Clarkson Fights Back
If you haven’t signed the Free Speech Union’s petition urging the CEO of ITV not to fire Jeremy Clarkson, please do so now. Meanwhile, Clarkson has written a blistering attack on the woke takeover of Britain in today’s Sunday Times. Here’s how it begins:
My son came over for a father-and-son pre-football supper the other day, and as he fussed over the Aga, making a particularly fine stir fry, we laughed about what innocuous word had been banned that day and who’d been cancelled. And then, after a pause, he said with a solemn face, “You do know there’s a war going on, don’t you?”
He wasn’t talking about Ukraine. He was talking about a full-on left-wing campaign to unstitch and burn the fabric of Britain. And the genius is that no one really knows that what they’re doing is serious. We laugh as they change the name of the Sir Francis Drake Primary School to something less slavey. We think it’s all a big joke. But it isn’t.
Think about what typically happens in a military operation and then look what the woke left has done here. It’s seized control of our television and radio stations to such an extent that last week Sophie Raworth said, on the BBC News at Six, with a straight face, “And over now to our LGBT and diversity correspondent …”
And TV drama? Unaffected? Right, and when was the last time you saw a fictional police force hunting a gang of Muslim extremists? It’s always the far right. And it’s the same story in comedy. Say anything you like about Boris or Rishi and the laughter track is turned up to 11. Make a joke about she/him pronouns or Greta Thunberg and they’ll blow a piece of tumbleweed across the stage.
In sport we sometimes have three women doing the punditry at a men’s football match, and if anyone remarks on this on Twitter, they are immediately singled out for the india-rubber treatment. And who’s doing the erasing? Who’s making the rules? That’s just it. We don’t have a clue. What we do know is that, having taken control of the television stations, without a shot being fired, they turned their attention, like any conquering army, to the schools. Here they went fully Pol Pot, doing a comprehensive year-zero job on the curriculum so that kids would know their parents were all racists. Apart from those with “unconscious bias”. Who were racists as well.
You probably think, because you don’t know this war is going on, that when you drop little Johnny off at the school gates he’s going to learn the nine times table that day. No, he isn’t. He’s learning that he might actually be a girl, which is why there are probably tampon dispensers in the boys’ lavatories.
With all this in place, they set about the police, and here they’ve done a tremendous job. Because, so far as I can tell, almost all the officers in the Met — apart from the terrifying number of sexual perverts — are now more wide awake than a frightened fox.
When some young people with green hair glue themselves to the road, large numbers of officers are dispatched to stand around looking at them. And they are only ever removed from the tarmac if they promise to go immediately to the nearest art gallery and throw some soup at a painting.
Has Clarkson been red-pilled by his recent punishment beating at the hands of the progressive thought police?
Worth reading in full.
And don’t forget to sign the petition!
Stop Press: The petition now has 30,000 signatures.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Let’s have an article on the historical cancellation of Tommy Robinson and the jailing of Julian Assange.
Very good points.
Clarkson represents the cuddly side of the “right”.
Robinson and Assange would represent a step too far for most. IIRC Hitchens has attacked the way Assange has been treated but seems to have something of a blind spot with regard to “racism”.
But for now, I will take this. Clarkson has a big following and is a mainstream figure, and what he has written here seems very well put to me.
Respect to JC and my comment on
https://staging.dailysceptic.org/2023/01/20/sign-the-petition-urging-itv-not-to-cancel-jeremy-clarkson/
Clarkson would have fared better going full-on offensive, rather than issuing grovelling mea-culpas to the Sussexes.
Correct. IMHO he should have said: “It’s a joke. If you don’t like it, tough” or words to that effect. You should never apologise, which is basically admitting that they’re right and you’re wrong. Just tell them to stick it.
Struggling to sign up to petition – no email coming in to confirm…and I’ve checked my junk mail. OK, as soon as I posted this, miraculously it came through!
When I try and sign the petition I just get a message saying that the site is not secure (although I can access some sites that are not secure but not all sites) and that cnhg.it sent an invalid response. I know that my internet provider is pretty rubbish (or censoring certain sites someone doesn’t approve of), but is there anything I can do to be able to sign?
I had similar, it seems to be in slow motion. Hopefully sheer weight of numbers wanting to sign.
My confirmation took hours to turn up.
A communist take over of police, civil service, schools avd media has occurred whilst the masses were fast asleep. Their plan to enslave us with energy rationing, because that’s what socialism basically is, permanent rationing by hateful ppl pretending to be virtuous.
https://declassifieduk.org/the-secretive-us-embassy-backed-group-cultivating-the-british-left/
Chunts !!.. The lot of em!
Clarkson needs to keep this up and even ramp up a gear or two.
“Do not go gently in to that good night.”
a very powerful and true piece. Clarkson now needs to drop the green credentials he acquired a while ago and realise that this agenda is the driving force behind much of what we are seeing today.
I can’t help thinking the whole woke agenda obessessed with race and gender and climate, all imaginary problems, is a provoked distraction.
It draws attention away from the truly critical issues like our unsustainable debt, the collapse of the global monetary system and the expanding power of our plutocrats.
As we squabble about wholly unimportant made up issues they are free to do and undo as they please with the matters that are truly important.
And you’d probably be right. Soros funds most of it. One of the biggest tragedies on Earth right now is that excess deaths are currently breaking records and not one of them is George Soros.
I don’t think he’s even on the Death List.
https://deathlist.net/
What a truly awful list.
It is missing all the big names.
Or the myriad of other silly old C-nts running the shit show !!
Don’t be concerned.
If the grim reaper comes a knocking on Georgie’s door you can be sure there will be a charitable fund in place to carry on Georgie’s “good works“.
Possibly, but all of those things are very real problems for those in the firing line – people whose livelihoods are at risk if they say the wrong thing, those who lose despite their merits, and society and civilisation are diminished.
“Clarkson Fights Back” – well done to him, but his fatal error was in apologising to the woke mob in the first place. Never, but never, do that. Ever.
He should start a Joe Rogan type podcast & then he could say what ever he likes ! Until The Online Safety Bill kicks in 🤦🏼♂️
Clarkson has made a career of being needlessly offensive to people, so I regard it as some kind of poetic justice that he’s finally offended someone who can trash him. Personally, I think there are much better recipients of your free speech campaigning out there – I would leave Clarkson to his own devices.
Amazing. Clarkson has managed to string sentences together without abusing anyone.
Probably had help whilst his hands were nailed to the table to stop him messing up again.
Pathetic: “My son came over for a father-and-son pre-football supper the other day, and as he fussed over the Aga, making a particularly fine stir fry”
His daughter did not come over to cook for him. She went public and told us what she thinks of him. His son came over to try to ensure his Dad’s demented scribbling was not wiping out his inheritance.
It is time Jezza quit.
Take a look at this and tell me me I am wrong.
Don’t forget to downvote this comment – click below.
I want to go for the world record of down votes. Help me achieve my ambition. Its what iconoclasts live for.
Hooray. My first down vote for my comment. Arrived within 28 minutes of posting. At that rate it will be less than 500,000 hours to hit a million. Which is a whisker less than 57 years.
Come on people, roll up, roll up and down vote asap. You have got to do better.
Another ambition of mine is to have ambitions.
Only people with ambition can be ambitious.
Why be ambiguous when ambition beckons.
Miserable effort. Only 14 down votes after 3 hours.
Do better!
Only 29 after 11 hours. Hopeless.
Barely 1 every 23 minutes.
Good for Jeremy Clarkson and his son – spot on.
No, I’m not signing the petition. For once let this hugely rich man put principle before lucre.
Good for you Smudger. The Sussexes have a genuine constant fear of violence for themselves and their children just because of who they are. But forget that and let’s all force the Free Speech Union to campaign for the repeal of criminal legislation in the name of Clarkson’s freedom of speech to threaten, abuse, insult and incite hate. Compare the petition with section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986. THE PETITION: “the negative reaction has been completely disproportionate” “these statements were not intended to be taken literally” “just using hyperbole for comedic effect” “much of the outrage ,,,,, has been ‘performative’” “the people expressing it do not appear to really believe Mr Clarkson’s remarks put anyone at risk.” “if they genuinely believe his words posed a danger to the safety of the Duchess of Sussex or women and girls in general ….. why have so many of them repeated those words verbatim in the course of condemning him?” “I hope you are not taking more seriously the complaints about Mr Clarkson because one of the complainants is a Duchess ….. To apportion extra weight to a complaint because the complainant is rich and powerful … would be to send… Read more »
You’d have to go a long way to prove that Clarkson calling for Sparkles to be hammered with doggie-do is going to provoke violence. Hazmat showing off that he bumped off two dozen Taliban is far more likely to get them creamed.
1) You people know no shame nor realise how damaging to the cause of free speech defending Clarkson is; 2) You also avoid facing up to the nasty creepy pervy sexual fantasy Clarkson wrote and substitute “hammered with doggie-do” – bah, pathetic; 3) proving it is not the point; 4) read s4 again for what constitutes the offence. ________________________ 1) It is foolish to set Clarkson up as a poster-boy martyr for free speech. He is soiled goods and this will come back on you. Why? Some for examples: No concern is expressed about the thousands of innocent people and school kids every day subjected constantly to exactly the same kinds of abuse online or to their phones via social media for the same kinds of bullying and abuse that Clarkson epitomises and encourages by his example. And there are those for whom it is too much and take their own lives. Clarkson is the last person the DS or FSU should be standing up for. Freedom of speech and freedom from abuse. Crocodile tears from you all about this multimillionaire “losing his livelihood” are hilarious. Is Clarkson a criminal – I think so. He in any event does not… Read more »
Although no fan of Piers Morgan he didn’t apologise to Meghan. He lost his job or walked off the show and good for him. Clarkson loves gobbing off to his credulous fans but the minute his money income stream is threatened he acts like a big spoilt kid and gives a grovelling apology. What a wimp.
Is he really any different to the money grubbing Sussexs?
Good on yer Smudger. And “gobbing off to his credulous fans” – nice turn of phrase which captures it nicely.
Also, Morgan said he did not believe the Duchess over comments made about her mental health in an interview with Oprah Winfrey.
He did not say:
“I’m unable to sleep as I lie there ….. dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her.”
At least someone knows right from wrong.
Denise Welch fumes as Meghan’s blamed for Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson being ‘sacked’
she fumed: “So it’s Meghan’s fault that they have said disgusting things about her??? Go f…k yourselves!!!”
Why don’t people here know right from wrong? A lot of others seem to.
Quotes below from more people who know right from wrong. Why not people here? There are those of us who joined the FSU because we have experienced hateful online abuse and bullying of the Clarkson kind just for expressing valid views and exercising our right to free speech. Freedom of speech and freedom from abuse. None of you can answer that. None of you can explain what is right about what Clarkson wrote or why he should be allowed to write it. And that is because he should not be and you all know it. _______________________________________ Clarkson’s Daughter Posting on her Instagram page on Sunday, podcast host Emily Clarkson said she supports those “targeted with online hatred”. “My views are and have always been clear when it comes to misogyny, bullying and the treatment of women by the media,” she wrote. “I want to make it very clear that I stand against everything my dad wrote about Meghan Markle.” Newsweek: There was instant condemnation of the words which resulted in 60 British politicians signing a letter calling for action from The Sun’s publishers. Clarkson issued an apology to those he offended on December 19, after his own daughter distanced herself from him and his comments… Read more »
Why would The Offendables ever go near Clarkson’s writing or his TV, if not for the specific risk, or even, purpose, of being offended? Clarkson’s Markle column was as they often are: satirical and clever and funny. It was arguably very un-clever only if it is conceded that in a world where the lunatics run the asylum, it is insane to poke sticks at the morons who rule over us. Like Trump, Jeremy can be … off-putting, but in the face of the existential danger posed by the Biden/Blair/Fauci/Shwaub/Trudeau/Sturgeon/Sunak et al view of the world we need to put aside our little foibles about personality and wtfu (first word wake, then “the” …) and organise our strengths. Jeremy has woken up I hope. The handling of Covid, of Climate, of China and Russia since 1990, are all absolute proof of the domination of left/liberal insanity. It is bringing to destruction the freak of nature which was the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it period when The West reigned supreme. This was the only time in human history – 1950/60’s – when equal opportunity was far from complete but was briefly on a seemingly permanent upward trajectory; grotesque historic injustices were beginning to be recognised and tackled.… Read more »
Lots of words but not much content from Dnacam. To summarise: “Na na na na na – our world to hell in a handbasket because of the woke idiots who rule us.” I’m still waiting for someone to explain why freedom of speech and freedom from abuse should not be the guiding principles of the Free Speech Union and for DS. No one explained why everyone should be free to suppress my freedom of speech by abusing me and attacking me and engaging in hate speech to encourage me to shut up, which has been attempted so often. I will not give up my free speech and be silenced by abusers and haters. Come on you lot – tell me why I should. Stop moaning about “Woke“. You use it complain about everything you don’t like with no idea what it means or represents. Snore, snore, snore. I’m as bored hearing wokism as I am hearing people complaining about it. Take my arguments apart if you can – but so far no one has tried. It is just down-votes from the Sheeple: “Aw, I’ll just click here and make it go away. But don’t ask me to exercise my brain… Read more »
Why would The Offendables ever go near Clarkson’s writing or his TV, if not for the specific risk, or even, purpose, of being offended? Clarkson’s Markle column was as they often are: satirical and clever and funny. It was arguably very un-clever only if it is conceded that in a world where the lunatics run the asylum, it is insane to poke sticks at the morons who rule over us. Like Trump, Jeremy can be … off-putting, but in the face of the existential danger posed by the Biden/Blair/Fauci/Shwaub /Trudeau/Sturgeon/Sunak et al view of the world we need to put aside our little foibles about personality, wake the bleep up and organise our strengths. Jeremy has woken up I hope. The handling of Covid, of Climate, of China and Russia since 1990, are all absolute proof of the domination of left/liberal insanity. It is bringing to destruction the freak of nature which was the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it period when The West reigned supreme. This was the only time in human history – 1950/60’s – when equal opportunity was far from complete but was briefly on a seemingly permanent upward trajectory; grotesque historic injustices were beginning to be recognised and tackled. So how sickly… Read more »
Well, well, well.
I have already answered this from Dnacam and demolished it
https://staging.dailysceptic.org/2023/01/22/clarkson-fights-back/#comment-856427
Instead of meeting my direct challenge to tell me why freedom of speech and freedom from abuse should not be the guiding principles of the Free Speech Union and for DS and how much better is his argument than mine, he just reposts exactly the same comment.
I guess ignoring someone’s free speech is another way to deny it.
But I thought that the DS and the Free Speech Union were interested in supporting and promoting free speech and not destroying it by supporting people like Clarkson who crush other peoples’ free speech by using abuse and hate to try to shut them up.
My direct challenge is to tell me why freedom of speech and freedom from abuse should not be the guiding principles of the Free Speech Union and for DS and how much better is your argument than mine.
Anyone up for it?
Notice how Dnacam creates a category of persons called “The Offendables”. In facf that category is everyone because everyone is capable of being offended by something. His/hers is a new category of Apartheid and a new way of shutting people up. His/her argument is that if anyone can be offended they should not read newspapers or interact with anyone or anything that might cause offence. S/he writes why should “they” [his/her invention of The Offendables] “ever go near Clarkson’s writing or his TV, if not for the specific risk, or even, purpose, of being offended?” So let us turn that around. Why should Clarkson ever be allowed to get into the position of broadcasting or publishing his views to people he intends to offend? So thanks to Dnacam we now have the perfect argument for keeping Jezza off the airwaves, out of print and out of sight. That way he cannot offend anyone. The greatest good for the greatest number. Well done Dnacam, you have just come up with the perfect argument for dealing with Jezza. Shut him up. See – I knew you were not interested in freedom of speech at all. So I think my solution is better – freedom… Read more »
Hey, Jezza. This article by Toby is entitled “Clarkson Fights Back”.
So come on. Come here and answer my arguments and prove me wrong.
You can even use abuse and hate as it seems to be what you know best, but I will call you out on it every time.
I’m responding Iconoclast. He (or she, but I think he) says my long 440 words say nothing. I have since browsed all the comments and realised he totally dominates with very long contributions saying, not nothing, but just one thing: that he has an all-consuming intense hatred of Jeremy Clarkson. To the power of ten! But what I was going to say was: Wow! Is Iconoclast actually responding to what I wrote? Of at least a dozen points he could have addressed, he picks on something I simply did not say. Actually, in essence, the opposite! You know you’ve touched a nerve when rather than deny one of my key points, that the lunatics are running the asylum, he demonstrates that he might be one of the managers. He must know from the essence of my words that I identify the liberal/left’s success in suppressing free speech as at the heart of our current malaise. He keeps returning to the Game of Thrones image. Deeply distasteful as that was, it is NOTHING compared to the catastrophe we see all around us, created by decades of lethally stupid decision-making, rooted in wokeism and virtue-signalling and the censorship of wiser voices. So… Read more »
Ha! Answer coming right up. Watch this space.
The challenge I posed to Jezza Clarkson, and to everyone else was to tell me why freedom of speech and freedom from abuse should not be the guiding principles of the Free Speech Union and for DS and how much better is his/her/their argument than mine. Still no answer. Instead I get strawmen arguments from Dnacam who is the first person I have ever read who can write in what seems to me to be a Dutch accent. A strawman argument is the ploy of substituting what the other person says with something different and then answering that. It of course does not answer the argument at all. So let us see the first “strawman”. Strawman 1 “he has an all-consuming intense hatred of Jeremy Clarkson”. Nowhere in my comments is it possible to find that. It is Dnacam’s pure invention. And he does not answer the challenge. Strawman 2 “he picks on something I simply did not say” “in essence, the opposite”. “the essence of my words that I identify the liberal/left’s success in suppressing free speech as at the heart of our current malaise” Where Dnacam gets that idea from I cannot say because I did not say… Read more »