News Round-Up
- “UK experts helped shut down Covid lab leak theory – weeks after being told it might be true” – The Telegraph reports that Sir Patrick Vallance is among the scientists behind a paper that stifled debate into the origins of the virus.
- “Fauci Could Not Recall Key Details During Deposition: Louisiana Attorney General” – Dr. Anthony Fauci said he could not recall key details about his actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to one of the officials who questioned him on Wednesday, reports the Epoch Times.
- “GPs will be named and shamed over failure to see patients face-to-face” – The Telegraph reports that the NHS is to publish data on every surgery in England after the health service ‘gridlock’ is linked to people unable to book appointments.
- “Workers at ‘iPhone city’ smash surveillance cameras in latest China Covid riot” – Online images show hundreds of workers protesting over delayed pay and food shortage, the Telegraph reports.
- “The grand folly of lockdown is coming home to roost” – Britain is now paying an extraordinary price for shutting down society, says Fraser Myers in Spiked.
- “Ice Cube missed out on $9M role after he refused to get vaccinated” – The Mail reports that the 53-year-old rapper-actor said, “I turned down a movie because I didn’t want to get the motherf***ing jab.”
- “Boy, 14, died three week after Covid jab – Coroner warns of ‘significant concern’” – Joseph McGinty’s health deteriorated following the administration of the Pfizer jab, an inquest has been told, according to GB News.
- “Fauci urges Americans to get Covid shot, as study finds new booster is best yet” – According to the Guardian, CDC data show the latest booster shots provide better protection than the original vaccines, as Dr. Fauci finally retires.
- “The SARS-CoV-2 transmission riddle – Part 14 close contact” – Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson look at the evidence for close contact transmission and the censorship that met them when they published on it.
- “Nicaragua’s inconvenient Covid victory” – John Perry in UnHerd says that Western media covered up the country’s success in avoiding coercive measures.
- “Not civil, and not providing a service” – Dr. Roger Watson writes in the New Conservative that civil servants want to ‘work’ from home and, now that winter is setting in and energy prices have taken a hike, they want their heating bills paid for.
- “New Fauci emails show Christian Drosten, other Corona astrologers debating whether and how to address the laboratory origins hypothesis” – Eugyppius with some new excerpts from the damning cover-up conversations.
- “Here is the official response from the CDC about the death safety signal being triggered in VAERS” – Steve Kirsch actually got a response from the CDC.
- “MHRA and BBC fail to meet their own deadline for responding to complaints about ‘Unvaccinated’” – Norman Fenton with an update about his complaint: the BBC has actually responded.
- “Writer apologises after finding no evidence J.K. Rowling is transphobic” – E.J. Rosetta said that she had spent three months reading the best-selling author’s archive of work and was unable to find any evidence to suggest that she is transphobic, according to the Mail.
- “Found in closet at Twitter HQ” – Watch Elon Musk uncover a cupboard full of “#StayWoke” T-shirts and clothing.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The excellent, latest and important substack from Katherine Watt; “Two observable facts have helped some people see through the fog of this war, and continue to help more people see through it all the time: FDA and other governments’ drug regulatory agencies have not withdrawn authorizations or approvals of the drugs, devices and protocols yet, despite millions of injuries and deaths experienced by recipients of the products during the initial deployment phase (January to November 2020, including the fraudulent clinical trials for the injections) and since the general deployment of the injections that began in December 2020. If the products were intended for medicinal, healing or protective purposes, and were subject to regulation governing research and development, production and use of medical drugs and devices, FDA and its counterparts in other countries would have stopped the programs as soon as the injuries and deaths became apparent. Instead, they have refused to even answer the question: “What is the stopping condition?” Independent third-party verification of vial contents is prohibited under the terms of the DOD-mediated contracts between purchasing governments and manufacturing corporations. In typical drug regulation frameworks, according to Sasha Latypova, independent researchers can and do purchase products from manufacturers to verify that contents match… Read more »
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/stopping-conditions
That’s a cracking article Mogs and I agree option 4. would be the pick. Sadly, we still have one hell of a job to convince the sheeple that TPTB want to kill millions.
👏 ✅ 👍
James Roguski makes a fine job of expanding on Katherine’s article, in particular the point she touches on about how the injections will never be removed from the market. He also explains it in a less legal jargon, more layman terms-type way. Basically he refers to this;
“The core reason, is that Emergency Use Authorized products, including masks, PCR tests, mRNA and DNA injections, and other drugs, devices and biologics, were “authorized” under 21 USC 360bbb-3(k).
So the depressing reality is that there will never be any justice for the injured victims and bereaved, nobody will face trial, none of the perpetrators’ heads will be on a spike and the criminals get to swan around, committing their crimes in broad daylight, all because of the behind the scenes shenanigans in changing laws, regulations, treaties etc. Highly recommended. And my first post is awaiting approval. Again! So you may as well follow his link in the article and read Katherine’s post for yourself.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exposing-trickery
Also, if you’re wondering how these regulations pertain to countries outside of the US Katherine explains here. So it looks unlikely that any country will cease the attack on their populations and/or investigate these lethal injections, no matter the evidence of ongoing damage which warrants it.
“It’s the World Health Organization that overrides the regulators in territories outside the USA, through the 2005 International Health Regulations as a binding international treaty that required nation-states to put into place legislation and regulations at the national level, which subordinate the nation-state to WHO in the event of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) declared and maintained by the WHO Secretary-General.
Meanwhile, the actual people orchestrating the whole global program day-to-day are working as embedded members of cross-institutional teams, with some at WHO and some in US Government/DOD/HHS and all the sub-agencies [and other entities like WEF, UN, BMGF, GAVI, CEPI, Pfizer and Moderna.]
The US laws and regulations are the model or template forms, and their content has been reproduced in each WHO member country over the past 30-40 years.”
PHEIC pronounced Fake…
“It’s the World Health Organization that overrides the regulators in territories outside the USA… (and) which subordinate the nation-state to WHO in the event of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) declared and maintained by the WHO Secretary-General.” I am fairly certain that any laws passed by nation states, if found to be injurious to public health, would be found to be illegal if challenged. A better legal mind than me would be able to provide the context but I am sure that Common Law would suffice. There is also the issue of WHO jurisdiction. This is a body that has no independant legal standing. Just because we are told it is so does not confirm its authenticity and clearly the WHO has now gone rogue. Allegedly, we cannot as a nation defy the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR). Why? Again, these are not grounded on legal mandates only implied authority. A sovereign nation does NOT have to follow the dictates of an undemocratic, self-regulating body. On the contrary nation states have a duty and responsibility to go their own way particularly where the utterances of the supranational body are at variance with the best interests of said nation states.… Read more »
Yes I agree. Countries should not be beholden to the WHO in any legal capacity. I copied that text from this post, which was a response to a query from Mike Yeadon;
“WHO says, “These are just recommendations, it’s up to each country to handle its health crisis” while the national governments say “We’re required by international treaty to carry out these specific surveillance, testing, and treatment recommendations of the WHO, using the laws and regulations we’ve passed to implement WHO control during public health emergencies.”
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/international-fractals-of-the-us
See also this very interesting but mammoth read;
“WHO wants member states to sign a new treaty on Covid-19, which expands the 2005 treaty. Once signed by the Minister of Health, the WHO constitution (as per Article 9 of the same) will take precedence over a country’s constitution (189 countries have signed the 2005 treaty) during natural disasters or pandemics.
Since the definition of pandemic was changed a few years ago, they will be able to impose obedience on any country and impose WHO guidelines on the public, which will be mandatory, not just recommended.”
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/legal-walls-of-the-covid-19-kill?s=w
Firkin hell!
And this hasn’t been years in the planning?
This may sound a bit obvious but…
The only way to avoid something that exists is to keep avoiding it until it doesn’t exist, which might as well be forever as far as we know.