Why Are We Vaccinating Babies?
The U.K. has approved Covid vaccines for babies. The medical watchdog saying the “lower-dose Pfizer jab is safe and effective for kids aged 6 months and above”, with the new approval covering infants age 6 months to 4 years.
The medicines regulator said the jab meets safety, quality and effectiveness standards. This means that Government vaccine advisers can now choose whether the jab should be dished out to babies.
There are already Government advertising campaigns targeting young people, as per the NHS: “The coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are safe and effective. They give you the best protection against COVID-19.”
Governments continue with the ‘safe and effective’ mantra. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said on its websites and elsewhere that the Covid genetic injection was ‘safe and effective’.
And in promoting the CDC’s recommendation for young children, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, Ashish Jha, stated that the vaccination for children aged 6 months to 5 years was “exceedingly safe and effective and thoroughly tested”.
Whilst the European Medicines Agency states that “the authorised COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. They were evaluated in tens of thousands of participants in clinical trials and have met EMA’s scientific standards for safety, efficacy and quality”.
Despite these assurances, there remain widespread concerns amongst the public regarding the safety, effectiveness and need to vaccinate very young children. The latest Government data on vaccine uptake show only 7% of children aged between five to 11 in England having had two doses of a Covid vaccine.
So what is the evidence of safety and effectiveness of the Covid vaccine for young and very young children, and what is the evidence of the need for vaccinating children at all?
It is notable that in the latest material there is no mention of vaccinating children so that they do not transmit to others and kill them, which I assume is because it is now widely accepted that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, so the only reason therefore to inject children is to protect the children themselves.
What is the Covid risk to children without vaccination?
Recently published analysis by Professor John Ioannidis shows persons 0-19 have a 0.0003% risk of death. For children 0-10 years of age the risk of severe outcome and death from Covid is basically zero.
In the U.S., analysis of the FDA’s data shows the risk of any child dying of COVID-19 is 0.000015 % and a study by the universities of Leeds and Leicester found that there had been no deaths of healthy children in the U.S.
In Canada, the Canadian Health Alliance states: “Without a serious pre-existing medical condition, the risk of death is statistically zero.”
And no healthy child has died of Covid in Scotland, Northern Ireland, Canada, USA, Iceland or Ireland.
In the U.K., according to Professor Norman Fenton, a world leading expert on risk assessment and statistics with Queen Mary University of London: “No healthy children died in the U.K. in 2020”; of the eight children who died, seven had life threatening conditions and one had a very serious condition.
That about sums up the risk to children: the evidence shows that children are not at risk.
So I ask again – ‘effective’ against what? There appears to be no threat to children, so what are the vaccines protecting them against?
And are they actually effective? Data from the CDC show case rates among children who got two shots were higher than rates in children who did not get the shots.
A CDC study also found that the effectiveness of two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots against symptomatic COVID-19 infection “was modest and decreased rapidly” from December 2021 to February 2022.
The study found that two to four weeks after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots, effectiveness was 60.1% among 5 to 11 year-olds. This fell to just 28.9% by the second month.
Research by Swiss Policy Research indicates that vaccine protection against symptomatic infection decreased from about 90-95% shortly after vaccination to close to 0% within about half a year.
The fact that current Covid vaccines provide only short-term, rapidly waning protection against infection and transmission means that Covid vaccines contribute very little to infection control, either at the individual level nor at the population level.
Thus, while the risk-benefit ratio may still be positive in senior citizens and other risk groups (based on current evidence), this does not appear to be the case in healthy young adults and children.
Obviously the risks from the vaccine should be set against the risk of a child dying from Covid, which as the data show is practically zero. The data also show it is not even effective in doing what it is claiming to do.
What about the safety?
As noted above, in promoting the CDC’s recommendation in the USA, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, Ashish Jha, stated that the vaccination for children aged 6 months to 5 years was “exceedingly safe and effective and thoroughly tested”.
In responding, Dr. Jeffrey Barke, the Chief Medical Officer for the Convention of States, stated, “This is simply not true,” and that to recommend this product (the vaccine) for six-month-old children “makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.”
“Healthy children do not die from this illness, so it doesn’t make sense to authorise it under emergency authorisation for kids under 18, let alone 6 months,” he added.
He said that these are products for which “there have been no long-term safety studies”.
According to data released in September, more than 55% of children ranging in age between 6 months and 2 years had a ‘systemic reaction’ after their first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.
Indeed, there were more than 1,000 reports of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5 and younger, according to CDC data.
And again, according to the CDC, one in 4,500 toddlers have been taken to the hospital emergency room after Covid vaccination, and around 10% experienced serious side-effects. The U.S. Government vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) reports 220 out of the approximately one million babies and toddlers vaccinated were taken to the emergency room right after vaccination.
According to a study published in JAMA, nearly one in every 500 children under five years who received the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine were hospitalised with a vaccine injury, and one in 200 had symptoms ongoing for weeks or months afterwards.
According to VAERS there have been 54,697 adverse event reports received for children from 6 months to 17 years through August 26th 2022, including 149 deaths, 507 permanently disabled and 1,902 cases of myocarditis.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading U.S. cardiologist, said about children suddenly dying: “It’s through the roof.” “Before Covid vaccines there were four cases of myocarditis per million… The current estimates are now… 25,000 per million.”
Meanwhile Denmark has banned Covid vaccines for anyone under 18 unless prescribed by a doctor based on an individual assessment of high risk.
Parents should be provided with this information relating to adverse effects and risk ratio. The law sets out what they are entitled to, namely informed consent. The NHS website explains:
What does consent mean?
It means agreement. Before a doctor, nurse or any other health professional can examine or treat you, they must have your consent.
You must be given enough information, and you should be allowed to make up your own mind without pressure from other people.
What information should I be given?
To help you make a decision, NHS staff involved in your care must give you information about the examination or treatment you are being offered in a way that you understand. E.g. what the benefits are whether there are any risks or side effects; how large or small the risks are; whether there are any alternatives.
Is this being done? Are parents being offered the information they require to make an informed decision?
The international medical and data expert organisation PANDA sums it up as follows:
These products should have been contra-indicated for the vast majority of the population for whom the overall net benefit-risk ratio is either zero, or limited and short-lived, with efficacy versus the risk of infection becoming negative after six months and an unknown longer-term safety profile.
There was insufficient justification for the emergency rollout of these products to the general population. This represents a massive failure of regulatory oversight and changes are needed to ensure this cannot happen again.
What we have, however, is uninformed consent, as seen in the tragic story of a 14 year-old vaccine myocarditis victim.
The evidence presented suggests that Covid vaccines are not effective, there are serious questions about their safety, and they are not necessary for children.
The weight of independent evidence here should be enough to cause the powers that be to pause and reflect. There is tremendous public anxiety regarding this push and elected officials should take cognisance of it.
As the Christian theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer said: “The test of the morality of a society is what it does for its children.”
Hugh McCarthy is a retired Headteacher in Northern Ireland who until recently served as a Director on two of the province’s main education councils and who remains a ministerial appointment on one.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I don’t think it’s any great mystery.
Covid was presented as an unprecedented deadly pandemic from which we could only ultimately saved by these miracle “vaccines” which everybody had to take because nobody was safe and to “stop the spread”. The “vaccines” are safe and effective.
So Reason 1 is doubling down on the narrative – if they start saying now that there’s even a small downside and/or not everyone should bother, people will start to question the narrative.
Reason 2 – simply that Big Pharma wants ££££s and those who make these decisions have been bought.
Reason 3 – miracle “vaccines”, developed and approved quickly, based on mRNA, will allow Big Pharma to make ££££s forever more, and will allow governments to pretend to “save” us from Mother Nature.
A good portion of those pulling the levers know that what they are doing is dishonest. It’s an evil conspiracy.
Agreed. All planned. Patents on SARS II, quacksines and testing stretch back 10 years.
Every year they tried the scamdemic idea – every year the new end of the world _insert here__ from Ebola to Avian flu.
Another reason these fascists want to stabbinate everyone is to reduce fertility. This will become more obvious as the months/years roll on (they will stab yearly for the Rona). Of course infertility will be blamed on climate thingy and changing scariants, not the Stabbinations of mRNA poisoned shyte.
Why stop blaming everything on Covid it’s worked up until now. They’re throwing money at research to divert attention away from the gene therapy.
And throwing money away (much of it mysteriously being found in their pockets) is all a key part of the plan.
Fear not. You will never be confronted by Handycock lunging out of a shop doorway with a piece of paper saying “Ex Minister of Health for England – And Homeless”.
Although my heart would greatly rejoice whilst kicking his wedding tackle, if he ever did….
pretend to “save” us from Mother Nature. Except this is not Mother Nature, this is Fauci and Gates funded basterdised nature.
Be aware that Bill Gates just conducted another exercise, aptly called “Catastrophic Contagion”
https://open.substack.com/pub/igorchudov/p/kids-and-young-people-targeted-by?r=1omj4z&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Yes, sorry, pretend to save us.
Covid may not have been Mother Nature, but other viruses/diseases were/are.
The guy really is evil incarnate.
How exactly are they going to ensure that the next “pandemic” they release will affect children and young people “disproportionately?”
The child vaccination schedule isn’t there to help children. It’s there to make money for the pharma companies.
It’s like sweets, or biscuits, or crisps. Could you argue that they have nutritional value? You could if you really pushed it. Is that why they are produced marketed and sold? Nope.
Do you think there is any mileage in the theory that big pharma’s corruption will catch up with them eventually? And if so, to what lengths will they go to try and postpone the day?
Who can say? I like to think history eventually judges wrongdoers, but how can we know how many evils have been forgotten?
I’m not holding my breath.
Is it because the regulator (who are meant to keep us safe) is 86%funded by the pharma industry and jabbing babies is very profitable?
If killing babies is profitable then killing babies is what the regulator is being paid to do – simples
See abortion for more info…..
There is only one reason why the shots are approved for minors of any age: to cement liability protection for their manufacturers, as required by US law.
Yes, it is and 21st century humans are that bad.
Excellent point – I forgot that one in my list. Again, simply evil.
The crude reality is that there is an oligarchy marshaling an army of bureaucrats, policy makers and ultra educated professionals who have the power to plough forward regardless of what any one else thinks or says. They have a vision and a plan, they’re not stopping. They literally don’t give a sh*t about anything but getting their way.
Why? Because they are science-denying, lying, psychopathic sickos who hate humanity, that’s why. The more carnage the better, but best play the long game if they don’t want too many people to rumble them and stop rolling up ( or sacrificing their kids ) for more death shots, is their strategy. Don’t want to kill off too many all in one go. Too many dozy sheeple might twig what’s occurring and that’s bad for business. All the many documented ( and many more undocumented ) cases of harms these vile shots of crud have caused thus far in adults and kids. All the weird, undisclosed sh*t that’s been discovered by scientists the world over and now they focus their sights on the infants? There is no benign reason to jab babies, none! This level of intentional wickedness makes me want to hurl. Do NOT click the link below if you’re squeamish but I make no apologies for sharing the reality of what lays behind these VAERS reports and technical-sounding diagnoses, giving faces to the poor people who have suffered terribly as a result of being jabbed. The author links to all of the listed cases in the comments section if… Read more »
I agree Mogs…we are truly living in the age where Nazis are in charge and openly killing and injuring people…It make me both furious, and heart-broken.
I don’t think there are many people who will give this to their babies and toddlers..I don’t read much MSM but when I do, the comments about this kind of stuff are always overwhelmingly negative.
I believe that the tide tide has truly turned against them….
I was thinking this the other day, they can keep saying, ‘safe and effective’…’climate change’….’Ukraine’s winning’….it’s meaningless..it’s just words….saying it doesn’t make any of it real or true….……..
we just need to ignore them, be ungovernable, preach the truth, and stay resolute…
I look at comments in MSM and they are all negative towards the jabs bar a few. Although Guardian readers are clinging on to the saved millions narrative and still wish the unjabbed would hurry up and die.
Shame for them then that it’s the unjabbed who will rightly inherit the earth.😁 Stupid bozos.
Yes I’m with you. I also cannot see many lining up to get their babies jabbed. Sadly there will be some though. And the whole “safe and effective” etc cobblers is just falling on more and more deaf ears. Mostly everyone i know is jabbed but they stopped after 1 or 2. Their attitude is “no more” because they’ve either seen the butt-naked emperor eventually or they’ve come to a quiet realisation they’ve been lead up the garden path and would rather not talk about it.
My guess is that horrific injuries, such as what I linked to above in adults, won’t be the fate that’s in store for babies getting jabbed but I think the evil ones are focusing more on fertility and likely sterilising them. It’s something that won’t be discovered for many years and they can still go about their depopulation agenda, plus they’ll be less likely to scare off parents if any childhood vaccines convert to mRNA types. They have to play the long game or they risk spooking too many people and their plans backfire. Just a guess though.
I think the sterilisation aspect will have been included in the recipe and no questions about it. As you rightly say Mogs they are also playing the long game. Those responsible for this mayhem perhaps won’t be around in 2050.
2050? Hmm?
Yep. I guess it’s just a waiting game now to see if the low birth rates that are being recorded in various countries eventually pick up. But, a bit like the excess mortality, if the current trajectories for both of these anomalies don’t change course over the next few months or so, and eventually normalize, then I think we have our answer.
Petition: Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/628165
The article is very well done and interesting, but the single reason for jabbing kids, as JoyBee stated earlier, is so that the vaccine manufacturers have legal protection in the US.
The vaccines are effective at boosting Big Pharma’s bottom line and now Pharma are safe from being sued. So, yes, safe and effective.
I thought they had indemnity from liability anyway, as long as the products are authorized under EUA at least. But wasn’t that the thingy that Reagan signed way back in the ’80s, that Big Pharma can no longer be sued by the vaccine injured? I thought the only court cases involving Pharma paying out mega sums was for things like fraud, not injuries anymore. But due to the PREP Act being invoked, these products and everyone who handles them is protected from prosecution. I’m not sure how much longer governments can keep up the pretense of an ”emergency” though, so they can hide behind this pseudo-legislation.
Yes they had indemnity as part of the “emergency” lie but I guess they realise that won’t wash forever hence Plan B.
For the fully approved versions, e.g. Corminaty, to enjoy full liability protection, they must be approved for children too.
Hence also why they have not dispensed the proper, approved Corminaty goo sofar, just the EA’d equivalent.
Luckily, as soon as covid propaganda mostly stopped, people, including parents started to use their brains more and the jab uptake (by healthy toddlers) is not going to be high, hopefully.
It’s not going to work that way.
Right now, it’s not that easy to opt out of the child vaccination schedule. And you can’t pick and chose which ones you want oland don’t want. They now do 5 in1 or 7 in 1.
And that’s how they’ll slip in through. Perhaps not now but soon. They’ll come up with an all on one MMR+Polio+COVID shot or whatever.
They’ll also start shifting the current jabs to the mRNA platform. This approval is a shoehorn for their mRNA platform. Once one is approved it clears the way to shift the traditional diseases to that platform too.
Watch.
As far as I know, you can just ignore NHS letters for child vaccination and they’ll go away eventually. This year they approached for a flu vaccine (nasal) on its own. If they do the same with the covid one, then the majority would just ignore it as of little benefit for a toddler. If they start sneaking it inside another package of useful ones (let’s assume, other vaccines are useful), then it’s going to be difficult of course. I’m not yet sure having other vaccines migrated to mRNA platform is good or bad. Are the side effects from pfizer and moderna due to the reaction to the spike protein, or in general? mRNA sounds dodgy and with it being new, I’d personally would like to wait another 5-10 years to make up my mind. Although, experience of the past 3 years made me reconsider vaccines in general and be more cautious with what’s been offered.
Why is anybody being jabbed with the Covid needles, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people? I’ve been asking questions on this for a while, see for example my recent email: Why was there a ‘vaccine solution’ proposed against SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19? 10 November 2022. As for children, it’s crazy isn’t it…but presumably the universal digital ID / vaccine passport won’t work unless everyone is pulled into the net, from womb to tomb… Of course it’s absolutely wrong to jab the kids. I challenged the chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) on this matter, but received no response, see: Why does ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years? 22 April 2022. Accountability is non-existent in the draconian state of Australia, where so many people meekly comply with the jabs…the fear-mongering propaganda and lies have been so effective here. The failure of the older generation to stand up and protect the young has been one of the most shocking standout aspects…that the children have been thrown under the bus. The Dietrich Bonhoeffer quote says it all i.e. “The test of the morality of a… Read more »
Excellent.
But if I might pick a nit, accountability isn’t entirely non existent.
Try saying something unobliging about The Prophet and his interactions with young Aisha and you may be quite surprised how accountable you actually are.
“What is the Covid risk to children without vaccination?
Recently published analysis by Professor John Ioannidis shows persons 0-19 have a 0.0003% risk of death.”
What is the risk of death for persons 0-19 who have been vaccinated?
Let’s say it’s x%
Therefore the risk reduction (if anything) for persons 0-19 who get vaccinated is 0.0003% minus x%
In other words the reduction in risk by getting vaccinated, for persons 0-19, is at best minuscule.
3% = 3 in 100
0.3% = 3 in 1,000
0.03% = 3 in 10,000
0.003% = 3 in 100,000
0.0003% = 3 in 1,000,000
3 in a million minus whatever x% is, at best = a very very very tiny reduction in risk.
What is the risk of being killed in a road accident on the way to the clinic to get vaccinated?
What is the risk of suffering serious adverse effects from the vaccine?
An important thing to keep in mind here is that COVID death statistics are still garbage: 0.0003% risk of death really means 3 of one million died within a certain number of days after a positive Sars-CoV2 PCR test. Also, for all practical purposes, 0.000003 (3 in a million as decimal fraction) is zero.