Covid Vaccination Linked to 21% Increase in Medical Problems – Nature

Adults have sharply higher risks of being diagnosed with heart, skin and psychiatric conditions for at least 90 days after they receive Covid jabs, a peer-reviewed study of almost 300,000 people in California, published in the leading journal Nature, has shown. Alex Berenson has the details.

The researchers examined new diagnoses given to the same people before and after they were vaccinated to see whether the shots changed the risk of new health problems.

They found that people were about 21% more likely to receive a new diagnosis in the three months after a shot, compared to the three months before. With almost 240 million American adults jabbed, the rise translates into millions of extra new medical problems found in the months after vaccination, and tens of millions worldwide.

Serious conditions such as hypertension were about 25% more likely to be diagnosed in the three months following a shot than the three months before, the researchers found.

Depression, eczema, diabetes, and cellulitis were 10-20% more likely.

Myocarditis diagnoses had the highest additional risk. They were about 2.6 times as likely overall, with an even higher risk in men. Myocarditis is a known side effect of the mRNAs, so the fact it had a particularly high rate of extra diagnoses provides strong evidence that the signal the researchers found was real.

Overall, the researchers reported that the 284,000 Covid-vaccinated adults they examined received almost 6,000 additional diagnoses of health conditions in the 90 days after being jabbed compared to the 90 days before.

With about 237 million American adults vaccinated, that estimate would translate into about five million extra diagnoses for problems like diabetes in the three months following the shots. Worldwide, the number could be up to 25 million.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Dogman
The Dogman
3 years ago

Another paper for the legacy media to diligently ignore. Still, it’s only in a fringe journal.

JayBee
3 years ago

Confirming most sceptics if not even most peoples personal anecdotes, and vice versa.
Maybe the mass awakening is indeed about to start?!
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/on-the-precipice-of-the-great-awakening

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

I’m not sure.

Many people now see all the covid insanity for the scam it was.

But I don’t see anger or frustration. Mostly I see resigned shrugging.

Kind of like an old dog that has got used to getting kicked from time to time and knows that it can bear it, more than anything because it doesn’t have the energy any more to react.

Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Exactly. At least they aren’t wearing the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence.

Mogwai
3 years ago

Although, on a positive note, Dr McCullough is recommending a supplement called ‘nattokinase’, which apparently dissolves the spike protein in the jabbed. Here he cites a study which looks promising. There are many positive comments under the article from people who’ve used this supplement, including professionals who have experience in using it in their practice. I nearly shared the Japanese river worm article but figured this must be a bit easier to come by for all your spike-detoxing needs… ”Far and away the most common question I get from those who took one of the COVID-19 vaccines is: “how do I get this out of my body.” The mRNA and adenoviral DNA products were rolled out with no idea on how or when the body would ever breakdown the genetic code. The synthetic mRNA carried on lipid nanoparticles appears to be resistant to breakdown by human ribonucleases by design so the product would be long-lasting and produce the protein product of interest for a considerable time period. This leaves dissolution of Spike protein as a therapeutic goal for the vaccine injured. With the respiratory infection, Spike is processed and activated by cellular proteases including transmembrane serine protein 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin,… Read more »

True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Thanks for sharing 🙂

True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

NAC is also good as well against the spike protein, as is resveratrol and fisetin.

Mogwai
3 years ago

I’ve never heard of nattokinase, but it appears to be good for lots of things, reading those comments. I’ve not checked online where one would get it, is it just as available as any other supplement? It’s great and important to know there’s hope for the jabbed and they have options. 🙂

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

One badly affected person I know in particular is close to the end of her tether, has researched furiously, has tried a bunch of things and is still suffering from this poison. I’ll pass it on.

Mogwai
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Oooh I’ll answer my own question because I got intrigued. Turns out you can get the stuff all over the place but it’s best to eat the actual whole food. Here’s a cardiologist, who must be a rarity because he’s actually advocating eating whole foods as opposed to taking meds, with the low-down. I’m tempted to hunt some down in the poncey organic supermarket over here if it’s as good as it sounds for you.

https://drjohnday.com/is-nattokinase-the-safest-blood-thinner/

MichaelM
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Thanks for posting – it looks like a true superfood, though not particularly appetising at first glance. Definitely have to give it a try…

The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I bought mine from Amazon.

JASA
JASA
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Serrapeptase is good too.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

Just in case some newby of any influence is reading this, FFS, these are the reasons why :
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

amanuensis
3 years ago

Note that this analysis only counted people who had an interaction with healthcare after their jabs — if any side-effects were below the threshold to consider seeking healthcare advice then they’d not be in the stats. Whether there is sub-clinical-symptoms-threshold damage that causes longer term problems is unknown.

Chris P
Chris P
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Also doesn’t include people who died suddenly and unexpectedly.

Myra
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

And should they not have added a control group of unvaccinated? That would have made this study so much stronger.

Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

I wonder if Phillip Schofield will on This Morning “Why aren’t we hearing about this?”

Stand in the Park 
Make friends & keep sane 

Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field 
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE