2022 Was Bad, But Things are Only Going to Get Worse in 2023

Daniel Hannan usually writes optimistic columns at the beginning of a new year, drawing on the statistical data in books like The Rational Optimist and The Better Angels of Our Nature to show that we’re living longer, in better health and generally getting more prosperous with each passing year. Not this time. He’s written a humdinger of a piece saying the Western world is going to hell in a handcart – a decline that didn’t begin in 2020 with the imposition of lockdowns around the world, but which was accelerated by it.

The lockdowns rendered us both grumpy and dependent. Like stroppy teenagers, we rage at the government while expecting it to solve our problems. Cut my fuel bills – and deliver on net zero! Make housing affordable – and don’t build anywhere near me! Pay the public sector more – and bring inflation down! Cut waiting lists – and Hands Off Our NHS! Grow the economy – but don’t expect me back in the office!

If, for the better part of two years, you infantilise voters, using the full force of the law to micromanage their behaviour and paying them to do nothing, you destroy their independence and their readiness to link action and consequence. Everything becomes someone else’s problem.

Consider the current strikes. The public-sector unions that demanded the longest and strictest lockdowns are now complaining because of the inflation that that policy produced. Granting their demands will fuel inflation further. Yet voters support the nurses, teachers, postal workers and even (albeit more narrowly) railway employees.

Why? Because we have largely given up on the concept of trade-offs. Rather than countenance the notion that our economic problems might have something to do with the lockdowns that we ourselves demanded, we airily declare that the fault lies with MPs Who Just Don’t Get It.

A poll published on Thursday showed unalloyed, if unsurprising, gloom about 2023. Only four per cent of people believe the cost of living crisis can be tackled. A word-cloud for people’s expectations is dominated by “difficult”, “worrying”, “challenging”, “scary”, “tough”, “bleak” and “disaster”, as well as several words rendered with asterisks.

There was a time when I’d have dismissed such polls as products of negativity bias, a well-chronicled cognitive failing. For most of my adult life, I have been a rational optimist of the Norberg-Ridley-Pinker school. On past New Year’s Days, I would write columns about how the coming year would be the best in human history. I would dwell on the improvements in longevity and literacy, equality and education, health and wealth, and gently chide readers for their false nostalgia.

Well, not this year. I’m afraid the lockdowns – or, rather, the public support for the lockdowns – knocked it out of me. When, in January 2020, I heard that the Chinese authorities were closing and quarantining cities, I thanked my lucky stars that I lived in a nation where such things were unthinkable. The months that followed taught me some hard truths. It became clear that many of my countrymen couldn’t give two hoots about liberty, either in the abstract or in practice. A horrifying survey in July 2021 showed that, with or without a virus, 26% of people wanted nightclubs closed, 35% wanted travellers quarantined and 40 per cent wanted mandatory facemasks. Incredibly, 19% wanted nightly curfews – to repeat, not in response to Covid, but as a general principle.

No wonder the Truss/Kwarteng attempt to bring the state closer to its pre-2020 size was unpopular. Britain is in the mood for big government. We don’t want deregulation or tax cuts. The words that came into circulation during the lockdown – “hoarder”, “profiteer”, words once associated with autocratic ideologies – still determine our economics. We can be roused against otherwise desirable policies, (building more houses, say) simply by being told that someone will make money from them.

Perhaps the new normal is not so new after all. Perhaps we are reverting to the way things have been for almost all of human history: a strongman at the top, a rapacious elite propping him up, and a passive populace that sees freedom as a threat to security. Putin’s regime would have been recognisable to Amenhotep or Nebuchadnezzar. Indeed, autocracy long precedes written history. For a million years, we lived in kin-groups where some kind of alpha male took decisions and the rest of the tribe lived under a form of collectivism.

In 2011, when Matt Ridley published The Rational Optimist and Steven Pinker The Better Angels of Our Nature, the world had experienced 65 years of progress towards peace, democracy and the rule of law. Yes, that progress was fitful, but the trend was unmissable: we were getting richer, freer and kinder.

Yet it suddenly looks as if 2011 might have been a high-water mark. Every survey tells the same story: at some point during the early 2010s, the movement towards liberal democracy went into reverse. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit’s democracy index, “More than a third of the world’s population live under authoritarian rule while just 6.4 per cent enjoy a full democracy.”

International IDEA uses a different methodology but finds the largely same thing: “The number of countries moving towards authoritarianism is more than double the number moving towards democracy.”

According to Freedom House: “A total of 60 countries suffered declines over the past year, while only 25 improved. As of today, some 38% of the global population live in Not Free countries, the highest proportion since 1997. Only about 20% now live in Free countries.”

All agree that the illiberalism began nearly a decade before the pandemic. The lockdown reinforced the trend, making it seem reasonable to ask the state’s permission before travelling or enjoying your property. Who, in this darkening age, can fail to be a rational pessimist?

Worth reading in full.

Happy New Year!

Stop Press: There’s plenty of irrational pessimism around too! Nostradamus predicted another ‘great war‘ and economic ruin in 2023, according to MailOnline.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

54 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Free Lemming
3 years ago

Agree with the vast majority of this with the exception of “Like stroppy teenagers, we rage at the government while expecting it to solve our problems“. No, I expect the government not to cause our problems.

JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

If only. If government did not cause problems, what would we need them for 😉

nige.oldfart
3 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

I agree with both of you, historically governments were behind the curve, generally playing catch up of where culture and social structure were going. Making laws and regulation about things they had no control over with the intent of being seen to know what they were doing. We all knew they didn’t understand life outside of their insulated environment, and lived in spite of it rather than because of it.

Over the last twenty to thirty years governments have considered themselves to be worthy enough to drive the direction of culture and societies, and as a result consider themselves superior to all those who are not within their academic,social, political circles, and accept only those who concur with them. And it aint going well.

We are being governed by emotive reactions rather than motive discussion. The group hug of altruism and the arrogance of the purported elite will be the source of civilizations own destruction

The Enforcer
The Enforcer
3 years ago
Reply to  nige.oldfart

Spot on. The one aspect not mentioned is that everything now seems to be based on ‘feelings’ not realism. People now comment on how they feel and how they feel threatened by prose. We have become both physically and mentally soft and what we used to call ‘girly’ back in the 50s and that was not seen as mysogynist before one complains.
Quite seriously, I would like to see National Service brought back; a substantial reduction of university numbers with an equal rise in technical colleges again; protection of marriage values with corresponding tax allowances and more power given to local communities.
This might be viewed by the Progressive Left as going backwards but they would say that, as they would lose power, but the country would thrive again.

True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
3 years ago
Reply to  The Enforcer

If by National Service you mean conscription, I would say that is an inherently authoritarian solution in search of a problem. Look at the countries that still have it to one degree or another, and tell me that it hasn’t made them just as likely if not more so to have fallen victim to COVID tyranny all the same.

The Enforcer
The Enforcer
3 years ago

You make a good point but the influnce would be about instilling discipline of mind and body and patriotism; both of which are sadly lacking in the Progressive’s mind set. The ‘fluffy’ attitudes that pertain through socirty have weakened our resolve to combat the debacle of lockdowns and not following through with democratic decisions like Brexit.

JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago

Illiberalism started taking hold with the spread of anti-social media and went into orbit with the ‘smartphone’ – the smarter the phone became, the dumber the person holding it will become, would appear to have been the motto of the inventors.

All wannabe dictators know that propaganda is key and seized upon the wonderful opportunities provided to them through anti-social media. I doubt anything much has changed in human nature, be it the sheeples that like to be herded or the wannabe dictators that get off on herding. Most people don’t like thinking for themselves; for a fair number that don’t mind giving it a shot every now and again, the relentless and ubiquitous propaganda made them assume they must have got it wrong – if literally everyone (according to twatter and faceache) wanted lockdowns and was delirious at the thought of being pumped full of poison, who were they do think differently? Only the very hard of thinking were left to stick to their guns.

It’s funny how as you get older you truly understand those adages or expressions that you didn’t totally get when you were younger – plus ca change indeed.

A Y M
3 years ago

At the core of this was the slow degradation of our institutions by fiat money. With no real mechanisms to restrict the link between money printing and government programs the growth of the state has had little to check it.

From that all else degrades into corruption, waste, avarice and spoiled stupidity.

Its cyclical and we are in the nasty end of a big one.

TJN
TJN
3 years ago

Hannan’s probably right. Then again, I do love a bit of doom and gloom. I’ve always tried to model myself on a combination of Privates Godfrey and Fraser in Dad’s Army. Worthwhile role models I reckon, and I reckon Fraser certainly wouldn’t have had the stab.

Seriously though, things don’t look good. We are no way near through this yet. (Although the unstabbed are likely a bit further through than the stabbed.)

YouDontSay
3 years ago

While I don’t disagree, it does feel like the media have been trying to talk the economy down lately; they want us to be gloomy.

NeilParkin
3 years ago

It is tantrum politics where the opinion polls swing the government response like leaves in the wind. No-one believes anything, no-one has courage, everyone is just shapeshifter to the next scare or scandal. The left make more and more proposals without taking a few moments to think through any of the consequences of their actions. ‘Do something smart, or do nothing’ has been replaced by ‘just do something now’. The thing I have become most surprised about is the brazen-ness of the corruption. There is no attempt to even cover stuff over. It is blatant like the USA to Ukraine and back through ATX, which is a scandal of vast proportions, but which no-one is talking about. Is no-one really interested that the FBI and CIA had people embedded in Google and Twitter and that they slewed the game to the Democrats during the Biden election..? Seems not. Cheat and steal and carry on. Lies are truth, truth is lies.

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

What kind of end-state for a political system were decision-making is exclusively based on short-term popularity with the mostly uneducated and easily swayable masses did you expect?

NeilParkin
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

I suppose I’m old enough to remember when politicians, (although we knew palms were getting greased and pockets filled), were a bit less obvious about their corruption, and also appeared to believe in policies and a view of the country’s future that meant something to them. The whole cycle of government makes decision > BBC criticise decision > People think it wrong decision because its been criticised on BBC > Government does U-Turn instead of standing its ground. Thats different. I dont recall that on anything like current scale.

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The first (somewhat) important politician I personally remember was Helmut Kohl. His reign as German chancellor ended with a serious scandal when it became known that he had accepted large cash donations from donors personally known to him and promised that he’d never disclose their names. He stuck to that promise after the affair went public.

If the official head of the German government brazenly breaks the law in this way and considers omerta more important than that, it’s a safe assumption that similar things are happening on all levels of so-called democratic government.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Daniel Hannan has simply adopted the government’s line and is blaming us for the intentional problems created by the so-called world elites. The whole of the Western world’s economies are facing the same collapses: failing health systems, corrupted media, collapsing transport systems, mass illegal immigration, wholesale destruction of medium and small businesses with accompanying rises in unemployment, disintegrating fuel / energy networks, bastardised legal systems with corrupt judges, completely ineffective parliamentary systems which refuse to do the work they are paid for. And the rest. These are not the faults of peoples who have been deliberately propogandised, demonised, belittled and brainwashed for the best part of three years, these are the wilful, evil actions of our nominal government’s acting at the behest of the WEF and other supranational NGO’s who are now running amok and seeking to destroy civilization. Daniel Hannan is an establishment mouthpiece and this poorly constructed piece of propoganda blatantly advertises that fact for those of us up-to-date with world events. Nations are led. This country and all other Western nations have been emasculated and puppets have been installed on the orders of the Davos mob. Our collapsing societies are not our fault. If we had any… Read more »

nige.oldfart
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Never before, has the term SNAFU been more appropriate. Nice comment by the way.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  nige.oldfart

Thank you nige.

MichaelM
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Great post, HP. I think you could have added that many western economies are also financially bust, with failing currencies being temporarily supported by emergency measures while a transition to a new system is progressed.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Thanks Michael.

Fair point but I would add that our economies have been and are being deliberately destroyed in order to make the introduction of a “new” financial system a “necessity,” although of course nobody will admit to such.

nige.oldfart
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It doesn’t install a lot of confidence if and when they decide to introduce a never tried before currency to replace existing one which worked well for centuries before they started messing around with it because it didn’t work in their favour. As usual any benefit will be for the few not the masses. The return to the dark ages, is nearer than you think.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  nige.oldfart

If CBDC is forced in us the gates will shut and we become slaves.

Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Make sure you can buy your ticket out before the drawbridge gets pulled up and the portcullis comes down. Of course, most people will think these mechanisms are protecting them.

Divergent (2014) is a good film.

Freddy Boy
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

👍 I wish my foot was in George Orwell’s Boot on the Face of Humanity ! Their are so many faces that need to view that Sole coming down !..

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

Very true Freddy.

Castorp
Castorp
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Hear, hear!

Smudger
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Daniel Hannan is an establishment shill and a poorly concealed one at that”. Exactly!

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Smudger

Thanks Smudger.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Schwab is but a puppet himself. The real pupeteer is in the shadows & will remain there.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

I agree but even as a comic book character he remains dangerous.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

Governments love disaster and crisis because it creates a desire among the sheeple to be led to safety. Dan is another one that was happy to go along with lockdown at the time but now bemoans the consequences.

Sinor
Sinor
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

And he apparently supports the Nett Zero bollox as well in his piece

welshsceptic
welshsceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  Sinor

Can you link to any articles where Hannan is explicitly in favour of the whole net zero thing? It’s not really clear to me what he thinks from his statement in this article (“Cut my fuel bills – and deliver on net zero!”).
I can imagine saying something similar to friends who believe in net zero while simultaneously complaining about fuel bills, even though I personally think net zero is total bollocks.

welshsceptic
welshsceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Hannan implies he always believed lockdowns were a bad idea (“I thanked my lucky stars that I lived in a nation where such things were unthinkable”).
So do you have any links you can post to any articles by him over the past 3 yrs where he explicitly supported their use in the UK?

JayBee
3 years ago

The vast majority of people and businesses are now dependent upon receiving money/business from the state and its entities and far too many are employed by them.
Add in the multinationals now in bed with the state and its various control agendas and the millions of always obedient middle managers there, and you’ve got the current situation and prevailing mindsets.
That system must eventually fail as it inevitably will run out of still valuable OPM, but it also can’t and won’t collapse before that or for other reasons.

ebygum
3 years ago

But…but…look on the bright side…the WEF in Davos starts on the 16th!!
yes…we are all doomed….!

Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

 “Like stroppy teenagers, we rage at the government while expecting it to solve our problems

Personally I always expect governments to cause our problems

Stand in the Park 
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am 
Make friends & keep sane 

Elms Field (near Everyman Cinema and play area) 
Wokingham RG40 2FE

FerdIII
3 years ago

Decline of Christianity= the decline of freedom.
In swaggers the fascist totalitarian, Rona-Climate thingy-state.
Incredible that ‘teachers’ and Dr Idiot and Nurse Tik Tok, full on fascist for LDs and the Stabs are supported (supposedly) by the public. Even GB News, tepid and useless as it most often is, ‘of course supports health and union workers’ to earn a ‘decent wage’.
Oh flock off.
The Rona fascism was a pilot project. No faith, no strictures, no belief = a vacuum into which the most abominable of man-created nonsense will fill.

zebedee
zebedee
3 years ago

I think things may be improving. I gave up trying to get my work published in academic journals last year and have been working with the editor on an educational journal instead. Currently out for peer review and I’ve fed the changes to the paper into a new video – https://youtu.be/hRC0D6LWwUQ

Roy Everett
3 years ago
Reply to  zebedee

Back in the early days of the UK pandemic (March-July) Public Health England (PHE) published daily new case figures, so I joined in the fun maths of Tag, which you illustrate in the video. Initially these figures fitted almost any reasonable curve-fitting that one wanted. The politicians favoured exponentials “doubling every few days” but after a few thousand cases it was clear that the traditional William Farr Curve would be needed. Plotted on a log/lin graph, a perfect exponential appears as a straight line, but in practice the best fit “line” had to be bent downwards to make more of a parabola, peaking at the point where the daily figures became constant, which is equivalent to fitting a Gaussian distribution on a lin/lin graph. This fitted the Farr Curve (which is not necessarily a parabola, but has the same symmetry). This enabled a rough guess to be made for the final case total. (With exponentials, as you point out, there is no “final” case total, other than infinity! Also, with the simplistic “doubling every N days”, but letting N vary, N is bound to increase, and ultimately becomes infinite if half the susceptible become infected.) One interesting feature is that… Read more »

EarlyCases.png
zebedee
zebedee
3 years ago
Reply to  Roy Everett

I had a play with Gompertz curves myself. I vaguely remember I tried it in two forms. One thing that stood out was that it gave me a dependency on the initial condition which Kermack-McKendrick doesn’t. N.B. My video is really about me failing to derive K-McK from first principals – the textbook explanations were pitiable.

Roy Everett
3 years ago

‘It was an unprecedentedly bright warm day in April, and the populace were getting their thirteenth booster.’ [2023, by Masanori Fukushima]

Pilla
Pilla
3 years ago

I like Dan Hannan but he doesn’t really get what’s going on, does he? Who on earth now would ever trust our government (or most world governments) to have good motives? They are the last I would look to for help since they are the ones who’ve brought us to the on-the-verge-of being a one world state. The unions have all along been in cahoots with globalist governments, they’ve never (or very rarely) been acting in their workers’ interests. The workers are being totally used in the political machinations of the unions/government. Who can we vote for now? Labour will bring more of the same and quite probably worse (Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission – what more need I say?). Sorry, this is a bit of a disconnected rant, but what’s been going on over this last three years (and actually probably for decades) is the beast raising its head above the water.

Epi
Epi
3 years ago
Reply to  Pilla

We’re all just conspiracy theorists – oh wait a minute it all seems to be coming true.

Personally I’m off to listen to Leonard Cohen and stick my head in the gas oven.

Pilla
Pilla
3 years ago
Reply to  Epi

Haha! 😊

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Pilla

Good post.

Hoppy Uniatz
Hoppy Uniatz
3 years ago

On the upside, Charles Massy reckons in ten years, regenerative agriculture will be mainstream, and that has more power to transform the planet than we can, perhaps, envisage.

Smudger
3 years ago

No one has accelerated that which he rails against more than his own political party – the fake Conservatives!

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
3 years ago

Make no mistake, God sent Toby Young🇬🇧

Martin Frost
Martin Frost
3 years ago

Wasn’t it Charles de Gaulle who once described the French as “cattle”. Many of those who cheered him on the streets of Paris in 1944 had done the same thing for Marshall Petain the year before. The Brits are not fundamentally any different. It was our unthinking political leaders who caused this situation to arise. The conventional wisdom was, shut down the country for 18 months and all would return to normal with the all clear. Give me a break!

Pembroke
Pembroke
3 years ago
Reply to  Martin Frost

Looking back from the luxury of the future I’d say De Gaulle was being slightly unfair as I expect Parisiennes not cheering for Petain would end up in a camp or be otherwise disciplined, whereas presumably they were welcoming his arrival of their own free will.

RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

So presumably Hannan has left the Pretendy-CON Party which has inflicted all this on the British people?

No?

So he’s just another hypocritical CON who values “his position” above any principles he may have. (Which he demonstrated previously when, having supposedly campaigned to leave the EU for years, he then wanted to stay in the single market).

Alan
3 years ago

Surely, the problems started when instead of working and saving to create wealth at steady pace the central banks started printing worthless money and encouraged the politicians to believe that it would create economic growth. All it has done is increase the assets of the rich and put the debt on the taxpayers account. The money printing alone is responsible for the boom and bust cycles. They are not a normal part of the business cycle as we are told. The politicians have tinkered about with interest rates and taxation in attempts to control it, but the debt has reached a level where it is not sustainable. This entire fraud is about to unravel with disastrous consequences.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Alan

The oncoming financial collapse has been long in the planning as it will “necessitate” the introduction of a new monetary system. Cue CBDC.

Pembroke
Pembroke
3 years ago

Stop Press. Seriously, a national news organisation (mail on line) still reading something into the rambling writings of Nostradamus when it’s been proven time and again that all he wrote was speculative fiction in a somewhat esoteric format.