Mainstream Media’s New Obsession: Labelling Criticism of 15-Minute Cities ‘Conspiracy Theories’

“Conspiracy theories” about 15-minute cities are “false”, “unhinged”, “dangerous” and “not to be believed”, declare mainstream media in unified chorus.

“In recent years, conspiracy theories that were once almost unheard of have spread like wildfire, with a growing number of Australians now sceptical of things like vaccines, 5G and election results,” News.com.au reports in one such article, titled, ‘Inside the 15-minute city conspiracy theory sucking in gullible Australians’.

The article explains that 15-minutes cities (also called Smart Cities) are a commonsense way of attempting to boost liveability for residents. City dwellers in proposed Smart Cities – including Melbourne, Paris, London, Edmonton and Oxford – will have access to everything they need within a 15 to 20-minute walk, cycle or public transport trip, and that’s really all there is to it.

“Anyone who has ever faced a long and painful commute will immediately see the appeal of having the daily essentials at their fingertips,” the article assures readers.

However, “gullible Australians” who cannot appreciate commonsense or convenience have been “sucked in” to a “dangerous conspiracy”. These “unhinged” conspiracy theorists actually believe that Smart Cities are “part of a secret plan by global elites to restrict people’s freedom and movements” – a form of lockdown justified by climate action.

Never mind that Western governments have just spent the past three years abusing their powers with gross overreach and wanton disregard for their citizens’ will or wellbeing, which might make some people nervous about giving government more control over movement, commerce, energy consumption and the like. The article notes that conspiracies about 15-minute cities have been flagged as “false information” on Facebook, so that really settles it, they’re definitely false.

The Victorian Government claims that Smart Cities are a benefits-only proposition, as depicted in the nice pastel coloured infographic on the official Government page detailing plans for Melbourne’s transformation into a Smart City. These plans extend to regional Victoria also. Residents in the Yarra Ranges (just under an hour’s drive from Melbourne) report that their council is already implementing a Smart City Urban Development Framework.

Smart City conspiracy theory reporting comes as the latest micro-meme in the larger meme of ‘cooker watch’ reporting, whereby media outlets clutch pearls and catastrophise over the proliferation of online ‘cookers’ expressing distrust in the government and big corporations.

At the same time as raising the alarm about ‘conspiracy theorists’, the media have relentlessly and without a hint of self-awareness published the most scientifically dubious theories themselves. Some of these false theories include: natural immunity is not effective, when studies have consistently demonstrated otherwise; your vaccine keeps others safe, long after the high level of ‘breakthrough’ infections was plain; Covid vaccines do not affect reproductive health, when the evidence of adverse events points in the other direction; masks reduce the spread of Covid, when no high quality study has found a significant effect; and, there are no safe or effective early treatments of Covid, when numerous studies have identified benefits from repurposed drugs.

In rare edge cases, such as the tragic shooting of Queensland police officers by Nathaniel, Gareth and Stacey Train, most media have been quick to blame conspiracy theorist communities for the violence, hinting at the need for increased regulation of online ‘wrongthink’ in order to prevent further violence. In reality, these things are always complex.

Mainstream media reporting rarely, if at all, addresses the role of the Government in seeding distrust, or of the media’s own role in facilitating the marginalisation and even radicalisation of mentally unstable people like gunman Nathaniel Train. Train lost his job due to his vaccination status, and endured years of social and economic deprivation and isolation imposed by his government, reinforced by a relentless media campaign in which people of his ilk were portrayed as morally bankrupt idiots unworthy of a place in society. Did anyone pause to consider the effects of such policies and campaigns on those who were already mentally vulnerable? Effects like pushing the already marginalised further out to the fringes of society and discourse?

It looks as though the ‘cooker’ contingent in Western populations is not insignificant. The Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report of 2023 found that of 32,000 respondents surveyed across 28 countries, nearly half considered the Government and the media to be sources of ‘false’ or ‘misleading’ information. A quarter of Canadians believe in online ‘conspiracy theories’, according to a large poll conducted in 2021. A Rasmussen Report found that more than a quarter of Americans think that they know someone who died from Covid vaccines, and almost half of Americans believe it is likely that Covid vaccines are driving unexplained deaths. A 2023 peer-reviewed paper titled ‘The role of social circle COVID-19 illness and vaccination experiences in COVID-19 vaccination decisions’ found that almost a quarter of respondents reported that they knew someone who had experienced a severe health problem after Covid vaccination, and that this was a driver of vaccine hesitancy.

The media’s response to the distrust of this fairly significant swathe of the population is typically to belittle, insult and defame them, ad infinitum. Which makes one wonder – who is the media’s ‘news’ aimed at, and what is the goal of such inflammatory content?

So here we go, full steam ahead. Smart Cities are coming whether the people want it or not. The Yarra Ranges council in Victoria has put out a statement warning residents to be, “wary of incorrect information circulating in their communities” about Smart City development in the region, which seems to be advancing despite pushback from the local community. In Oxford, U.K., Heritage Party leader David Kurten says that the majority of the residents do not want the implementation of the Smart City framework, which thus far has focused heavily on surveillance cameras and limitations on free movement. That the Council intends to go ahead with plans regardless of the will of the people, “makes a mockery of democracy”, says Kurten.

What will be interesting to observe as Smart City planning progresses is, what gets implemented first? Better infrastructure and support for small businesses, childcare and playgrounds within local hubs? Or systems and technology to facilitate control of movement, commerce and energy? The Oxford experience hints at the latter.

For the time being, the media’s great obsession with 15-minute city conspiracy theories gives a tell. Anyone raising questions about the great plans being imposed on us is stupid and dangerous, say the mainstream media, delegitimising and shutting down debate. This is how we know that powerful interests are very much invested in Smart Cities moving forward, unopposed.

Rebekah Barnett reports from Western Australia. She holds a BA (Hons First Class) in Communications. Find her work at Dystopian Down Under.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sinor
Sinor
3 years ago

Its all part of the UN inspired Agenda 2030 for the human race and this is a small section of it .Are facts a conspiracy? I think not …

transmissionofflame
3 years ago

As is so often the case these days, the “conspiracy” is in plain sight. Key features of 15 minute cities – limits on personal movement, probably via some kind of tax, so rich people are not unduly affected, and more state interference in our lives.

FerdIII
3 years ago

Barriers, technology, taxes. Coercion first.
What if I:
-want to go to my church which is 20 mins away?
-need to take the young’uns to their footie matches 30 min away?
-need to drive 20 mins to get a mainline train connection?
-don’t live in a city but an ex-urban rural area, but need to access the ‘city’?
-work in a trade or work in a business where I need to travel around?
-drive a truck or transport for a living?
-need to drive my daughter to the private school 30 mins away?
-need to get my roadbike repaired 17 mins away?
-want to take my wife out for a special evening 1 hr away?
-want to take the family and tour the south downs 35 mins away?
-meeting some chums for a pint 16 mins away?

Should I take my electric scooter for the above, road cycle it, or walk? Buses don’t go much of anywhere where we live.

What if….so apparently being caged up in a little area which will never provide ‘what we need’ is ‘freedom’ and saving this and that….No it is what it is. A prison.

ebygum
3 years ago

The thing is if I had local lovely parks and green spaces, convenient local shops, a brilliant bus, tram, train, roads services, sports facilities, good schools, a doctors and a dentist and lots of interesting, creative, well paid jobs I could apply for …. And all within fifteen minutes of my ‘affordable’ home ……as this promises ….I would use them, and so would everyone else…it would be brilliant….
So why would you need to coerce, threaten and force us?

The reason for the force is that the reality is that none of those things are in place, and it’s typical of how things works in this country…climate lockdown first, then you may, but most likely will not, get a fraction of what is promised. But the lockdown will be in place….job done…
it isn’t a conspiracy theory it’s a plain obvious fact…..

When all of those wonderful proposals are in place…then I’ll have a think about it, and not before….

Miss Dolly
Miss Dolly
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

They don’t seem interested in making real improvements. Instead the aim seems to be to distract us with Virtual Reality,

“Mark McCann, Belfast’s City Innovation Programme Lead, told Cities Today: “We are not planning a major public launch for the district. Instead, we are developing individual initiatives within the district concept. In delivering each project we will also be strengthening the district’s various functions.”

He said the first initiative in spring or summer this year will be a £1 million (US$1.2 million) collaborative innovation funding call, focusing on the potential of mixed reality (XR) technologies to “re-imagine the city centre experience””

https://cities-today.com/plans-take-shape-for-belfasts-smart-district/

ebygum
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

LOL! Whatever that means, but you are right it’s a perfect example of the nonsense they pretend is going to achieve something real…
as opposed to actual reality…. I’ve been reliably informed by family that one of the three doctor practices in Bridlington will soon be closing..that means there will be two doctors surgeries for around 40.000 people….and they will certainly be more than fifteen minutes away for many, that’s if they can possibly get to see a doctor, which is highly unlikely.
I wonder if they really are so deluded, or just plain stupid?

john1T
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

Smart Cities: How The Elites Plan To Control Us!!
Excellent YouTube video explaining most of what is happening

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

When all of those wonderful proposals are in place…then I’ll have a think about it, and….”

I’ll still tell them ‘you can GTF!’

ebygum
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yes..F right off sound nice in Yorkshire brogue….but I’m a laydee and I was being polite…LOL!

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Nice one ebg.

stewart
3 years ago

The lifecycle of a conspiracy theory:

  1. 1 .It’s the delusion of a few loons and dangerous radicals.
  2. 2. It’s happening but not for the reasons conspiracy theorists say, it’s all for good, honest, reasons.
  3. 3. Yes it’s happening, but it’s the best thing for everyone and anyone who argues that it’s not good for you is a loon and a dangerous radical.

This particular conspiracy theory is in phase 2. Just a few months ago it was in phase 1, when the Oxford city council wasn’t planning a 15 minute city, it was just drawing up some plans to regulate traffic in Oxford.

Phase 3 will be when we get locked down in our 15 minute city and we are told that we are lucky we have it and that thanks to it our lives are going to be saved and anyone who says otherwise will get a visit from the local police precinct, who will take much less than 15 minutes to reach you because they’ll be the only ones with cars.

MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

This particular conspiracy theory is in phase 2. Just a few months ago it was in phase 1, when the Oxford city council wasn’t planning a 15 minute city, it was just drawing up some plans to regulate traffic in Oxford.

The two are quite separate. 15 minute city is one of the concepts behind Oxford City Council’s Local Plan 2040. Like any local authority it draws up development plans which are then subject to extensive consultation and submitted to the DCLG. There is also the Oxford County Council’s plan to introduce traffic filters to reduce traffic.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

I don’t think at this point you are 77 Brigade but your script is seriously wonky.

Your understanding of facts and circumstances is rather juvenile or naiive if I succumb to generosity.

MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Sorry – which part of what I wrote is false?

transmissionofflame
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

I think stewart’s general point is that things move from Statement A “we have no specific plans to do X or Y, just to improve something or other in some unspecified way” to Statement B “we’re going to improve things by doing X and Y”. “Conspiracy theorists” may have pointed out when Statement A was made that the logical or likely conclusion or real agenda behind “we’re going to improve things” was always “we’re going to do X or Y”. It’s a softening up process. My default assumption is that powerful people are lying about their motives and intentions, until proven otherwise. If we’d all taken that view when “covid” started, we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in.

MTF
MTF
3 years ago

Stewart may be right in some instances. But this seems a poor example. The detail (the traffic plan) did not derive from the general concepts (Local Plan 2040). They came from different institutions and operate on different timescales. In any case the traffic plan doesn’t seem so threatening. Various councils have been introducing different traffic restrictions to tackle congestion for decades without anyone suggesting they were part of some conspiracy to limit our personal freedoms.

transmissionofflame
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

Various councils have been introducing different traffic restrictions to tackle congestion for decades without anyone suggesting they were part of some conspiracy to limit our personal freedoms.”

Au contraire I think a lot of people thought that decades ago.

transmissionofflame
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

Various councils have been introducing different traffic restrictions to tackle congestion for decades without anyone suggesting they were part of some conspiracy to limit our personal freedoms.”

Examples of tackling congestion that do not limit freedoms previously enjoyed, or charge for same: building roads, making roads bigger, tweaking layouts/traffic light phases etc to make use of roads more efficient, changing where people park to reduce blockages (and not I refer to changing not removing parking completely or charging for it across the board). Examples of “tackling congestion” whose main aim is not to “tackle congestion” but to make people drive less: Congestion charging, ULEZ, LTNs, residents parking.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Bags over cameras and a puff from a black spray can over a spy lense is not difficult. Not one Gatso speed camera works in the Black Country in the Midlands. Most were set alight by anonymous individuals and never repaired. Only the UK Keystone Cops in stealth speed vans have any traction and even technology flushes them out.

Miss Dolly
Miss Dolly
3 years ago

Improvements happen organically. People see that new innovations are a good idea and they do them naturally, without coercion.

People didn’t have to be forced to buy cars. The government didn’t have to ban horse drawn carts from the roads. And they didn’t have to force people to electrify their houses or install flushing toilets or gas boilers either.

The fact that the government is having to use carrots and ever-larger sticks to try to force people to buy into this eco utopian rubbish says a lot.

Miss Dolly
Miss Dolly
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

P.S. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s all laid out here in Cities Today, their self-congratulatory online global magazine which announces their progress towards their goal of fully smart cities.

https://cities-today.com/category/liveability/

I like to read it to keep an eye on what the enemy are up to.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

Thanks for the link.

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

The problem is the trump card that collectivists always pull out which is: if we don’t all do it, it doesn’t work. That’s the other life cycle we keep seeing, the life cycle of the collectivist pipe dream: 1. Identify a problem that needs resolving. It doesn’t need to be a real problem, it can be completely made up. Or it can be something that is already improving by itself. 2. Formulate a plan to fix it. The plan must consist mostly of a far away goal that is essentially utopian and unachievable. Any detail of what needs to be done should be very vague and under no circumstances contain any detail of the cost. The only cost that needs to be mentioned is the imaginary and highly exaggerated cost.of not doing what happens if we don’t do as the plan says. 3. The plan is defended entirely on moralistic grounds. Not following the plan is evil, following the plan shows care and compassion for others. There is no need to explain or defend the plan in amy different way. The moral argument is the only argument necessary. 4. Essential to the plan is everyone’s participation. It serves both to… Read more »

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

There’s unfortunately actually a counterexample to that: The people on whose behalf the Great Western Railway was constructed bought the Kennet and Avon Canal and shut it down to get rid of this competiton to the planned freigth and passenger service.

ebygum
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

It’s the new way…first you get the stick, with the promise of the carrot…but then you don’t get the carrot, just more stick!

RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

When you see the word “SMART” in the context of a government-controlled “service” substitute the word “CONTROLLED” and you will understand what is intended.

A SMART motorway is a controlled motorway. They are controlling traffic flow; traffic numbers; the drivers and …. in due course …. the cost of using one.

SMART meters are controlled energy.

SMART cities are controlled cities: the population’s movement will be controlled.

It’s no conspiracy; it’s fact.

Resist SMART (15 minute cities) whilst you still can.

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Adopting SMART devices or systems is not necessarily smart – unless you benefit from whatever it is financially, or in some other way. Various definitions of the acronym, without clear explanations of what it is by it’s promoter, no doubt on the assumption that it sounds good.

David101
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Smart, independent minds using thick, subservient technology should be how things are done… not the other way round!

Jonathan M
Jonathan M
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

In fact anything with “Smart” in front of it should be avoided at all costs.
Except Smarties, of course.

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Cracking observation. Applies to phones as well.

Smartphones: the ultimate control technology.

David101
3 years ago

The best point made in the article is about the fact that the first features of “Smart Cities” to be implemented are those that monitor and control movement, i.e. the NPRCs on street corners at which residents have demonstrated their revulsion by means of shopping bags obscuring their Orwellian surveillance.

If the prospect of smart cities really was as rosy and utopian as the picture that is sold to the hapless ovine masses, then why are we not seeing the actual infrastructure put in place that will allow access to all this “local convenience” first? Why on earth is the most important priority to control the movement of residents in their cars? Climate change?

Will we one day inhabit this promised land of uber-convenient life? Will we ever flourish in a 15-minute paradise? Will our porcine friends one day grow appendages of flight and take to the skies?

transmissionofflame
3 years ago
Reply to  David101

Will we one day inhabit this promised land of uber-convenient life?”

In my limited experience (London) most things were very easy to get to. It’s in the nature of cities, and it’s what you trade peace and quiet for. I moved away from London because I no longer prioritise having easy access to everything. I don’t WANT more convenience.

john1T
3 years ago

The elites have an over-inflated opinion of their capabilities. I doubt they could organise a p…up in a brewery let alone a smart city. Unfortunately that will not stop them doing a lot of damage trying.

Miss Dolly
Miss Dolly
3 years ago
Reply to  john1T

Exactly.

Everywhere you look the infrastructure is crumbling. They can’t even build a high speed railway.

They are fantasists who have little experience of building things in the physical world.

Sinor
Sinor
3 years ago
Reply to  Miss Dolly

HS2 is for the birds .They cannot even maintain the potholed and breaking up B roads here in Norfolk that are used every day by many as bus services in the sticks are based on a calender not a watch !!!

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  john1T

Intellectual capabilities – agreed.

But elites don’t get their way because they are clever, they get their way by force. They accumulate enough power to force their self-serving, dystopian ideas on everyone.

As long as they aren’t allowed to accumulate enough power, we’re fine. It’s when they start getting lots of power and using it that things start getting scary.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

As we are seeing in London with the vandalism of ANPR cameras and those ridiculous flower boxes blocking street off; if you ignore your democratic mandate and impose these top-down policies without consent, then they will be treated with the contempt that they deserve.

Sinor
Sinor
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

We need to learn to be more French in these things !!!

john1T
3 years ago
Reply to  Sinor

“Be more French” I never though I would hear that, but I think you are right we should.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

“Smart city” – I am using quotation marks because they are most definitely NOT smart – plans are being rolled out across the world but to state that this confirms a globalist conspiracy is ….erm….another conspiracy. Would that be up to the point where TPTB confirm that the conspiracy was not a conspiracy but merely a coincidence that governments across the world just happened to be working in Lockstep to keep their populations locked up?

Or would it be reasonable to state that the true intention behind the ’40 Cities’ project (head honcho the Next Tuesday Khan), to imprison populations, was the real plan from the beginning?

TonyRS
TonyRS
3 years ago

So our benevolent rulers say we will have access to everything we need.

Who exactly determines what I need, and who gave them a mandate to make that decision for me? More importantly, why should I face obstacles to gaining access to things I want?

Is freedom of movement only going to be open to people who illegally enter other countries to go benefits shopping? The only way this is going to be stopped is to cut the head off the snake by voting out those politicians who are imposing such policies on us, while we still have a vote.

The old bat
3 years ago

And what about rural areas and the predominantly rural counties? We don’t even have a bus service – the nearest bus stop is on a main road two miles away, the nearest supermarket an eight mile drive. I never see any wacky ideas as to how people who live in the back of beyond are going to be brought under control by these faceless bureaucrats (thank goodness).
As there seems to be no actual democratic process going on regarding these decisions, the only answer is direct action. There’s more of us than them!

Sinor
Sinor
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

SPOT ON !!!. I have just opened my pitchfork sharpening service as its all getting rather silly now !!

Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

Everything smart relies on everybody being stupid

Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane 

Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field 
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE

varmint
3 years ago

There is the Official version of reality backed up by “The Science”. Then there is THE REAL WORLD. ——-We are all encouraged and coerced into abandoning the REAL WORLD and living in the phony world of the Liberal Progressive Central Planners who simply declare what is true and then force us all to comply. —First comes the NUDGE. Then comes the PUSH. If we question anything we are “deniers” “right wing extremists” or “conspiracy theorists”. ———Is this what we ever expected the FREE WORLD to turn into?

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
3 years ago

Bags over cameras and a puff from a black spray can over a spy lense is not difficult. Not one Gatso speed camera works in the Black Country in the Midlands. Most were set alight by anonymous individuals and never repaired. Only the UK Keystone Cops in stealth speed vans have any traction and even technology flushes them out.

Epi
Epi
3 years ago

Conspiracy theory eh? So why are they fining people for going outside those 15/20 minute areas?? That to me is ghettoisation. Then they lock you down because your “carbon footprint” is too much.
Also looks like Justin Rowlatt a conspiracy theorist as well!

https://youtu.be/kzQSveSsUjs

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Epi

I have been pointing out for some time that what are being inflicted are ghettos and not cities.

We MUST use appropriate words.

SimCS
3 years ago

Can these 15/20-min ghettos ever work? Think of an example. The council decides a particular ghetto needs more childcare facilities, so give planning permission for one to be set up. Do they also mandate that the staff must live in that same ghetto, as if they don’t and it’s a cold, dark, wet early morning, they will not want to walk or cycle, and the public transport may not have that particular route (and if people are forced onto it, will be very crowded, and slow). The unintended consequences have not been thought through.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  SimCS

The consequences you outline are those intended.

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
3 years ago

I get my information as far as possible from books and other printed publications. According to Patrick M Wood in his ‘Technocracy The Hard Road to World Order’, S.M.A.R.T. means Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Timely. He deals with SMART Cities in great depth and they are not conspiracy theories, they are facts. In the UK the Chinese/British (no such thing as dual nationality in China, but never mind) Smart City expert Dr Wei Yang designs Chinese and British smart cities. Anyone who says these ghastly prisons ruled by social credit scoring are the paranoid fantasies of so-called conspiracy theorists is either very stupid or they think we are deranged enough to accept them. Yes, it is part of Agenda 2030.

GMO
GMO
3 years ago

The problem is not so much as ’15 minute’ cities but the coercion involved.

Those who believe in ’15 minute’ cities have the right to live according to their beliefs but those who do not agree also have the same equal rights to not live and work according to the ’15 minute’ city beliefs and ideology.