The Large Hadron Collider and the War in Ukraine

Russiaโ€™s invasion of Ukraine has prompted its fair share of deranged responses from Western elites, including the Cardiff Philharmonic Orchestraโ€™s decision to remove Tchaikovsky from its program because his masterpiece 1812 commemorates a Russian military victory (from two hundred years ago).

However, perhaps the most inane example of virtue-signalling that does nothing to help Ukraine comes from the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland.

According to the Guardian, no academic papers have been published by the scientists working there since last March. Why? Because some of them object to co-authorship with Russian institutes and โ€œeven with the individuals working for themโ€. In other words: they donโ€™t want to have their names listed on a paper alongside Russian scientists and funding bodies.

One Russian scientist who spoke to the paper mentioned that none of his fellow Russian colleagues โ€œcan accept what Russia is doing in Ukraineโ€. And a British scientist confirmed that some have even signed open letters protesting the war (presumably at some personal risk). Yet this wasnโ€™t enough to pacify the activists.

โ€œMost of my Ukrainian colleagues do not extend responsibility for the invasion to their colleagues from Russian institutes,โ€ the Russian scientist explained. But โ€œsome of my EU colleagues are much more radical.โ€ So itโ€™s not even Ukrainians behind this; itโ€™s Europeans virtue-signalling on their behalf.

As the Guardian notes, more than 70 papers are now stuck in the pipeline, with potential negative consequences for the younger researchers involved: because academia is obsessed with credentials, itโ€™s much harder to get a job if your work doesnโ€™t appear in peer-reviewed journals.

Among Robert K. Mertonโ€™s four norms for ideal scientific practice is โ€œuniversalismโ€ โ€“ the norm that scientists be judged on impersonal criteria. โ€œTo restrict scientific careers on grounds other than lack of competence,โ€ Merton notes, โ€œis to prejudice the furtherance of knowledge.โ€

If every scientist refused to collaborate with people or organisations from countries with objectionable governments, science could never make any progress. Should we have abandoned American scientists during the Iraq war?

Of course, holding up scientific publications because you donโ€™t want your name listed next to a Russian colleagueโ€™s isnโ€™t about helping Ukraine; itโ€™s about sending the message โ€œI am a good person, I deserve to be thought highly ofโ€ (although in my view, it sends the opposite message).

If scientists at the LHC really want to help Ukraine, they could make a private donation to one of the charities working there. Making a fuss about co-authorship, and in the process undermining Mertonโ€™s norm of universalism, doesnโ€™t help anyone. It only hurts science.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian Rons
Editor
3 years ago

Couldn’t agree more.

Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Ian Rons

Stop the Press! ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿ‘

As an aside, how did you comment here at least 12 hours before publication here?

I know, sneak peek.

stewart
3 years ago

It’s one more symptom of the feminisation of society.

This is a very female form of confrontation – social ostracising. A woman who wants to beat down another woman typically won’t confront her directly. She’ll launch a campaign among all her social network of friends against her enemy until that person feels completely ostracised.

Guys are different. They’re more likely to have it out there and then. And even at the end of a punch up, not long after, they might be have a beer and consider the matter settled.

In one you’re more likely to get a big, short violent conflict. In the other, you have a lower intensity, drawn out conflict that never ends and just breeds more and more resentment and hatred.

pan0
pan0
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

What nonsense.

Tiwo
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Another stereotype/truism that’s a stereotype/truism because its observably stereotypical and true.

Men resolve conflict through confrontation and violence. Women solve conflict with passive aggression and weaponised empathy (the guilt trip.)

True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

‘In one youโ€™re more likely to get a big, short violent conflict. In the other, you have a lower intensity, drawn out conflict that never ends and just breeds more and more resentment and hatred.”

The latter can perhaps be called “flatten the curve”, to use the lingua franca of today. Which clearly does more harm than good.

Welcome to the Republic of Passiveaggressiva.

Though I am not sure if it is a gender thing though, more like a personality thing. And also an infantilization thing, for which the only real cure is to treat such folks as adults in every way, good and bad, whether they like it or not.

Tiwo
3 years ago

It may not be a gender thing. Never before in recorded history have man-made environments, food chains and chemicals decimated sperm counts and spiked diseases as much as today. It should be expected that gender dysphoria, sexual abnormality and mental health instability would follow.

All tailwinds for more feminised men as stewart put it.

HumanBeing
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

As a 6′ 1 235 llbs male I have to respectfully dismiss your opinion as a vastly over simplified and frankly purile comparison to the subjext matter at hand.Mate.

Jon Garvey
3 years ago

Xenophobia is a reprehensible trait which, unfortunately, is as well-represented in scientists as in other bigots. That’s why the Quaker pacifist Arthur Eddington was about the only British scientist willing to work on relativity during World War 1, Einstein being one of those Germans well-known to bayonet babies.

Though I suppose, by the enlightened standards of 2023, it was Eddington who was the bigoted Wilhelm-stooge.

Tiwo
3 years ago

How embarrassing that these men of empirical sciences also resort to such dogmatic, supine and spiteful behaviour.

While we’re at CERN lets check in on the joyous opening ceremony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbOldRsITpQ

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

No surprise in this at all. Scientists have always held the moral high ground when it comes to refusing to work with colleagues of different/immoral political persuasion.
Just look at how America refused to embrace Nazi rocket scientists just after WW2 for example…..

ELH
ELH
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

So true and I think they have much of Mengele’s research work – certainly the x-ray film of a person walking…

Mr10Percent
3 years ago

More of following the money “Science”.

Imagine a world where Scientists do research to improve the lot of Mankind rather than roll-over and do what the Government and Corporate “sponsors” wish?

I wish nothing more than a new “Golden age” of humankind development and advancement through science, engineering and mathematics comes soon and washes this rotten mess away. Renaissance II.

I wonder in that Golden Age, scientists who look back and see what relatively little we actually achieved today did because of self-imposed hinderance of their lack of spine in challenging their masters.