation, neurological conditions, immune downgrading and menstrual disorders”, the report states.
The secrecy around Covid vaccines in particular is blasted, with key documents on risks versus benefits that are routinely published for other medicines being absent for Covid vaccines. “This compromised informed consent,” notes the group.
Other problems include that the MHRA authorised the mRNA products as vaccines, which have lower regulatory requirements, rather than properly classifying them as novel genetic products, and that it failed to identify and address problems with manufacturing and quality control, leading to batch quality problems.
More general criticisms of the agency include that it assesses the safety of a medicine relative to its benefit rather than in absolute terms, which the report likens to the Nuclear Regulator saying, “Our nuclear power station is safe because it has fewer contaminated water leaks than other stations”.
The regulator also nowhere defines the tolerable rate of fatal and serious side-effects of new medicines, which the report blames for its slowness to act when problems emerge.
Freedom of information requests also reveal, alarmingly, that the MHRA has no process for investigating Yellow Card reports of adverse events potentially linked to the COVID-19 vaccines or other medicines. This, the report highlights, is just one facet of a broader lack of the kind of robust safety management systems and processes that are standard in other safety critical sectors such as aviation, defence, nuclear, oil and gas and rail. Similarly, freedom of information requests reveal that there has never been a safety audit of MHRA.
The report’s findings are damning and expose a regulator not fit for purpose and clearly failing in its basic aim of keeping the public safe from harmful medical products.
Concerns about the MHRA are nothing new. The 2020 Cumberlege report listed basic safety and governance issues that the Commons Health Select Committee in December 2022 noted with concern were slow in being addressed. But the new Perseus group report lays out in devastating detail for the first time how the MHRA’s longstanding failings have directly impacted on the disastrous rollout of the Covid vaccines.
The Perseus group suggests that anyone who shares its concerns could write to his or her MP to ask if they have read the report and what they intend to do. Other suggested actions include signing the petition to “Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for COVID-19 vaccines” and signing the open letter to the Health Secretary organised by the Together Declaration.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I agree with the sentiment, and the proposal that they should not be used at all. I’m bound to say that I said no, right from the start, and am rather glad about my choice in March 2021. “Full Inquiries” have a nasty habit of being a smokescreen , but the mechanics of issuing Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) is fairly well understood by those wise enough to understand why it was done. That, and alongside the manipulation of the definition of “vaccine” so that it could be defined as such, made it possible to step aside from normal protocols for approving the use of a novel pharmaceutical product. Then money talks.
Spot on. EUA suspended all rights and turned Parle-ment into Pharma-ment.
Everyone knows the MHRA is funded by criminal Pharma and Kill Gates. Yet no one cares. As you said money talks and $cience is simply Scientism ie totalitarian with one answer ruling them all.
And the MHRA’s June Raine needs to be held to account. She has been delivering presentation talks showing bar charts for each region of the country for 2019, 2020 and 2021, showing decreasing yellow card reports per 100,000 of the population each year. But the bar charts simply and unbelievably omit to include Covid vaccine reports, which of course, if included, show a MASSIVE increase for 2021. She then has a small text footnote on another slide entirely kind of indicating this data has been omitted (but not clearly). The level of deliberate deception involved to doctor the data this way is simply mind boggling and in my (non-lawyer) opinion crosses into the criminal. Surely the fact work has to be done to remove this data shows: 1. an amateur clown-world level cover-up 2. knowing criminal negligence (if she wasn’t already in the territory of criminal negligence based on the failure to properly assess safety prior to release). 3. fear for what she has done here’s the presentation and, later in the thread, how the bar chart should really look: https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1647993156472848384?s=42&t=e1a40-oKfYwkLVmcZ2sMaQ [correction: I misremembered the detail, the small print wasn’t even out on another slide but was uncovered by Prof… Read more »
Good work but “misremembered” has no place in our lexicon. We must not surrender our language to that of our killers.
The absence of “robust safety management systems” is a bit like a red rag to a bull with me, being a retired engineer in an industry where safety integrity levels associated with novel systems was the norm, generally in compliance with IEC 61508. If anyone is interested, look up the term “safety integrity level”, and the IEC 61508 standard. Maybe there is something similar in the pharmaceutical trade, but in any case, the simplistic use of terms like “safe and effective” are not best practice.
Remember how they lied to us about Covid being the disease to bring us to the brink of civilisational collapse? And how they used the telly, the government bought legacy media and the deep state weaponised social media to stifle dissent?
Well now they have their emergency alert system which will render your phone temporarily unusable unless you disable the feature before Sunday.
The first real emergency that this system will alert us to will be of an imminent nuclear attack from Mad Bad Vlad and the pesky Russkies.
The (fake) conflict with Ukraine (for which there still appears to be no battle footage despite the entire world now possessing mobile phones with cameras) is nearing its inevitable conclusion:
Fake nuclear war.
The munificent government will insist we must all shelter at home and await their assistance.
They’re already softening us up to expect it!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/#source=refresh
At risk of sounding like a broken record, there’s not a snowball in hell’s chance these death shots will ever be paused, let alone a proper, independent investigation take place. Why would they do that? If they were going to out of good conscience and because medical ethics still meant a damn thing then they would have done so early on in the deployment, when the data started rolling in that people were dying of ‘coincidence’. It’s just a sick joke and it gets a bit tedious hearing people bleating on about it when they know it’ll never happen due to countless other vaccines converting to mRNA, so they’re hardly going to admit to problems with safety now are they? We’ve got ‘vaccines’ developed in 100 days to look forward to, which won’t have any safety/biodistribution studies done on them, just keep that lucrative gravy train rolling.. Australia is a good illustration of just how dire things are post-bioweapon deployment. How the chuff can a country have such massive excess deaths *after* the silver-bullet, life-saving dream jabs were launched as opposed to no jabs and a deadly virus running amok? Seriously.. ”The data reveals the following: Australia suffered 11,068 excess… Read more »
Thanks Will for raising this. Is a well written report and a quick read for those who haven’t yet, as far as it goes. What June Raine deserves is not printable.
What the report should have demanded is sight of the contracts signed by HMG on our behalf. If other countries’ contracts are a guide, military bases are forfeit in the case of non-payment. This is consistent with Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt ‘s findings that these are US DOD contracted and manufactured bioweapons.
If you are interested in digging deeper Will, both have excellent, free access substacks, have done numerous interviews together and SL with RFK Jr, available on Childerns Health Defense site, also open access.
Indeed, it is outrageous that to this day the contracts signed by health ministers and pharma companies have not been published or made available for perusal, even by a country’s parliament. There is no excuse for this – these contracts were signed (in theory) on behalf of the people and are paid for by the people – the people’s representatives have both the right and obligation to review the contracts. The fact that they have not been made public means they have something to hide. I read something recently about the contract Ursi fond of Lying signed on behalf of the entire EU with her close buddy Bourla. The future product ordered has to be purchased, regardless of whether it is wanted, regardless of whether it has even yet been produced. I suspect this is true. Some 2 years back I saw what was said to be a leaked version of the Israeli contract and it had a clause that pretty much came down to that – payment had to be made, regardless of whether the product was wanted, delivered or even produced, regardless of whether the product proved to be completely ineffective, regardless of whether it had proven to… Read more »
The jabs only ever made any sense if they were intended to significantly reduce life expectancy and fertlity.
Anybody who is “shocked” at the “lack of interest in post-rollout issues” is in deep denial.
I’m not shocked that those who pushed this poison don’t want to look into the harm it’s caused. I am, however, appalled that opposition politicians, health experts and media do not question the known fact that the health regulators have, by their own admission, done pretty much f-all in terms of following up on AEs, etc.
There is no longer any opposition.
“In the future, medicines, will come to market quicker with less data, with more research being conducted in the post-license phase.”Sir Patrick Vallance (26 November 2014)’
You first Patrick, old bean.
Were we not in Clown World – and I include large elements of the Legal Profession/CPS/Police in that world, the MHRA and even individuals administering the jab without informed, lol, consent, would be facing Charges/Indictments of Manslaughter/AOABH.
I know this is my pet paper but the dangers of the jabs were known over 2 years ago, and given the MHRA’S level of expertise they SHOULD have been aware of these dangers.
Instead they became “enablers”. :-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
The conversation is exhausted, the only question that remains is when are we going to go all Francias….
1789 that is..
What would Cromwell think of our utterly corrupt and useless Parliament.. He’d be turning in his grave… Well if they left him there that is…
It isn’t rocket science the order went out long ago for a quiet orderly withdrawal.Doesn’t really matter though it achieved the desired result in terms of consolidation of power. The next stage is far uglier. Like Orson Welles and Rita Hayworth in The Lady of Shanghai. Where Orson Welles describes the feeding frenzy of sharks. First they go wild eating the fish and then they become frenzied and start biting each other and finally they are so utterly demented that they start biting at their own stomachs. People often try to argue against truth by saying that surely the elite wouldn’t really poison themselves and their own children but really they would and very easily.
It’s not the current batch of poisons we should be concerned about, it’s the ones currently in production.
According to Dr Mike Yeadon the current batches were trials to enable a finer calibration of the new soups. I see no reason to challenge his thinking.
We ain’t seen nothing yet.
The plans involve the WHO taking global command in May 25.
So I reckon a species-ending pandemic will be declared in late 25, with complete totalitarianism by spring 26.
If you were to calculate the liability based upon compensation for previous vaccines then obviously this one would break the bank. The real difficult situation is yet to come. In the same way that bullets these days are designed to injure not kill. So that two or more other soldiers will be required to remove him from the battlefield.I am sure that you people know these things already.
What is enough I have known two people who have croaked it following vaccination and both were in their forties. Are you taking the piss? Neither of them had any issues before. Do I look like I was born under a Christmas Tree? Some of us live in the real world.I wouldn’t talk from a fantasy realm under current circumstances.Those of you who were involved in this campaign I would like to say that there is mercy but there isn’t. You sewed the wind now reap the whirlwind.
The time frame for people in our country to wise up a bit is running out.I’m all for it I’m just saying thst the way we are going isn’t going to win we will become a conquered country if we are not careful. That is not the way it should be. I don’t want to lecture anyone but lets just work together to keep things going
That was a revolution in waiting in terms of rna. Shot down now of course. And so much came with that agenda too. Just our resistance of the last three years has born fruit beyond out imagining. Because people know on a deeper level about team humanity. If we come together over a campfire offering animal sacrifices then that is okay.
My own experience of the MHRA goes back to 2007 when I was involved in trying to get a drug data sheet adjusted and with my expert team was met with obdurate resistance. As an aside though you will have seen that a doctor’s death was attributed yesterday to vaccination. This was flagged on the medical website Medscape, with an article about the case, but go to the link (https://www.medscape.co.uk/viewarticle/healthy-doctor-died-after-rare-severe-reaction-astrazeneca-2023a100081j?ecd=wnl_tp10_daily_230419_MSCPEDIT_etid5353727&uac=308617HG&impID=5353727&sso=true) and you find it’s been removed for “not meeting editorial standards”. Cover-up?
I’m aware of the double standards of the MHRA. It took the best part of 4 years to reclassify a HRT product from POM to P. This was a product with 30+ years of safety data. Yet the so called “vaccines” were approved at warp speed with no safety data
I listened to the Perseus discussion on Twitter last night.
One further striking comment was that apparently in the WHO documents regarding vaccine safety regulations, a vaccine needs to be halted if 2 (!) adverse reactions have been reported…..
Tried to find the reference:
https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1247061/retrieve
page 64: adverse event following immunisations needs to be investigated when 2 similar adverse events have been reported.
When reading on, the type of investigations is put into more detail. I could not find any reference to halting the vaccine campaign in the meantime, it appears to be left to national institutions to determine what they do.
I have written to my (Cons) MP numerous times about the whole Covid response including vaccine safety, but just get back the ‘safe and effective’ rhetoric, and that ‘the MRHA has the highest standards’ guff. They don’t care, and just want to brush this whole episode under the carpet. They must fear the ramifications when (not if) they are shown up to have been very wrong, deadly wrong, and actively supported and encouraged a highly dangerous product. We must not let them do that.
MP Andrew Bridgen spoke in a practically empty parliament about this and the chamber was cleared as our despicable politicians didn’t want to hear what he had to say, which was important information about all politicians’ constituents health. Perhaps they will take note of this report, but I don’t count on it. Our politicians are so useless and by always following their party line they demonstrate they are more interested in their political life than that of the people they are supposed to be representing. It takes individual MP’s like Bridgen who care about these things and risk their career and suffer loosing their party whip for their trouble to demonstrate how politicians should represent the interests of their constituents above that of their crap party.
“Other problems include that the MHRA authorised the mRNA products as vaccines, which have lower regulatory requirements,..”
To me, this is THE problem.
Why is that so?
Who knew that before this whole saga made one aware of it?
Haven’t we always been told the exact opposite, namely that vaccines are so super safe and take so long to develop because safety requirements for vaccines are HIGHER than for drugs when going through the approval process, as they are given to healthy people and children instead of to sick and old ones?!
Why are we quiet about this instead of demanding an immediate reversal of this situation for ALL vaccines?!
In particular, as the mRNA industry is already open about labelling its cancer etc. drugs as vaccines from now on, to use that loophole and skip safety trials.
Are we just mad?!